Defense in Depth

All links and images for this episode can be found on CISO Series (https://cisoseries.com/defense-in-depth-legal-protection-for-cisos/) What's the legal responsibility of a CISO? New cases are placing the liability for certain aspects of security incidents squarely on the CISO. And attorney-client privilege has been overruled lately too. What does this mean for corporate and for CISO risk? Check out this post for the basis for our conversation on this week's episode which features me, David Spark (@dspark), producer of CISO Series, co-host Allan Alford (@allanalfordintx), and our guest is Evan Wolff, partner at Crowell & Moring. Thank to our episode sponsor, TrustMAPP. TrustMAPP delivers continuous, automated Security Performance Management, a real-time view of your cybersecurity maturity. TrustMAPP tells you where you are, where you're going, and what it will take to get there. TrustMAPP lets you manage security as a business, quantifying and prioritizing remediation actions and costs. On this episode of Defense in Depth, you'll learn: We repeatedly joke about Davi Ottenheimer's comment that the CISO has held the moniker of "designated felon" in American risk mitigation. Big piece of advice that was repeated throughout the episode is to have an employment contract. In the employment contract you want an exit strategy that allows you to leave if you think a situation is not tenable or the company is asking you to do something that you believe to be unethical. It gives you an opportunity to leave without any blame assigned. The cc field is your friend. If you don't want to be seen as the only one "in the know" take advantage of making sure key people are also in the loop. We heard one unbelievable story of an employment contract where it was clear that the CISO would be the "designated felon" should there be any breach. This was put in place to protect the executive team. The contract offered financial security for two years post breach. We all agreed this was insane and had never heard of anything like that before. Be wary of being forced to take on personal ownership of security issues. A CISO is responsible, not accountable.

All links and images for this episode can be found on CISO Series (https://cisoseries.com/defense-in-depth-xdr-extended-detection-and-response/) Is XDR changing the investigative landscape for security professionals? The "X" in XDR extends traditional endpoint detection and response or EDR to also include network and cloud sensors. Having this full breadth, XDR can contextualize alerts to tell a more cogent story as to what's going on in your environment. Check out this post for the basis for our conversation on this week's episode which features me, David Spark (@dspark), producer of CISO Series, co-host Allan Alford (@allanalfordintx), and our guest is Dave Bittner (@bittner), host, The CyberWire. Thanks to our sponsor, Hunters. Attackers always find new ways to bypass organizational defenses. While their traces hide in the data, they're also extremely difficult to detect. Hunters.AI is a context-fueled XDR solution that harnesses top-tier threat hunting expertise and ML to autonomously detect, investigate and correlate attack findings across cloud, network, and endpoint. On this episode of Defense in Depth, you'll learn: XDR extends traditional endpoint detection and response or EDR to also include network and cloud sensors. XDR is viewed as a comprehensive solution that rolls up all your critical feeds, sensors, and analytics. Having this full breadth, XDR can contextualize alerts to tell a more cogent story as to what's going on in your environment. If you've got a greenfield security program (essentially it's non existent), XDR is a no-brainer. But for everyone else, which is most of us, rolling out XDR is not as clear cut a decision. How does it integrate with your existing tech stack? Lots of question as to why do you need a SIEM if you have XDR? But, most responded that the two technologies are complimentary. Where XDR becomes redundant is if you have SIEM + SOAR + XDR + NDR. XDR's real power is the ability to give you some of the investigative details rather than just telling you that somebody breached a certain endpoint. But it can connect the dots and explain that a certain breach also resulted in a certain action. This greatly reduces the time your SOC needs to spend investigating cases. Don't though be fooled with solutions that sell purely on reducing time and effort. You're only going to have that if you have useful integrations.

All links and images for this episode can be found on CISO Series (https://cisoseries.com/defense-in-depth-calling-users-stupid/) Many cybersecurity professionals use derogatory terms towards their users, like calling them "dumb" because they fell for a phish or some type of online scam. It can be detrimental, even behind their back, and it doesn't foster a stronger security culture. Check out this post for the basis for our conversation on this week's episode which features me, David Spark (@dspark), producer of CISO Series, co-host Allan Alford (@allanalfordintx), and our guest Dustin Wilcox, CISO, Anthem. Thanks to our sponsor, Hunters. Attackers always find new ways to bypass organizational defenses. While their traces hide in the data, they're also extremely difficult to detect. Hunters.AI is a context-fueled XDR solution that harnesses top-tier threat hunting expertise and ML to autonomously detect, investigate and correlate attack findings across cloud, network, and endpoint. On this episode of Defense in Depth, you'll learn: Security people have notoriously had a "better than them" attitude towards their users who they view as the ones causing all the problems and making their lives more difficult. Calling users stupid for making a "mistake of effort" even if it's behind their back does not foster a bond with the security team. It fosters the us vs. them attitude. Security professionals will have a lot more success if they understand why users do the things they do. Once there is that understanding, then cybersecurity will better be able to design systems that accommodate users. About a third of your users confidently believe they're following the right cybersecurity procedures. That discrepancy is not the fault of the users, it's the fault of cybersecurity's education of users. Security can always be more effective in offering up the right tools and the correct education. Security awareness must begin with good service and process design. Phishing tests are pointless to determine security effectiveness. That's because no matter how low your click rates go, someone can always create a more creative test that will send them soaring back up again. If your defense in depth strategy is so poorly designed that your company can be compromised by the simple click of a phish, then you've got a poorly configured security stack. Security professionals' jobs exist because of their users. If there was no organization and users, then there would be no need for security professionals. Quoting Albert Einstein: "If you judge a fish by his ability to climb a tree, he will live his whole life thinking he is stupid." Look at user mistakes as an education moment, not an opportunity to put them down. If you educate them, they'll go onto educate others as well. Mistakes can actually be very beneficial.

All links and images for this episode can be found on CISO Series (https://cisoseries.com/defense-in-depth-is-college-necessary-for-a-job-in-cybersecurity/) Where is the best education for our cyber staff of the future? Where does college fit in or not fit in? Check out this post for the basis for our conversation on this week's episode which features me, David Spark (@dspark), producer of CISO Series, co-host Allan Alford (@allanalfordintx), and our guest Dan Walsh, CISO, Rally Health. Thanks to our sponsor, Hunters. Attackers always find new ways to bypass organizational defenses. While their traces hide in the data, they're also extremely difficult to detect. Hunters.AI is a context-fueled XDR solution that harnesses top-tier threat hunting expertise and ML to autonomously detect, investigate and correlate attack findings across cloud, network, and endpoint. On this episode of Defense in Depth, you'll learn: Years ago most would say a college degree is necessary, but it appears the ROI for exorbitant college education simply doesn't deliver like it used to. Tons of valuable online courseware can deliver a targeted education for individuals wanting to start a career in cybersecurity. If organizations believe these first two statements to be true, then why are they putting down a college degree as a requirement for jobs in cybersecurity? Is requiring a college degree a false and elitist narrative that doesn't drive better cybersecurity talent? With such a stringent requirement, it detracts many people, including women and minorities, who may not have college degrees to pursue cybersecurity roles. Most college courseware in computer science is often quickly outdated. But that doesn't speak to all colleges. Some that specialize in cybersecurity are doing their best to stay current. Those arguing the need for college explain it teaches critical thinking and the desire to always keep learning. Does the lack of having a college degree prevent an individual from moving up the ranks in cybersecurity leadership? The college degree requirement may be arbitrary or it may be there because of management's jealousy. They had to have a college degree when they joined so everyone else should as well. A college degree doesn't necessarily mean you'll be a great technician.

All links and images for this episode can be found on CISO Series (https://cisoseries.com/defense-in-depth-when-red-teams-break-down/) What happens when red team engagements go sideways? The idea of real world testing of your defenses sounds great, but how do you close the loop and what happens if it's not closed? Check out this post for the basis for our conversation on this week's episode which features me, David Spark (@dspark), producer of CISO Series, co-host Allan Alford (@allanalfordintx), and our sponsored guest, Dan DeCloss, founder and CEO, PlexTrac. Thanks to this week's podcast sponsor, PlexTrac. PlexTrac is a revolutionary, yet simple, cybersecurity platform that centralizes all security assessments, penetration test reports, audit findings, and vulnerabilities into a single location. PlexTrac vastly improves the risk management lifecycle, allowing security professionals to generate better reports faster, aggregate and visualize important analytics, and collaborate on remediation in real-time. On this episode of Defense in Depth, you'll learn: Don't make the mistake of red teaming too early. If you don't have your fundamental security program in place, you'll be testing out non-existing defenses. If you're just starting to build up your security program, conduct a vulnerability scan and do some basic patch management. A red team exercise exists to discover risks you didn't even know about and couldn't have predicted in your threat model exercises. Have a plan of what you're going to do after the red team exercise. Just discovering you've got problems with no plan to remediate them will not only be a waste of money, but will also breed discontent. Don't red team just to fill out an audit report. You can do a vulnerability scan for that. Consider moving the red team to purple to actually help the blue team remediate the findings. If you don't have a plan for remediation you'll find yourself running the same red team and filling out the same report. Prioritize! The red (now purple) team can greatly help along with those who've assessed business risks. First to remediate are the ones that are high impact and easy to execute. The rest is determined by an analysis of likelihood and impact.

All links and images for this episode can be found on CISO Series (https://cisoseries.com/defense-in-depth-what-cyber-pro-are-you-trying-to-hire/) Do companies hiring cybersecurity talent even know what they want? More and more we see management jobs asking for engineering skills, and even CISO jobs with coding requirements. What's breaking down? Check out this post for the basis for our conversation on this week's episode which features me, David Spark (@dspark), producer of CISO Series, co-host Allan Alford (@allanalfordintx), and our guest Liam Connolly, CISO, Seek. Thanks to this week's podcast sponsor, Salt Security. Salt Security protects the APIs at the core of SaaS, web, and mobile applications. By using patented behavioral protection Salt Security automatically and continuously discovers and learns the granular behavior of each unique API and stops attacks. In 2020 Salt Security was named a Gartner Cool Vendor in API Strategy. On this episode of Defense in Depth, you'll learn: The poor focus of cybersecurity job listings often exposes either the poor understanding or lack of maturity of a company's information security program. We often see management cyber jobs asking for engineering skills and vice versa. Job listings can also portray the "last guy" syndrome. Those are the job listings that tack on desired skills the last person did not have. When you see too many requirements it comes off as a wish list. It's not what is required, it's more of a question as to how many boxes can a candidate check off. There can be serious harm to a company's ability to hire if they throw down too many requirements or even optional items. People who are truly required for the position you want may never apply because they'll be scared off by the other skills required or desired. CISOs are often hired by non security people and as a result they don't have a full understanding of what type of CISO they want. As a result it's often hard to find two similar CISO job listings. While CISO technical competencies are desired, it's clear that once hired a CISO will not be showing off their technical expertise. As a result, there's a lot of debate as to how much technical skill a CISO really needs. The job requires management, influencing, and communications. Many hiring teams have a hard time parsing out the types of security people they need to build out a security team. That's why you get a single job listing that appears to want to hire five different types of security people. If a CISO isn't given the budget and authority to hire a staff to fill all the necessary gaps for the company's security program, they will become fed up and leave. That starts the whole process again. Many debate that job titles in job listings are just there to massage the ego. But if compensation doesn't match the title, then they realize the title is just for show.

All links and images for this episode can be found on CISO Series (https://cisoseries.com/defense-in-depth-junior-cyber-people/) There are so few jobs available for junior cybersecurity professionals. Are these cyber beginners not valued? Or are we as managers not creating the right roles for them to improve our own security? Check out this post for the basis for our conversation on this week's episode which features me, David Spark (@dspark), producer of CISO Series, co-host Allan Alford (@allanalfordintx), and guest Naomi Buckwalter (@ineedmorecyber), director of information security & privacy at Energage. Thanks to this week's podcast sponsor, Salt Security. Salt Security protects the APIs at the core of SaaS, web, and mobile applications. By using patented behavioral protection Salt Security automatically and continuously discovers and learns the granular behavior of each unique API and stops attacks. In 2020 Salt Security was named a Gartner Cool Vendor in API Strategy. On this episode of Defense in Depth, you'll learn: There are tons of newbies eager to work in cybersecurity. The shortcoming is not the available pipeline, but a lack of headcount and managers' willingness to train and find appropriate assignments. Because headcount is often the limitation to hiring, leaders will opt to hire the most senior person they can get. Common feeling is hire one experienced person and stress them out rather than hire three junior people and train them. Problem with the former is if you stress that experienced person they will leave and tell others not to work there. There is plenty of good junior-level cybersecurity work, such as asset management cleanup, PII discovery, procedure documentation, filling out security questionnaires, scrubbing and tuning out false positives from alerting systems, reviewing vendor contracts, patch verification, following up on vulnerability management with other teams, launching and managing vulnerability scans, interviewing for shadow IT installations, working with help desk for user account remediation, and scanning logs for anomalies.

All links and images for this episode can be found on CISO Series (https://cisoseries.com/defense-in-depth-trusting-security-vendor-claims/) Do security vendors deliver on their claims and heck, are they even explaining what they do clearly so CISOs actually know what they're buying? Check out this post and the Valimail survey for the basis of our conversation on this week's episode which features me, David Spark (@dspark), producer of CISO Series, co-host Allan Alford (@allanalfordintx), and guest Lee Parrish (@LeeParrish), CISO, Hertz. Thanks to this week's podcast sponsor, AttackIQ. AttackIQ, the leading independent vendor of breach and attack simulation solutions, built the industry's first Security Optimization Platform for continuous security control validation and improving security program effectiveness and efficiency. AttackIQ is trusted by leading organizations worldwide to plan security improvements and verify that cyberdefenses work as expected, aligned with the MITRE ATT&CK framework. On this episode of Defense in Depth, you'll learn: From those surveyed by Valimail survey, a third to a half didn't believe that vendors did a good job explaining what their product does, or that the product actually performed, or there was any way to actually measure that performance. Many questioned those numbers because they feel many security buyers still fall for security vendors' boastful claims. Both can actually be true. Stunned behavior at a trade show is not the indicator of knowledge and susceptibility to vendor pitches. When you're under the gun as a security professional to produce results you often become victim to security vendor claims because you want to deliver on demands from the business. By nature, CISOs should be skeptical about vendor claims and information within their own environment. There's a battle between those vendors truly trying to deliver value and those who are using their marketing savvy to sway industry thinking. Don't place all the blame on the vendors. CISOs still have trouble understanding their requirements, risk, and priorities. Many are guilty of engaging in "random acts of security". Claims can often be more trustworthy if the vendor is willing to explain what they can't do.

All links and images for this episode can be found on CISO Series (https://cisoseries.com/defense-in-depth-how-vendors-should-approach-cisos/) "How do I approach a CISO?" It's the most common question I get from security vendors. In fact, I have another podcast dedicated to this very question. But now we're going to tackle it on this show. Check out this post for the basis of our conversation on this week's episode which features me, David Spark (@dspark), producer of CISO Series, co-host Allan Alford (@allanalfordintx), and guest Ian Amit (@iiamit), CSO, Cimpress. Here also is my original article with Allan Alford when he first launched this engage with vendors campaign. Thanks to this week's podcast sponsor, Sonrai Security. Identity and data access complexity are exploding in your public cloud. 10,000+ pieces of compute, 1000s of roles, and a dizzying array of interdependencies and inheritances. Sonrai Security delivers an enterprise cloud security platform that identifies and monitors every possible relationship between identities and data that exists inside your public cloud. On this episode of Defense in Depth, you'll learn: All CISOs are different so any advice we provide will vary from CISO to CISO. Plus, we have an entire other show, CISO/Security Vendor Relationship Podcast, dedicated to this very topic. We acknowledge that this is tough because to be really on target you need to know what the CISO has, what their mix of products are, and how your product could work in their current security maturity and mix of security products and processes. It's all a very tall order for a security vendor. Vendors must stop thinking of themselves as point solutions, but rather how they fit into the overall makeup of a security program. You're not coming in with a blank slate. How do you interoperate with what's existing? There's unfortunately the trend of the people who make the contact, then initiate a meeting, and hand off to someone else. CISOs do not welcome that kind of engagement, although it may be very cost effective for security vendors to hire junior people to make those contacts and hand offs. Lots of argument about the efficacy and the acceptance of cold calling. Those who claim they don't like it are often working at organizations that do it repeatedly to great success. The pushy salesperson who eventually gets through after repeated attempts even when they're told no may show success, but they don't calculate all the people they've angered and the word-of-mouth negativity that has resulted from that behavior. If you push beyond a request to stop, the worse that can happen is your reputation will be destroyed. CISOs are more receptive to market pull into your organization. That can happen through traditional marketing, content marketing, podcasts, analyst reviews, and word-of-mouth. Problem is these techniques don't leave any room for salespeople to operate.

All links and images for this episode can be found on CISO Series (https://cisoseries.com/defense-in-depth-secure-access/) What is the Holy Grail of secure access? There are many options, all of which are being strained by our new work from home model. Are we currently at the max? Check out this post for the discussion that is the basis of our conversation on this week's episode co-hosted by me, David Spark (@dspark), the producer of CISO Series and Allan Alford (@AllanAlfordinTX). Our sponsored guest is Rohini Kasturi, chief product officer, Pulse Secure. Thanks to this week's podcast sponsor, Pulse Secure. Pulse Secure offers easy, comprehensive solutions that provide visibility and seamless, protected connectivity for hybrid IT in a Zero Trust world. Over 24,000 enterprises entrust Pulse Secure to empower their mobile workforce to securely access applications and information in the data center and cloud while ensuring business compliance. On this episode of Defense in Depth, you'll learn: Multiple technologies, such as VPN, split-tunnel VPN, VDI, SASE, EDR, and secure management, are used in attempts to insure secure access. But given that secure access isn't just about managing endpoints, but users, you also have to look at IAM. We look to conditional access to provide more support than just full VPN access. Argument that we are moving away from endpoints to identity as that's the new perimeter. SASE solution blocks by default, instead of allows by default, and requires permission for access. User is secured dynamically based on a combination of identity and device. Would be great if secure access solutions were universal, but they vary country by country based on costs, availability, and regulations. Secure access models must be user experience first. One possible play that works in this way is IAM + SASE + EDR + secure management. Another factor that prevents the one-size fits all model for secure access is the complexity of stacks.