It Could Happen Here

A lively discussion unfolds around the contentious rendition of Venezuelan migrants and the legal ramifications of the Trump administration's deportation tactics. The hosts tackle alarming actions against trans individuals in the military, while highlighting the troubling arrests of graduate students. They also scrutinize geopolitical tensions linked to Ukraine and the implications of trade tariffs on global dynamics. Finally, a quirky take on April superstitions lightens the mood amidst serious discussions on public health concerns related to the bird flu.

Former President Donald Trump discusses the escalating protests and vandalism against Tesla, emphasizing its connection to Elon Musk's controversial reputation. He delves into the phenomenon of 'Tesla derangement syndrome,' exploring how public perception shifts amid turmoil. Trump also touches on the impact of these events on Tesla’s stock value and market struggles, as well as the political narratives fueling discontent against the company. The conversation reveals the intricate relationship between technology, politics, and consumer sentiment in today's landscape.

Mia and James dive into the implications of a controversial government funding resolution that has empowered Trump, raising concerns about executive overreach. They discuss the risks to federal programs and the erosion of immigration protections, spotlighting the internal struggles within the Democratic Party. The conversation also critiques recent deportation practices and the troubling alignment with past policies. As they reassess political engagement, the hosts advocate for more personal and meaningful activities to effect change.

Andrew is joined by James to talk about the history of anarchism in Uruguay.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In an episode recorded before the agreement between the Syrian government and the SDF, James talks with Jenni Keasden (@jkeasden) about the situation in Rojava and the resistance at Tishrin Dam. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Margaret reads Robert Evans the second book in her Danielle Cain seriesSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Bridget Todd, a dynamic journalist and host of There Are No Girls on the Internet, joins the conversation to explore the intertwining of neoliberalism and the rise of tech giants like Elon Musk. They delve into how government interventions and financial incentives have shaped the market, particularly Tesla's journey to profitability. The discussion also highlights the societal implications of figures like Candace Owens in right-wing media. Additionally, they tackle serious issues surrounding immigration, including the challenges faced by students like Mahmoud Khalil amid political unrest.

This discussion dives into the chaotic world of unhinged tariff news, exploring how recent U.S. tariffs are rattling the economy and sparking fears of a trade war. The team also highlights the troubling detention of activist Khalil, raising questions about free speech and government overreach. A lively musical interlude transitions into deeper insights about political agendas influencing education and corporate interests, all while balancing serious issues with a humorous take on Tesla's political entanglements.

The hosts dive into Nate Silver's theory that tweets reveal Elon Musk as a 'spiky' genius. They humorously critique unconventional investment strategies and the volatility of market predictions. Exploring Musk's complexities, they question the true nature of genius and the impact of social media. The decline of FiveThirtyEight is examined alongside absurd narratives of productivity and the troubling habits of high achievers. With wit, they satirize political commentary and dive into the contradictions of polling data.

The arrest of Mahmoud Khalil raises urgent questions about civil rights and immigration policies. Discussions reveal the complexities of his case, especially concerning the separation of visas and green cards. The legal ramifications of his arrest reflect a broader trend of targeting dissenting voices on college campuses. Analysts explore differing perspectives from the ACLU and ADL, prompting listeners to reconsider their stances on advocacy. This situation serves as a critical lens on the intersection of freedom of speech and immigration enforcement.