Opening Arguments

Law professor Caroline Mala Corbin discusses the constitutional implications of 'Don't Say Gay' laws. Topics include government speech doctrine, free speech challenges for teachers, limitations on classroom discussions, and the complexities of applying legal principles in cases involving LGBTQ+ content.

Legal podcaster Charles Star discusses the end of Chevron deference, its impact on administrative law, and implications for immigration lawyers. The conversation touches on recent Supreme Court decisions, challenges to administrative regulations, and concerns about the elimination of Chevron deference.

The answer for T3BE30 is coming your way, and we launch our next Bar Prep question with Heather!  Right now, the best place to play (if you aren't a patron...) is at reddit.com/r/openargs! If you’d like to support the show (and lose the ads!), please pledge at patreon.com/law!

Joanna Schwartz, a Professor of Law at UCLA, discusses the history and impact of qualified immunity, highlighting cases of police misconduct shielded by this doctrine. The podcast challenges the necessity of qualified immunity, explores asset seizure loopholes, and addresses the barriers in seeking justice for police misconduct cases.

Exploring the alarming Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity, historical context of Trump v. U.S. and Nixon v. U.S., implications for future presidents, concerns about authoritarian consequences, perspectives on asylum seekers from failing democracies, hopes for a better American future.

Attorney Ashleigh Merchant discusses the Young Thug contempt hearing, defense strategies, and her role in seeking to recuse prosecutor Fani Willis. The episode covers legal challenges, courtroom drama, and Thanksgiving preparations. The conversation navigates RICO charges, ethics dilemmas, and courthouse security procedures, highlighting the complexities of contempt cases and legal chaos in the legal environment.

Special guest Ashley Merchant joins the hosts to discuss the complexities of the Young Thug contempt case, RICO trial drama, courtroom confrontation, legal maneuvering, and intense drama in hearings and trials, highlighting the importance of transparency and proper legal procedures.

The podcast delves into recent Supreme Court decisions on immigrant visa rights and bribery, critiquing conservative rulings. They discuss Steve Bannon's legal troubles and House Republicans' support, ending with a review of Justice Jackson's Snyder dissent for patrons.

The answer for T3BE29 is coming your way, and we launch our next Bar Prep question with Heather! Right now, the best place to play (if you aren't a patron...) is at reddit.com/r/openargs! If you’d like to support the show (and lose the ads!), please pledge at patreon.com/law!

Exploring the Young Thug trial under Georgia's RICO statute, dissecting mumble rap origins, judge's controversial decisions, and the use of lyrics as evidence. Unveiling the complexities of the trial proceedings, witness testimonies, and unconventional legal tactics. Contempt hearing drama and the implications of using mandatory minimum sentences in legal cases.