Opening Arguments

Former Vice President Kamala Harris is examined for her career as a prosecutor and attorney general, highlighting her stance on policy issues like the death penalty and marijuana. The podcast discusses Harris's progressive evolution, Senate voting record, and efforts in addressing Central America issues. The hosts also joke about being kicked out of a library in Rhode Island.

The answer for T3BE32 is coming your way, and we launch our next Bar Prep question with Heather!  Right now, the best place to play (if you aren't a patron...) is at reddit.com/r/openargs! If you’d like to support the show (and lose the ads!), please pledge at patreon.com/law!

The podcast discusses the legal implications of a presidential candidate dropping out, Biden's position as the Democratic nominee, campaign funding rules, potential DNC replacements, and the idea of the Democratic Party nominating Mitt Romney for the presidency.

Judge Aileen Cannon stirs controversy by dismissing Trump case; Clarence Thomas's unexpected involvement raises questions. Analysis of concurrences in legal decisions and historical context of special prosecutors. Discussion on appointments clause and scrutiny of Judge Cannon's writing. Delve into legal challenges, decision-making authority, and interpretation of officials in legal cases.

The answer for T3BE31 is coming your way, and we launch our next Bar Prep question with Heather!  Right now, the best place to play (if you aren't a patron...) is at reddit.com/r/openargs! If you’d like to support the show (and lose the ads!), please pledge at patreon.com/law!

Law professor Caroline Mala Corbin discusses the constitutional implications of 'Don't Say Gay' laws. Topics include government speech doctrine, free speech challenges for teachers, limitations on classroom discussions, and the complexities of applying legal principles in cases involving LGBTQ+ content.

Legal podcaster Charles Star discusses the end of Chevron deference, its impact on administrative law, and implications for immigration lawyers. The conversation touches on recent Supreme Court decisions, challenges to administrative regulations, and concerns about the elimination of Chevron deference.

The answer for T3BE30 is coming your way, and we launch our next Bar Prep question with Heather!  Right now, the best place to play (if you aren't a patron...) is at reddit.com/r/openargs! If you’d like to support the show (and lose the ads!), please pledge at patreon.com/law!

Joanna Schwartz, a Professor of Law at UCLA, discusses the history and impact of qualified immunity, highlighting cases of police misconduct shielded by this doctrine. The podcast challenges the necessity of qualified immunity, explores asset seizure loopholes, and addresses the barriers in seeking justice for police misconduct cases.

Exploring the alarming Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity, historical context of Trump v. U.S. and Nixon v. U.S., implications for future presidents, concerns about authoritarian consequences, perspectives on asylum seekers from failing democracies, hopes for a better American future.