The Daily Heretic

Helen Webberley, the founder of GenderGP and one of the most controversial figures in the gender-medicine debate, joins Andrew Gold for a fiery, uncomfortable and eye-opening conversation. In this unfiltered interview, Webberley defends her approach to gender healthcare while Andrew challenges her on claims of pseudoscience, medical certainty, and the real-world consequences of her advice. If you enjoy deep, challenging debates with people who sit at the centre of national controversy, make sure you subscribe to Heretics Clips: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos This is one of the most intense interviews we’ve released — a clash between two completely different worldviews. Andrew presses Webberley on the foundations of her work: the evidence base behind her claims, her role at GenderGP, and the criticism she has received from regulators, doctors, journalists and former patients. Webberley pushes back, insisting her model is compassionate, progressive and rooted in lived experience. What follows is a heated debate about medicine, mental health, ethics, responsibility, and the meaning of scientific standards. Throughout the conversation, Andrew repeatedly challenges Webberley on whether her views can be supported by robust data, peer-reviewed research or long-term studies — questioning if her approach risks falling into pseudoscientific territory. Webberley disputes this strongly, arguing that traditional systems have failed trans people and that alternative pathways are necessary. The tension creates moments of real discomfort as both sides confront the human cost of getting these issues wrong. The interview explores crucial questions: – What counts as legitimate science in the gender-medicine space? – Have young people been harmed by untested or insufficiently regulated treatments? – Is the current gender-care model driven by evidence — or ideology? – And what responsibility do high-profile clinicians like Webberley carry? Nothing in this discussion is simple. Nothing is black and white. And whether you agree with Webberley or believe her critics, this conversation forces you to confront uncomfortable truths about modern gender medicine, healthcare ethics and the limits of “progressive” thinking. 🔥 Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Lh8SVtqpQI #HelenWebberley #GenderGP #AndrewGold #Heretics #TransDebate #GenderMedicine #PseudoscienceDebate #MedicalEthics #HereticsClips Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

👉 Subscribe now to Heretics Clips for fearless interviews that the mainstream media won’t touch: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos London is one of the world’s greatest cities — but under Sadiq Khan’s leadership, many argue it has been dragged into decline. Crime is up, free speech is under attack, and the Mayor spends more time pushing a divisive woke agenda than solving real problems. Has London really fallen to ideological capture? In this explosive episode of Heretics, Andrew Gold sits down with Tom Slater (Editor of Spiked) to expose how Khan has become less a leader and more a woke troll, more interested in policing language and playing identity politics than protecting Londoners. 🔥 In this hard-hitting conversation, you’ll discover: Why Sadiq Khan’s obsession with woke posturing is eroding trust in London’s leadership. How London’s rising crime and knife violence clash with Khan’s carefully curated progressive image. The chilling parallels between Khan’s rhetoric and the wider Labour Party’s drift into identity politics. Why critics like Salman Rushdie, Graham Linehan, and others are targeted while extremists are excused. How multiculturalism, once seen as London’s strength, is now used as a shield for censorship. The complicity of the media elite — from Rory Stewart & Alastair Campbell to Sopel & Maitlis — in protecting Khan from real scrutiny. Why ordinary Londoners are paying the price for ideological battles that ignore crime, housing, and community breakdown. This is more than a critique of one mayor — it’s a warning about how woke politics have captured institutions across Britain. From the Greens to Labour, the same story repeats: leaders pushing symbolic battles while ignoring the people they claim to represent. Tom Slater and Andrew Gold cut through the spin, dismantle the hypocrisy, and ask the question the mainstream won’t: Has London truly fallen under Khan’s watch? 📺 Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cY-CqsGNpEA #SadiqKhan #London #WokePolitics #TomSlater #Heretics #AndrewGold #HereticsPodcast #FreeSpeech #CancelCulture #UKPolitics #LondonCrime #IdentityPolitics #CultureWar #SpikedOnline #LabourParty #GreenParty #IslamoWoke Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

What’s really happening on Britain’s streets? Why does it feel like the police play favourites with some groups while cracking down hard on others? In this explosive interview, former detective Peter Bleksley reveals how two-tier policing is fuelling division, unrest, and fear across the UK. He’s seen it up close — and what he has to say will shock you. Subscribe for more fearless conversations here: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos Bleksley explains how radical Islamists and far-left agitators are often allowed to spread hate unchecked, while ordinary citizens — from Jewish communities to working-class Brits — face heavy-handed policing. Even political leaders like Keir Starmer label them as “far-right thugs,” but are turning a blind eye to the real threat of extremism. Could this double standard be pushing Britain to the breaking point? The recent UK riots were a wake-up call. Many blamed economic pressures, but Bleksley digs deeper. He exposes how weak leadership, cultural complacency, and political fear have created an environment where radical ideologies thrive. Why are the police failing to take meaningful action? And what dangers lie ahead if this continues? This isn’t just speculation. Peter Bleksley is one of the UK’s most respected voices on crime and policing. Known to millions as “The Chief” on Channel 4’s Hunted, a regular on the BBC, and a guest on hard-hitting shows like Triggernometry, Bleksley combines insider knowledge with decades of street-level experience. His perspective on radicalisation, law enforcement, and government failure is not only rare — it’s essential. If you’ve ever wondered whether Britain’s leaders are truly protecting its people, or whether the rise of radical Islam in the UK is being ignored at the highest levels, this interview will give you answers — and raise even bigger questions. 👉 Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UbytXaQW2w&t=501s 👉 Hit subscribe and turn on notifications for Heretics Clips so you don’t miss the raw, unfiltered truth the mainstream avoids. #RadicalIslam #PeterBleksley #UKRiots #TwoTierPolicing #Islamism #KeirStarmer #HereticsClips Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Former Home Secretary Suella Braverman joins Andrew Gold on Heretics for one of her most explosive and personal interviews yet. In this unfiltered conversation, Suella fires back at BBC journalist Emily Maitlis, accusing her of leading the media campaign that has branded her “racist” for speaking uncomfortable truths about immigration, identity, and British values. 👉 Subscribe to Heretics Clips for more fearless, uncensored interviews: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos Has Britain’s media become too powerful — and too biased? Suella Braverman opens up about her decade-long battle with the mainstream press, claiming that journalists like Emily Maitlis have distorted her words, vilified her character, and silenced honest debate in the name of “progressivism.” She explains what it’s like to be relentlessly attacked for defending border control, free speech, and traditional values — and how the term “racist” has been weaponised to shut down political discussion. Suella argues that this toxic culture of outrage doesn’t just target politicians like her — it affects everyone who dares to question the narrative. 💬 “They can’t debate ideas, so they attack your character.” 💬 “Emily Maitlis has been calling me racist for 10 years.” 💬 “If you challenge the media elite, they’ll try to destroy you.” Andrew Gold presses Suella on her reputation, her critics, and whether she’s ever gone too far in her rhetoric. The result is a gripping, no-holds-barred conversation about power, hypocrisy, and the battle for truth in modern Britain. From the BBC’s role in shaping public opinion to the wider culture war gripping the UK, Suella Braverman gives a rare insider’s perspective on what it’s like to be demonised by the very institutions meant to hold power to account. This episode of Heretics isn’t about left or right — it’s about who gets to decide what you’re allowed to say. 🔥 Topics Include: • Emily Maitlis & BBC bias • The media’s war on free speech • Being labelled “racist” for speaking truth • Cancel culture & political censorship • The role of the press in modern Britain • What Suella Braverman really stands for #HereticsPodcast #SuellaBraverman #AndrewGold #EmilyMaitlis #BBCBias #FreeSpeech #CancelCulture #UKPolitics #MediaBias #HereticsClips #CultureWar #Britain2025 #PoliticalInterview Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Subscribe to Heretics Clips for fearless, unfiltered interviews with people who aren’t afraid to test the limits of free speech: 👉 https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos In this explosive episode of Heretics, George Gilbert — the Big Brother contestant who made national headlines after being kicked out of the house — sits down with Andrew Gold to break his silence. George opens up about what really happened, why he believes humour and offence have become dangerously confused, and why he stands by Ricky Gervais’s famous line: “Who cares if you’re offended?” For the first time, George gives his full account of the incident that led to his removal — the jokes, the editing, and the moments the public never saw. He insists it wasn’t hate speech, but a misunderstood conversation about boundaries, comedy, and context. Was this genuine accountability, or another example of a culture where offence equals guilt? Andrew challenges him on all sides: What exactly did George say — and why did the producers react so severely? Is Big Brother still a social experiment, or now a corporate PR machine afraid of social media outrage? Do comedians like Ricky Gervais, Dave Chappelle, and Jimmy Carr have a point about free speech being under attack? Where do we draw the line between cruelty and comedy? George pulls back the curtain on life inside the Big Brother house — the politics, the paranoia, and the fear of saying the wrong thing on camera. He reflects on what the experience taught him about modern fame, outrage culture, and what happens when your reputation is rewritten overnight. This is a conversation about more than one TV show. It’s about the state of truth, humour, and courage in a time when everyone’s watching and no one’s forgiving. 💬 Tell us in the comments: Do you agree with George and Ricky Gervais — is being offended part of living in a free society? Hit Subscribe for more uncompromising Heretics conversations that go where others won’t — and keep being a heretic. Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kb5u1XrInaw #GeorgeGilbert #BigBrother #RickyGervais #HereticsPodcast #AndrewGold #CancelCulture #FreeSpeech #ComedyDebate #OutrageCulture #FreedomOfExpression #HereticsClips #MediaControversy #BritishTV Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Subscribe to Heretics Clips for more explosive political investigations, media exposés and unfiltered conversations with the journalists who know exactly what’s happening inside Westminster and the British press. https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos In this gripping and revealing interview, Camilla Tominey joins Andrew Gold to break down the investigation into Nigel Farage — and what the findings really show. Camilla, one of Britain’s most fearless political journalists, cuts through the noise, speculation and media narratives to reveal what actually emerged from the scrutiny surrounding one of the UK’s most divisive political figures. From the Brexit years to banking scandals and media clashes, Nigel Farage has been at the centre of controversy for over a decade. But few people truly understand what investigators uncovered, what was exaggerated, what was quietly buried, and what the public was never told. Camilla pulls back the curtain, offering clarity, context and insider insight into the probe that made headlines across the country. In this detailed and often surprising conversation, Camilla and Andrew explore: What triggered the investigation into Farage in the first place The key findings that never made the front pages How political enemies and allies both used the investigation to their advantage What the media got wrong — and what they accidentally got right Why the findings matter even more today How Farage himself responded privately and publicly Camilla also gives a rare journalist’s-eye view of how investigations into high-profile political figures actually work behind the scenes: the leaks, the anonymous briefings, the internal conflicts and the editorial decisions that shape public perception. She explains why Farage remains such a lightning rod in British politics — and why every probe into him becomes a national spectacle. Whether you admire Nigel Farage, distrust him, or simply want to understand the truth behind the headlines, this interview exposes the deeper story: what investigators found, what they didn’t, and how the findings reveal the state of modern British politics, media bias and institutional power. If you want a clear-eyed, insider explanation of what the investigation uncovered — without spin or tribalism — this conversation is essential viewing. Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCrBeJto0_s #CamillaTominey #NigelFarage #FarageInvestigation #UKPolitics #HereticsPodcast #AndrewGold #BritishMedia #PoliticalScandal #Westminster Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

👉 Subscribe now to Heretics Clips for fearless conversations the mainstream won’t touch: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos Is the political Left being swept up in a narcissistic tsunami? In this explosive interview, Edward Dutton – the controversial anthropologist and author – dives into his bold hypothesis about why woke ideology has spread like wildfire, and why so many on the Left display what he calls “mutant traits.” Dutton argues that woke activists are not just political ideologues, but the by-product of genetic and cultural shifts that have created a new breed of narcissism. He claims this has profound consequences for the West, for conservative-minded people, and for the very survival of free societies. But is he right? Or is this simply too radical to accept? 🔥 Inside this video: Why Edward Dutton believes the Left is being driven by narcissistic personalities. His shocking claim about mutated genes and how they fuel woke ideology. How this supposed “narcissistic tsunami” is eroding trust, stability, and harmony in the West. A fiery debate about racial harmony, David Duke, and the darker side of identity politics. What emerges is a clash of ideas that raises uncomfortable questions: Are woke movements really about justice and equality, or are they fuelled by deeper psychological flaws? Why do narcissistic traits thrive on the Left — and what does this mean for conservatives who resist? Edward Dutton doesn’t hold back, and this discussion is guaranteed to spark outrage, curiosity, and reflection. Whether you agree with him or not, his research and confrontational style force us to consider questions that polite society refuses to ask. 👉 Watch until the end for Dutton’s most shocking claim yet — about what happens if conservatives fail to recognise the scale of the narcissistic wave rising around them. 🎥 Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxqYRNv24h4&t=12s #narcissism #antiwoke #politics #leftwing #culturewars #hereticsclips #edwarddutton #woke #identitypolitics #cancelculture #psychology #freeexpression Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Investigative journalist Andy Webb joins Andrew Gold to explore one of the most intriguing and lesser-known chapters in Princess Diana’s life — her secret relationship with her bodyguard, and the mysterious, almost spooky circumstances surrounding it. Webb has spent years researching Diana’s private world, and in this gripping conversation he reveals the emotional complexity, hidden fears, and unusual events that shaped this deeply personal story. If you enjoy these rare insights into royal history, make sure you subscribe to Heretics Clips: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos In this fascinating clip, Andy Webb explains how Princess Diana formed a powerful bond with one of her protection officers — a relationship that blended trust, vulnerability, and quiet intimacy at a moment when she felt increasingly isolated inside the royal family. Webb uncovers why Diana relied so heavily on this particular bodyguard, what made their connection so special, and why the relationship remained hidden from the public for so long. But what makes the story even more compelling is the eerie, unsettling sequence of events that followed. Webb describes the strange coincidences, whispers inside the security services, and the chilling episode that convinced Diana something sinister might be happening behind the scenes. As he explains it, the atmosphere around Diana at that time felt charged — almost haunted — by unanswered questions and unexplained moments that intensified her growing sense of danger. What did Diana really confide in her bodyguard? Why did she trust him more than almost anyone else in her life? And what happened that turned this private relationship into one of the most whispered stories in royal history? Webb reveals the details that biographers often gloss over: the emotional dynamics, the quiet signals insiders noticed, and the moment that left Diana shaken in a way she never forgot. Webb also explores the broader context — why Diana felt abandoned by the institution around her, why she sought emotional refuge in those tasked with protecting her, and how this relationship shaped her decisions in the final years of her life. The story is not just intimate; it is chilling, atmospheric, and filled with moments that still leave experts wondering what was really going on. If you’ve ever heard rumours about Princess Diana’s secret connection with her bodyguard, or you’re curious about the eerie incident that became part of royal folklore, this conversation reveals the truth behind the story — with the clarity only Andy Webb can provide. 🔥 Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qq9fcGZTKM #PrincessDiana #AndyWebb #RoyalFamily #DianaBodyguard #Heretics #AndrewGold #PrincessDianaSecrets #SpookyStory Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

What will Britain look like when white Britons become a minority — and what does that mean for national identity, politics, and culture? In this gripping interview, Andrew Gold sits down with political scientist and author Matt Goodwin to unpack one of the most controversial and misunderstood questions shaping the UK’s future: the year 2063, when demographic change could transform Britain forever. 👉 Subscribe to Heretics Clips for more fearless, unfiltered conversations: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos Matt Goodwin — a leading expert on populism, class, and identity — breaks down the data behind Britain’s rapid demographic shifts. He explains why trust, belonging, and social cohesion are fracturing — and how political elites have failed to confront the realities of mass immigration and cultural change. This isn’t a conversation about fear; it’s about what happens when an entire nation is told not to talk about what it’s really thinking. Andrew and Matt explore the future of British identity: what does it mean to be “white British” in an increasingly multicultural nation? Is identity purely civic — or is something deeper being lost in the process? The two debate whether multiculturalism has gone too far, why diversity and trust don’t always align, and how the political class has misunderstood working-class voters who feel left behind by both Left and Right. Expect bold insights into: Why 2063 could be the most politically explosive year in British history The rise of Reform UK, Nigel Farage, and anti-establishment movements The growing divide between metropolitan elites and ordinary Britons What future governments could do to preserve social unity in a diverse nation Whether Britain’s identity crisis could reshape Western politics as a whole Matt also shares predictions about the Britain of 2100 — a radically different society where class, race, and identity will define the new political map. This is not about division — it’s about asking the questions no one else will. 🎧 Watch the full Heretics episode here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEb4mOXl7_c&t=1970s #Heretics #AndrewGold #MattGoodwin #BritishPolitics #UKIdentity #Demographics #Immigration #ReformUK #NigelFarage #Culture #WesternCivilisation #Multiculturalism #FutureOfBritain #PopulationChange #2063 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Dr. Helen Webberley joins Andrew Gold for one of the most intense and revealing clashes ever recorded on Heretics — a debate focused on the science, ethics, and dangers surrounding puberty blockers. Despite growing medical consensus, multiple investigations, and international reviews challenging their safety, Webberley continues to deny that puberty blockers have been debunked. This fiery exchange exposes the deep divide between clinical caution and ideological certainty. If you want more debates like this, subscribe to Heretics Clips here: https://www.youtube.com/@hereticsclips/videos In this gripping interview, Andrew Gold pushes Dr. Webberley on one of the most controversial subjects in modern medicine: the use of puberty blockers on children and teenagers. Webberley argues that blockers are safe, reversible, and essential for trans youth — but Andrew challenges her with the evidence from recent studies, medical reviews, and expert warnings that suggest the opposite. The conversation becomes tense as Webberley repeatedly dismisses the growing body of criticism, even when presented with international findings that contradict her position. This episode dives into the core of the controversy: do puberty blockers help vulnerable young people, or do they risk long-term harm? Andrew asks direct questions about bone density loss, brain development, fertility issues, psychological impacts, and why multiple countries have restricted or halted their use entirely. Webberley deflects, disputes, and denies — creating a clash of worldviews that reveals just how polarising this debate has become. The interview becomes especially heated when Andrew challenges Webberley on professional responsibility, medical ethics, and whether activists in the gender field have overtaken science. Her refusal to acknowledge the global shift in medical opinion, including Sweden, Finland, Norway, and England reevaluating or rolling back treatment protocols, raises unsettling questions about how entrenched beliefs may override scientific caution. Whether you agree with Webberley or find her stance alarming, this is a conversation you cannot ignore. It offers a rare, unfiltered look into one of the most contentious medical debates of our time — and exposes the uncomfortable truth about how divided experts really are. 🔥 Watch the full podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Lh8SVtqpQI #HelenWebberley #PubertyBlockers #GenderGP #TransgenderDebate #Heretics #AndrewGold #Transitioning #GenderMedicine #Debate #MedicalEthics Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices