As “The Words That Made Us” approaches its May release, we continue to explore new perspectives on the early Presidents.  Akhil’s disillusionment with Jefferson is explained, and the rise of the third President’s cousin and near-usurper makes for some surprising moments.  We return to the visual for examples of particularly blatant painting propaganda, and a future guest makes a cameo.

We continue “Presidential Month” with the second set of readings - this time on Jahn Adams - from the forthcoming (in May) “The Words That Made Us.”  Adams’ unique combination of bombast, verbosity, grandiloquence, ubiquity, and insecurity, makes him an author’s dream.  It also left him extraordinarily thin-skinned, and the notorious Sedition Act was the result. Akhil and Andy take a grand tour of Adams’ constitutional misadventures.

Akhil’s new book, “The Words That Made Us,” will be available in May.  This widely anticipated tome has already garnered a starred review from Kirkus Reviews.  In this episode Akhil provides a preview, with reading and commentary from Chapter 7 - “Washington.”  Although all Americans know that Washington was the first president, they may not know quite why the first American electors elected him unanimously - twice.  Akhil provides a reading, and Andy and Akhil discuss.

How does Akhil dislike the Presidential Succession Act?  Andy tries to count the ways.  This Constitutional disaster-in-waiting is definitively dissected.  We could have had President Pelosi being sued by would-be President Pompeo, with your 401k turning into a 201F. Show notes on the website include the three incarnations of the Act since the Founding, and some tips on counting from the experts.

The many dangers of the lame duck that gave rise to our "Bullets Dodged" series raise the question - do we really need a lame duck period at all?  Akhil and Andy recall the "secession winters" of the past and how 2020 shared aspects of all of them; and of course, we have suggestions for how to solve it.  As for Lisbon, this is not the first episode of ours that references "Casablanca..."

Philip Bobbitt is a top academic expert on Impeachment.  He has led the lonely chorus of those who have maintained that Trump’s second impeachment trial is unconstitutional, since it takes place when he is no longer President.  Akhil and Professor Bobbitt debate this and other points crucial to the trial - with surprising results. News flash: opinions change, and consensus is nearer.  One can only wish the Senate had similarly open minds.

The impeachment trial has begun.  We depart from our leisurely time-independent pace to go nearly live and address the most important issues.  Can you try an ex-president?  Is this really about "insurrection?"  What are "high crimes and misdemeanors?"  How can Presidents Obama, Bush, et all help? Akhil and Andy also discuss their recent op-ed from the NY Daily News earlier this week.

The quadrennial choice Americans make was particularly fateful in 2016, and Akhil asserts that itself this was a bullet not dodged.  The unique nature of the American Presidency places enormous burdens on the office's holders, but so, too, does it ask much of the American people as they exercise the franchise.  What makes a good president?  What should Americans consider, and how can they frame the choice?  Akhil and Andy find lessons in the early republic, and the early Akhil, for that matter.  And of course, a few words about the recent occupant of the office.  Should we have known what we were in for?

Continuing our discussion of the various disasters that might have befallen America around the election, this time we explore the period after the election and before the Electoral College, and then as Congress prepared to meet and certify the vote. The toxic mixture of the Greeley precedent and Faithless Electors was rendered a veritable Chernobyl by a 2020 Supreme Court decision that Akhil finds, shall we say, imperfect. Life imitates art ("The West Wing," again)? Actually, it's more frightening than that.

Introducing "Amarica's Constitution;" Electoral pitfalls in the Constitution and the election of 2020 - Part I.   It didn't feel smooth, but believe it or not, many things didn't go wrong that might have in the recent election.  For example, what happens if a candidate dies on or about Election Day?  Akhil and Andy discuss how issues of election timing, the electoral college, the Greeley Precedent, presidential succession, the 12th and 25th Amendments, and partisan politics make for a witches' brew that is denying Professor Amar his beauty sleep.