Who Funds that?

As we discussed last week, the robot apocalypse is maybe not coming, which means that we’re going to have to learn to live with artificial intelligence and related technologies. And now Randi Weingarten, one of the least helpful people in American public life, is here to help us. Joining us to discuss how teachers unions are trying to wriggle themselves into AI regulation is CRC Senior Fellow Kali Fontanilla.  Links:https://capitalresearch.org/article/unions-and-school-districts-have-been-clumsy-ai-regulators/https://capitalresearch.org/article/who-funds-that-episode-23-the-prophets-of-the-ai-apocalypse/

It’s not every day that the would be masters of the universe are going on television and proclaiming an imminent doomsday, as if they were street preachers or the people who used to walk around public parks with sandwich boards saying “The end is nigh!” But the heads of major artificial intelligence companies like Anthropic and OpenAI have spent the last couple of weeks doing just that, claiming that they themselves are bringing forth Armageddon and that only government bureaucracy can stop them. But are these “AI Doomers” a true, organic response to concerns best known by those building the god-machine, or is it a cynical media operation by a mega-business interested in using the regulatory state to lock out potential competitors? Our colleague Parker Thayer, who is skeptical of the motivations of the corporate titans, joins us to discuss. Links:https://x.com/ParkerThayer/status/2097759699626328575?s=20https://capitalresearch.org/article/my-problem-with-effective-altruism/https://capitalresearch.org/article/left-wing-billionaire-dustin-moskovitz/https://www.influencewatch.org/for-profit/anthropic/https://www.influencewatch.org/for-profit/openai/

They say that every son of a gun deserves a lawyer and his day in court; it’s a core principle of the American legal system. But certain lawyers informally focus on certain cases and certain clients, often for ideological reasons. That raises the question: Who do Communists—both foreign Communist regimes and Americans facing investigation for alleged Communist activities—call when they need counsel? The answer, often, is Rabinowitz, Boudin, Standard, Krinsky & Lieberman, P.C., which has made a name for itself as the preferred U.S. legal representatives of clients including Cuba’s Communist government, Vietnam War draft opponents and Communist-influenced labor unions, among others. Joining us today to discuss RBSKL is our CRC colleague Robert Stilson, who just conducted a major research project for our InfluenceWatch project on the law firm. Links:https://www.influencewatch.org/for-profit/rabinowitz-boudin-standard-krinsky-lieberman-p-c-rbskl/https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/national-lawyers-guild/https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/venceremos-brigade/https://www.influencewatch.org/organization/weather-underground-weatherman-weathermen/

On this podcast, we largely cover who funds the groups and people who are influencing public policy — and today we'll be diving into the abyss of labor unions with our regular host and CRC's research director, Mike Watson.Thirty years ago, a former teachers-union operative named Max Green wrote a book called Epitaph for American Labor. He came not to praise the American labor movement but to bury it. Mike went back to that book at the thirty-year mark to ask whether Green was right — and his answer is yes, and it's worse than Green thought. Links:https://capitalresearch.org/article/an-epitaph-for-a-distinctly-american-labor-movement-at-30/https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/-epitaph-for-american-labor_125813738926.pdf?x91208https://capitalresearch.org/article/the-thesis-that-drove-american-politics-crazy-part-1/https://capitalresearch.org/article/a-republican-plan-to-resurrect-obamas-assault-on-labor-union-democracy/

Charities (like Capital Research Center) are formally prohibited from intervening in election campaigns. But for years, liberal Big Philanthropy has exploited non-enforcement and loopholes in the law to use charities for transparently electoral purposes. Joining Michael Watson and Tiffany Gabbay to discuss how the left uses charities to directly influence elections is our colleague Parker Thayer, who just released a report on the topic.Links:https://capitalresearch.org/article/the-charities-influencing-elections-2024-and-beyond/https://capitalresearch.org/article/the-vote-machine-is-already-planning-for-the-2030-census-2/https://capitalresearch.org/article/the-lefts-voter-registration-grift-thrived-in-2024/https://capitalresearch.org/article/influencewatch-podcast-332-voter-participation-unless-you-like-nascar/https://capitalresearch.org/article/testimony-on-the-nonprofit-voter-registration-industry/

Occasionally we step back from our usual focus on advocacy groups and take a broader look at the news and the world around us, with help from subject-matter experts. This week, we take a look at Iran, and the lessons the ongoing conflict and other contemporary conflicts have for the American defense industry. Joining me is Barak Seener, an associate research fellow at the Henry Jackson Society, a foreign- and military-affairs think tank in the United Kingdom. Links:https://henryjacksonsociety.org/publications/restoring-deterrence-destabilising-the-iranian-regime/https://henryjacksonsociety.org/publications/regime-collapse-in-iran-a-necessity-for-regional-stability/https://henryjacksonsociety.org/publications/policy-briefing-regional-influence-after-iran-preventing-a-vacuum-following-regime-collapse/https://capitalresearch.org/article/influencewatch-podcast-398-the-mullahs-friends-in-america/

On this podcast, we take time to investigate who funds the groups and people who are influencing public policy—but what if you want to be one of those people? Well, you could always provide well-appreciated support to us if you like the sort of things we do—not just this podcast. Joining me to discuss that which you could fund by supporting Capital Research Center is our organization president, Scott Walter.Links:https://www.influencewatch.org/person/neville-roy-singham/ https://capitalresearch.org/publication/enemies-of-energy-the-myths-the-movement-and-the-money/ https://www.encounterbooks.com/books/arabella/ https://capitalresearch.org/article/bill-gates-to-stop-grantmaking-via-arabella-advisors/ https://capitalresearch.org/article/communism-and-the-democratic-socialists-of-america/ https://www.wsj.com/opinion/amazon-teamsters-subcontractors-new-york-zohran-mamdani-fd76f25f?st=QVH7Dk

Do environmentalists—and the rest of the progressive left that includes combating climate change as part of its “Omnicause”—care more about saving the planet or replacing market capitalism, private property, and pluralist living arrangements with socialist tower-blocks connected by overcrowded light rail (on which there will be no enforcement of fare payment, naturally)? There’s a tell—opposing nuclear-powered electric generation, which emits no point-source carbon emissions whatsoever. And my colleague Ken Braun, author of Capital Research Center’s comprehensive report on the environmentalist movement’s “Enemies of Energy,” has updated his extensive list of left-wing groups opposed to nuclear energy—the ones that clearly privilege making a New Soviet Man over making the Earth better for people.Links:https://capitalresearch.org/article/opponents-of-nuclear-power-now-hauling-in-400k-per-hour/https://www.influencewatch.org/influence-networks/opposition-to-nuclear-energy/https://capitalresearch.org/article/the-ideological-fuel-of-a-new-left-part-1/https://capitalresearch.org/article/nrdc-adopts-nuclear-power-sanity-and-exits-list-of-nuclear-energy-enemies/’https://capitalresearch.org/article/the-odd-enemies-of-nuclear-energy/

A faction of the political right, supported by the think tank American Compass that is funded by the leftist Hewlett Foundation, claims that organized labor has a “conservative heart” and should be empowered to dominate American life in a manner not seen since the 1940s or 1950s. But is that true? Just about all available evidence suggests not—Big Labor is, as it has been since at latest the turn of the twentieth century, Everything Leftism. Adding more evidence to the pile today is Jarrett Skorup of the Mackinac Center, who joins me to discuss his report on Big Labor’s involvement in left-wing “environmental, social, and governance” — ESG — investing movements.Links:https://www.mackinac.org/archives/2026/s2026-04.pdfhttps://capitalresearch.org/article/2026-proxy-preview-reports-far-fewer-esg-resolutions/https://www.influencewatch.org/influence-networks/esg-activism/

Many people are saying that Congress doesn’t do anything, and…yeah they’re often correct—and that’s sometimes a good thing. But on the subject of nonprofit and advocacy group regulation, the House Committee on Ways and Means—responsible for writing federal tax laws—is proving very active, advancing four bills to change how nonprofits and political advocacy groups operate. Joining us is our colleague Robert Stilson to discuss the legislation and the goals of nonprofit regulatory policies. Chairman Smith Opening Statement: Markup of Legislation Increasing Transparency & Accountability in …https://capitalresearch.org/article/who-funds-that-episode-14-the-foreign-funding-election-loophole/https://capitalresearch.org/article/influencewatch-podcast-396-congress-tackles-foreign-nonprofit-funding/https://capitalresearch.org/article/treasury-is-rightly-focused-on-nonprofit-transparency/