The Minefield

Miranda Fricker, Julius Silver Professor of Philosophy at NYU, explores the nuanced landscapes of blame and forgiveness. She discusses how cultural events like Yom Kippur shape our moral perspectives and the collective nature of repentance. Delving into various religious practices, she highlights the need for humility and recognition of faults. The conversation also touches on the challenges of communication surrounding forgiveness, especially in the context of historical injustices and collective guilt, advocating for accountability and compassion.

Andrea Carson, a Professor of Political Communication at La Trobe University and author of "Investigative Journalism, Democracy and the Digital Age," dives deep into the challenges facing democracy today. She discusses how social media has transformed political discourse, creating confusion and division. The conversation highlights the impact of misinformation, the fragmentation of audiences, and the evolving dynamics of political engagement. Carson emphasizes the necessity of media literacy and collaborative efforts to promote fact-based communication in a chaotic digital landscape.

The podcast explores society's focus on criticism over appreciation, delving into the challenge of expressing love genuinely. It discusses the importance of attentiveness in art interpretation and touches on issues like white appropriation in culture. The episode also explores the power of affirmation and worship in a culture saturated with criticism, while examining the essence of progressive and conservative politics.

Spanish painter Francisco de Goya’s depiction of Saturn eating his son is a haunting portrait of lust and the fear of one’s own finitude. Christos Tsiolkas joins Waleed and Scott to look into that darkness, and discover what looks back.

Celeste Little, an Arunda woman and passionate social commentator, shares her insights on the Voice to Parliament referendum. She dives into how referenda can create a divisive atmosphere, regardless of outcomes. The discussion addresses the ethical complexities of using referenda for political questions, particularly regarding marginalized voices. Little emphasizes the need for genuine representation in these processes, while also confronting Australia's colonial legacy and the impact of fear-driven narratives surrounding constitutional change.

Opposition leader Peter Dutton has recently reintroduced the prospect of nuclear power as part of Australia’s commitment to decarbonisation. But what is behind the push for nuclear, and does it make sense in a nation like this?

When Oxford University proposed to confer an honorary degree on the man who ordered an atomic bomb to be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, philosopher Elizabeth Anscombe condemned the decision as “shar[ing] in the guilt of a bad action by praise and flattery”.

When US President Gerald Ford pardoned Nixon of his crimes, did he thereby place the presidency above the law — or did he understand a hard reality about democratic politics that should inform the multiple prosecutions of Donald Trump?

It is fair to say that boredom is a distinctly modern terror. But, as Stan Grant discusses with Waleed and Scott, what if existential boredom points us to our deeper need?

Philosopher Robert Sparrow from Monash University explores the unsettling impacts of AI on language, knowledge, and human connections. He challenges alarmist views with a focus on the real threats posed by AI's pervasive integration into daily life. Sparrow discusses how AI could commodify language and degrade communication standards, risking authenticity in human expression. He also raises concerns over AI's influence on creativity and genuine relationships, reminding listeners of the value of shared human experiences amidst technological advancements.