Ben Yeoh Chats

Tassos Stevens is artistic director of Coney. The transcript of the podcast here.  Prior to Coney, he did a doctorate in Psychology, won the inaugural James Menzies-Kitchin Award for theatre directors, did the NT Studio Directors Course, ran the ROAR platform to support new work and new artists on the London fringe, and also worked as critic, teacher, many flavours of researcher, salesman, and chef. We chat about pivotal moments of theatre and explore what interactive and immersive mean for theatre. The importance of play and “making belief’ as opposed to “suspending disbelief” How to involved audiences in agency and what Tassos advises for young people interested in theatre.

Matt Clancy is a progress fellow at Emergent Ventures. He teaches at Iowa State University and writes on Substack a newsletter called New Things Under the Sun, which you should subscribe to if you are interested in anything innovation related. Matt has also synthesised many of the emerging studies on remote working. Transcript and video links here. We discuss whether progress has been stagnating and the importance of moral and social progress as well as technological. Whether small team or large teams are better for invention. How important are agglomeration effects and how a declining agglomeration impact might make the case for remote work stronger. The role of innovation prizes and patents for incentivising innovation and if copyright is too long. Whether innovation agencies (eg ARPA)  are the answer and what Matt would do as an executive director of one. Differences between UK and US university systems and advice for young people. Matt’s thinking on remote work. 

Short introduction to Ben Yeoh Chats. If you are curious about the world this show is for you. I have extended conversations across humanities and science with artists, philosophers, writers, theatre makers, activists, economists and all walks of life. Episodes include: -What is like to go to Columbia University at 15 and be valedictorian with Leopold Aschenbrenner? -What should worry us about gamification with philosopher Thi Nguyen ? -What sparks invention with innovation historian, Anton Howes ? -What do story telling and improvisation tell us about being human with Lee Simpson. -I’ve learned a tremendous amount doing these shows and hope you enjoy and learn too. Enjoy.

Lee Simpson is a founder member of Improbable (theatre makers and improvisers), a long time Comedy Store Player (since the 1980s) and one of Paul Merton's Impro Chums. He’s also been a croupier, cinema projectionist and breakfast show DJ. He’s written plays, appeared in sit-coms and in some films, been on some Radio 4 panel shows and once did a very poor poodle act at the London Palladium.  That vast range highlights two strong threads one in the world of improv and another in the world of theatre making. Transcript available here and video version available here. -I speak to Lee on his roots in theatre and improv and the importance of  Keith Johnstone’s work. -Lee outlines his thoughts on on his drama school experience, two schools of improv (US and UK) andhow improv and theatre misunderstand one another. -We discuss the  infrastructure (or lack of) behind improv and theatre and techniques on listening to the audience and feedback loops in performing. -We sketch out ideas on structure and story form, on being human and Lee explains status structure as a technique. -We chat about how  humans understand the world and how we view our lives as story that changes through time. -Lee reflects on being part of a comedy group for a long time and shares a stroy on Mo Mowlam. -We talk on how to “build back better” in the arts and what Open Space is and techniques for listening and genuine connections to art. -We end with advice Lee has for young people.  Contents:  01:17 Lee on his roots in theat re and improv and Keith Johnstone.  04:07 Lee on his drama school experience and two schools of improv  09:43 How improv and theatre misunderstand one another.  13:32 Lee on the infrastructure (or lack of) behind improv and theatre. On listening to the audience and feedback loops in performing.  21:27 Lee on current UK Improv organisations 26:56 Money no issue… what the work of Improbable would do  29:01 Ben on language of improv and comedy, repetition and twist  32:29 Lee on structure and story form, on being human. Explains status structure.  36:44 Lee on how humans understand the world. Viewing our lives as story that changes through time.  42:47 On being part of a comedy group for a long time.  43:00 On Mo Mowlam being involved with the comedy store players  47:37 Mo Mowlam’s final months and concerns on anti-democracy 53:33 Lee on “Build Back Better”  57:46 Lee on Open Space, techniques for listening and genuine connections to art  1:05:07 Improv teaching you to listen to yourself  1:07:46 More on OpenSpace  1:15:34 Advice for young people, Ben channeling phantom Lee  1:17:15 Lee’s advice: step outside your path a little. 

I had an excellent chat with Leopold Aschenbrenner. Leopold is a grant winner from Tyler Cowen’s  Emergent Ventures. He went to Columbia University, aged 15, and graduated in 2021 as valedictorian. (Contents below ↓ ↓ ). He is a researcher  at the Global Priorities Institute, thinking about long-termism. He has drafted a provocative paper encompassing ideas of long-termisim, existential risk and growth. For some of our conversation we were joined by phantom Tyler Cowen imagining what he might think.   We discussed Leopold’s critique of German culture and whether he’d swap German infrastructure for the American entrepreneurial spirit.    Whether being a valedictorian is efficient, if going to University at 15 is underrated and life at Columbia University.    What you can learn from speed solving Rubik’s cubes and if Leopold had to make the choice today if he’d still be vegetarian.   Thinking about existential risk, Leopold considers whether nuclear or biological warfare risk is a bigger threat than climate change and how growth matters and if the rate of growth matters as much depending on how long you think humanity survives.     Considering possible under rated existential risk Leopold sketches out several concerns over the falling global birth rate, how sticky that might be and whether policy would be effective.  We consider what is worth seeing in Germany, how good or not GDP is as a measure and what we should do with our lives.    Leopold has wide ranging thoughts and in thinking and working on fat tail existential ruin risks is working on saving the human world. Fascinating thoughts. Transcript Here with links and  a video version here.  Ben Yeoh's microgrants here. 1:35 How to think about a future career (80000 hours)  4:10 Is going to university at 15 years old  underrated?  6:22 In favour of college and liberal arts vs Thiel fellowships  9:14 Is being a valedictorian efficient (H/T Tyler Cowen)  13:01 Leopold on externalities and how to sort smart people  15:08 Learnings from Columbia. The importance of work ethic.  19:50 Leopold learning from Adam Tooze and German history  22:16 Leopold critiques German culture on standing out.  23:08 Observations on decline of German universities  25:22 Leopold concerns on the German leadership class 30:25 German infrastructure and if it feels poor  34:13 Critique of too much netflix  35:27 What to learn from speed cubing Rubik’s cubes and weird communities  38:04 Leopold’s story of Emergent Ventures and what he found valuable  40:08 Embracing weirdness and disagreeableness   42:20  Leopold considering whether US entrepreneurial culture worth swapping for German infrastructure 44:44 Leopold on social ills of alcohol  44:59 Examining Leopold’s ideas of existential risk and growth  48:49 Different views depending on time frame:700 years or millions of years  52:18 Leopold’s view on importance of growth and risk of dark ages   57:07 Climate as a real risk but not a top existential risk 1:01:02 Nuclear weapons as an underrated existential risk  1:01:45 View on emergent AI risk 1:03:20 Falling fertility as an underrated risk  1:15:35 Mormon and eternal family  1:17:29 Underrated/overrated with phantom Tyler Cowen   1:36:10 What EA gets right/wrong, EA as religion? 1:44:56 Advice: Being independent, creative and writing blogs

I chat with C. Thi Nguyen who used to be a food writer and is now a philosophy professor at University of Utah.   Thi thinks about trust, art, games, and communities.    We discuss his first book, Games: Agency as Art. The book is about how games are the art form that work in the medium of agency.   We chat about the difference between play and games and wider games philosophy.   Thi worries about the problems on trusting experts, if oneself is not an expert and how none of us are experts in most domains.  We discuss making tea, process art and how we should be thinking about making food.  Fascinating topics across food and philosophy.   Transcript and links available here.   Contents and Youtube links below. 06:13 Thi on Gamification 12:15 Thi on Trust and what to be worried about a gamified system  16:25 Thi on philosophy of expertise and the challenge of finding experts to trust  20:58 Thi on board games recommendations  26:05 Is “play” better or “games” better? Thi answers on how games are different from play.  31:20 The importance of drinking games  34:13 The four types of games  36:35 How constraints are useful  45:47 What is process art  50:02 Games and cooking  57:39 How to make tea  1:02:16 Thi on creative productivity (don't kill the weird ideas)

Anton Howes on innovation history, the improving mindset and progress studies. Anton Howes is an innovation historian and policy thinker, we have a fascinating wide ranging conversation on innovation. Transcript and video available here.  We discuss raising the prestige of innovators today, but consider it easy to say but harder to enact.  Anton argues for the benefits of a “great Exhibition” as a direct mechanism to inspire an “improving” mindset - the type of mindset that leads to innovation.   Anton shares what he has discovered about how invention has happened in history; and whether stagnation has happened or not recently, that it might be good to send a signal on the importance of innovation in any case. Why incremental innovation might be underrated, and why the process of innovation (ideas, iterations) is not publicised more.   Anton discusses evidence that formal education has not been needed for historic inventors (an improving mindset being potentially more important) and whether there are more than enough innovation prizes currently.    We have a strong section on problems with copyright and how rules around copyright might not be fit for purpose today and how to pronounce “gimcrack” - a useless invention - and why having more gimcracks might be a sign of healthy innovation.   A fascinating walk through innovation history.    Anton Howes is an innovation historian and policy thinker. He’s written a brilliant history of the RSA - the royal society for arts, manufactures and commerce - arguably Britain’s national improvement agency over the last 260 years - and is the RSA’s Historian in Residence. I recommend you check out his book, Arts and Minds. He writes a substack newsletter blog on innovation thinking that has won an award from Tyler Cowen’s Emergent Ventures. He has a day job as head of innovation research at the Entrepreneurs Network think tank and in my mind is an all round excellent thinker on innovation.

Tom Gosling was a partner at PwC, and an advisor to boards around executive pay and incentives, governance, and strategy. He's currently an Executive Fellow at London Business School and helps steer the work of the purposeful company collaboration.    Tom speaks about the benefits of purpose and the risk of corporate puff. We touch on audit reform and the challenges of regulation. We discuss the importance of democractic process and the role of government compared to the role of business. We underrate/overate carbon taxes, diversity targets, Milton Friedman and financial incentives.   On a personal note, we talk about the challenges of achieving a personal netzero, the joys of singing and the importance of understanding what makes you happy.  It's a fascinating conversation on many currently debated topics. Read the transcript. 

Jonathan Meth is a dramaturg, extraordinaire, director, curator, very involved in the European theatre and disability arts. He's a lecturer at Goldsmiths. He's worked with many of the major theatre organizations in Britain, and he's a fascinating theatre thinker. We speak about dramaturgy and theatre as playwright lead and theatre as colloboration lead. We discuss disability arts and a little about what autism has taught us. Jonathan looks at theatre funding and infrastrucutre and what it might mean to build back differently. We discuss his work with Fence and what he has learned teaching a wide mix of international students. Jonathan makes a case for the power of questions and curiosity. A transcript is available here along with video.

Rishi Dastidar and I chat about life, poetry, writing and poets always having another job. Rishi gives advice on how to be a poet, embracing Insta poets and whether last lines are harder than first lines, or second books harder than first books; and why we love lists and why we need to pay more attention to verbs. He is open to offers from companies seeking a Chief Poetry Officer. A fascinating and wide ranging chat from this leading British poet. Transcript at the blog here with video.   Links to Rishi’s books: Tickertape here and Saffron Jack here. His twitter here.  *** Rishi Dastidar’s poetry has been published by Financial Times, New Scientist and the BBC amongst many others. His debut poetry collection Ticker-tape and his second book is Saffron Jack. He is chair of the London writer development organisation Spread The Word. Rishi edited  the final part of the Nine Arches Press writers’ trilogy, The Craft: A Guide to Making Poetry Happen in the 21st Century.  (Blog on that here). Rishi is also head of brand language for Brand Pie.