Quantitude

Join the hosts as they hilariously navigate the chaos of ad libbing a discussion on writing quantitative pedagogical papers. They share strategies for clarity while exploring innovative methods in research and reflect on nostalgic childhood movies. Their playful banter about time zones and improvisation adds a lighthearted twist to academic challenges. With insights on balancing rigor and accessibility, this lively conversation inspires both budding and seasoned scholars to think creatively in their writing!

In a humorous exploration, the hosts compare quantitative research to a military camp, emphasizing inclusivity. They highlight community involvement and resourcefulness in accessing existing datasets, particularly from data repositories. The significance of historical educational data is addressed, along with challenges like restricted access. Advanced methodologies are discussed, including latent transition analysis and ethical considerations in educational research. The episode encourages innovative approaches while grounding methods in real data applications, fostering collaboration among researchers.

The hosts kick off with a quirky coincidence that sets a lighthearted tone. They dive into the nitty-gritty of selecting the perfect journal for quantitative work, mixing personal anecdotes and humor. There's a heartfelt reflection on how reviewer feedback can pivot academic careers. A fun comparison of nurturing ideas in academia to parenting adds depth. They emphasize thorough research about potential journals and share practical tips for boosting chances of acceptance. Light banter keeps the atmosphere enjoyable as they prep for the next Quanti•Qamp challenge.

Join a playful journey to develop quantitative research ideas, where fun meets serious learning. Discover how casual chats can spark innovative questions, and the importance of clarity in research terms. Gain insights into the value of collaboration and feedback in shaping research methodologies. Explore the implications of statistical assumptions in real-world scenarios and nurture your curiosity for sustainable research projects. Get inspired to refine your own quantitative ideas this summer!

In this, our final episode of the season, we reveal that we have actually been quietly arming sleeper cells around the world and that we are now sending out a call-to-arms for listeners to rise up and become quantitative leaders in their own fields of study. Along the way we also discuss scaling fences, bad business decisions, Henry the Fifth, Braveheart, saddles and horses, sideways fish, Legos, Kapla blocks, meta-nerds, more ice cream sandwiches, pyramid schemes, and knuckleheads. Stay in contact with Quantitude! Web page: quantitudepod.org TwitterX: @quantitudepod YouTube: @quantitudepod Merch: redbubble.com

Greg and Patrick talk about internal validity -- broadly and traditionally -- but also as an increasingly important lens through which to view our information-saturated world, and be responsible, critical, and skeptical members of scientific communities as well as society. Along the way, they also mention gargling bleach, 5G cell towers, vaping lysol, fecal transplants, the problem with firetrucks, Star Trek and causality, Sherlock Holmes, melon-wrapped prosciutto, kitty physics, the regression fairy, tails-challenged individuals, and Mad Eye Moody.Stay in contact with Quantitude! Web page: quantitudepod.org TwitterX: @quantitudepod YouTube: @quantitudepod Merch: redbubble.com

Patrick and Greg draw on their experience in author, reviewer, and editorial roles to talk about the manuscript review process, and offer strategies for revising a manuscript and crafting a letter in response to editorial guidance and reviewer feedback. Along the way they also discuss spring break for octogenarians, spitting on graves, being flabby and unfocused, Milo and Otis, meat on a stick, subway jumpers, understanding square roots, voodoo dolls, ugly babies, Klingons, hostage negotiators, and rejected rejections. Stay in contact with Quantitude! Web page: quantitudepod.org TwitterX: @quantitudepod YouTube: @quantitudepod Merch: redbubble.com

In today’s episode, Greg and Patrick start a conversation about how COVID-19 has had an instantaneous and lasting impact on research, what we can do about it right now, and what we can be thinking about for the future as we move forward, together. Along the way they also manage to mention... elevators of blood, Joe Exotic, wisdom of crowds, a fatted ox, skinned knees, intellectual judo, I meant to do that, truck drivin’ subtlety, Apollo 13, hitting a change-up, naive optimism, Thomas Kuhn, and losing your balance. Stay in contact with Quantitude! Web page: quantitudepod.org TwitterX: @quantitudepod YouTube: @quantitudepod Merch: redbubble.com

Patrick and Greg spend an hour stumbling through the world of Monte Carlo computer simulation methodology as a way of knowing within the quantitative sciences. They also delve into: bad ideas, the Dans in Patrick’s life, unique Zoom backgrounds, typical birth weights, theoretical models underlying reading glasses, Jan Ken Pon, being due, archery, blue and green blox pots, felonious speeding, horse races, and Easter egg hunts. Stay in contact with Quantitude! Web page: quantitudepod.org TwitterX: @quantitudepod YouTube: @quantitudepod Merch: redbubble.com

Greg and Patrick are inspired by possibly the greatest Western movie ever filmed as they navigate The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly of factor analysis. In addition to arguing that exploratory factor analysis isn't really exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis isn't really confirmatory, they adroitly traverse topics including sabbatical do-overs, Corona Academy, leeches, tall ship wine, grad school accomplishments, Roz from Monsters Inc., extraverted statisticians, bread pudding, obituaries, the statistician's greatest insult, factor analysis parties, playing with knives, and going toward the light. Stay in contact with Quantitude! Web page: quantitudepod.org TwitterX: @quantitudepod YouTube: @quantitudepod Merch: redbubble.com