Reasonable Faith Podcast

Christian scholarship in academia, challenges of maintaining belief while seeking truth, valuable scholarship of respected Christian philosophers, challenging bias against Christian scholarship, skepticism in academia, analyzing trends in gospel scholarship and challenging biased perspectives

Discussion on the criticism of Christian apologists in academia, the influence of emotional investment in faith, Christian scholars' views on apologetics, and the divide between evangelical apologists and academic scholarship.

Exploring AI and UFOs, finding common ground with atheists, attending church online, reflecting on salvation, reading preferences

Dr. Craig interacts with a skeptic who questions the historicity of Jesus' resurrection, discussing insights from experts Mike Lacona and Dale Allison, analyzing the evidence for the resurrection, addressing accusations against non-Christian scholars, and exploring scholars' evolving views on the historical evidence and the importance of personal encounters with God.

Debate continues on whether a scientifically minded person would believe in God as the ultimate cause. They discuss the misconception about simplicity as the sole criterion for evaluating theory. Swinburne argues that objects with partial understanding in science can be an analogy for the existence of God. The debate explores whether God's simplicity is compatible with His ability to read billions of people's thoughts at the same time.

Dawkins and Swinburne debate the mystery of existence and the role of God. They discuss fine-tuning, multiverses, and the concept of a theory of everything. The simplicity of theism and arguments based on the laws of nature are explored. The contingency of the laws of nature suggests a divine designer. Financial support for Reasonable Faith is requested.

In this podcast, Dr. Craig explores the fate of those who never hear of Jesus, the application of deductive reasoning and probabilities, the existence of God using Bayes' theorem, God's preferences and the literal interpretation of Adam's creation, and the authenticity of religious experiences.

The Reasonable Faith Podcast discusses revisions to the Kalam Cosmological Argument, including objections and clarifications. They explore the nature of time, the impossibility of an actually infinite collection of objects, and the paradoxes of time travel. The concept of an infinite past and its effects are examined, along with the influence of William Lane Craig and the absurdity of an infinite temporal regress of events.

Dr. Craig answers a variety of criticisms including recent statements from Ken Ham.

Dr. Craig discusses whether recent data from the James Webb telescope undermines the Big Bang.