The St.Emlyn’s Podcast

St Emlyn’s Blog and Podcast
undefined
May 1, 2019 • 14min

Ep 135 - April 2019 Round Up

St. Emlyn's April 2019 Podcast Highlights Hello and welcome to the St. Emlyn's blog. I'm Simon Carley, and today I'll be sharing the exciting developments from April 2019 on our St. Emlyn's blog. This month has been packed with insightful posts and groundbreaking research, so let's dive in. Andromeda Shock Trial: A New Perspective We begin with a thought-provoking journal club post by Dan Horner, an intensivist and emergency physician, who explores the Andromeda Shock trial. This study, conducted in Argentina, compared two resuscitation strategies for patients with septic shock: targeting lactate levels versus peripheral perfusion as measured by capillary refill time. The Andromeda Shock trial is fascinating because it challenges our reliance on measurable indicators like lactate levels. Many experts argue that lactate doesn't provide the information we think it does about sepsis. Rich Carden's excellent blog on lactate delves into this topic, explaining why the common assumption that lactate indicates anaerobic metabolism is incorrect. Insights from leading intensivists like John Mayberg and Simon Finfer prompt a reevaluation of how we interpret lactate levels. In the trial, patients managed using peripheral perfusion monitoring showed better outcomes than those managed by lactate levels. Although the trial is underpowered to show definitive differences, the findings suggest that both methods are likely similar in effectiveness. This study highlights the need to reconsider our approach to monitoring septic shock patients and suggests that capillary refill time could be a valuable, low-cost alternative to lactate measurement. Enhancing Learning with Minimal Effort Next, we turn to an intriguing blog by Nick Smith, who shares a lazy yet effective way to enhance learning. Inspired by Matthew Walker's book "Why We Sleep," Nick discusses the critical role of rest in learning and retention. The key takeaway is simple: if you're not well-rested before and after learning, you won't retain information effectively. Nick emphasizes understanding individual learning rhythms. Some people, like early risers, learn best in the morning, while night owls perform better later in the day. This insight is crucial for medical educators and learners alike. For instance, teenagers naturally have later sleep cycles, making early morning learning sessions less effective. Walker’s book provides compelling evidence on how sleep affects cognitive function and memory consolidation. During sleep, particularly REM sleep, the brain processes and organizes information learned throughout the day. Lack of sleep disrupts this process, leading to poorer retention and understanding. Nick integrates these scientific insights with practical advice, making his blog an invaluable resource for optimizing learning strategies. He offers tips on improving sleep hygiene, such as maintaining a consistent sleep schedule, creating a restful environment, and avoiding stimulants before bedtime. Nick also highlights the impact of disrupted sleep patterns, especially when attending international conferences. Jet lag and lack of sleep can severely hamper your ability to absorb new information. Moreover, alcohol consumption negatively affects learning, which is worth considering during conference social events. Nick's post is packed with practical tips and impressive infographics that make the information easily digestible. It's a must-read for anyone involved in medical education or looking to optimize their learning strategies. Aortic Emergencies: Key Insights from George Willis George Willis, a renowned speaker and former professional American football player, presented on aortic emergencies at the St. Emlyn's Live Conference. His talk is a goldmine of information for emergency medicine practitioners. Aortic emergencies, such as ruptured aortic aneurysms and dissections, are critical conditions that require swift diagnosis and management. George emphasizes using clinical history and tools like ultrasound to diagnose aortic emergencies. For example, ultrasound can identify abdominal aortic aneurysms and dissections via transthoracic echo. He also discusses managing these patients, particularly those with dissections, who present unique challenges due to their unstable blood pressure. One notable case George describes involves managing pericardial effusion and tamponade resulting from aortic dissection. Techniques like pericardiocentesis can be life-saving, buying valuable time for definitive treatment. George's practical tips and real-world examples make his presentation an invaluable resource for anyone dealing with aortic emergencies. Managing aortic emergencies requires a nuanced approach, particularly when dealing with unstable patients. George discusses using medications like labetalol for beta-blockade and alpha-blockade to manage blood pressure in dissection patients. These medications help reduce the strain on the aorta without compromising patient safety. George also covers using imaging techniques, such as CT angiography, to confirm diagnoses and plan interventions. The ability to quickly and accurately diagnose these conditions is crucial for timely surgical intervention, which can significantly improve patient outcomes. Ambulatory Care for PEs: Dan Horner's Expert Insights Dan Horner returns with another insightful blog, this time on the ambulatory management of pulmonary embolisms (PEs). At the Arkham conference in Belfast, Dan discussed the benefits and challenges of treating PEs as outpatients. His post is a comprehensive guide to identifying which patients can be safely managed at home and which require hospital admission. Dan explores various prognostic factors and scoring systems, such as PESI and sPESI, used to predict complications in PE patients. While these scores are better than Gestalt, they are not without limitations. Dan also touches on biomarkers and their role in predicting PE outcomes, though current data is not definitive. Identifying patients who can be safely managed on an outpatient basis is crucial for optimizing resource use and improving patient comfort. Dan discusses the criteria for outpatient management, including the absence of hemodynamic instability, low bleeding risk, and adequate home support. These criteria help ensure that only patients with a low risk of complications are selected for ambulatory care. Treatment options for PEs are evolving, with a shift from traditional anticoagulants like Warfarin to NOACs/DOACs. While these newer agents offer convenience, the evidence base is still developing. Dan also addresses the complexities of managing PEs in special populations, such as pregnant patients, highlighting the need for individualized care and informed discussions with patients. Implementing ambulatory care for PEs requires careful planning and coordination. Dan provides practical advice on setting up ambulatory care pathways, including patient education, follow-up protocols, and the use of telemedicine to monitor patients remotely. He also discusses the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration in managing these patients. Dan's blog is a treasure trove of resources, including guidelines for outpatient management, risk scores, and follow-up strategies. It's an essential read for anyone involved in the care of PE patients, offering the latest evidence and practical advice. Coping with Clinical Tragedies: Liz Crowe's Personal Journey To conclude our April roundup, we have two deeply moving blogs by Liz Crowe, where she shares her experiences of dealing with clinical tragedies. Liz's candid account of a recent tragic event in her professional life resonates with many healthcare professionals who have faced similar situations. Her blogs not only describe the emotional impact of these events but also offer strategies for coping and recovery. Liz's first blog delves into the profound emotional toll that clinical tragedies can take on healthcare providers. She describes the initial shock, feelings of guilt and helplessness, and the long-lasting impact on mental health. These experiences are not uncommon in the medical field, where the stakes are high, and the outcomes can sometimes be devastating. Liz emphasizes the importance of acknowledging and processing these experiences, rather than burying the emotions. She provides practical advice on how to support yourself, your colleagues, and your loved ones during such challenging times. Liz's insights are invaluable for anyone in the healthcare field, offering guidance on how to navigate the emotional aftermath of clinical tragedies. In her second blog, Liz focuses on strategies for coping with and recovering from clinical tragedies. She highlights the importance of seeking professional help when needed, whether through counseling, peer support groups, or other mental health resources. Liz also emphasizes the value of self-care practices, such as exercise, mindfulness, and maintaining a healthy work-life balance. Liz shares her personal journey of recovery, including the support she received from colleagues and the strategies that helped her regain her confidence and resilience. Her story is a powerful reminder that, while clinical tragedies are deeply challenging, it is possible to heal and continue to provide compassionate care to patients. Liz's blogs also underscore the importance of building a supportive community within the healthcare profession. She advocates for open conversations about mental health and the emotional challenges of medical practice, fostering an environment where healthcare providers feel safe to share their experiences and seek help. Liz's blogs are a must-read for anyone who has experienced or is supporting someone through a clinical tragedy. They offer hope and practical strategies for healing and moving forward. Final Thoughts April 2019 has been an incredibly insightful month on the St. Emlyn's blog. From groundbreaking research and practical medical education tips to deeply personal reflections on clinical tragedies, we've covered a wide range of topics. Each post offers valuable insights and practical advice for healthcare professionals. As we continue to face the challenges of a busy emergency department, it's crucial to stay informed and up-to-date with the latest evidence and best practices. Whether you're managing septic shock, improving your learning strategies, diagnosing aortic emergencies, treating PEs, or coping with clinical tragedies, the St. Emlyn's blog has you covered. The diversity of topics covered this month highlights the importance of continuous learning and adaptation in emergency medicine. By staying abreast of the latest research and best practices, we can ensure that we are providing the highest quality care to our patients. Thank you for joining us on this journey through April 2019. We hope you find these posts as enlightening and helpful as we do. Stay tuned for more exciting updates and insights from the St. Emlyn's team. Enjoy your emergency medicine practice, and we'll speak to you again soon.  
undefined
Apr 24, 2019 • 17min

Ep 134 - March 2019 Round Up

Highlights from March 2019: Key Insights and Updates Welcome to the St Emlyn's podcast. I'm Simon Carley and today; I'll be taking you through the highlights from our blog in March 2019. This was a busy month filled with exceptional content, insightful trips, and significant conferences. Let's dive into the details and explore some key topics, starting with adult congenital heart disease, top trauma papers, and the importance of responsible volunteering. Management of Adult Congenital Heart Disease March kicked off with an important post on the management of adult congenital heart disease (ACHD). This topic is particularly close to my heart as the hospital I work at is a level two centre for ACHD in the UK. Services have become centralized, and surgical components are now managed at a few specialized centres, with Liverpool being the hub for my region. Despite this centralization, we still encounter a large population of ACHD patients in our area. These patients often present complex medical histories and unique pathologies that can be challenging to manage in emergency settings. The guidance available typically focuses on chronic and surgical management, but emergency care for these patients requires a different approach. Common Issues in ACHD Patients ACHD patients commonly present with dysrhythmias, which can be particularly challenging to manage. Chest pain is also prevalent, although the incidence of ischemic heart disease isn’t significantly higher in ACHD patients, except for those who have undergone certain procedures like the switch operation. Other common issues include: Cyanotic patients: Those with single ventricle physiology and right-to-left shunts. Endocarditis: A rare but serious complication. Non-cardiac problems: Managing ACHD patients with conditions like appendicitis or pneumonia can be complex due to their unique circulatory dynamics. The bottom line is that these patients often require specialized management strategies. When ACHD patients present with cardiac complications, we consult our local cardiologist or the ACHD centre. However, non-cardiac issues in ACHD patients also warrant discussion with the ACHD centre to ensure comprehensive care. Key Takeaways for Emergency Physicians Emergency physicians should familiarize themselves with the unique aspects of Fontan circulation, which relies on venous return based on venous pressure. Aggressive interventions like CPAP, bagging, and diuretics can be detrimental. Understanding these nuances is crucial for providing optimal care. A Deeper Dive into Fontan Circulation The Fontan procedure, a surgical intervention for single ventricle defects, creates a unique circulatory system that can be difficult to manage in emergency settings. Unlike normal circulation, Fontan physiology depends heavily on passive blood flow from the veins to the lungs. This means that increasing intrathoracic pressure through methods like CPAP or bagging can reduce cardiac output and worsen the patient's condition. Fontan patients are particularly vulnerable to fluid shifts and pressures, making careful management of intravenous fluids and medications essential. Understanding these dynamics can be life-saving in the ED. For example, while diuretics might seem a reasonable choice for a patient with fluid overload, they can lead to dangerously low preload and cardiac output in a Fontan patient. Top Trauma Papers from the Trauma UK Conference Next up, we revisited some of the top trauma papers presented at the Trauma UK conference. These papers covered a range of topics, from the use of bougies in the ED to bag-mask ventilation during hypertensive resuscitation. Here are some key highlights: The PAMPer Trial The PAMPer trial examined the use of prehospital plasma in trauma patients and found significant survival benefits. This trial has important implications for trauma care protocols, emphasizing the potential of early plasma administration to improve outcomes. The trial showed that administering plasma before hospital arrival can reduce mortality rates in severely injured patients. This finding supports the concept of damage control resuscitation, aiming to stabilize patients early and prevent coagulopathy, acidosis, and hypothermia—the lethal triad in trauma. Bougie Use in the ED Another focal point was the utility of bougies in emergency airway management. Evidence suggests that bougies can significantly improve first-pass success rates in difficult intubations, making them a valuable tool in the ED. A study highlighted at the conference demonstrated that the use of a bougie, even in routine intubations, could increase the success rates for first-pass intubations. This is particularly important in prehospital settings and emergency departments where difficult airways are common. Late Presenting Head Injury Patients A paper from Hull explored the management of patients presenting with head injuries more than 24 hours post-injury. The findings indicated that these patients have a significant incidence of important findings on CT scans, suggesting that delayed presentations should not be underestimated. This study challenges the conventional exclusion of late-presenting head injury patients from acute imaging protocols. It suggests that significant injuries can still be present and warrant immediate attention, even if the patient presents days after the initial trauma. The Zero Point Survey The Zero Point Survey, which emphasizes situational awareness, team dynamics, and environmental control before initiating the primary survey, was also highlighted. This approach can significantly enhance resuscitation efforts, ensuring a more organized and effective response. The Zero Point Survey encourages clinicians to prepare mentally and physically before patient contact. By assessing the situation, assembling the right team, and ensuring the environment is conducive to optimal care, clinicians can improve outcomes and reduce errors in high-stress scenarios. Responsible Volunteering Overseas One of the most thought-provoking posts of the month came from Stefan Brisions, discussing the need for responsible volunteering overseas. Volunteering in low and middle-income countries can be incredibly rewarding, but it’s essential to approach it with the right mindset and framework. The Ethics of Volunteering Stefan emphasized the importance of volunteering within a system that has sustainability and benefits for all parties involved. There have been concerns about individuals volunteering for personal gain rather than genuine altruism. It’s crucial to ensure that our efforts are focused on creating lasting, positive impacts. Volunteering should always aim to build local capacity rather than create dependency. This means working with local healthcare providers to enhance their skills and infrastructure, ensuring that the benefits of volunteering continue long after volunteers have left. Volunteering Responsibly If you're considering volunteering abroad, it’s vital to engage with established organizations that have a clear mission and ethical framework. This ensures that your contributions are meaningful and aligned with the needs of the local community. Our discussions with experts like Shweta Gidwani, Hooling Harrison, Jennifer Hulls, and Najee Rahman offer valuable insights into this complex issue. Case Study: Volunteering in South Africa Kat Evans, who works in Mitchell’s Plain in South Africa, shared her experiences at St Emlyn’s Live. Kat discussed the challenges of working in a resource-limited environment, particularly in managing trauma and toxicology cases. Her insights into managing trauma in a high-volume, low-resource setting were eye-opening. Kat also shared fascinating details about the use of high doses of atropine for poisoning cases, highlighting the unique medical practices required in such environments. Kat’s presentation underscored the value of structured volunteer programs that integrate volunteers into local healthcare systems, providing both valuable learning experiences and much-needed support to local healthcare providers. The Future of SMACC: CODA March also marked the end of an era with the final SMACC conference in Sydney. SMACC has been a cornerstone for many in the emergency and critical care communities, offering unparalleled opportunities for learning and networking. However, the spirit of SMACC lives on in its successor, CODA. CODA: A New Beginning CODA aims to build on SMACC's successes while addressing broader health issues such as vaccination, climate change, and healthcare inequality. The goal is to leverage the engaged community SMACC created to drive meaningful change on a global scale. CODA plans to tackle these global health issues by bringing together a diverse group of professionals, including those outside the traditional medical fields. This interdisciplinary approach aims to create innovative solutions to some of the world’s most pressing health challenges. Looking Ahead While we bid farewell to SMACC, we look forward to the new opportunities CODA will bring. Its emphasis on tackling significant health challenges aligns with the evolving needs of the global healthcare community, promising an exciting future. What to Expect from CODA CODA will continue the tradition of high-quality content and dynamic presentations that SMACC was known for. However, it will also incorporate new elements focused on global health advocacy and interdisciplinary collaboration. Expect to see more discussions on how healthcare professionals can contribute to solving broader societal issues. Additional Highlights from March Critical Appraisal Nuggets (CANS) on P-values We also introduced a mini podcast series called Critical Appraisal Nuggets (CANS) focusing on p-values, featuring myself and Rick Body. P-values are a common topic in exams and critical appraisal, and understanding them is crucial for interpreting medical research. This less-than-ten-minute podcast provides a concise overview of p-values, helping clinicians and students alike grasp this important concept. By demystifying p-values, we aim to enhance our audience's critical appraisal skills, enabling better evidence-based practice. Dual Coding in Medical Education Nick Smith, a recent addition to the St Emlyn's team and a brilliant clinical educator, shared insights on dual coding. Dual coding involves using both verbal and visual information to enhance learning and retention. Nick’s post emphasized how our brains struggle to process multiple streams of information simultaneously. Effective teaching and communication require a balance between verbal explanations and visual aids, ensuring that learners can absorb and retain information without being overwhelmed. The Impact of Reboa in Trauma Care Zaf Qasim, a great friend of ours over in the US, examined the impact of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (Reboa) in trauma care. This post, based on a paper published in JAMA Surgery, analyzed Reboa success rates in civilian trauma using a US database. The findings suggested that Reboa was associated with higher mortality rates compared to similar patients who did not receive Reboa. This raises important questions about patient selection and the overall benefits of Reboa in trauma care. Zaf’s post highlighted the need for ongoing research and evidence to determine Reboa's true value. While there are compelling pathophysiological arguments for its use, the clinical outcomes must be scrutinized to ensure it is applied appropriately and effectively. The Role of Evidence-Based Practice At St Emlyn's, we prioritize evidence-based practice in all aspects of emergency medicine. The discussions around Reboa, p-values, and dual coding all reinforce the importance of using high-quality evidence to guide clinical decisions and educational strategies. Final Thoughts March 2019 was a month of incredible learning and growth. From managing complex ACHD patients to discussing the ethics of volunteering and exploring cutting-edge trauma research, we covered a wide range of topics that are crucial for emergency medicine professionals. Stay Connected As we move forward, we encourage you to stay connected with St Emlyn’s for more insights, updates, and discussions. Follow our blog, participate in our events, and join the conversation on social media. Together, we can continue to advance the field of emergency medicine and make a difference in the lives of our patients. Thank you for joining us this month. Enjoy your practice, and we’ll be back with more great content in April. Have fun, stay safe, and keep learning!                            
undefined
Apr 13, 2019 • 13min

Ep 133 - February 2019 Round Up

Exploring the Latest in Emergency Medicine: February 2024 Edition Hello and welcome to the St Emlyn's Podcast! I’m Simon Carly, and today, albeit a little later than planned, I'll be diving into the fascinating February papers and blogs that have graced the St Emlyn's Podcast. If you missed out in February, fear not—you can always revisit the archives on our blog. It’s all there, waiting for you to explore. Let’s take a deep dive into what made February such an exciting month in emergency medicine. A Journey to Jeddah: Bridging Borders in Emergency Medicine In February, I had the distinct honour of travelling to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, to join the Saudi Arabian Society of Emergency Medicine. Jeddah is a city brimming with activity and change. Despite Saudi Arabia being vastly different from the UK, I found common ground with the emergency physicians there. Many of them have trained abroad in Canada, the US, and the UK, making them kindred spirits with shared values and ideas in treating emergency patients. During my visit, I was invited to present the top ten trauma papers, a task I thoroughly enjoy. These papers, detailed on our website, included highlights like the PAMPER trial and airway management papers around cardiac arrest. We also delved into studies beyond trauma, such as the Airways 2 study on superox in critically ill patients and intubation with ED use of bougies, which we advocate at St. Emlyn’s. Additionally, the conservative management of pneumothoraces, a topic we've discussed before, is becoming increasingly recognized as safe, especially for traumatic pneumothoraces visible only on CT scans. PTSD and the Road to Recovery: Insights from Rusty Carroll Our friend and colleague, Rusty Carroll, has shared another compelling post on PTSD. Rusty’s previous blogs detailed his recovery journey from PTSD, stemming from his work in the ambulance service. His latest update brings us into his post-therapy life as he navigates a new, rewarding, and successful path. For anyone experiencing PTSD or knowing someone who is, Rusty's series is invaluable. His journey may differ from yours, but understanding that there is a path to recovery is incredibly encouraging. PTSD is a serious issue that affects many healthcare professionals, and Rusty’s openness about his struggles and recovery provides a beacon of hope for others. His posts cover various aspects of his journey, from the initial recognition of symptoms to the therapeutic interventions that helped him reclaim his life. Rusty emphasizes the importance of seeking help, breaking the stigma associated with mental health issues, and supporting colleagues who may be going through similar experiences. Understanding Trauma Mortality: A Shift in Focus In our journal club, we explored why bleeding trauma patients die. This editorial by Karen Broe and John Holcomb in Critical Care Medicine challenges our preconceptions about trauma mortality. The implementation of pre-hospital systems, emergency management, and damage control surgery has significantly reduced pre-hospital deaths. However, this has shifted mortality to the emergency department's early hours and even later, 24 hours down the line. We are now seeing deaths caused by late systematic immunosuppression, persistent inflammation, and catabolism syndromes. Despite successful initial management, patients are still succumbing later on. This shift indicates that our trauma story is far from complete. More research is needed to understand and address these late-phase deaths, suggesting that critical care phases hold the key to future advancements. This new understanding prompts us to reconsider our approaches in trauma care. While we have made significant strides in reducing early mortality, the challenge now lies in managing these complex late-phase issues. This involves multidisciplinary collaboration, innovative research, and a commitment to continuous improvement in trauma care protocols. Reevaluating PE in Syncope: A Fresh Perspective Natalie May published a follow-up paper related to the PESIT study, which had previously suggested a high incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) as a cause of syncope. This controversial study, conducted in Italy, sparked debates across various platforms, including EM Nerd, EMCrit, Emlyns Note, and Rebel EM. However, new research from the North American Syncope Consortium reveals a much lower prevalence of PE among emergency department patients with syncope. This is a significant finding, as it challenges the alarming figures from the PESIT study. It allows us to return to our previous practices of using well-established tools like Wells' scoring and PERC scoring without the heightened fear of PE being the primary cause of syncope. Natalie’s analysis provides a balanced perspective, highlighting the importance of context in interpreting study results. The discrepancy between the PESIT study and the North American Syncope Consortium's findings underscores the need for ongoing research and validation of clinical guidelines. As emergency physicians, staying informed about such developments ensures that we provide the best care based on the latest evidence. Philosophy of Emergency Medicine: Workplace Relationships Matter Stefan Brzezins contributes a thought-provoking post on the importance of workplace relationships. Stefan, a colleague who has worked in South Africa and now the UK, highlights how our interactions with colleagues significantly impact our behaviour, happiness, and departmental efficiency. Dysfunctional departments often correlate with poor personal relationships among consultants and senior nurses, ultimately affecting patient care. Stefan's advice includes not taking unnecessary offence, showing gratitude, celebrating the good news, and fostering teamwork. While these may seem obvious, their implementation can transform workplace dynamics. Reflecting on Stefan's insights has prompted me to reevaluate my practices and strive for better interpersonal relationships at work. Good workplace relationships are foundational to creating a supportive and effective healthcare environment. When colleagues communicate openly, show appreciation for each other’s efforts, and work collaboratively, they experience higher job satisfaction, reduced stress, and, ultimately, better patient outcomes. Stefan’s post serves as a reminder that the human element of healthcare is just as important as the clinical skills we bring to our practice. Ventilation During RSI: Revisiting Established Practices Another significant post examines whether we should continue ventilation during rapid sequence intubation (RSI). Traditional teaching discouraged ventilation during the apnea period due to safety concerns. However, for critically ill patients with low oxygen saturation, not ventilating can lead to severe hypoxia. A randomized control trial in the ED assessed the safety of ventilation during this period. The study found that patients who were ventilated during the apnea period had less oxygen desaturation without significant adverse effects. While the study's sample size is small, it supports our evolving practices and aligns with our experiences. However, it is crucial to critically assess the study's methodology and incorporate this knowledge cautiously into clinical practice. This trial’s findings challenge the long-standing dogma of no ventilation during RSI, pushing us to rethink and potentially update our protocols. As emergency medicine evolves, we must remain flexible and willing to adapt our practices based on emerging evidence. Ensuring that our approaches are both safe and effective is paramount to improving patient outcomes. The Role of Scribes in the ED: Efficiency and Quality Improvement Chris Gray's post on the use of scribes in the ED follows a previous discussion on this topic. Scribes can save time and improve documentation quality, which is vital in a high-pressure environment. A randomized control trial demonstrated that scribes do save time, though the effect size was modest. The potential for better documentation quality is equally important, making scribes a valuable addition to emergency departments. We are keen to hear from anyone using scribes in the UK, as this practice is more common in the US. The use of scribes can enhance the efficiency of emergency departments by allowing physicians to focus more on patient care rather than administrative tasks. Improved documentation can also lead to better patient tracking, follow-up, and overall care quality. As our healthcare systems become increasingly strained, innovations like scribes offer practical solutions to maintain high standards of care. Reflecting on February: A Busy Month in Emergency Medicine February was packed with insights and developments in emergency medicine. From international collaborations and trauma management advancements to revisiting PTSD recovery stories and philosophical reflections on workplace relationships, the month offered a wealth of knowledge. As we move into March, we look forward to sharing more exciting updates, including coverage of the SMACC conference. The diversity of topics covered in February highlights the multifaceted nature of emergency medicine. Each paper and blog post contributes to a broader understanding of how we can improve patient care, support our colleagues, and adapt to new challenges. This continuous learning process is what makes emergency medicine such a dynamic and rewarding field. Supporting the St Emlyn's Podcast: Your Contribution Matters Since 2012, we've funded the blog and podcast out of our own pockets. As our audience grows, so do our expenses. If you find our content valuable and wish to support us, please consider making a small donation or subscribing regularly. Your contributions help us keep St Emlyn's a free, open-access medical education resource for all. By supporting the St Emlyn's Podcast, you enable us to continue delivering high-quality, evidence-based content to the emergency medicine community. Your donations help cover the costs of hosting, producing, and distributing our materials, ensuring that we can reach a global audience of healthcare professionals. Conclusion The February edition of the St Emlyn's Podcast provided a rich tapestry of insights and developments in emergency medicine. From my journey to Jeddah and the fascinating trauma studies to the personal stories of PTSD recovery and the philosophical reflections on workplace relationships, there was something for everyone. Our exploration of new research, such as the reevaluation of PE in syncope and the safety of ventilation during RSI, underscores the importance of staying informed and adaptable in our practice. Meanwhile, discussions on the role of scribes and the significance of workplace dynamics highlight the multifaceted challenges we face in emergency medicine. As we look forward to March and beyond, we remain committed to bringing you the latest in emergency medicine and fostering a community of continuous learning and improvement. Thank you for joining us on this journey, and we appreciate your support in keeping St Emlyn's a vital resource for all. Stay tuned for more insights, updates, and discussions. Until then, keep pushing the boundaries of emergency medicine, supporting your colleagues, and striving for excellence in patient care. Have a great time, and we’ll be back with you shortly.   Exploring the Latest in Emergency Medicine: February 2024 Edition Hello and welcome to the St Emlyn's Podcast! I’m Simon Carly, and today, albeit a little later than planned, I'll be diving into the fascinating February papers and blogs that have graced the St Emlyn's Podcast. If you missed out in February, fear not—you can always revisit the archives on our blog. It’s all there, waiting for you to explore. Let’s take a deep dive into what made February such an exciting month in emergency medicine. A Journey to Jeddah: Bridging Borders in Emergency Medicine In February, I had the distinct honour of travelling to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, to join the Saudi Arabian Society of Emergency Medicine. Jeddah is a city brimming with activity and change. Despite Saudi Arabia being vastly different from the UK, I found common ground with the emergency physicians there. Many of them have trained abroad in Canada, the US, and the UK, making them kindred spirits with shared values and ideas in treating emergency patients. During my visit, I was invited to present the top ten trauma papers, a task I thoroughly enjoy. These papers, detailed on our website, included highlights like the PAMPER trial and airway management papers around cardiac arrest. We also delved into studies beyond trauma, such as the Airways 2 study on superox in critically ill patients and intubation with ED use of bougies, which we advocate at St. Emlyn’s. Additionally, the conservative management of pneumothoraces, a topic we've discussed before, is becoming increasingly recognized as safe, especially for traumatic pneumothoraces visible only on CT scans. PTSD and the Road to Recovery: Insights from Rusty Carroll Our friend and colleague, Rusty Carroll, has shared another compelling post on PTSD. Rusty’s previous blogs detailed his recovery journey from PTSD, stemming from his work in the ambulance service. His latest update brings us into his post-therapy life as he navigates a new, rewarding, and successful path. For anyone experiencing PTSD or knowing someone who is, Rusty's series is invaluable. His journey may differ from yours, but understanding that there is a path to recovery is incredibly encouraging. PTSD is a serious issue that affects many healthcare professionals, and Rusty’s openness about his struggles and recovery provides a beacon of hope for others. His posts cover various aspects of his journey, from the initial recognition of symptoms to the therapeutic interventions that helped him reclaim his life. Rusty emphasizes the importance of seeking help, breaking the stigma associated with mental health issues, and supporting colleagues who may be going through similar experiences. Understanding Trauma Mortality: A Shift in Focus In our journal club, we explored why bleeding trauma patients die. This editorial by Karen Broe and John Holcomb in Critical Care Medicine challenges our preconceptions about trauma mortality. The implementation of pre-hospital systems, emergency management, and damage control surgery has significantly reduced pre-hospital deaths. However, this has shifted mortality to the emergency department's early hours and even later, 24 hours down the line. We are now seeing deaths caused by late systematic immunosuppression, persistent inflammation, and catabolism syndromes. Despite successful initial management, patients are still succumbing later on. This shift indicates that our trauma story is far from complete. More research is needed to understand and address these late-phase deaths, suggesting that critical care phases hold the key to future advancements. This new understanding prompts us to reconsider our approaches in trauma care. While we have made significant strides in reducing early mortality, the challenge now lies in managing these complex late-phase issues. This involves multidisciplinary collaboration, innovative research, and a commitment to continuous improvement in trauma care protocols. Reevaluating PE in Syncope: A Fresh Perspective Natalie May published a follow-up paper related to the PESIT study, which had previously suggested a high incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) as a cause of syncope. This controversial study, conducted in Italy, sparked debates across various platforms, including EM Nerd, EMCrit, Emlyns Note, and Rebel EM. However, new research from the North American Syncope Consortium reveals a much lower prevalence of PE among emergency department patients with syncope. This is a significant finding, as it challenges the alarming figures from the PESIT study. It allows us to return to our previous practices of using well-established tools like Wells' scoring and PERC scoring without the heightened fear of PE being the primary cause of syncope. Natalie’s analysis provides a balanced perspective, highlighting the importance of context in interpreting study results. The discrepancy between the PESIT study and the North American Syncope Consortium's findings underscores the need for ongoing research and validation of clinical guidelines. As emergency physicians, staying informed about such developments ensures that we provide the best care based on the latest evidence. Philosophy of Emergency Medicine: Workplace Relationships Matter Stefan Brzezins contributes a thought-provoking post on the importance of workplace relationships. Stefan, a colleague who has worked in South Africa and now the UK, highlights how our interactions with colleagues significantly impact our behaviour, happiness, and departmental efficiency. Dysfunctional departments often correlate with poor personal relationships among consultants and senior nurses, ultimately affecting patient care. Stefan's advice includes not taking unnecessary offence, showing gratitude, celebrating the good news, and fostering teamwork. While these may seem obvious, their implementation can transform workplace dynamics. Reflecting on Stefan's insights has prompted me to reevaluate my practices and strive for better interpersonal relationships at work. Good workplace relationships are foundational to creating a supportive and effective healthcare environment. When colleagues communicate openly, show appreciation for each other’s efforts, and work collaboratively, it leads to higher job satisfaction, reduced stress, and ultimately better patient outcomes. Stefan’s post serves as a reminder that the human element of healthcare is just as important as the clinical skills we bring to our practice. Ventilation During RSI: Revisiting Established Practices Another significant post examines whether we should continue ventilation during rapid sequence intubation (RSI). Traditional teaching discouraged ventilation during the apnea period due to safety concerns. However, for critically ill patients with low oxygen saturation, not ventilating can lead to severe hypoxia. A randomized control trial in the ED assessed the safety of ventilation during this period. The study found that patients who were ventilated during the apnea period had less oxygen desaturation without significant adverse effects. While the study's sample size is small, it supports our evolving practices and aligns with our experiences. However, it is crucial to critically assess the study's methodology and incorporate this knowledge cautiously into clinical practice. This trial’s findings challenge the long-standing dogma of no ventilation during RSI, pushing us to rethink and potentially update our protocols. As emergency medicine evolves, we must remain flexible and willing to adapt our practices based on emerging evidence. Ensuring that our approaches are both safe and effective is paramount to improving patient outcomes. The Role of Scribes in the ED: Efficiency and Quality Improvement Chris Gray's post on the use of scribes in the ED follows a previous discussion on this topic. Scribes can save time and improve documentation quality, which is vital in a high-pressure environment. A randomized control trial demonstrated that scribes do save time, though the effect size was modest. The potential for better documentation quality is equally important, making scribes a valuable addition to emergency departments. We are keen to hear from anyone using scribes in the UK, as this practice is more common in the US. The use of scribes can enhance the efficiency of emergency departments by allowing physicians to focus more on patient care rather than administrative tasks. Improved documentation can also lead to better patient tracking, follow-up, and overall care quality. As our healthcare systems become increasingly strained, innovations like scribes offer practical solutions to maintain high standards of care. Reflecting on February: A Busy Month in Emergency Medicine February was packed with insights and developments in emergency medicine. From international collaborations and trauma management advancements to revisiting PTSD recovery stories and philosophical reflections on workplace relationships, the month offered a wealth of knowledge. As we move into March, we look forward to sharing more exciting updates, including coverage of the SMACC conference. The diversity of topics covered in February highlights the multifaceted nature of emergency medicine. Each paper and blog post contributes to a broader understanding of how we can improve patient care, support our colleagues, and adapt to new challenges. This continuous learning process is what makes emergency medicine such a dynamic and rewarding field. Supporting the St Emlyn's Podcast: Your Contribution Matters Since 2012, we've funded the blog and podcast out of our own pockets. As our audience grows, so do our expenses. If you find our content valuable and wish to support us, please consider making a small donation or subscribing regularly. Your contributions help us keep St Emlyn's a free, open-access medical education resource for all. By supporting the St Emlyn's Podcast, you enable us to continue delivering high-quality, evidence-based content to the emergency medicine community. Your donations help cover the costs of hosting, producing, and distributing our materials, ensuring that we can reach a global audience of healthcare professionals. Conclusion The February edition of the St Emlyn's Podcast provided a rich tapestry of insights and developments in emergency medicine. From my journey to Jeddah and the fascinating trauma studies to the personal stories of PTSD recovery and the philosophical reflections on workplace relationships, there was something for everyone. Our exploration of new research, such as the reevaluation of PE in syncope and the safety of ventilation during RSI, underscores the importance of staying informed and adaptable in our practice. Meanwhile, discussions on the role of scribes and the significance of workplace dynamics highlight the multifaceted challenges we face in emergency medicine. As we look forward to March and beyond, we remain committed to bringing you the latest in emergency medicine and fostering a community of continuous learning and improvement. Thank you for joining us on this journey, and we appreciate your support in keeping St Emlyn's a vital resource for all. Stay tuned for more insights, updates, and discussions. Until then, keep pushing the boundaries of emergency medicine, supporting your colleagues, and striving for excellence in patient care. Have a great time, and we’ll be back with you shortly.
undefined
Apr 10, 2019 • 24min

Ep 132 - Aortic Emergencies with George Wills at #stemlynsLIVE

Back in late 2018 we gathered in Manchester for the inaugural #stemlynsLIVE conference. Our friend Dr George Wills gave a great talk on Aortic Emergencies. All emergency physicians know that it's all to easy to miss an aortic catastrophe. Listen to George's wisdom on common pitfalls and top tips to make you a better emergency clinician. vb S Also check out these excellent #FOAMed resources. Subscribe to the blog (look top right for the link) Subscribe to our PODCAST on iTunes Follow us on twitter @stemlyns PLEASE Like us on Facebook Find out more about the St.Emlyn’s team
undefined
Mar 15, 2019 • 29min

Ep 131 - South African Emergency Medicine with Kat Evans at #stemlynsLIVE

Last year we were honoured to bring Kat Evans to Manchester to talk at the #stemlynsLIVE conference. We've covered emergency medicine in South Africa before on the blog, but there is no substitute to hearing about it from someone who actually works there.
undefined
Feb 23, 2019 • 10min

Ep 130 - Critical Appraisal Nuggets: p-values

Understanding P Values: A Comprehensive Guide for Clinicians Welcome to St Emlyn's blog, where we delve into the complex world of P values—a crucial element in medical research. For emergency medicine clinicians, understanding P values is essential for interpreting study results and applying them effectively in clinical practice. This post aims to demystify P values and enhance your critical appraisal skills. What Are P Values? P values are a measure of the probability that an observed difference could have occurred just by chance if the null hypothesis were true. The null hypothesis generally states that there is no difference between two treatments or interventions. Thus, a P value helps us determine whether the observed data is consistent with this hypothesis. The Null Hypothesis and Significance Testing To grasp P values fully, we start with the null hypothesis. In any trial, we begin with the premise that there is no difference between the treatments being tested. Our goal is to test this null hypothesis and ideally disprove it, a process known as significance testing. When we calculate a P value, we express the probability of obtaining a result as extreme as the one observed, assuming the null hypothesis is true. For instance, a P value of 0.05 suggests a 5% chance that the observed difference is due to random variation alone. The Magic of 0.05 The threshold of 0.05 has become a benchmark in research. A P value below this threshold is often considered statistically significant, while one above is not. However, this binary approach oversimplifies statistical analysis. The figure 0.05 is arbitrary and does not imply that results just above or below this threshold are vastly different in terms of practical significance. Clinical vs. Statistical Significance Distinguishing between statistical significance and clinical significance is crucial. A statistically significant result with a very small P value may not always translate into clinical importance. For example, a large study might find that a new treatment reduces blood pressure by 0.5 millimetres of mercury with a P value of 0.001. While statistically significant, such a small reduction may not be clinically relevant. Conversely, a clinically significant finding might not reach the strict threshold of statistical significance, particularly in smaller studies. Therefore, it's essential to consider both the magnitude of the effect and its practical implications in clinical practice. The Fragility Index The fragility index is an alternative measure that addresses some limitations of P values. It calculates the number of events that would need to change to alter the study's results from statistically significant to non-significant. This index provides insight into the robustness of the findings. Surprisingly, even large trials can have a low fragility index, indicating that their results hinge on a small number of events. Moving Beyond 0.05 Recognizing the limitations of the 0.05 threshold, some researchers advocate for more stringent criteria, such as a P value of 0.02, particularly in large randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This approach aims to reduce the likelihood of false-positive results and improve the reliability of findings. However, it also raises the bar for demonstrating the efficacy of new treatments, which can be a double-edged sword. Multiple Testing and Bonferroni Adjustment A significant challenge in research is multiple testing. Conducting numerous statistical tests increases the probability of finding at least one significant result purely by chance. This issue is particularly relevant in exploratory studies where multiple outcomes are assessed. One method to address this problem is the Bonferroni adjustment, which adjusts the significance threshold based on the number of tests performed. While this approach helps control the risk of false positives, it can be overly conservative and reduce the power to detect true effects. Therefore, it should be used judiciously. Interim Analysis in Clinical Trials Interim analysis is a crucial aspect of clinical trials, allowing researchers to assess the effectiveness or harm of an intervention before the study's completion. However, performing multiple interim analyses can increase the risk of false-positive findings. To mitigate this risk, researchers use techniques like P value spending functions, which adjust the significance threshold for each interim analysis. Additionally, the number of interim analyses should be limited and pre-specified in the study protocol. This ensures that decisions to stop a trial early are based on robust evidence and not on arbitrary or opportunistic analyses. Effect Size and Confidence Intervals P values alone do not provide a complete picture of the study results. It's equally important to consider the effect size, which measures the magnitude of the difference between treatments. A small P value might indicate statistical significance, but without a substantial effect size, the clinical relevance of the finding remains questionable. Confidence intervals (CIs) complement P values by providing a range within which the true effect size is likely to lie. A 95% CI means that if the study were repeated multiple times, 95% of the calculated intervals would contain the true effect size. CIs offer valuable context for interpreting P values and understanding the precision of the estimated effect. Practical Tips for Interpreting P Values Understand the Null Hypothesis: Always start with a clear understanding of the null hypothesis and what the study aims to test. Look Beyond the P Value: Consider the effect size, confidence intervals, and clinical significance of the findings. Be Cautious with Multiple Testing: Recognize the increased risk of false positives with multiple comparisons and apply appropriate adjustments. Assess the Fragility Index: Use the fragility index to gauge the robustness of the study's findings. Consider Interim Analysis: Ensure that interim analyses are pre-planned and interpreted with caution to avoid bias. Question the Threshold: Remember that the 0.05 threshold is not a magic number. Interpret P values in the context of the study design, sample size, and practical implications. Conclusion P values are a fundamental aspect of medical research, but their interpretation requires a nuanced understanding. By considering the null hypothesis, clinical significance, effect size, and confidence intervals, we can make more informed decisions based on the data. As emergency medicine clinicians, our goal is to apply research findings judiciously to improve patient care. We hope this deep dive into P values has clarified their role and limitations in research. Remember, the journey to mastering statistical concepts is ongoing, and continuous learning is key. If you have any questions or thoughts, please share them in the comments below. Happy appraising, and stay curious!
undefined
Feb 17, 2019 • 21min

Ep 129 - January 2019 Round Up

St. Emlyn's January Roundup: Key Insights and Innovations Hello and welcome to the St. Emlyn’s Podcast. I’m Simon Carley, joined by Rick Body. Today, we’re bringing you our January roundup, sharing the most intriguing and impactful content we've covered this month. From reflecting on 2018 to exploring new guidelines and innovations in emergency medicine, we have a lot to discuss. Let’s dive in! Reflecting on 2018: Transformational Reads and Achievements As we started January, we reflected on 2018, a year filled with significant achievements and insights. One standout discussion was our review of key books that left a lasting impact. A personal favorite of mine is "Why We Sleep" by Matthew Walker. This book has been transformational for me, influencing how I live and advise others on health, well-being, and performance. The insights on sleep’s importance in education, creativity, and overall health are profound. Rick, did anything from our 2018 review resonate with you? Rick Body: Absolutely, Simon. The variety of books we discussed was impressive. It was enlightening to hear about others' achievements in 2018 and their goals for 2019. This exercise really focused my mind on what I hope to achieve this year. Goals for 2019: Innovations and Personal Aspirations As we moved from reflections to aspirations, we set our sights on exciting projects for 2019. One major highlight is the AI incubator for emergency care. This initiative aims to support academic careers and foster partnerships between data and industry to enhance medical technologies. It’s an exhilarating time for advancements in emergency care. Rick is incredibly busy with groundbreaking work, particularly in diagnostics in Manchester. His research and speaking engagements are making waves in the medical community. For more details on these projects, check out the blog where all the information is comprehensively covered. New Year’s Resolutions: Insights from Liz Crowe We explored New Year’s resolutions with Liz Crowe, who offered a fresh perspective on well-being and resolutions. Instead of focusing on all-or-nothing goals, Liz suggests starting small and seeking rewards rather than punishments. This approach makes significant lifestyle changes more manageable and sustainable. Committing to resolutions publicly or with a friend can enhance accountability and success. Rick, do you have any New Year’s resolutions? Rick Body: It’s challenging to pinpoint one or two, but Liz’s advice on avoiding binary thinking is crucial. Recognizing progress rather than dwelling on setbacks can make a big difference. Tetanus Guidelines: New Insights and Practical Applications In January, we delved into updated tetanus guidelines, highlighting significant changes. Previously, a single booster in your early 20s was deemed sufficient, but the new guidelines recommend a 10-year booster. This change stems from the recognition that immunity wanes over time. Interestingly, point-of-care testing is now available to detect active tetanus immunization, allowing for more tailored booster decisions. These updates are crucial for emergency physicians to ensure compliance with current standards and provide optimal patient care. The blog post simplifies these guidelines, making them accessible and easy to understand. Excellence in Emergency Medicine: Claire Richmond’s Contributions We featured Claire Richmond, a hero in the emergency medicine community. Claire, who works with Sydney HEMS, delivered an inspiring keynote at the St. Emlyn’s live conference. Her talk focused on excellence, performance, training, and development in retrieval medicine. She emphasized the importance of honesty, feedback, and continuous improvement. For those aspiring to achieve self-actualization in emergency medicine, Claire’s insights are invaluable. We’ve shared the video and podcast of her talk, and we highly recommend checking them out. Prognosticating Cardiac Arrest Outcomes: Dan Horner’s Research Another highlight of January was Professor Dan Horner’s discussion on serum neurofilament light chains, a promising tool for prognosticating cardiac arrest outcomes. This research, stemming from the TTM trial, suggests that these biomarkers can provide early predictions about patient outcomes. Early identification of patients likely to have poor neurological outcomes can significantly impact family discussions, treatment decisions, and overall management. This research is groundbreaking and holds potential for future clinical applications, although it’s not yet ready for immediate practice. Celebrating Evidence-Based Medicine: Critical Appraisal E-Book We’re incredibly proud of our journal club series at St. Emlyn’s, which advocates for evidence-based medicine. This series highlights the latest research, making it accessible and understandable. To celebrate the contributions over the past year, we’ve compiled an e-book available for free download. This resource is a testament to our commitment to advancing medical knowledge and practice. Pre-Medication for Ketamine Sedation: Exploring New Research One of the intriguing studies we covered this month examined pre-medication with midazolam or haloperidol for ketamine sedation. The randomized control trial suggested that pre-medication could reduce complications like abnormal behaviors and emergence phenomena. However, it also increased recovery time, requiring more resources and nursing time. While the findings are interesting, they haven’t convinced us to change our current practice. However, it’s essential to stay informed about such research to make informed decisions in clinical practice. HEMS and Traumatic Cardiac Arrest: Evaluating Outcomes We also discussed the role of HEMS in improving outcomes for traumatic cardiac arrest. The study from the UK highlighted the high-level interventions provided by HEMS teams. However, it raised questions about the overall impact on patient survival. Of the 263 patients attended, only seven survived, and all had achieved ROSC before HEMS arrival. This data suggests that while HEMS interventions are critical, their direct impact on survival needs further evaluation. This topic is sure to spark debate, and we appreciate the transparency of HEMS services in sharing their data and encouraging open discussions. Looking Ahead: Plans for the Future As we wrap up January, we’re excited about the plans for the coming months. Simon is heading to Jeddah for a significant event, and we’re considering hosting another St. Emlyn’s live conference and teaching course. We’re exploring innovative formats for medical conferences and welcome your ideas on how we can make these events even more impactful. Support St. Emlyn’s: Keeping Education Free and Accessible Since 2012, we’ve funded the blog and podcast out of our own pockets, but as our audience has grown, so have the costs. If you find our content valuable, please consider making a small donation or subscribing for regular contributions. Your support helps us keep St. Emlyn’s free and accessible to all. Thank you for your time and continued support. Stay tuned for more updates, and as always, enjoy your emergency medicine practice and take care!
undefined
Jan 30, 2019 • 11min

Ep 128 - Can we use diagnostic probability to guide treatment thresholds in ACS with Charlie Reynard and Rick Body

In this episode of the St. Emlyn's podcast, Rick Body and Charlie Reynard discuss an influential research project conducted by Dr. Reynard during his academic foundation program. The paper, titled 'Optimizing Antiplatelet Utilization in the Acute Care Setting,' explores decision-making under clinical uncertainty, specifically in emergency medicine for suspected acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Through systematic reviews and decision tree modeling, the research evaluates the benefits and risks of various antiplatelet therapies, such as Ticagrelor and aspirin versus Clopidogrel and aspirin. The findings reveal that Ticagrelor and aspirin are often more beneficial for patients with a greater than 8% probability of ACS, while Clopidogrel holds little to no place in current practice. The discussion opened up new questions about dynamic risk prediction and the importance of modeling to inform clinical decisions. 00:00 Introduction to the Podcast 00:26 Charlie's Research Background 00:52 Overview of the Research Paper 01:17 Decision Making Under Uncertainty 03:05 Systematic Reviews and Data Collection 03:46 Building the Decision Tree Model 04:48 Results and Key Findings 08:07 Implications for Clinical Practice 09:19 Future Directions and Conclusion
undefined
Jan 11, 2019 • 26min

Ep 127 - The Journey that Matters with Clare Richmond at #stemlynsLIVE

This podcast and presentation was recorded at the St Emlyn's LIVE conference in Manchester 2018. In this presentation Clare takes us through the rationale, principles, training and practice that we need in order to continually develop as prehospital and resuscitation practitioners. You can read more from the event at http://www.stemlynsblog.org  This is a great presentation for anyone interested in continually developing their own and their colleagues practice, delivered by someone who really knows what they are talking about and who works for one of the best developed resuscitation services in the world. Clare is an Emergency Physician and specialist in Pre-Hospital Care and Retrieval medicine based in Sydney, with Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and Sydney HEMS. She has completed a fellowship in simulation based education, and enjoys training with “real” people - patients, bystanders and the other clinicians we come across as we treat our patients every day. She is a lecturer with the University of Sydney, and is involved in education for the NSW Institute for Trauma Injury Management. When Clare is not working on helicopters or training teams, she is studying yoga or hanging out with her puppy, Archie. 
undefined
Dec 31, 2018 • 18min

Ep 126 - December 2018 Round Up

A Deep Dive into December: The Best of St. Emlyn’s Blog and Beyond Welcome to the St. Emlyn’s Podcast! I’m Simon Carley, and today we’re going to journey through December 2018. This month has been filled with intriguing discussions, significant insights, and top-notch blogs from a variety of experts. As we wrap up the year and get ready to welcome 2019, it’s the perfect time to reflect on the key topics that have shaped our discussions around Christmas and the New Year. Tribalism in Healthcare with Ross Fischer First up, we have an insightful contribution from Ross Fischer, a key member of the St. Emlyn’s team and a Pediatric Surgeon based in Sheffield. Ross has delved into the topic of tribalism in healthcare, a subject we've explored previously but which remains ever relevant. Tribalism refers to the formation of groups or 'tribes' based on common beliefs and cultures, which significantly influences our behaviour and treatment approaches in healthcare. Ross's blog revisits a remarkable presentation by Vic Brazil at SMACC Gold in 2014, highlighting how tribalism drives our interactions and behaviours within the medical field. In healthcare, tribes often form around specialities – emergency physicians, surgeons, anaesthetists, etc. While having a strong group identity can be positive, it can also lead to unhealthy competition and misunderstandings. For example, emergency physicians might unfairly label surgeons as uncooperative, which is not only untrue but also counterproductive. Ross's extensive experience across various medical cultures has given him a unique perspective on this issue. His blog emphasizes the importance of recognizing and mitigating tribalism to foster better cooperation and ultimately improve patient care. Some strategies he suggests include using personal names during referrals, face-to-face communication, being supportive rather than critical when things go wrong, organizing social events across specialities, and calling out tribalism in casual conversations. Conservative Management of Chest Trauma Next, I’ve put together a blog on the conservative management of chest trauma, inspired by several presentations I've done this year on torso trauma. The increasing body of evidence suggests that not all chest injuries, such as hemothoraces and small pneumothoraces, require invasive intervention. Reflecting on my early days in emergency medicine, we operated under the strict guideline that any pneumothorax or hemothorax warranted a chest drain. However, advances in imaging technology, like whole-body CT scans, have revealed that many small pneumothoraces and hemothoraces were previously undetected and thus untreated without significant complications. Recent studies, including a substantial observational study by Walker, support the safety of conservative management for many of these cases. This shift in practice aligns with our experiences here in Virchester, where we often opt to observe rather than immediately intervene with chest drains, even in ventilated patients. The evidence is still evolving, but it’s encouraging to see data supporting less invasive approaches. Intensive Care Insights with Dan Horner Dan Horner, Professor of Emergency Medicine at Virchester West, has shared three exceptional posts from our time at the Intensive Care Society conference in London. The interface between emergency medicine and ICU is a critical area, and Dan’s insights are invaluable for anyone interested in this field. One standout topic from the conference was Tom Evans' presentation on exercise physiology. Though I missed it, the demonstration with Olympic rowers on stage, showcasing their lactate levels, was reportedly phenomenal. This type of hands-on demonstration highlights the extraordinary resilience and adaptability of human physiology, insights that are crucial for both emergency and intensive care practitioners. In addition to exercise physiology, Dan and I covered the continuum of patient care from the roadside to critical care, emphasizing the importance of effective handovers and collaborative work with paramedics. Our discussions included the zero point survey, ATMIST handovers, and the significance of follow-ups to ensure paramedics receive feedback on their patients' outcomes, all crucial elements for improving patient care and professional practice. FemInEM Conference Highlights with Natalie May Natalie May wrapped up our review of the FemInEM conference, emphasizing the multifaceted nature of medicine. The themes of passion, role models, organization, consistency, persistence, mentorship, and leadership were central to the conference discussions. FIX19, the upcoming FemInEM event, promises to continue this tradition of exploring how medical professionals can impact not just clinical outcomes but also their own lives, colleagues, and the broader community. HIV Management in Emergency Medicine Gareth Roberts, a recent addition to our consultant team in Manchester, provided a comprehensive review of HIV management from an emergency physician’s perspective. His blog focuses on post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), critical areas for emergency physicians to master. With the ongoing changes in HIV treatment and prevention, understanding the nuances of PEP and PrEP is vital. Gareth also touches on the rise of chemsex and its implications for emergency medicine, emphasizing the need for awareness and appropriate management strategies for patients involved in these practices. Trauma Laparotomy: A Decade of Data Rich Cardens explored the intriguing findings from his PhD research on trauma laparotomy. Despite significant advancements in trauma care over the past decade, the mortality rate for trauma laparotomy has remained unchanged. This surprising discovery prompts a deeper investigation into the factors influencing these outcomes. Rich's research compares data from the JTTR military registry and the Royal London Hospital, highlighting the need for a comprehensive trauma emergency laparotomy audit. Understanding why mortality rates haven't improved could lead to better strategies and practices in trauma care. Game of Thrones Mortality Study For a lighter, yet still educational note, Janos Byan Beethar found an entertaining yet insightful study in the Injury Prevention Journal. This study analyzed the mortality of characters in Game of Thrones, a bit of fun that doubles as a critical appraisal exercise. With over half of the 330 characters meeting untimely deaths through injury, burns, or poisoning, the study offers a unique way to engage with epidemiological concepts and cause-effect associations. Interestingly, the study also suggests that characters who change allegiances have a higher survival rate – perhaps a subtle hint at the importance of adaptability in both fictional and real-world scenarios. Looking Ahead to 2019 As we close out December, it’s clear that 2018 has been a year of growth, learning, and exciting developments here at St. Emlyn’s. From addressing tribalism in healthcare to exploring conservative management strategies for chest trauma, and from the latest insights in intensive care to the evolving field of HIV management, our blogs have covered a wide range of critical topics. We look forward to continuing this journey in 2019, bringing you the latest research, discussions, and insights in emergency medicine. Whether through our blogs, podcasts, or live events, we aim to foster a community of continuous learning and professional growth. Stay connected with us on Twitter, Facebook, the blog, and the podcast. We’re here to support you in your practice and to ensure you stay at the forefront of emergency medicine. Here’s to another great year with St. Emlyn’s!

The AI-powered Podcast Player

Save insights by tapping your headphones, chat with episodes, discover the best highlights - and more!
App store bannerPlay store banner
Get the app