The Cold-Case Christianity Podcast

Dive into a lively exploration of the teleological argument, where design in nature meets complex biological systems. Discover how even skeptics, like Richard Dawkins, recognize the illusion of design. Unpack the nuances of irreducible complexity and the controversial notion of 'poor design.' Engage with the use of analogies to bridge evolutionary theory and theological concepts. Lastly, delve into the debate of guided mutations versus random processes, challenging listeners to rethink the origins of biological ingenuity.

Delve into the fascinating evidence of design in biological organisms and how even prominent atheists acknowledge its appearance. Examine the teleological argument for God, contrasting intelligent design with Darwinian evolution. Discover the concept of irreducible complexity highlighted by intricate systems like the bacterial flagellum. Explore how complexity and order in nature point to an intelligent creator, revealing the connections between biological systems and community dynamics. This intriguing discussion bridges faith, reason, and the beauty of creation.

Young people are increasingly distancing themselves from church, a troubling trend highlighted by concerning statistics. The discussion introduces the TRAIN model to help students tackle diverse worldviews in academic settings. There's a call for rigorous theological training paired with academic pursuits to strengthen their faith. Engaging youth in real-world conversations and transforming traditional teaching into active training are key strategies. Ultimately, equipping young minds to confront opposing beliefs is crucial for creating resilient future generations.

In this podcast, J. Warner follows up on the previous podcast and examines objections to the axiological argument for the existence of God. Can naturalists account for transcendent moral truths without grounding them in a transcendent source? Are these alternative explanations reasonable?

Dive into the intriguing exploration of whether objective moral truths exist. The discussion challenges moral relativism by linking universal moral outrage to a transcendent moral law giver. Personal anecdotes highlight issues like child marriage to demonstrate absolute morals. The importance of patience in faith conversations is emphasized, contrasting subjective morality with historical contexts. Plus, listeners are invited to submit their questions about morality, as the hosts prepare to tackle objections to the objectivity of moral truths.

Dive into the intricacies of the Trinity, a central yet complex Christian doctrine. The discussion reveals how God embodies unity while existing as three distinct persons. Explore its roots in Jewish tradition and how Jesus's worship fits into monotheism. The conversation highlights the all-loving nature shared by the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, emphasizing the importance of this belief in understanding divine love. Listeners will gain insights into the theological implications and the necessity of defending this foundational tenet.

J. Warner examines the orthodox definition of Salvation and the important work of the cross. Jim also answers listener email related to the nature of the soul.

Navigating faith online can be challenging, but practical guidelines can help. Authentic engagement is key, focusing on wisdom and character during discussions. The podcast highlights the importance of simplifying complex ideas for clearer communication. It also discusses how people can maintain their faith while wrestling with doubts. Adapting conversations to suit your audience is crucial, and creativity in sharing beliefs can enhance the impact of your message.

J. Warner examines the Gospel of Mark for signs of Peter’s influence. Papias, the early church bishop, claimed Mark’s Gospel was written as he sat at the feet of Peter in Rome. According to Papias, Mark scribed Peter’s sermons and created the narrative we now have in our Bible. In this audio podcast, J. Warner applies Forensic Statement Analysis to Mark’s text to see if Peter’s fingerprints are present.

In this episode of the Cold-Case Christianity Broadcast, J. Warner examines alleged “contradictions” in the eyewitness New Testament accounts. Do variations between witness accounts automatically discredit their reliability? J. Warner provides two examples from the Gospel Resurrection accounts to illustrate the manner in which eyewitness accounts are typically reconciled.