Compliance Perspectives

Garth Jordan, the newly appointed CEO of SCCE & HCCA, brings a rich background in association management. He shares his excitement for building trustworthy organizations and the opportunities for growth in membership and global presence. Garth emphasizes his unique perspective on product development and strategy, aiming to leverage his operational experience to enhance the association's offerings. He also discusses his plans to rapidly immerse himself in the compliance sector by cultivating an empathy-focused understanding, rather than just technical expertise.

Barbara-Ann Boehler, Senior Director of the Program on Corporate Compliance and Ethics at Fordham University, shares her passion for experiential learning in compliance training. She highlights the surprising connection between baking cupcakes and effective training, illustrating how hands-on activities can make lessons more memorable. Barbara-Ann discusses engaging simulations, including a cybersecurity exercise and a fun frosting test, emphasizing the importance of communication in policy drafting. Her interactive approach prompts lasting discussions and deeper understanding.

Kim Jablonski, Chief Compliance & Ethics Officer at Bristol Myers Squibb, sheds light on the complexities of compliance leadership in rapidly changing times. She emphasizes the importance of a data-driven approach and the need for leaders to communicate integrity as a core value. Kim advocates for collaboration across teams, highlighting that understanding the business landscape is vital. Notably, she reminds us that we all have 'obstructed view seats,' urging leaders to recognize diverse perspectives when navigating compliance challenges.

Join Colin May, a Professor of Forensic Studies and Criminal Justice at Stevenson University, as he delves into the alarming rise of fraud in non-emergency medical transportation. He discusses various schemes like billing for unprovided services and overcharging for tolls. Colin stresses the importance of training frontline employees to spot irregularities and highlights the potential of technology in pre-trip screenings to enhance oversight. Tune in to discover how providers can safeguard their services and patients against these fraudulent practices.

By Adam Turteltaub Things are a bit out of balance when it comes to Business Associates (BAs) in healthcare.  Organizations invest a great deal of time and resources in vetting these third parties to make sure that they will safely handle data from the covered entity.  But, when the relationship ends, those same organizations may overlook the risks to their data post-separation. The problem is complex because different BAs will fall under different regulations and use data differently.  Some may process but not retain data.  Others may have terabytes of your data to return or destroy immediately.  For others, there may be a law or regulation requiring them to hold onto that data for several years. The compliance team, explains Marti Arvin (LinkedIn), Vice President, Chief Compliance and privacy Officer at Erlanger Health System, needs to ensure it is part of the process whenever a BA relationship is coming to an end.    At that point, it’s time to reach out to the BA to ensure there is a plan in place for how data will be handled, and to begin documenting the process.  This helps in case there is an incident later. Listen in to learn more about what you can and should be doing to ensure that the close-out process is as healthy as it should be.

Ahmed Salim, a consultant and adjunct professor, is passionate about transforming change management in compliance. He breaks down eight essential steps that ensure successful change, from crafting a compelling vision to engaging leadership and maintaining effective communication. Salim emphasizes the importance of continuous monitoring and adaptation for long-term sustainability. Personal anecdotes illuminate the critical role of stakeholder engagement in building a strong compliance culture, making his insights invaluable for those in the compliance community.

By Adam Turteltaub As with so many other areas, communication, or a lack of it, can be a big problem when it comes to eDiscovery.  Legal doesn’t always adequately communicate what it needs.  The business unit doesn’t share information about all the technologies its teams are using to communicate, and compliance may be giving the wrong message as a result. The cure, as Joey Seeber, CEO of Level Legal lays out in this podcast, is making sure that everyone is aware of the issues, the technology and what proper practices look like. That means understanding what platforms are being used for collaboration, and deletion schedules need to be understood and consistent, wherever possible. To understand more about navigating around these problems, and how to find a vendor that will help your efforts, listen in to discover more about eDiscovery.

By Adam Turteltaub On July 10, 2025 the European Commission posted The General-Purpose AI Code of Practice.  Unlike the EU AI Act, this new Code of Practice is not compulsory, at least not yet. Still, it seems prudent to start understanding what it says and what expectations are being laid, as well as what the definition of general-purpose AI (GPAI) is.  To that end, we spoke with  London-based Jonathan Armstrong, Partner at Punter Southall. Jonathan explains that GPAI systems perform generally applicable functions such as image and speech recognition, audio and video generation, pattern recognition, question answering and translation.  It is similar to generative AI but is not the same. He then shares that the Code of Practice contains three sections:  transparency, copyright, and safety and security. Transparency is a hugely important issues for AI.  Organizations need to keep their technical documents related to their AI use current and address topics such as how the AI was designed, the technical means by which it performs functions and energy consumption. Copyright is a significant source of litigation at present.  Authors and other content creators see the use of their work by AI engines as a violation.  AI developers see the use of those works as furthering a greater good.  The Code of Practice sets out measures designed to help navigate these difficult waters. Safety & Security guidance is targeted predominantly at the most impactful GPAI operations.  The Code calls for extra efforts to examine cybersecurity and the impact of the technology.  This chapter of the document also includes 10 commitments for organizations to make. Listen in to the podcast and then spend some time reviewing The General-Purpose AI Code of Practice.   It’s worth seeing where regulations, and perhaps your AI efforts, are going.

By Adam Turteltaub Managing whistleblowers is always a hot topic, and you’ll find it on the agenda at the 2025 SCCE Annual Compliance & Ethics Institute.   To provide a preview of what you will see if you join us in Nashville, we sat down with the speakers for the session “Someone Blew The Whistle: Perspectives from Former Whistleblowers, In-House Compliance, and External Investigators”. The speakers in Nashville, and guests of this podcast, are: Jordan Segall, Senior Counsel, Ethics & Compliance, Xylem John Pease, Partner, Morgan Lewis Andrew Bakaj, Chief Legal Counsel, Whistleblower Aid. In our conversation they share the work Xylem has done to encourage internal whistleblowing.  The compliance team’s efforts include not just having a policy but ensuring that it is clearly accessible as well as explaining confidentiality, anonymity, and even investigative standards and processes. The company offers their employees multiple avenues to speak up, including HR, internal audit, the hotline, compliance, and even the audit committee of the board. These efforts are important, the speakers explain, because when whistleblowers go outside and bring a matter to the qui tame bar, typically it’s because they felt that their concerns weren’t taken seriously. To help keep employees from going outside, they offer several recommendations.  First, show employees that their concerns are appreciated and will be looked into.  Second, explain the investigative process.  Third, to the extent possible, provide regular updates.  Fourth, clearly communicate what the next steps are. Listen in to learn more, and then be sure to join their session at the  Compliance & Ethics Institute in Nashville.

By Adam Turteltaub There’s a lot new going on in healthcare enforcement, and, at the same, there’s a lot that hasn’t changed, reports Greg Demske (LinkedIn), partner at Goodwin Proctor and, formerly, Chief Counsel to the Inspector General at HHS. While the US Department of Justice has changed its priorities in areas such as anticorruption, if you look at what they and the Office of Inspector General (OIG) at Health and Human Services have been doing, he observes, the long-time bipartisan effort to stop fraud in healthcare is continuing. Yet, there are some significant changes.  At CMS a major shift has occurred when it comes to Medicare Advantage.  In the past there were audits of fifty plans a year, but now the goal is to audit all six hundred or so annually.  Backing that up is an expansion in the number of coders from 40 to 2000.  This has huge implications both for the plans and providers. Meantime the Department of Justice and HHS have created a False Claims Act Working group to further their efforts. Then, of course, there are qui tam claims, which hit a record high in 2024, and we have dispositions in the courts as well. So what should compliance teams do?  He recommends keeping a close eye on what the government is saying to ensure your program is staying ahead of the curve. And, of course, you should listen to this podcast to gain more of his insights from private practice and over 16 years at HHS.