The Next Reel Film Podcast

“This was not intended to be a book-of-the-month club lunch.”A British Heist Film That Set Early Genre StandardsIn 1958, John Boland published his novel The League of Gentlemen, which quickly caught the attention of British filmmakers. Director Basil Dearden, known for his work with Ealing Studios, saw potential in this story of ex-military men planning an elaborate bank robbery. Working with screenwriter Bryan Forbes, who also took a role in the film, Dearden assembled an impressive cast including Jack Hawkins, Richard Attenborough, and Nigel Patrick. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we return to our Heist Films series with a conversation about Dearden’s 1960 film The League of Gentlemen.Breaking Down This Military-Precision HeistThe film follows a group of former military officers who, feeling cast aside by society (and kicked out of the military), band together to execute a sophisticated bank robbery. As we discuss the film, we explore how it handles character development within its large ensemble cast. While some characters receive more attention than others, the film mostly effectively balances its numerous players. Furthermore, we examine how the film's visual elements, particularly the smoke-filled heist sequence with gas masks, create memorable and striking imagery in black and white.Exploring Themes and Cultural ContextThroughout our discussion, we delve into several fascinating aspects of the film:The military hierarchy that naturally reasserts itself among the charactersThe film's commentary on post-war soldiers struggling to find their place in societyThe blend of comedy and crime elements that would influence future heist filmsThe impressive performances, particularly from Jack Hawkins and Richard AttenboroughThe film's innovative use of practical effects, especially during the climactic heist sequenceThe cultural attitudes and gender relations reflected in the filmA Must-Watch Early Heist FilmThe League of Gentlemen stands as an important early entry in the heist film genre, arriving the same year as the original Ocean's 11. While some character development opportunities may have been missed due to the large cast, the film succeeds in delivering both entertainment and social commentary. We both thoroughly enjoyed this British crime caper, particularly appreciating its technical achievements and ensemble performances. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesWatch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerOriginal MaterialLetterboxdSupport The Next Reel Family of Film Podcasts:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next Reel Film PodcastSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Letterboxd Pro/Patron discount | Audible

“When I asked for your advice, I didn't mean that you should actually speak.”Rebooting the Jack Ryan FranchiseAfter the success of Patriot Games and Clear and Present Danger, Paramount Pictures aimed to continue the Jack Ryan franchise with an adaptation of The Sum of All Fears. Initially, Harrison Ford was set to reprise his role as Jack Ryan, but he and director Phillip Noyce dropped out due to script issues. Paramount then decided to reboot the franchise with a younger actor, offering the role to Ben Affleck, who received blessings from Ford and Alec Baldwin. With director Phil Alden Robinson on board, the stage was set for a new era of Jack Ryan. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the Jack Ryan series with a conversation about Noyce’s 2002 film The Sum of All Fears.A Bold Adaptation Filled with Fascinating Political IntrigueIn this episode, we delve into the daring choices made in adapting Clancy's novel, particularly how the film allows Jack Ryan, the embodiment of institutional intelligence, to fail. The movie's second half, focusing on the aftermath of a devastating bomb blast in Baltimore, surprised us with its engaging portrayal of escalating tensions between the U.S. and Russian presidents. We appreciate how the film questions the intelligence and diplomacy machine by highlighting Ryan's struggle to convey crucial information to decision-makers.(Mostly) Great Performances and Controversial VillainsThroughout our discussion, we praise the performances of James Cromwell as President Fowler, Morgan Freeman as CIA Director William Cabot, and Liev Schreiber as John Clark. However, we do struggle a bit with Affleck playing Ryan. We also express disappointment in the film's decision to replace the Islamic terrorists from the novel with neo-Nazis, feeling that it weakens the story's impact and makes the villains less compelling.Other points:The challenges of adapting Clancy's novel and the script issues that led to the rebootBen Affleck's performance as a younger Jack RyanThe film's depiction of the U.S. and Russian presidents' responses to the crisisAlan Bates and Colm Feore's roles as tepid neo-Nazi villains and their impact on the storyA Thought-Provoking Entry in the Jack Ryan SeriesWhile The Sum of All Fears may not be the most celebrated entry in the Jack Ryan series, it offers a thought-provoking exploration of political intrigue and the consequences of intelligence failures. Despite some weaknesses in its adaptation choices and the lead casting choice, the film's second half delivers a gripping narrative that keeps viewers engaged. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesWatch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerOriginal Material and on AudibleLetterboxdSupport The Next Reel Family of Film Podcasts:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next Reel Film PodcastSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Letterboxd Pro/Patron discount | Audible

“The course of action I’d suggest is a course of action I can’t suggest.”The Road to Clear and Present DangerAfter the success of Patriot Games, Paramount Pictures was eager to continue the Jack Ryan series with another adaptation of a Tom Clancy novel. With Harrison Ford set to return as the intrepid CIA analyst and Phillip Noyce back in the director's chair, the stage was set for Clear and Present Danger. The film, released in 1994, brought a new level of complexity to the series, delving into the murky world of covert operations and political machinations. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the Jack Ryan series with a conversation about Clear and Present Danger.Navigating the Murky Waters of Clear and Present DangerIn our discussion, we dive into the intricacies of Clear and Present Danger, exploring how the film captures the complexities of the political landscape and the moral ambiguity of covert operations. We examine Harrison Ford's portrayal of Jack Ryan, noting how he brings a different energy to the character compared to his performance in Patriot Games. The film's ability to balance the high-stakes political drama in Washington with the intense action sequences in Colombia is a point of interest, as we analyze how these two seemingly disparate storylines ultimately converge.Uncovering the Layers of CorruptionClear and Present Danger takes us on a journey through the labyrinthine world of government corruption, where personal agendas and political maneuvering take precedence over the greater good. We discuss:The performances of Henry Czerny and Harris Yulin as the villainous Ritter and CutterWillem Dafoe's role as John Clark and the film's portrayal of covert military operationsThe emotional impact of James Earl Jones' character, Admiral Greer, and his relationship with Jack RyanA Thrilling Addition to the Jack Ryan SeriesWhile Clear and Present Danger may not be perfect, it remains a compelling entry in the Jack Ryan series. The film's ability to tackle complex themes and its unflinching look at the darker aspects of government operations make it a thought-provoking and engaging watch. Harrison Ford's performance as Jack Ryan, coupled with the strong supporting cast, elevates the material and keeps the audience invested in the story.Clear and Present Danger stands as a testament to the enduring appeal of Tom Clancy's novels and the Jack Ryan character. Its exploration of political corruption, moral ambiguity, and the consequences of unchecked power remains as relevant today as it was upon the film's release. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesWatch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerOriginal Material or on AudibleLetterboxdSupport The Next Reel Family of Film Podcasts:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next Reel Film PodcastSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Letterboxd Pro/Patron discount | Audible

“You walk into a bar, half of whose customers want you dead. You walk up to the IRA's bagman, and in front of his guys, you threaten him? You're not a field man, Jack. You never were. You are an analyst. Analyze that.”The Second Chapter in Jack Ryan's JourneyAfter the success of The Hunt for Red October, Paramount Pictures faced challenges bringing the next Jack Ryan story to the screen. The situation with Alec Baldwin's departure proved contentious, with Baldwin claiming Paramount "cut his throat" by negotiating with another actor (presumably Ford) while still in talks with him. The studio allegedly used Baldwin's Broadway commitment to A Streetcar Named Desire and script approval demands as leverage to make the switch. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the Jack Ryan series with a conversation about Phillip Noyce’s 1992 film Patriot Games.Playing Both Sides of the GameThe transition from Baldwin to Ford fundamentally changes the character's dynamics, shifting from a younger analyst to a more seasoned veteran. We explore how this affected the film's tone and action sequences, particularly discussing whether some of the more intense scenes feel appropriate for Ryan's character. The film presents an intriguing mirror story between Ryan and Sean Miller - both men driven by family, albeit in opposing directions. While Ryan fights to protect his family, Miller seeks revenge for his brother's death, creating parallel narratives that drive the story's conflict.Elements That Drive the Action• The controversial casting change and its implications for the franchise• The mirrored narratives of family protection versus family revenge• Sean Bean's memorable performance as vengeful terrorist Sean Miller• The innovative satellite attack sequence that showcases '90s military technology• Debate over the film's balance between analysis and action• The political dynamics of presenting IRA terrorism to American audiences• Discussion of whether the finale's boat chase sequence serves the story effectivelyPatriot Games successfully continues the Jack Ryan franchise while charting its own course, though some creative choices push the character in new directions that don't always align with his analytical roots. The film proves entertaining even as it diverges from the more cerebral approach of its predecessor. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesWatch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerOriginal Material and on AudibleLetterboxdSupport The Next Reel Family of Film Podcasts:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next Reel Film PodcastSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Letterboxd Pro/Patron discount | Audible

“You’re in a house of desperate women here, and a long, long way from home.”Roger Corman's Exploitation Cinema: The Story Behind Caged HeatIn the early 1970s, Roger Corman was producing a slew of women-in-prison films, capitalizing on the exploitation genre that had been popular then. When wannabe director Jonathan Demme approached Corman with the idea for Caged Heat, Corman initially declined, believing the subgenre had run its course. Undeterred, Demme raised the funds independently and eventually secured Corman as the distributor. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue our member bonusRoger Corman series with a conversation about Demme’s 1974 film Caged Heat.Exploring the Depths of Women's Incarceration in Caged HeatIn our discussion, we delve into the themes and statements Demme makes about institutional oppression, mental health, and unethical medical practices within the prison system. We also examine how the film attaches power to sexuality, potentially empowering the female characters in a way that was uncommon for the era. Additionally, we touch on the interesting casting choices, particularly Barbara Steele as the prison warden and Warren Miller as the sociopathic doctor, and how these decisions subvert audience expectations.Caged Heat: A Closer Look at the Characters and Filmmaking TechniquesThroughout the episode, we discuss:The relationships between the various inmates and how Demme allows time for character developmentTak Fujimoto's cinematography and the effective use of tracking shotsThe film's balance between comedy and serious momentsThe shocking and powerful sequence involving shock therapyWhile Caged Heat may not be a perfect film, it offers an intriguing look at the women-in-prison subgenre through the lens of Jonathan Demme's early directorial work. The movie's exploration of serious themes, combined with its exploitation elements, makes for an engaging and thought-provoking viewing experience. Although we have some reservations about the film and the subgenre as a whole, we appreciate the conversations it sparks. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesWatch this on Amazon or find other places at JustWatchTheatrical trailerLetterboxdThis is a member bonus episode. We'd love it if you became a member to support our show, but you’d love it because of everything you get. We have monthly member bonus episodes that only members can access. You also get other monthly member bonus episodes, access to members-only Discord channels, and early releases for every episode. Plus, no ads! And you get to vote on the movies we discuss in our members only episodes! What can we say? It pays to be a member. Learn more about supporting The Next Reel Film Podcast through your own membership — visit TruStory FM.

The podcast explores the fascinating journey of adapting Tom Clancy's iconic novel into a film. It discusses the complex character of Jack Ryan, portrayed by Alec Baldwin, highlighting his portrayal as a reluctant hero. The episode dives into John McTiernan's direction, emphasizing character development over action. Discussion on the innovative accent techniques and casting choices adds depth. The hosts reflect on the film’s legacy, its impact on games, and the changing landscape of film production budgets, creating an engaging analysis of cinematic history.

“The heavens have never seen such an ignominious Patsak as you, Violinist. It grieves me deeply.”A Satirical Take on Soviet SocietyKin-Dza-Dza!, a 1986 Soviet science fiction comedy film directed by Georgiy Daneliya, was initially met with skepticism by Soviet authorities due to its satirical nature. However, Daneliya persevered and managed to get the film made, despite the challenges of filming in the hot Turkmenistan desert and dealing with bureaucratic red tape that delayed production. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we wrap up this return to our Soviet Sci-Fi series with a conversation about Daneliya’s 1986 film Kin-Dza-Dza!.Diving into the Absurdist World of Kin-Dza-Dza!We explore the film's absurdist humor and how it effectively satirizes various aspects of Soviet society, such as the rigid caste system, the limitations on free speech, and the devolution of language. We discuss how the film's low-budget, dystopian aesthetic contributes to its commentary on consumerism and environmentalism, drawing comparisons to other works like Idiocracy and the films of Terry Gilliam and Jean-Pierre Jeunet.The Strengths of Soviet Science FictionThroughout our discussion, we highlight how Kin-Dza-Dza! exemplifies the strengths of Soviet science fiction in its ability to critique contemporary society through a futuristic lens. We also touch on:The performances of the actors and their commitment to the absurdist toneThe film's clever use of practical effects and production designThe recurring jokes and their cultural significance, such as the "match math"Kin-Dza-Dza! stands as a unique and entertaining entry in the Soviet science fiction canon, successfully blending biting social commentary with absurdist humor. Its ability to critique Soviet society while still being an engaging and entertaining film is a testament to Daneliya's skill as a filmmaker and the power of science fiction to reflect on contemporary issues. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesBuy the Blu-ray from Deaf Crocodile, See where they’re streaming it, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerLetterboxdSupport The Next Reel Family of Film Podcasts:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next Reel Film PodcastSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Letterboxd Pro/Patron discount | Audible

“I don’t want to live among the fishes anymore. I’ll die of loneliness.”A Soviet Sci-Fi Fairy Tale of Love and ScienceIn the 1960s, during the Khrushchev Thaw, Soviet filmmakers were given more creative freedom to explore stories beyond the typical Stalinist propaganda. This period saw a surge in sci-fi films, including the 1961 classic Amphibian Man, directed by Vladimir Chebotaryov and Gennadiy Kazanskiy. Based on the novel by Alexander Beliaev, the film tells the story of a man with surgically implanted shark gills who falls in love with a young woman, despite the disapproval of her capitalist suitor. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we kick off a short return to our Soviet Sci-Fi series with a conversation about the 1961 film Amphibian Man.Diving Deep into the Story's Themes and MotifsIn our discussion, we explore how Amphibian Man weaves together elements of science fiction, romance, and social commentary. The film's protagonist, Ichtyandr, embodies the Soviet ideal of scientific progress, while his love interest, Gutiere, represents the allure of a world beyond his underwater utopia. We also examine the film's villain, Don Pedro, as a classic capitalist exploiter, showcasing the Soviet critique of Western values.Throughout our conversation, we delve into the fairy tale aspects of the story, the believability of the romance, and the tragic ending that subverts expectations. We also discuss the technical achievements of the underwater cinematography and the film's influence on modern directors like Guillermo del Toro.Other Topics Covered in the EpisodeThe film's original title, "Tarzan of the Sea," and its copyright issuesThe dream sequence and its role in the narrativeThe ambiguity surrounding Ichtyandr's abilities and the dolphin sceneAccusations of plagiarism against Guillermo del Toro's The Shape of WaterThe changing perceptions of ocean exploitation in Soviet cinemaA Timeless Tale of Love and ProgressAmphibian Man may not be a perfect film, but it remains a fascinating example of Soviet sci-fi cinema during a period of creative liberation. Its blend of science, romance, and social commentary creates a timeless fairy tale that continues to captivate audiences decades later. Despite some plot inconsistencies and missed opportunities, the film's core themes and visual splendor make it a worthwhile entry in the genre. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesWatch this on Amazon or find other places at JustWatchTheatrical trailerOriginal MaterialLetterboxdSupport The Next Reel Family of Film Podcasts:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next Reel Film PodcastSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Letterboxd Pro/Patron discount | Audible

“I’ve got a weird sense of humor, man.”Pushing Boundaries in Found Footage HorrorMark Duplass, known for his contributions to the mumblecore movement, teamed up with newcomer Patrick Brice to create a low-budget indie horror film that would challenge conventions and explore the unsettling nature of human interactions. With Duplass's experience in crafting authentic, character-driven stories and Brice's fresh perspective, they set out to push the boundaries of the found footage genre. Armed with a minimal crew, a largely improvised script, and a shared vision, they embarked on a journey that would result in the creation of Creep. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we return to our Found Footage series with a conversation about Brice’s 2014 film Creep.Authenticity, Eccentricity, and MalevolenceIn our discussion of Creep, we explore how the film navigates the spectrum between authenticity, eccentricity, and malevolence. We examine Mark Duplass' portrayal of Joseph, a character who initially comes across as genuine and relatable but gradually reveals a darker, more unsettling side. The found footage aesthetic enhances the sense of unease, blurring the lines between reality and fiction. Additionally, we delve into the movie's ability to subvert audience expectations and keep viewers on edge throughout.Other Points of DiscussionThe effective use of a minimalist cast and settingThe possible and somewhat weak attempt at creating a twistThe chemistry between Mark Duplass and Patrick BriceThe film's exploration of the darker aspects of human natureThe pacing issues in the latter half of the movieCreeping into the Horror GenreCreep showcases the potential of low-budget, independent filmmaking to create a memorable and unsettling horror experience. Mark Duplass' expertise in crafting authentic characters, combined with Patrick Brice's fresh perspective, results in a film that pushes the boundaries of the found footage genre. Despite some pacing issues, Creep's exploration of the darker aspects of human nature and its ability to keep the audience guessing make it a worthwhile addition to the horror genre. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesWatch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchScript OptionsTheatrical trailerLetterboxdSupport The Next Reel Family of Film Podcasts:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Podcasts:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next Reel Film PodcastSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Letterboxd Pro/Patron discount | Audible

“It’s called ‘Murdered Man’.”Roger Corman's Comical Foray into Beatnik HorrorIn the late 1950s, American International Pictures approached Roger Corman to create a low-budget horror film in just five days, using sets from another project. Corman, along with screenwriter Charles B. Griffith, decided to take a satirical approach, crafting a black comedy that poked fun at the beatnik culture of the era. The result was A Bucket of Blood, a quirky and entertaining film that showcases Corman's ability to deliver a memorable movie on a shoestring budget. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the member bonus Roger Corman series with a conversation about A Bucket of Blood.Sculpting a Masterpiece of Macabre HumorIn our discussion of A Bucket of Blood, we delve into the film's clever satirical elements and its comical take on the horror genre. We explore how the movie lampoons both the beatnik scene and the pretentiousness of the art world, with Corman and Griffith drawing from their own experiences and observations. The film's lead actor, Dick Miller, delivers a standout performance as the lovable yet misguided busboy-turned-artist Walter Paisley, whose quest for fame and acceptance takes a dark and murderous turn.Corman's Signature Style and Social CommentaryThroughout our conversation, we touch upon various aspects of the film that showcase Roger Corman's signature style and his ability to infuse social commentary into his low-budget productions. We examine how A Bucket of Blood addresses themes of social mobility, the search for identity, and the folly of pursuing success at any cost. Additionally, we discuss how the film fits into the broader context of 1950s cinema, drawing comparisons to other notable works of the era, such as Rebel Without a Cause and film noir.Other points covered in our discussion include:The film's effective use of a limited set and budgetThe portrayal of the beat generation and youth cultureThe transformation of Walter Paisley from protagonist to antagonistThe satirical representation of the art world and its patronsA Timeless Tale of Ambition and MoralityA Bucket of Blood may be a product of its time, but its themes and humor remain relatable and entertaining decades later. Corman's ability to craft a compelling and thought-provoking story within the constraints of a tight budget and schedule is a testament to his skill as a filmmaker. While the film's low-budget origins are evident, its clever writing, memorable performances, and biting satire more than compensate for any technical limitations. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Film SundriesWatch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatchTheatrical trailerLetterboxdThis is a member bonus episode. We'd love it if you became a member to support our show, but you’d love it because of everything you get. We have monthly member bonus episodes that only members can access. You also get other monthly member bonus episodes, access to members-only Discord channels, and early releases for every episode. Plus, no ads! And you get to vote on the movies we discuss in our members only episodes! What can we say? It pays to be a member. Learn more about supporting The Next Reel Film Podcast through your own membership — visit TruStory FM.