IEA Podcast

In this Institute of Economic Affairs podcast, IEA Director of Communications Callum Price interviews Andrew Barclay, entrepreneur and founder of Land of Opportunity, a campaign group exploring economic lessons from America. The conversation examines why the US economy has dramatically outpaced the EU since 2008, with America's GDP skyrocketing ahead while Europe stagnated. Barclay discusses his team's research trip to America to understand what drives their economic success and how Britain can learn from their pro-enterprise culture and policies. The discussion reveals how America's bipartisan celebration of the "American Dream" creates a culture where aspiration and wealth creation are rewarded across political lines. Barclay explains how the US tax system is structured to favour long-term wealth creation, with features like tax deferrals for property developers who reinvest profits and capital gains incentives for start-up investments. He contrasts this with Britain's complex tax code filled with cliff edges and disincentives, such as the VAT threshold that actually encourages businesses to stay small, and argues that America instinctively views regulation as increasing costs on business rather than helping it. Looking at solutions for Britain, Barclay advocates for reducing the size of government and welfare spending while returning money to entrepreneurs and wealth creators through tax reform. He emphasises that Britain still has the talent and innovation - describing the American Dream as "a British seed planted in American soil" - but has lost its way through decades of politics that penalised enterprise. The conversation concludes with his call for a bipartisan "British Dream" that celebrates aspiration and entrepreneurship, arguing that with the right cultural shift and policy changes, Britain can reclaim its position as a true land of opportunity. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe

In this Institute of Economic Affairs podcast, Head of Media Reem Ibrahim interviews John Penrose, recovering government minister, Chair of the Conservative Policy Forum and Director of the Centre for Small State Conservatives. The conversation examines Britain's economic decline through decades of missed opportunities, comparing the UK's sluggish growth to the United States where compounding effects have created a widening wealth gap. They explore structural problems across childcare, housing, rail, energy and healthcare that have remained unfixed for decades, with Penrose arguing that supply-side reforms similar to Thatcher's approach are essential to revive Britain's economic engine.Penrose advocates for fundamental welfare system reforms to eliminate benefit traps that discourage work, proposing that benefit withdrawal rates should never exceed the top rate of income tax. The discussion covers pension reform, moving from the current pay-as-you-go system to fully funded personal pots, and addresses the NHS as a bureaucratic system that spends significant taxpayer money without delivering outcomes comparable to other developed nations. They examine how regulatory burdens in childcare create expensive, rigid provision that doesn't match what working families actually need, arguing for deregulation to allow market-based solutions.The interview concludes with analysis of immigration policy challenges, including outdated refugee conventions written for a different era, and the political difficulties of implementing genuine small-state reforms. Penrose explains his Centre for Small State Conservatives' mission to develop policies that create "bigger citizens who need smaller government" through upstream prevention rather than expensive downstream intervention. The conversation addresses why the Conservative Party must return to its supply-side reform roots to tackle Britain's fundamental structural problems that neither increased spending nor current political approaches have resolved. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe

In this Institute of Economic Affairs podcast, IEA Head of Media and Linda Whetstone Scholar Reem Ibrahim interviews Executive Director Tom Clougherty and Editorial Director Kristian Niemietz. The conversation covers the deteriorating UK economy, examining zero growth in July, persistent inflation at 3.8%, and the highest August borrowing figures in five years. They discuss the Office for Budget Responsibility's expected downgrade of productivity forecasts, which could create an additional £36 billion fiscal black hole, and analyse why public sector productivity assumptions of four times historical growth rates appear unrealistic.The discussion explores Trump's recent visit to the UK and the nuclear energy agreements that emerged, particularly around mutual recognition of regulatory standards for US companies building nuclear power stations in Britain. They examine why UK nuclear costs are six times higher than South Korea's and advocate for regulatory free-riding and standardisation to reduce expenses. The conversation also covers the UK's declining energy production per capita since 2008 and questions how the country can achieve innovation and growth while using less energy.The podcast concludes with analysis of recent political protests in Britain, including the Unite the Kingdom march and anti-Trump demonstrations, examining what these movements reveal about the direction of British politics. They compare the UK's economic challenges with France's more severe fiscal problems, noting France's unique position as the only country where over-65s have higher average incomes than working-age people. The discussion highlights concerns about prioritising cultural issues over economic growth and questions whether either emerging political movement will support classical liberal free-market reforms. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe

In this Institute of Economic Affairs briefing, managing editor Daniel Freeman interviews Stephen Dnes, a competition lawyer with 15 years of experience and lecturer at Royal Holloway, University of London, about his new IEA report, titled “Class Act,” examining the rise of class action litigation in the UK. The discussion covers the dramatic growth of opt-out class actions since their introduction in 2015, with current claims totaling between £95-135 billion and potentially affecting every adult in Britain as claimants in multiple cases. Dnes explains how these cases work, from hardcore cartels like alleged salmon price-fixing to more contentious claims involving data usage by tech companies.The conversation reveals significant problems with the current system, including cases taking up to nine years to complete, mixed quality claims, and conflicts of interest between third-party litigation funders, lawyers, and consumers. Dnes highlights the dramatic Merricks versus Mastercard case, which after nine years resulted in a settlement where funders initially attempted to claim £179 million of a £200 million settlement, leaving just 48 pence for each of the 44 million claimants. He explains how the current funding structure creates perverse incentives that can delay settlements and prioritize funder returns over consumer compensation.Dnes proposes market-based reforms to address these issues, particularly requiring funders to pay out a portion of claims upfront to demonstrate their confidence in cases and ensure money actually reaches consumers. Drawing on examples from Germany's emerging system, he argues this would weed out weak claims, speed up proceedings, and align incentives between all parties. The discussion concludes with Dnes expressing cautious optimism about potential government reforms, noting that legal changes are inevitable due to recent court decisions, though the scope of broader reforms remains uncertain.Read “Class Act” here. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe

In this Institute of Economic Affairs podcast, IEA Executive Director Tom Clougherty interviews Professor Simon Johnson, 2024 Nobel Prize winner in Economics from MIT. The conversation explores Johnson's groundbreaking research on extractive versus inclusive institutions and how colonial mortality rates shaped economic development patterns that persist today. Johnson explains how European settlers' different experiences with disease in various colonies led to fundamentally different institutional structures - from the inclusive property rights systems established in North America to the extractive frameworks left behind in West Africa and the Caribbean.The discussion examines how these institutional differences became supercharged during the Industrial Revolution, enabling countries with inclusive institutions to industrialise rapidly while others lagged behind. Johnson draws on his family's Sheffield manufacturing background to illustrate how rule of law and property rights protection enabled Britain's industrial middle class to flourish. They also address why bad institutions persist despite our understanding of their harmful effects, with Johnson arguing that powerful elites often benefit from extractive systems and resist changes that would broaden economic opportunity.The interview concludes with Johnson's concerns about institutional degradation in modern America, the risks of AI oligopoly creating new forms of central planning, and Europe's economic stagnation. Johnson advocates for entrepreneurship, competition, and decentralised innovation while warning against both technological monism and fiscal irresponsibility. He calls for a return to fiscal conservatism and emphasises the importance of inclusive institutions that empower entrepreneurs and support shared prosperity rather than concentrated wealth extraction. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe

Join IEA Managing Editor Daniel Freeman in conversation with Ian Williams, author of "Vampire State: The Rise and Fall of the Chinese Economy," for an analysis of China's mounting economic challenges. Williams, a veteran journalist with 20 years of experience covering China as a foreign correspondent for Channel 4 News and NBC, delivers a chilling account of how the world's second-largest economy is facing an unprecedented crisis of sustainability.In this wide-ranging discussion, Williams exposes the fundamental flaws in China's economic model - from the burst property bubble that once accounted for a third of the economy to the systematic manipulation of growth statistics that he likens to "one of the greatest works of contemporary Chinese fiction." The conversation explores Xi Jinping's shift from economic pragmatism to authoritarian control, the ghost cities littering China's landscape, and why the Communist Party has effectively "criminalised pessimism" about economic data. Williams argues that China's leaders have created a system so dependent on unsustainable drivers like property speculation and wasteful infrastructure investment that transition to genuine innovation-led growth may be impossible under current leadership.The discussion also delves into China's use of economic coercion as a geopolitical weapon, the demographic time bomb facing the nation, and why Xi Jinping's ambitious plan to make China a football superpower serves as a perfect metaphor for the limitations of top-down innovation in an authoritarian system. This is essential viewing for anyone seeking to understand the real state of China's economy beyond the official propaganda.Buy Vampire State here. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe

In this Institute of Economic Affairs podcast, Communications Director Callum Price interviews Executive Director Tom Clougherty and Editorial Director Kristian Niemietz. The conversation examines Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch's offer to help Labour cut the welfare bill and her party's return to fiscal conservatism. They discuss whether this represents genuine commitment to balanced budgets or political positioning, questioning how radical the Conservatives are prepared to be when they refuse to touch entitlements for older voters like the state pension and triple lock.The discussion turns to Labour's internal divisions as the party faces a deputy leadership contest that exposes tensions between pro-growth and spending-focused factions. They analyse how Labour's abundance agenda has stalled, with policies like the Employment Rights Bill and Renters Rights Bill undermining growth objectives. The hosts examine whether Labour's early optimism about deregulation was merely skin deep, and explore the emerging split between the Treasury's fiscal conservatism and other departments' regulatory expansion.The conversation concludes with an examination of the Competition and Markets Authority's plans to target Google and Apple under new strategic market status powers. Tom Clougherty argues this represents a fundamental misstep in competition policy, focusing on static market share measures rather than dynamic innovation. They discuss how Britain missed the opportunity for post-Brexit regulatory divergence, instead adopting even more interventionist approaches than the EU. The broader theme emerges of Britain's shift from central planning to bureaucratic control, with the regulatory state strangling entrepreneurship and innovation across multiple sectors. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe

Rory Sutherland, Vice Chairman of Ogilvy Group and an expert in behavioral economics, joins the conversation on pressing economic issues. He argues that markets excel at uncovering unexpected innovations rather than solely maximizing efficiency. Sutherland critiques the housing crisis, highlighting wealth concentration through property ownership and psychological factors influencing buyers. He proposes innovative solutions, like Japanese-style planning reforms and flexible work arrangements, to tackle housing costs and promote economic mobility.

In this Institute of Economic Affairs interview, our Managing Editor Daniel Freeman interviews Mary Kissel, Executive Vice President at investment bank Stephens and former Senior Advisor to US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. The conversation examines the current state of US-China relations, China's economic challenges under Xi Jinping, and the national security threats posed by Chinese infiltration of Western infrastructure. They discuss how the Trump administration's 2017-2018 national security strategy marked a shift from viewing China as a competitor to recognising it as an adversary, particularly following China's handling of Covid-19 and ongoing cyberattacks like the Salt Typhoon hack.Kissel argues that economic interdependence has failed to liberalise China politically, describing Xi Jinping as a pure expression of Communist Party control rather than an aberration. She explains how US companies are increasingly divesting from China following the lessons learned from Russia's invasion of Ukraine, though Fortune 500 companies with significant investments remain committed. The discussion covers China's military buildup, including its million-man army and 600 nuclear weapons, alongside domestic repression including the treatment of Uyghurs and the use of 1.5 million police to monitor Chinese citizens.The interview concludes with an examination of Hong Kong's transformation and the case of imprisoned newspaper proprietor Jimmy Lai, whom Kissel describes as a friend facing life imprisonment for peaceful protests and press freedom. She criticises Britain's response to Lai's detention as inadequate and argues that Hong Kong now serves as a preview of what a China-led world order would look like. Kissel emphasises that Western democracies must move beyond "strategic narcissism" to understand China's true intentions and take coordinated action to protect critical infrastructure and democratic values. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe

In this Institute of Economic Affairs Podcast, Managing Editor Daniel Freeman is joined by Executive Director Tom Clougherty and Editorial Director Kristian Niemietz to examine whether Britain is truly facing fiscal meltdown or if the doom-mongering has been overblown. The conversation unpacks Chris Giles' Financial Times analysis arguing that Britain's fiscal situation, while problematic, may not be as catastrophic as commonly portrayed. They discuss how Britain's deficit compares favourably to the United States, why UK borrowing costs remain stubbornly high despite relatively better fundamentals, and whether the endless cycle of fiscal speculation created by having two budget events per year is contributing to market pessimism.The discussion turns to how government policy is actively undermining growth through a proposed dramatic increase in landfill duties that could add tens of thousands of pounds to housing construction costs. Freeman, Clougherty and Niemietz explore the cascade of new building regulations, safety requirements, and bureaucratic hurdles that have caused London housebuilding to collapse to just 2,158 new homes started in the first half of 2025. They examine how dual-aspect flat requirements, second staircase rules, and a building safety regulator with a 70% rejection rate are combining with planning constraints and affordable housing targets to make construction economically unviable in areas with the highest housing demand.The podcast concludes with an examination of free speech in Britain following the high-profile arrest of comedian Graham Linehan at Heathrow Airport for allegedly anti-trans tweets posted while in America. The hosts discuss why this case has attracted cross-party criticism, the disproportionate police response involving five armed officers, and whether the increasing frequency of social media arrests signals a need for stronger legislative protection of free expression. They consider how both progressive and conservative voices are beginning to recognise that current speech laws may be creating a chilling effect that extends beyond their intended targets. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit insider.iea.org.uk/subscribe