Defending Democracy with Marc Elias

Marc sits down with former U.S. Rep. Mondaire Jones (D-N.Y.) to discuss the Congressman’s experience in the U.S. House, the future of federal voting rights legislation, New York’s antiquated voting laws and what’s next for Mondaire Jones. For a transcript of this episode, please email transcripts@democracydocket.com. Shop our new merch!  Twitter Post Facebook Instagram TikTok Subscribe to our free newsletters  Related links: Congressional Black Caucus letter to the DOJ

Voter registration in the U.S. is out of date and in desperate need of an update. Marc Elias sits down with Andrea Hailey of Vote.org — the nation’s largest nonpartisan digital voter engagement organization — to discuss voter registration, the outdated voter technology in America and legislation targeting how and when people can register to vote. For a transcript of this episode, please email transcripts@democracydocket.com. Check out Vote.org. Shop our new merch!  Twitter Post Facebook Instagram TikTok Subscribe to our free newsletters  Related links: The Little Known Rule That Makes It Harder to Register to Vote Vote.org Georgia lawsuit Vote.org Texas lawsuit Vote.org Florida lawsuit

The U.S. Supreme Court is poised to issue rulings in two major elections cases — Moore v. Harper and Allen v. Milligan — in the next few months. In this episode, Marc and Paige discuss the potential ways the Supreme Court could decide these cases and how each ruling would impact democracy. However the Court decides to rule will impact the voting rights of millions of Americans across the country.  Shop our new merch!  Make sure to follow us on: Twitter Post Facebook Instagram TikTok Subscribe to our free newsletters  Related links: Moore v. Harper Allen v. Milligan What is the independent state legislature theory? HOW SCOTUS can rule in Moore v. Harper How SCOTUS can rule in Allen v. Milligan North Carolina Supreme Court Reverses Decision, Permits Partisan Gerrymandering

Youth voters are making a difference in elections across the country. Instead of celebrating this increased turnout or Instead of changing its policies to win young voters' trust and support, Republicans would rather enact laws that suppress them from voting. Marc and Paige discuss the latest Republican attacks on the youth vote. For a transcript of this episode, please email transcripts@democracydocket.com. Shop our new merch!  Twitter Post Facebook Instagram TikTok Subscribe to our free newsletters  Related links: Here’s How the 26th Amendment Protects Voting Rights Cleta Mitchell Recording Attacking the Youth Vote on Florida’s College Campuses It’s Harder for Young People To Vote Young Voters Turned Out in Droves Despite Barriers New Hampshire Moves To Limit Student Voting Cases: Idaho state lawsuit Idaho federal lawsuit Ohio lawsuit

After years of extreme gerrymandering and suppressive voting laws to block opposition, Republican-led states are now enacting laws explicitly targeting their Democratic-leaning cities and counties — particularly in how they conduct elections. In states like Tennessee, Texas, Mississippi, Louisiana and North Carolina, GOP lawmakers are determined to strip power away from the states’ bluest areas.  For a transcript of this episode, please email transcripts@democracydocket.com. 🛍️Shop our new merch! 🛍️ Follow us on: Twitter Post Facebook Instagram TikTok Subscribe to our free newsletters  Related links: The Depth of the Tennessee GOP’s Disdain for Democracy “An Unprecedented Disenfranchisement”: How Republicans Are Stripping Nashville of Political Power Tennessee General Assembly Expels Two Black Lawmakers in Latest Attack on Democracy Texas Senate Passes Bill To Seize Control of Elections from Local Authorities This 1986 Louisiana Case Is Back in Court 40 Years Later Mississippi Continues To Deny Black Americans Political Power Letter from Birmingham Jail

From attempts to overturn election results to county officials refusing to certify vote totals and Republicans’ continued attacks on mail-in voting, Pennsylvania has seen its fair share of election drama over the past few years. Marc sat down with U.S. Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon (D) of Pennsylvania’s 5th Congressional District to discuss recent election issues in the Keystone State and how they highlight the dire need for federal voting rights legislation. For a transcript of this episode, please email transcripts@democracydocket.com. Make sure you’re following us on all platforms: Twitter Post Facebook Instagram TikTok Subscribe to our free newsletters  Related links: A Constitutional Crisis Is Brewing in Pennsylvania When Election Officials Refuse To Certify Complete Election Results Message to Counties: Certifying Elections Is Not Optional 50 States of Lawsuits: Pennsylvania Act 77 lawsuits: Bonner v. Chapman and McLinko v. Degraffenreid

Wisconsin has long been an important swing state for presidential elections, but it has grown into a major battleground in the fight for democracy. All eyes are on the Wisconsin Supreme Court race that will determine decisions related to gerrymandering, abortion access and the 2024 presidential election. Wisconsin Democratic Party Chair Ben Wikler joins to discuss what’s at stake in the April 4 election, Republicans’ continued attacks on democracy and how people — in and out of state — can help. Volunteer with WisDems | Donate to WisDemsFor a transcript of this episode, please email transcripts@democracydocket.com. Make sure you’re following us on all platforms:Twitter Post Facebook Instagram TikTok Subscribe to our free newsletters Related links:The Wisconsin Win: Investing in Long-term Infrastructure by Ben WiklerMeet Wisconsin’s Proudest Vote Suppressor by Marc EliasMeet the Wisconsin Supreme Court Candidates Who Want To Protect DemocracyDebunking the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s Drop Box Opinion50 States of Lawsuits: Wisconsin

Civil and voting rights groups have long challenged voter suppression laws and unfair maps in court using federal voting rights protections. But the conservative legal movement is now arguing that individuals and groups cannot bring these lawsuits — only the U.S. Department of Justice can — proposing that there is no private right of action in crucial federal voting laws. If courts endorse this concept, laws like the Voting Rights Act would be severely undermined and become largely unenforceable. Marc and Paige discuss where this surge of private right of action lawsuits came from, the current cases pushing this theory and what could potentially happen. Make sure you’re following us on all platforms. Twitter Post Facebook Instagram TikTok Subscribe to our free newsletters Related links: The Conservative Legal Movement’s Latest Target Private Right of Action, Explained This Civil Rights Provision Protects Your Vote from Simple Mistakes Is the DOJ Doing Enough To Protect Voting Rights? Case pages: Vote.org v. Callanen Arkansas State Conference NAACP v. Arkansas Board of Apportionment Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee

In 1876, North Carolina added a felony disenfranchisement provision to its state constitution with the express purpose of disenfranchising Black voters. The provision remains in place today and is being challenged in Community Success Initiative v. Moore. The outcome of the case is currently pending before the North Carolina Supreme Court and will determine if individuals on probation, parole or post-release supervision — over 56,000 North Carolinians — have the right to vote. We’re joined by Forward Justice Co-Director, and attorney in the case, Daryl Atkinson to discuss what’s at stake in this crucial lawsuit. Support Forward Justice’s work here. Volunteer with Forward Justice and Unlock Our Vote here. Make sure you’re following us on all platforms: Twitter Post Facebook Instagram TikTok Subscribe to our free newsletters Related links: The History of Felony Disenfranchisement in North Carolina North Carolina’s Felony Disenfranchisement Law Heads to Court Inside Forward Justice’s Fight To Restore Voting Rights to 56,000 North Carolinians Community Success Initiative v. Moore

Mississippi passed a bill to create an unelected court system in Jackson, a city with a Black population of over 80%, with judges appointed entirely by white state officials. Unfortunately, the proposed court system is just the tip of the iceberg in a state with a long history of undermining Black political power. We’re joined by Arekia Bennett-Scott, the executive director of Mississippi Votes and Mississippi Votes Action Fund, to discuss the history of anti-democratic legislation, the slew of bills targeting Jackson and what people can do to help. Make sure you’re following us on all platforms. Twitter Post Facebook Instagram TikTok Subscribe to our free newsletters Related links: Mississippi Continues To Deny Black Americans Political Power Support Mississippi Votes Sign the petition against HB 1020 The book Arekia mentions is Redemption: The Last Battle of the Civil War by Nicholas Lehmann