Resilient Cyber

In this episode, I sit down with SAIC Chief Technology Officer (CTO) and longtime Federal/Defense leader Bob Ritchie to discuss his experience securing public sector digital modernization, including everything from large multi-cloud environments to zero trust, identity, and where things are headed with AI.Bob starts discussing SAIC and his background there. He went from intern to CTO over 20 years with this public sector industry leader, including a brief stint with Capital One on the commercial side.We covered the current state of the federal cloud community across multiple clouds (e.g., Azure, AWS, and GCP) and some of the challenges and opportunities on the security front.We often hear phrases such as “identity is the new perimeter,” but the perimeter is porous and problematic, especially in large, disparate environments such as the Federal/Defense ecosystem. Bob touched on the current state of identity security in this ecosystem, where progress is being made and what challenges still need to be tackled.The government is doing a big push towards Zero Trust, with the Cyber EO 14028, Federal/Defense ZT strategies, and more. But how much progress is being made on ZT, and where can we look for examples of innovation and success?We dove into the rise of excitement and adoption of AI, GenAI, Agentic AI, and protocols such as MCP, A2A, and where the public sector community can lean into Agentic AI for use cases ranging from SecOps, AppSec, GRC, and more.Bob explains how he balances a good business focus while staying deep in the weeds and proficient in relevant emerging technologies and nuances required as a CTO.I’ve known Bob for several years, and you would be hard pressed to find a more competent technology leader. This is not one to miss!

In this episode, I sit down with longtime industry leader and visionary Phil Venables to discuss the evolution of cybersecurity leadership, including Phil's own journey from CISO to Venture Capitalist. We chatted about: A recent interview Phil gave about CISOs transforming into business-critical digital risk leaders and some of the key themes and areas CISOs need to focus on the most when making that transition Some of the key attributes CISOs need to be the most effective in terms of technical, soft skills, financial acumen, and more, leaning on Phil's 30 years of experience in the field and as a multiple-time CISO Phil's transition to Venture Capital with Ballistic Ventures and what drew him to this space from being a security practitioner Some of the product areas and categories Phil is most excited about from an investment perspectiveThe double-edged sword is AI, which is used for security and needs security. Phil's past five years blogging and sharing his practical, hard-earned wisdom at www.philvenables.com, and how that has helped him organize his thinking and contribute to the community.Some specific tactics and strategies Phil finds the most valuable when it comes to maintaining deep domain expertise, but also broader strategic skillsets, and the importance of being in the right environment around the right people to learn and grow

In this episode, I discuss the Model Context Protocol (MCP) with the OWASP GenAI Co-Lead for Agentic Application Security, Vineeth Sai Narajala. We will discuss MCP's potential and pitfalls, its role in the emerging Agentic AI ecosystem, and how security practitioners should consider secure MCP enablement.We discussed: MCP 101, what it is and why it mattersThe role of MCP as a double-edged sword, offering opportunities but additional risks and considerations from a security perspectiveVineeth's work on the "Vulnerable MCP" project is a repository of MCP risks, vulnerabilities, and corresponding mitigations.How MCP is also offering tremendous opportunities on the security-enabling side, extending security capabilities into AI-native platforms such as Claude and Cursor, and security vendors releasing their own MCP serversWhere we see MCP heading from a research and implementation perspectiveAdditional Resources:Anthropic - Introducing the Model Context Protocol (MCP)Enhanced Tool Definition Interface (ETDI): A Security Fortification for the Model Context ProtocolEnterprise-Grade Security for the Model Context Protocol (MCP): Frameworks and Mitigation StrategiesVulnerable MCP Project

In this episode, I sit with long-time vulnerability management and data science experts Jay Jacobs and Michael Roytman, who recently co-founded Empirical Security.We dive into the state of vulnerability management, including:How it is difficult to quantify and evaluate the effectiveness of vulnerability prioritization and scoring schemes, such as CVSS, EPSS, KEV, and proprietary vendor prioritization frameworks, and what can be done betterSystemic challenges include setbacks in the NIST National Vulnerability Database (NVD) program, the MITRE CVE funding fiasco, and the need for a more resilient vulnerability database and reporting ecosystem.Domain-specific considerations when it comes to vulnerability identifiers and vulnerability management, in areas such as AppSec, Cloud, and Configuration Management, and using data to make more effective decisionsThe overuse of the term “single pane of glass” and some alternativesEmpirical’s innovative approach to “localized” models when it comes to vulnerability management, which takes unique organizational and environmental considerations into play, such as mitigating controls, threats, tooling, and more, and how they are experimenting with this new approach for the industry

In this episode, we sit down with the Co-Founder and CPO of Seemplicity, Ravid Circus, to discuss tackling the prioritization crisis in cybersecurity and how AI is changing vulnerability management.We dove into a lot of great topics, including:The massive challenge of not just finding and managing vulnerabilities but also remediation, with Seemplicity’s Year in Review report finding organizations face 48.6 million vulnerabilities annually and only 1.7% of them are critical. That still means hundreds of thousands to millions of vulnerabilities need to be remedied - and organizations struggle with this, even with the context of what to prioritize.There’s a lot of excitement around AI in Cyber, including in GRC, SecOps, and, of course, AppSec and vulnerability management. How do you discern between what is hype and what can provide real outcomes?What practical steps can teams take to bridge the gap between AI’s ability to find problems and security teams’ ability to fix them?One of the major issues is determining who is responsible for fixing findings in the space of Remediation Operations, where Seemplicity specializes. Ravid talks about how, both technically and culturally, Seemplicity addresses this challenge of finding the fixer.What lies ahead for Seemplicity this year with RSA and beyond

In this episode, we sit down with Varun Badhwar, Founder and CEO of Endor Labs, to discuss the state of AI for AppSec and move beyond the buzzwords. We discussed the rapid adoption of AI-driven development, its implications for AppSec, and how AppSec can leverage AI to address longstanding challenges and mitigate organizational risks at scale.Varun and I dove into a lot of great topics, such as:The rise of GenAI and LLMs and their broad implications on CybersecurityThe dominant use case of AI-driven development with Copilots and LLM written code, leading to a Developer productivity boost. AppSec has struggled to keep up historically, with vulnerability backlogs getting out of control. What will the future look like now?Studies show that AI-driven development and Copilots don’t inherently produce secure code, and frontier models are primarily trained on open source software, which has vulnerabilities and other risks. What are the implications of this for AppSec?How can AppSec and Cyber leverage AI and agentic workflows to address systemic security challenges? Developers and attackers are both early adopters of this technology.Navigating vulnerability prioritization, dealing with insecure design decisions and addressing factors such as transitive dependencies.The importance of integrating with developer workflows, reducing cognitive disruption and avoiding imposing a “Developer Tax” with legacy processes and tooling from security.

In this episode, we sit down with David Melamed and Shai Horovitz of the Jit team. We discussed Agentic AI for AppSec and how security teams use it to get real work done.We covered a lot of key topics, including:What some of the systemic problems facing AppSec are, even before the widespread adoption of AI, such as vulnerability prioritization, security technical debt and being outnumbered exponentially by Developers.The surge of interest and investment in AI and agentic workflows for AppSec, and why AppSec is an appealing space for this sort of investment and excitement.How the prior wave of AppSec tooling was focused on findings problems, riding the wave of shift left but how this has led to alert fatigue and overload, and how the next-era of AppSec tools will need to focus on not just finding but actually fixing problems.Some of the unique capabilities and features the Jit team has been working on, such as purpose-built agents in areas such as SecOps, AppSec and Compliance, as well as context-graphs with organizational insights to drive effective remediation.The role of Agentic AI and how it will help tackle some of the systemic challenges in the AppSec industry.Addressing concerns around privacy and security when using AI, by leveraging offerings from CSPs and integrating guardrails and controls to mitigate risks.

We sit with Lasso Security CEO and Co-Founder Elad Schulman in this episode.Lasso focuses on secure enterprise LLM/GenAI adoption, from LLM Applications, GenAI Chatbots, Code Protection, Model Red Teaming, and more. Check them out at https://lasso.securityWe dove into a lot of great topics, such as:Dealing with challenges around visibility and governance of AI, much like previous technological waves such as mobile, Cloud, and SaaSUnique security considerations for different paths of using and building with AI, such as self-hosted models and consuming models as-a-service from SaaS LLM providersPotential vulnerabilities and threats associated with AI-driven development products such as Copilots and Coding assistantsSoftware Supply Chain Security (SSCS) risks such as package hallucinations, and both safeguarding the data that goes out to external coding tools, as well as secure consumption of the data coming into the organizationSecuring AI itself and dealing with risks and threats such as model poisoning and implementing model red teamingLasso discovered several critical concerns in their AI security research, such as Microsoft’s Copilot exposing thousands of private GitHub repos

In this episode, we sit down with Piyush Sharrma, CEO and co-founder of the Tuskira team. They're an AI-powered defense optimization platform innovating around leveraging an Agentic Security Mesh.We will dive into topics such as Platform vs. Point Solutions, Security Tool Sprawl, Alert Fatigue, and how AI can create "intelligent" layers to unify and enhance security tooling ROI.We discussed:What drove Piyush to jump back into the startup space after successfully exiting from a previous startup he helped foundThe industry debate around Platform vs. Point Solutions or Best-of-Breed and the perspectives between industry industry leaders and innovative startupsDealing with the challenge of alert fatigue security and development teams and the role of AI in reducing cognitive overload and providing insight into organizational risks across tools, tech stacks, and architecturesThe role of AI in providing intelligence layers or an Agentic Security Mesh across existing security tools and defenses and mitigating organizational risks beyond isolated vulnerability scans by looking at compensating controls, configurations, and more.Shifting security from a reactionary model around incident response and exploitation to a preemptive risk defense model that minimizes attack surface and optimizes existing security investments and architectures

In this episode, we sit with security leader and venture investor Sergej Epp to discuss the Cloud-native Security Landscape. Sergej currently serves as the Global CISO and Executive at Cloud Security leader Sysdig and is a Venture Partner at Picus Capital. We will dive into some insights from Sysdig's recent "2025 Cloud-native Security and Usage Report."Big shout out to our episode sponsor, Yubico!Passwords aren’t enough. Cyber threats are evolving, and attackers bypass weak authentication every day. YubiKeys provides phishing-resistant security for individuals and businesses—fast, frictionless, and passwordless.Upgrade your security:https://yubico.comSergj and I dove into a lot of great topics related to Cloud-native Security, including:Some of the key trends in the latest Sysdig 2025 Cloud-native Security Report and trends that have stayed consistent YoY. Sergj points out that while attackers have stayed consistent, organizations have and continue to make improvements to their securitySergj elaborated on his current role as Sysdig’s internal CISO and his prior role as a field CISO and the differences between the two roles in terms of how you interact with your organization, customers, and the community.We unpacked the need for automated Incident Response, touching on how modern cloud-native attacks can happen in as little as 10 minutes and how organizations can and do struggle without sufficient visibility and the ability to automate their incident response.The report points out that machine identities, or Non-Human Identities (NHI), are 7.5 times riskier than human identities and that there are 40,000 times more of them to manage. This is a massive problem and gap for the industry, and Sergj and I walked through why this is a challenge and its potential risks.Vulnerability prioritization continues to be crucial, with the latest Sysdig report showing that just 6% of vulnerabilities are “in-use”, or reachable. Still, container bloat has ballooned, quintupling in the last year alone. This presents real problems as organizations continue to expand their attack surface with expanded open-source usage but struggle to determine what vulnerabilities truly present risks and need to be addressed.We covered the challenges with compliance, as organizations wrestle with multiple disparate compliance frameworks, and how compliance can drive better security but also can have inverse impacts when written poorly or not keeping pace with technologies and threats.We rounded out the conversation with discussing AI/ML packages and the fact they have grown by 500% when it comes to usage, but organizations have decreased public exposure of AI/ML workloads by 38% since the year prior, showing some improvements are being made to safeguarding AI workloads from risks as well.