Tara Brabazon podcast

Amy Seymour-Walsh talks with Tara about her PhD and her innovative strategy to move from a series of ideas and incomplete chapters and to a full first PhD draft.  

Tara and Steve discuss strategies for early article publication, transitioning from articles to theoretical papers, the impact of digitization on publishing speed, efficient referee selection, and integrating teaching and research in legal education.

Tara, Steve and Anne probe what it means when the word 'educator' is replaced by 'teacher'?  Particularly, they probe the consequences of changing the language from 'early childhood educator' to 'early childhood teacher.'

Steve and Tara introduce Mark Brown's mock confirmation of candidature.  They talk about the value of a mock event and how students can improve and learn through this process.  The podcast also includes Mark's live and raw mock CoC and how - in real time - he created improvement.

The discussion dives into the intersection of academia and journalism, highlighting essential storytelling skills. Topics include how digital advancements are reshaping academic journalism and the challenges faced by early-career journalists, especially women. The importance of sharing research freely to build an academic brand is emphasized, along with the role of social media in democratizing ideas. Finally, the conversation touches on the removal of traditional gatekeepers in academic publishing, empowering scholars to reach wider audiences.

What are the reasons to choose to enrol in a research masters rather than a doctor of philosophy?  Steve and Tara talk through the differences for students, supervisors and examiners and - once more - recognize the key skill of time management in supervision.

Navigating interim reports and milestones for part-time PhD candidates is essential for progress and engagement. Setting precise goals and using milestones guide students effectively towards successful completion within a reasonable timeframe.

Tara, a PhD student and supervisor, discusses achieving international standards in the final thesis report, including communication, writing, and academic integrity. She also talks about preparing for the final thesis examination and providing emotional support during the process.

Tara discusses the challenges of the mid-candidature review in a PhD, emphasizing the need for clear goals and academic integrity. Strategies such as setting word length goals and seeking solutions are key, along with effective supervision and support.

Exploring the pivotal milestone of confirmation of candidature for PhD students, emphasizing the importance of producing a proposal and giving an oral presentation. Importance of academic protocols, originality, and preparation by supervisors. Navigating expectations, setting clear goals, and completing the program within three years.