Think Foley's

In this Daze in Court episode, Foley's List barristers Rohan Hoult, Andrea Skinner and Principal Will Stidston from Barry Nilsson explore the evolving role and drawbacks of artificial intelligence, particularly its impact on generating and evaluating documents. They also discuss expert evidence and the practical challenges of engaging a shadow expert in complex litigation.

In this Daze in Court episode, Foley's List barristers Rohan Hoult, Bronia Tulloch and Chief Clerk Andrew Turner sharing about their journey and the progress in Foley’s List, and dive into a conversation with Bronia about the appeal process in court.

ln this episode, List member Aaron Lane and Steven Pettigrove from Piper Alderman break down 2024 Federal Court cases of Blockchain and Digital Assets. They also discuss global trends, industry regulations predictions for 2025, and what evolving policies mean for investors, businesses, and innovators.

In this Daze in Court episode, Foley's List barristers Rohan Hoult and Simon Fuller sit down alongside solicitor Raffaella Oliva from Hope Earle Lawyers to share and discuss some papers they have written. Raffaella explores adult children seeking access to their parent’s file, drawing from her article Through the Looking Glass. Simon delves into the strategic use of third parties in property proceedings. 

This is a recording of session 6 of the 2025 foley's February criminal law series.  In this session, Paul Holdenson KC and Jack O'Connor discuss key appellate decisions on latent ambiguity in evidence, jury direction failures, the admissibility of tendency and character evidence. It highlights cases where judicial errors and procedural breaches affected trial outcomes, refining criminal law interpretation and procedural fairness.

This is a recording of session 5 of the 2025 foley's February criminal law series.  In this session, Michael Stanton SC, Katarina Ljubicic and Patrick Hurst discuss the legal framework governing admissions under Part 3.4 of the 𝘌𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘈𝘤𝘵 2008 (Vic), including key statutory provisions, police interview techniques, and protections for vulnerable individuals. It also examines case law, such as Ridley v The King [2024], and discusses the admissibility of covertly obtained admissions, fairness considerations, and emerging legal developments.

This is a recording of session 4 of the 2025 foley's February criminal law series. In This session, Richard Edney, Ran Zaydan & Edwina Dane provide a thorough guide to preparing a strong defence by examining the prosecution brief, ensuring complete disclosure, and creating a detailed chronology. It emphasizes the importance of the cultural and historical context, involving clients in their defence, and assessing the effectiveness of police investigations.

This is a recording of session 3 of the 2025 foley's February criminal law series. In This session Tim Marsh, Maddie Lees & Thomas Bell provides a detailed guide on handling cases involving the defence of mental impairment in criminal proceedings. It also includes case studies and references to relevant legal provisions and practice notes to guide practitioners through the process of defending clients with mental impairments.

Commercial landlords must give notice to a tenant before exercising a right of forfeiture for breach of a lease. That requirement can be modified by the terms of the lease. In this podcast, Erik Dober discusses how landlords can draft an effective notice, and how a tenant can respond.

Open and Shut Case: Open Justice, Closed Courts and Suppression Orders for Criminal Lawyers This is a recording of session 2 of the 2025 Foley's February criminal law series. In this session, Ruth Champion, Natalie Simpson & Louis Andrews discusses the principals of open justice and presents five key questions to ask before applying for a suppression order, emphasising a  need for thorough case preparation, effective decision-making, and having a draft order ready to minimise interference with court procedures. Ruth Champion appears for the prosecution and defence, and, in both trial and appellate matters. Ruth has particular experience in subpoena proceedings including on claims of public interest immunity and legal professional privilege.  Natalie’s primary practice is in criminal law, but she also accepts briefs in quasi criminal, family law and public law matters. Natalie has significant experience in a range of crime types including complex drug matters, child sex offences, human trafficking, and white-collar crime. Louis Andrews has a broad practice in criminal law and public law.  In his criminal law practice, he accepts briefs to prosecute and defend.  Louis has specialised experience in the intersection of the criminal law and media law, including contempt and suppression orders.