

Subtext: Conversations about Classic Books and Films
Wes Alwan and Erin O'Luanaigh
Subtext is a book club podcast for readers interested in what the greatest works of the human imagination say about life’s big questions. Each episode, philosopher Wes Alwan and poet Erin O’Luanaigh conduct a close reading of a text or film and co-write an audio essay about it in real time. It’s literary analysis, but in the best sense: we try not overly stuffy and pedantic, but rather focus on unearthing what’s most compelling about great books and movies, and how it is they can touch our lives in such a significant way.
Episodes
Mentioned books

Aug 10, 2020 • 1h 1min
Mastery and Repetition in “Groundhog Day” (1993)
When egotistical weatherman Phil Connors gets trapped in a time loop in Punxsutawney, Pennsylvania, he gets drunk, steals money, manipulates women, binges on breakfast food, plays God… and finally grows up. The story charts Phil’s development over the course of thousands of repeated February 2nds. Along the way, it raises questions about our own capacity for growth. How do we go about improving ourselves? How can we escape boredom? Achieve fulfillment? Wes and Erin analyze the 1993 film Groundhog Day.
Pre-order Erin’s forthcoming book “Avail” here: http://subtextpodcast.com/avail
For bonus content, become a paid subscriber at Patreon or directly on the Apple Podcasts app. Patreon subscribers also get early access to ad-free regular episodes.
This podcast is part of the Airwave Media podcast network. Visit AirwaveMedia.com to listen and subscribe to other Airwave shows like Good Job, Brain and Big Picture Science.
Email advertising@airwavemedia.com to enquire about advertising on the podcast.
Follow: Twitter | Facebook | Website
Thanks to Jeff Mitchel for allowing us to repurpose his poster for the cover art.
Thanks to Tyler Hislop for the audio editing on this episode.

Aug 4, 2020 • 1h 30min
Love and Wit in Shakespeare’s “Much Ado About Nothing”
At the center of every courting ritual, there’s a great unknown. How do we know when we’ve met someone we can love? How do we know the other person is actually who they seem to be? In the beginning, all we have to go on is surface appearances, which amount to a kind of hearsay. The question is how to get beyond them. Wes and Erin analyze Shakespeare’s Much Ado About Nothing, which seems to suggest that witty banter is more than just good fun, and has an important role to play in getting to know others.
The conversation continues on our after-show (post)script. Get this and other bonus content at by subscribing at Patreon.
Follow: Twitter | Facebook | Website
Thanks to Tyler Hislop for the audio editing on this episode.

Aug 1, 2020 • 15min
(post)script: Debut
Discover the quirky dynamics of two hosts grappling with existential thoughts and past lives. Wes shares bizarre tales of alien abduction while Erin warns against mayonnaise. Their conversations meander through Erin's poetic influences and her time as a deep-sea fisherman. Conversations also dive into reading habits, with Wes reflecting on Infinite Jest and pandemic-era literature like The Plague. Explore the complex relationship between humor, pain, and the art of joke-writing as they unravel their creative journeys.

Jul 27, 2020 • 57min
Expediency and Intimacy in Billy Wilder’s “The Apartment” (1960)
You know, it’s that old story of boy meets girl … girl is dating boy’s married boss … girl tries to commit suicide … boy saves girl’s life …. Okay, that sounds pretty dark. But somehow it’s the basis for a classic romantic comedy, Billy Wilder’s 1960 film, The Apartment. The film raises the question of how we distinguish authentic relationships from relationships of utility and convenience. What cultivates human intimacy? What compromises it? When are we just using people? Wes and Erin analyze.
Cover art is based on a French poster for the film.
The conversation continues on our after-show (post)script. Get this and other bonus content at by subscribing at Patreon.
Follow: Twitter | Facebook | Website
Thanks to Tyler Hislop for the audio editing on this episode.

Jul 20, 2020 • 1h 21min
Marital Economics in Jane Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice”
An advantageous marriage is Elizabeth Bennet’s only potential escape from a foolish mother, a disinterested father, three very silly sisters, and a house that’s entailed away to her idiotic cousin Mr. Collins. But she turns down fabulously wealthy Mr. Darcy because he’s prideful—and maybe a little prejudiced. But then, so is she. How do we know if two people are well-suited to each other? What makes a successful match? Is Mr. Collins actually the perfect man? Wes and Erin give their analysis of Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice.
The conversation continues on our after-show (post)script. Get this and other bonus content at by subscribing at Patreon.
Follow: Twitter | Facebook | Website
Thanks to Abbie Smith for allowing us to repurpose her poster for the cover art.
Thanks to Tyler Hislop for the audio editing on this episode.


