Explore failed constitutional amendments including the Equal Rights Amendment and the frustration with the current political climate hindering the amendment process. Delve into the reaction and complex sentiments surrounding the death of a political figure. Discuss the process of amending the constitution, requirements for passing an amendment, and the historical rarity of amendments approved by Congress but not ratified by the states.

A concrete company's claim is examined in court. Amy Coney Barrett's language and urgency are explored. The Supreme Court reviews preemption and union behavior. Issues with clarity in the case are discussed. Implications for administrative agencies and the Biden administration are analyzed. Retirement wishes and future hopes are shared.

The podcast discusses the nomination and resignation of Abe Fortas as Chief Justice, comparing his actions to modern Supreme Court justices.

The podcast discusses the case of Richardson v. Ramirez which led to the disenfranchisement of formerly incarcerated individuals and the denial of their right to vote. It explores the 14th Amendment provision and Supreme Court ruling, and analyzes Thurgood Marshall's dissent arguing for voting rights. The podcast also delves into the unenforced provision of the 14th Amendment, voter suppression, collateral consequences of disenfranchisement, and the controversial application of the Equal Protection Clause.

This podcast explores the Supreme Court case Schenck v. United States and its impact on free speech during World War I. It delves into the background of the Espionage Act and the prosecution of socialists distributing anti-draft flyers, examining the implications for free speech and protest today. The podcast also addresses recent attacks by Iran-backed forces, the branding of Palestine activists as endorsers of terrorism, and the suppression of pro-Palestine speech. It discusses the significance of the First Amendment in protecting politically objectionable speech and the chilling effect of punishment on speech and activism.

The podcast discusses the urgent call to action for Gaza, emphasizing the devastating effects of the conflict and the need for a ceasefire and international solidarity. It also provides recommendations for updates, news, and education on Palestine, including photographers, journalists, poets, organizations, and legal support for pro-Palestine speech.

Discussion of 'Legally Blonde' film and its impact on the legal profession. Analysis of biases in the legal profession portrayed in the movie. Exploration of the cult following and primary theme of female solidarity among female law students.

Attorneys from Palestine Legal discuss their mission to protect Palestinian activists from harassment and the power of intersectional liberation movements. They cover topics such as challenging efforts to silence activists, sabotage of Palestinian economic activity, discrimination against Palestinian students, backlash faced by ASA professors, a case of targeted investigation, and the importance of legal expertise and organizing.

The podcast discusses the case of Geduldig v. Aiello, exploring discrimination against pregnancy and the exclusion of pregnancy-related disabilities from California's unemployment insurance. They analyze the constitutional implications, discuss tiers of scrutiny in judicial review and flaws in the court's analysis of discrimination laws and equality.

Exploring the complexities of Miranda rights and the significance of invoking the right to remain silent. Criticizing the Supreme Court's opinion on remaining silent. Analyzing the discrepancy between invoking and waiving the right to remain silent. Understanding the conservative mindset towards the criminal justice system. Emphasizing the importance of clearly stating the decision to remain silent when dealing with the police. Discussing routine violation of constitutional rights and introducing 'Balls and Strikes' website for legal punditry.