The Manufacturers' Network cover image

The Manufacturers' Network

Latest episodes

undefined
Oct 16, 2023 • 23min

Innovations in Waste Management and Sustainability with Heather Johnson

Connect with Heather: Website: www.pureingenium.comLisa Ryan: Hey, it's Lisa Ryan. Welcome to the Manufacturers Network podcast. I'm excited to introduce our guest today, Heather Johnson. Heather is the CEO of Ingenium and has over 25 years of experience in hazardous waste management. Her innovative sustainability and waste management approach has positioned Ingenium as an industry leader in waste-to-energy programs and zero-waste initiatives.Lisa Ryan: Heather, welcome to the show.Heather Johnson: Thank you, Lisa. I'm excited to be here today.Lisa Ryan: Share a little bit about your background and what led you to do what you're doing.Heather Johnson: You named it over 25 years of experience. Back in my college days, I was answering phones in this industry. Along the way, I started doing some marketing and sales and ultimately ended up 27 years in the industry. I never look back on anything, finding anything in this and carrying it forward.Lisa Ryan: Yeah. Right now, many companies are aspiring to achieve a zero-waste status. What are some of the steps and strategies businesses can take to embark on this journey?Heather Johnson: So zero waste is a journey, as you mentioned, and there are several steps. The first step for a business is to determine that they want to move forward. And in that, the first step is looking at what they're generating in terms of waste, what's going into the trash cans at the cubicle level, what's going into the trash cans in their kitchens or cafeterias throughout the facilities that all end up in a dumpster typically and where we start is at the dumpster level.For lack of a better term, we call it a dumpster dive, but dig in the trash and look at what are these guys producing that might have some value and be removed from the waste world and used elsewhere. From there, we provide data. So it's data collection and then reporting out to the business.Hey, here's what you guys are doing. Are you aware? And most of the time, they are not aware to any significant extent of what types of things are making it into the trash. But it starts with the conversation at that point: okay, here's what's happening. What are you willing to do as a business to reduce the waste going into the trash?From there, we talk about strategies that can be deployed within the business, ways to minimize waste, and ways to reuse materials in lieu of creating waste. And continue to track the progress of the efforts and provide more data to show reduction over time. Ultimately, the objective would be to achieve this zero waste certification, with a certain percentage milestone to remove waste from the landfill.Lisa Ryan: So when it comes to zero waste certification, I think about zero waste, just in my own house, and what goes out into the trash every week. What is that percentage? How much are people reducing their waste to get that certification? What does that look like?Heather Johnson: I believe it's 90 percent on average, which sounds extremely challenging, and it is. Don't get me wrong again. A business has to have a concerted effort. It doesn't just include leadership behind it; everybody in the organization takes pride in reducing waste.Lisa Ryan: Yeah, I know your company is known for its innovative waste-to-energy programs, but how can these green solutions work as a viable option for manufacturers?Heather Johnson: Believe it or not, manufacturers produce a lot of waste. There's a lot of opportunity. Manufacturers use solvents as an example, and we can reuse those materials and repurpose them for another business that can continue the use as opposed to a manufacturer having to send out the material as waste.Many different items are used in manufacturing, resulting in a beneficial reuse opportunity that minimizes what goes into the track. There are a lot of opportunities in manufacturing. In the event we can't do something better with the material, then make it a waste or call it a waste, then waste to energy comes into play as a viable technology that's greener than putting something into a landfill or incinerating it.Lisa Ryan: So when you're reusing, like you said, solvents, would that manufacturer who was using the solvents be able to use them again? Or would another manufacturer or another company buy that? Heather Johnson: Yeah, both. The answer is both. Some manufacturers will continue to use a solvent until it's so dirty. They cannot do anything further with it. Some manufacturers have quality control. These procedures allow using a material only once, and it's still clean enough for someone else to use. They don't allow it in their process.We can pass that along to another manufacturer or company using that material. Additionally, when a solvent gets dirty, we can do something called distillation, which cleans it up and creates a renewable product, the solvent. Without whatever was contaminating it, those manufacturers can rebuy it because it does have a cost associated with it, but it's less expensive than buying a new solvent.Heather Johnson: The ultimate goal is to minimize what is wasted. If you can prolong the use, the longer you do that, instead of using a new product, you're doing the environment a favor every time.Lisa Ryan: Absolutely. Discuss hazardous risk because assessing and managing hazardous waste is crucial in industrial operations. So what can businesses do to mitigate their hazardous waste risks so that they're in compliance and safe?Heather Johnson: Call ingenium? No, calling a company like Ingenium can help them understand both from a compliance standpoint. What are you required to do based on what you're generating? What are your hazardous processes? And then what are the requirements and regulatory risks around what you're doing? It's a whole world that most people don't think about regarding tracking and managing.If you have a chemical, for example, that you're using, only when you say you no longer have a use for it, and there is no longer a use for it, then it's a waste. So once you determine something is a waste, new regulations kick in. And. A lot of businesses don't necessarily understand what the requirements are around managing hazardous waste, so they can bring in a consultant who does understand that, or bigger businesses, often, will have a full-time environmental health and safety manager who is responsible for the hazardous waste and the tracking and management of it.Either way, from a safety standpoint, a lot of training goes into place so that people know what they're handling. And then, from a regulatory requirement standpoint, there are holding time issues. There are manifest paperwork-type issues. There's also something called cradle to grave, which means once you have a waste, it's yours until you know it's been managed to the end.So you must know what's happening to the waste. And you're using a company that's properly disposing of it at the end of the day. And there's a paperwork trail on that. And there's a time requirement for that. So, if you understand all of the needs, you should be good to go, but if you don't, I highly encourage you to have a consultant on board to help you with everything because there is a lot.Lisa Ryan: Yeah, it sounds like it. And I think about this when we're looking at attracting younger people into manufacturing and the industry. Sustainability is a huge topic because they want to protect the planet in whatever they do, or at least not cause additional harm.What are some things businesses are doing to use eco-friendly practices, or are there specific success stories or examples you can share?Heather Johnson: Yeah. And you're right. As it pertains to younger people in any industry, they want to work for a company that is environmentally friendly and conscious and doing something if they can to better protect the environment.Many businesses that can make a difference are pushing back on their suppliers to use greener materials, whether shipping materials or things that can be recycled or reused. That's a big one I'm seeing because many businesses we work with receive chemicals in styrofoam, for example.And the styrofoam is it's voluminous. If you will, it's lightweight. It's got a recycle value, but It's costly to move it unless you can condense it. And so I've seen companies pushing back on people that use styrofoam to take it back and use it again, for example, instead of the stuff going into the landfill because it takes up a lot of space and doesn't break down easily.Additionally, they should look at more environmentally friendly products they can use in their processes instead of highly toxic chemicals if there's a way that they can introduce something more environmentally friendly. They're doing that and then ultimately downstream on the wayside. How can they reduce or reuse materials before they become a waste, prolonging the use of something?Lisa Ryan: Yeah, one of the arguments you hear from people is that the more environmentally friendly products don't. They don't believe they work as well. As the horrifically hazardous materials that they've been using forever. What are you seeing as far as the advances in technology, or is that still true?Heather Johnson: Yes. And no, I totally know what you're talking about. I know. We also work with a lot of research and development. And they use mercury thermometers. And I remember when they made a play to use cause mercury is highly toxic.And so, what else can we use in lieu of that? And it took a long time, but they've come out now with a good alternative to the mercury. But there are several products that people will argue are nothing better than radiation isotopes in some cases. However, it's become more challenging to manage that stuff, so people have almost been forced to move away in many situations, but over the last 25 years, I've seen a lot of movement in that area.Lisa Ryan: Yeah, that's a good thing. Then, we also look at things like community service and corporate responsibility, which you are big on in your organization. How do you tie in what you're doing with sustainability goals regarding focusing on the corporate responsibility efforts of the companies you work with?Heather Johnson: We have a big push in innovation. On top of what exists today, we're always looking for what is coming in the future that we can leverage and introduce to people. We are the experts in the technology as it presents itself. We don't own any technology, nor do we create any technology. Still, we understand what other people are doing and how it can benefit our customers - from manufacturing businesses to pharma and any industry that uses chemicals and produces hazardous waste. There's more and more technology that's greener to manage this stuff in the future. Historically, it's gone for landfill or incineration, and we want to minimize what goes to the landfill.More and more, there are conversations about that. But if it's not going to landfill, where is it going? What can we do? And so, more and more, you're seeing new technologies present themselves that minimize the need to send things to the landfill.Lisa Ryan: What are you seeing regarding some of those new technologies that you've been the most impressed with, or have changed the game in waste management or your zero waste initiatives?Heather Johnson: I've seen more people figuring out how to prolong the life of things. If you have to dispose of it, there's something called fuel blending, where you can use hazardous waste as a secondary fuel in a cement kiln. So, a lot of hazardous waste qualifies instead of using natural resources.To make cement as an example, I'm also seeing people clean up waste reuse. It can't say clean up waste because once it's waste, you have a different right to prolong the use of a chemical. We have something called an orphan chemical program. For example, a large manufacturer with quality controls can't use products past their shelf life, but that doesn't mean that a smaller business with fewer funds can't use those chemicals in their research.We can take them from the large manufacturer to the small startup, and they can continue using them without buying new chemicals. It may end up as waste in the future as well.Lisa Ryan: How did they find out about you? I mean you because you're, we talked earlier about the companies reusing themselves, or it goes to other companies.How does that whole process work? How would somebody even find out what you have in the list of products that you have that you can make available to people?Heather Johnson: Right now, that program is Largely amongst our current customer base because we haven't figured out how to leverage AI, which I think would be our next play.But right now, we have a list of all our customers who are interested in being potential recipients of chemicals. So when a customer wants to donate, there's the donor and the recipient. Let's call it: the big manufacturer has a list of chemicals they no longer need, but there are still good chemicals, right?They're not crystallizing around the caps or inherently waistline. They will go out as waste unless we find a home for them. So we'll take their inventory of chemicals, and we'll send it to our customer base of recipients. And then those guys will look at it and say, okay, I'd like to have the following chemicals, and then we will arrange.The transportation from point A to point B of those materials and the way they find us when they find us is frequently a Google search for hazardous waste recycling because more and more people want to be sustainable. And so it's more complex than hazardous waste disposal, which we'd still come up with in a search for that, but it's word of mouth or Google search.Lisa Ryan: How does a company know they need to talk to somebody like you? What is the first clue that making the call to Ingenium is a good option?Heather Johnson: If they're generating hazardous waste and they understand they can't throw it in the trash, that's the first clue.And then, what type of business do they want to work with? I would say the majority of business. Businesses today have gotten on board with sustainability. When we started Ingenium 17 years ago, sustainability was not a big deal to people. It was. I don't even know if it was a word used in our industry.And then, when the markets crashed in 08. We saw a huge influx of chemicals that had to go for disposal because businesses were shutting down. These would be chemicals that had never been opened, but the business is closing, and part of the closure process is that all of the chemicals have to go out as hazardous waste.And it was crazy for us to see just how much good material was being wasted. So, we started to promote sustainability back in 2008. However, it comes at a cost, so traditional disposal is less expensive than some screener opportunities. And early on, businesses weren't willing to take on additional costs to do that today.Fast forward 15 years later, and it's a big initiative at the leadership level for many of these businesses. In addition to just having hazardous waste and saying, Hey, I need to dispose of this, many people managing it know they also want to try something greener. So they'll be looking for companies who have these innovations.Lisa Ryan: So what's the process? They call you for the first time because they have some waste or want to look at more sustainability. What happens next?Heather Johnson: We send somebody out to their facility and talk to them about what they're doing. We want to understand what they're doing and why they're doing it because if there are things they can change upstream, and we can help consult with them on that to reduce the amount of waste or use less toxic materials, all kinds of those things that I spoke to earlier.And then, in that conversation, what are their goals? Again, most companies will tell you that they have some sustainability goals. Some will say we want the lowest cost. Based on what they're trying to accomplish, we will tailor a program for them that meets those needs.Lisa Ryan: And are you cleaning up the chemicals and stuff? Do you have a pro, so you have a whole processing facility?Heather Johnson: We don't have a processing facility, but we have the trucks and the people. So, we will go to the manufacturer and ensure everything's properly labeled and packaged so that it can go on a truck for safe transport to the disposal facility or wherever the material will ultimately end up.Lisa Ryan: Is there anything I haven't asked you about that you think is important for people listening to? No,Heather Johnson: I think you touched on it, but ultimately, what I believe is the most important for people to know if they are not aware and understand is the cradle-to-the-grave element of the waste generation that they, it's crucial that they're working with a dependable company like Ingenium, because, again, if you're working with somebody you're getting a cheap price or, these people aren't on the up and up.If your waste ends up somewhere it shouldn't, you're going to pay for cleanup a second time, and possibly, if other companies have waste in that area and are out of business, you're going to be paying for other people's waste as well. So it's most crucial that. You know that you're working with a reliable vendor.Lisa Ryan: If somebody wanted to continue the conversation or learn more about how Ingenium can help them and you, what would be the best way to contact you?Heather Johnson: The best way to contact me and learn about Ingenium services is to visit our website, www.pureingenium.com, and that's P U R E I N G E N I U M dot com slash podcast. This podcast will be listed there with others, and they'll be able to get all of our other information on the website from there.Lisa Ryan: Heather, having you on the show has been a pleasure today. Thank you so much for joining me.Heather Johnson: Thank you for having me, Lisa.Lisa Ryan: I'm Lisa Ryan, and this is the Manufacturers' Network Podcast. We'll see you next time.
undefined
Sep 18, 2023 • 29min

The Battle Against Cybercrime: James Fair Reveals Common Threats Faced by Manufacturers

Connect with James FairWebsite: executech.comLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jamesmfair/Lisa Ryan: Welcome to the Manufacturer's Network podcast. Our guest today is James Fair. James is an IT and cybersecurity veteran with 35 years of experience. He's held every role from entry-level tech to senior VP, and now he's working in cybersecurity. James, welcome to the show.James Fair: Thanks, Lisa. It's an honor to be here. I'm very excited.Lisa Ryan: Great. Please share a little about your background and what led you to do what you're doing in those 35-plus years.James Fair: Yeah. I've been doing this since computers were around; I'm an old-school guy. What started for me was a passion for technology. At age 13, I got my first real PC. At age 16, I would deep dive into that, and no one would see me for two years. When I came out, I would know everything about it. It's always been a passion of mine to dive into technology. I've been doing technology for a long time, but part of that has always been cybersecurity because back when I was doing it, there was no separate role for cybersecurity. Now you did everything.No one realized there was a separate need for that, and there wasn't because there wasn't much going on out there, or at least we weren't aware of it anyway. Over time, I have developed a passion for helping organizations stay protected, prevent attacks, or deal with them when and hopefully if they ever happen. Hopefully, they never happen to anybody; if they do, I want everyone to be prepared.We do not wait until the cyber stuff hits the fan before deciding to take action. Now, we'll make a plan. They're like, Ooh, what? What do we do in this situation? Let's get ahead of that. That's what I'm after. Let's help organizations be protected and respond better when something does happen.Lisa Ryan: Yeah, and it's scary stuff with all the ransomware and everything else that you're, I've had friends that have gone through that and without proper backup or thankfully they had outside backup, it didn't cost them as much time or money as it could have, but it was a pain to deal with. So, what are some common cybersecurity threats you see in manufacturing?James Fair: We see some similarities across all industries, but mainly manufacturing is, first of all, the common one, ransomware, right? As you mentioned, I want to caution your listeners for organizations and home users; please have backups. You can recover from about anything: fire, flood, theft, ransomware if you have good backups. And I've had tough conversations with people to say, Hey, this lady called me up, just, it was awful. She said, my grandmother passed away last month, and I have all the pictures of her, and they're on my computer, and now there's this ransom note on my computer.What should I do? And that is not a conversation I ever want to have with anybody. Please make sure you're backing up. I don't care what product you use; I'm not selling anything, but please ensure you're backing up your home machines and organizations. Okay, back to your original question.Lisa Ryan: Since we're talking about that, what do you think of cloud backup? I've been using Carbonite for years, but is there something about it going into the cloud, like a product like Carbonite, or should it be a physical backup as well? Or is there? It doesn't matter. Like, where does that fall for? Yeah, home and business.James Fair: The cloud is perfectly acceptable for home and always works. Business may be different in that you may need to recover the data quickly or a lot of data very quickly. And if it's all in the cloud, you have to download it.What's your internet speed like? Because now the rate at which you can recover is based on your internet speeds. We want to have that conversation with each business or organization to see how long they can deal with an outage; let's say ransomware hits, and everything's cleaned up.Now, we're doing the recovery process. How long can they take? Can we prioritize files first? It depends; it is not a great answer. But it depends on the organization that we're working with. Whether they can do both in many cases for larger organizations, we certainly encourage both.Have a copy locally that you can recover quickly. Have a copy on the cloud in case someone gets ahold attackers get ahold of that backup. We worked with one organization that got hit by ransomware, and the attackers had gone in and formatted the hard drives they used for backups. Like they wanted to make sure they could not recover from them.Remember, when attackers are going after organizations, particularly larger ones, they're going to do everything they can to ensure that you cannot recover from that, including one thing we haven't mentioned yet: an exfiltration of data. Nowadays, we're seeing a lot of this: I'm also going to steal your HR data or intellectual property.So, when I come to you and say, Hey, will you pay this ransom? And you say, Nope, I got good backups. I'll go okay, but I have this information. You don't; you do not want to release it to the public. Now, that's being held over people's heads as well.Lisa Ryan: What is X infiltration? What? What is that term?James Fair: I'm sorry—x filtration of data, meaning, okay. I'm going to take information on your servers that you don't want out there in the public, and I will grab that first. Then I will say, Hey, I will sell this unless you pay me.Lisa Ryan: Oh, wow. Yeah. Is there honor among thieves? When you pay the ransomware, will you get your data back, and then you're going to fix it, or will they keep coming after you? That's why it's such a crooked business.James Fair: It is. Yeah. And how do you have any trust in here? To give it a no, I don't want to put a positive spin on this. There is nothing positive about this, however. The attackers want credibility because if, for any reason, you believed that they would not come through on their side of it, people would stop paying.So, they have a vested interest in proving that they will recover your files. Now, I've only done this twice, but in my experience, two times at least. Yes, they got almost all the files back. A couple of corrupted ones couldn't be recovered, but in general, yes. If you pay, you get the files back. Statistically, I've heard something closer to 80% of the time. But in my experience, I'm two for two. Yeah, because the attackers have a vested interest in ensuring their reputation stays good; otherwise, no one would pay these ransoms, and they would no longer be in business.Lisa Ryan: When I also think about phishing, when the CEO is going out of town, and supposedly that person calls the secretary or sends them an email, Hey, I need this kind of cash. And they don't even think, because it's oh no, the CEO's calling me. How would you educate your staff? Because the phishing emails are getting better than Holy cow. I always check the return address and email address to ensure it's something instead of XYZ@GmT@yahoo.com or something.James Fair: Yeah. That is, that is a great question. The most effective technique we see is doing an internal phishing campaign. Some organizations like that feel "big brother" to attack our own people. But I have a different perspective. It's meant to raise awareness. It's intended to get people to look at the reply email because we are humans first. We make mistakes.We get busy. We respond emotionally before we respond logically. If you've ever been cut off in traffic, you may have experienced this. That's what the attackers are leveraging. All these great tools that we put in place, the anti-ransomware, the antivirus, firewalls, everything else, are programmatic, and they're much more challenging to get what you want.But humans, conversely, can manipulate them to some degree. Internal phishing campaigns to raise awareness are probably the most effective tool. And again, it's not meant to get someone; it's meant to look like, hey, here's a quick training for you. In five minutes, you'll know how to quickly check to ensure you're not clicking on something you don't want to.And you'd rather have us, the white hat folks, doing it than find out that someone sent credentials out that they shouldn't have via phishing email.Lisa Ryan: So do they know if management hires a company like you to white hats to send the phishing emails, or do employees know that they may be coming, or do they have training before and then, afterward, to see how much they learn? How, what does that look like?James Fair: Some organizations will dictate what that is for us. Our engagement looks like a very, and yes, they will come to us saying, hey, we have been phished before. We don't want it to happen again. What should we do? And we proffer this suggestion, and they buy off on it.Then we'll do a very easy-to-catch one. Very few people may get caught in that first one to create a baseline that we can do more difficult ones to see how we're improving, where we're, maybe there's a particular group or a few members who need more training than others.And then maybe we come in and do an hour-long security awareness training. I do a lot of those. I'll go into an organization and spend an hour talking about what we're seeing out in the wild. Best practices for security, those kinds of things. These days, you need all those great security and IT tools in place, but you've also had to train the users because we are humans, make mistakes, and are busy.Lisa Ryan: Yeah. On your list of topics here, ransomware was one of them, but you also said breaches through third parties. Is that the same as ransomware, or what would that mean?James Fair: If you consider, I don't know if you recall the target breach from long ago. Target wasn't directly attacked. Someone got in through their HVAC system. The H V A C folks had put a computer in their network that they could connect to do work on the system, which unfortunately had been connected to the rest of the network's backbone. The attackers could break into that H V A C system and then into the rest of the network.So, was that a direct attack on Target? No, not necessarily. It was through a third party. We want to ensure we're careful about engaging with third parties and that they have the proper security tools in place. Because you may have all the best ones in the world, but if the person you're working with doesn't, that can be a challenge.So it's not about us having them; it's also about the people we work with, having those in place.Lisa Ryan: You think about how interconnected everything in manufacturing is with the H V A sys C systems, the production lines, accounting, HR, finance, and everything woven together. So yeah, that would be quite the danger.James Fair: Yeah, it's a challenge. Best practices, and I don't want to get too technical here, is to segment those pieces off that you can't talk to each other except by. Pre-designed paths that any new path can't suddenly show up and start connecting through there.But I want to touch on something because if there's a relevant story, that applies here quite a bit. It was a manufacturing company. They were working with a large vendor of theirs, and there was an email exchange going back and forth between someone in finance and on both sides. And no one knew that the vendor side's email had been infiltrated.Now, many times, we think, all right, someone gets ahold of my credentials, they're going to jump in and start doing stuff immediately. But we've found that's not the case. Often, we see it hanging out; maybe we'll call it. They're watching, seeing what's going on. They're learning; they see who you talk to, who speaks to you, who you report to, and who reports to you.Who are you doing business with? What kind of language do you use? What's your signature? They're learning as we go. They stayed in the system for, we do not know how long because it was into somebody else's organization. This email transaction went back and forth, and they finally agreed to a $150,000 invoice.Immediately, the attackers jumped in and did a reply to all. They had all the previous email transactions in the email, and they said, Here's the link to pay the $150,000 and the email domain, as they got even trickier. You caught that. It was not the actual domain it was coming from. They got tricky.They bought a domain; they figured it was worth trying. The company had a W in the name. They bought a domain with two Vs. Right next to each other. It looked like a W if your brain wasn't paying attention, and unfortunately, someone clicked the link and paid $150,000; that company was out 150,000 and still owed the vendor $150,000.Wow. Phishing is a big deal, and account compromises are a big deal these days; we must watch out. I cannot stress enough the value, and it's not a hundred percent; it's not a silver bullet. Nothing is, but the value of multifactor authentication or two-factor authentication or MFA or, however, you want to call it, having some additional level besides your login and password that you have to enter, that's a huge difference in security for a very minimal impact in efficiency for people.Lisa Ryan: Wow. And I think about two, and this isn't totally with manufacturing because you do have to be at the plant, obviously, but there's still a lot of people working from home. My husband works for a manufacturer but is in accounting; he gets to work from home a couple of days a week. When you look at that rise in remote work and all the interconnected supply chains, What are some things that manufacturers can do to ensure that the remote work isn't potentially causing any problems?James Fair: Yeah, the organization is mature enough. We can start looking at some sophisticated tools. For instance, internally, we use a product from Microsoft called Intune. Intune is designed for a remote workforce, allowing us to set the same parameters. On devices that we would if they were in the office.So it has to have a screen timeout, and it has to have these specific password parameters, and it has to, it has to have antivirus. We can list a whole series of things a computer must adhere to before being allowed to connect and access company data. I encourage people to look at ways to lock down those devices only to have access if certain criteria are being met.Lisa Ryan: And then we're also looking at things like, you want to be efficient, but you also want to be safe. How would manufacturers balance the productivity they need to make money and the cybersecurity that keeps all their efforts safe?James Fair: That is a great question, and as much as it pains me to say it, security and ease of use tend to be at opposite ends of the spectrum.The most secure computer in the world is the one unplugged, sitting in the middle of the room. It's not very effective that way. And the easiest one to use is the one that doesn't require a password, but we want to be somewhere in between, right? It is about finding a good balancing act.The idea is for a security team to come in and say, you have to do this and this and make your work difficult. That's not the idea. That's never what, certainly what we want to present, right? We want to come in and add some security that works with the business model and the businesspeople.And yeah, we'll add a little bit of MFA, right? We will add a bit of overhead to what we're doing in return for a lot of return insecurity nowadays. We want to base everything on risk. A lot of organizations are playing whack-a-mole, whatever's in the news.That's what they're working on that day to try to block it from happening. They're playing whack-a-mole all the time. And while what they're doing is busy working, it's progressing, and they're making the environment more secure. We want to encourage people to consider the most significant risk to the organization.So, let's make a spreadsheet. We call it a risk register. Let's make a spreadsheet and list all the things we can think of. Other people can think of imaginary scenarios. Who knew we were going to have a nationwide epidemic, right? But list all these things that could occur, their likelihood, and how significant the impact is if it does happen. And then, based on that, let's give it a risk factor. Then let's sort by the risk. And we start working on the things that are the highest risk to the organization first. And we're not playing that whack-a-mole with our time.Lisa Ryan: Wow. That's something. It's funny when you talked about passwords; I don't think a day goes by that I do not utter the sentence. I hate passwords because I forget them all the time. I use one of those password keepers, but it only has some. Yeah. Right, there is that. That maintains that security and does not frustrate your employees.James Fair: Better solutions are coming, and better tech is coming. If you think of it on your laptop, the windows, hello. You open it up; it recognizes your face and logs you in. You didn't have to touch a thing, didn't have to our password, right? Phones are the same thing. Passwordless tech is coming more and more. Hopefully, that's a pain that will soon be a thing of the past for you.Lisa Ryan: And the funny thing is because I like crime shows, I think about the number of where they have the criminal, and they're trying to get into his phone, and they hold the phone up to his face and unlock it.James Fair: Exactly. I thought the same thing. Why do you put a ping on it? Otherwise, put our finger on it, right? Cut your finger off. In the worst case, this is horrible. That's a possibility.Lisa Ryan: Exactly. And it wouldn't be on television if it didn't happen at some point. Yeah. I know that you've worked with a lot of these different cases; what would be, and of course, you're not going into the minute details of it, but what would be a real-world case where you worked with a manufacturer and maybe this is a tale to warn what, what could happen if they're not careful?James Fair: Yeah. We worked with 500 users. The organization here in Utah that had been hit by ransomware multiple times. And they brought us on, unfortunately, before we could get everything solidified. They got hit one more time. It was through one of...
undefined
Sep 4, 2023 • 30min

Maximizing ROI in Manufacturing: The Hidden Opportunity of R&D Tax Credits with Casey Barka

Connect with Casey Barka:Website: www.striketax.comLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/caseybarka/Lisa Ryan:: Hey. It's Lisa Ryan. Welcome to the manufacturer's network podcast. I'm here today with Casey Barker. Casey is an R&D tax credit expert with 20 years of industry knowledge and nine years of proven experience calculating R&D tax credits for major accounting and financial service firms. Before co-founding Strike, Casey spent eight years in the petrochemical industry in Houston, Texas. His distinguished knowledge of the dynamic properties of polyethylene polypropylene and styrene-butadiene copolymer resins drove significant department improvement. I'm glad I got all those out. And, Casey, welcome to the show.Casey Barka::: Thank you very much, Lisa. Glad to be here.Lisa Ryan:: share a little about your background and what led you to do what you're doing.Casey Barka:: I hail from the great state of Wisconsin originally. My bachelor's is actually in biochemistry and molecular biology. I had hopes and aspirations of going into the medical field. And as life hands you lemons, I went to the army and traveled the world for a few years. Happy to have served my country there. And after that, I found my way to Houston, Texas, an oil and gas hub. It was a very natural landing place for me. I spent 8 to ten years with various large Chevron Total big names in the industry, primarily focused on plastics and polymers; as you mentioned, I got my MBA as I worked up the corporate ladder. I just happened upon a job posting for research and development Credit Consulting, and it hurt my interest. And as the story goes, here we are ten years later. I co-founded Strike Tax Advisory, headquartered in Boise, Idaho. I am leading part of a team here in Houston. And, yeah, really excited to talk to your group about how R&D tax credits can benefit the manufacturing industry.Lisa Ryan:: Let's start at the very beginning. What is an R&D tax credit? And how does it relate to manufacturing? Why do we care?Casey Barka:: Okay. Good question. For those of you that may not be familiar, the research and development tax credit, its common name, officially, is the credit for increasing research activities. This is section 41 of the Art of the tax code. It's been around since the early eighties. That's a Ronald Reagan-era credit. It was meant to incentivize US-based companies to keep those high-tech, high-paying jobs here in the US as opposed to being offshored to that was the primary driver. It's technically a glorified jobs credit if you want to get down to it. Over the last 40-plus years, there have been many changes to the tax code itself.There's been a lot of judicial precedent that has been established that goes into what is R&D and what is not R&D. That's primarily our job is to help our clients determine what expenses they are incurring on what we consider to be an R&D project. That can be anything from a product. It can be a process. It can be a formulation, invention, or technique. It can be it's an extensive bird. Not only to the manufacturing industry but also applies to many food and beverage architecture, engineering, medical, and pharmaceutical software; we work with many different industries. Manufacturing is the number 2 or 3 industry we work with here at Stripe. And as you're getting into manufacturing itself, there are many sub-industries that we work with. Everything from agriculture to apparel and textiles, Oil And Gas is there. Robotics, tool and die manufacturers, and semiconductors. The list goes on, and we work with these R&D tax credits.Lisa Ryan: [00:04:12]:So you mentioned that I thought about what R&D is and isn't fascinating. It just sounds like it's research and development. What might your clients think is R & D but isn't?Casey Barka: Yes. Many people believe that this is the white lab coat, beakers, and goggles, mixing and doing things of that nature, but it's much more than that. The way that the credit is, we call it an R&D study. We're doing a study for each of our clients. And as we're diving in, it's a project-based analysis. We look at your projects or R&D initiatives, which can be very broad in scope. What we always fall back to is the 4 part test. This is the basis for a lot of our analysis.  You must start with what's called the permitted purpose. Now this is basically what you are doing. As I mentioned, this could be the product process improvement, formulation, technique, or patent. You're trying to impart newer, improved functionality, performance, quality, reliability, and tangible metrics. You're not quite sure how that's going to go. You have to have some technical uncertainty or a challenge. That can be in a couple of different forms.It could be you didn't know if you could do it. It could be capability, or it may not. You might not know what the optimal design will be or how you will do this. The methodology that goes into that to overcome those. That's the second prong, by the way, the uncertainty. To overcome that uncertainty, you go through a process of experimentation. Now this, again, is unique to each client that we have. Not everybody does things the same way, but it's looking at a regimen or trial and error.It can be some formalized product development life cycle that you may have, a stage gate process, or a mechanism that our clients have in place where they evaluate alternative solutions. They have a hypothesis and devise ways to test it to see the best design. They go through some modeling or simulation. They go through prototyping stages where they test and ensure they achieve the requirements and specifications they sought to develop or design. That's the 3rd prong, like, the how you do it. What was that process, and what did it look like?And the 4th part of this is we're only looking at the technological activities. These are based on the hard sciences. We're not concerned about your marketing, sales, and HR back-office. We're looking at those people actively using biology, chemistry, physics, engineering principles, and things of that nature and applying those concepts in and throughout that 4-part test. We analyze which projects are qualified and which are disqualified and removed from the analysis for each of those projects. Once we have qualified projects, we start getting into the qualified expenses associated with each of those projects.Lisa Ryan: This may be a similar question, but are there other common misconceptions people have about R&D tax credits in the manufacturing industry?Casey Barka: You would be surprised. We hear it's good to be skeptical of whether or not you qualify for this because not everybody is qualified or doing qualified activities. Here at Strike, we ensure we do everything by the book. It's very ethical. We're not overinflating your credits because part of what we do is stand behind our work. We have a money-back guarantee on anything we help our clients claim.Some of those misconceptions, we don't qualify. Our main thought is that we're just doing general production. The question to that is, do you need to improve your products? Do you need to go through and add new features and enhancements, or are you adding automation on the process side? Are you increasing your throughput and efficiency and improving your quality metrics? Those are all process improvement initiatives we see in the manufacturing sector that people often don't think about, but that is a qualified R&D activity.That process improvement and things of that nature, some people don't think we don't have engineers on staff. We do a lot of on-the-job training. We hire from tech schools. It doesn't matter. Again, it's based on the activities that you're doing. And if you're doing the If you're using the scientific principles in this in the improvements that you're making within your facility, often that would be qualified. And often, clients don't understand the full breadth of expenses we can also claim. For each project, we can look at not only your employee wages but also your taxable W2 box 1. That's what we're looking for. But raw materials and supplies are used during the R&D process.If you're doing prototyping, if you're doing first articles, if you're doing certifications and things of that nature before production, all of the supplies that went into that first article, or maybe you had to go through four different versions of that prototype before you stamped it off for production. For each of those four, you're still resolving that to uncertainty. Whether it is a design or your methods, the raw materials can add up quickly if you outsource to a third-party contractor. You may not have those fee capabilities in-house. There are often testing facilities that people will send samples to or have those contract employees, the ten people you pay, inside your facility. That contractor costs, as long as they're doing the qualified activities I mentioned before, but we can count those expenses. Then the fourth one will probably only apply to some of our manufacturing clients, but you can include computer rent for our software clients developing in the cloud. They're paying for their development for Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure if we can include them.Lisa Ryan: Okay. Do you have some examples of people you've worked with, like other manufacturers, who have benefited from R&D tax credits?Casey Barka:: We have had to thin down the list. We've worked with over 400 R & D clients now. I picked a couple of examples I did want to share. Our custom racing engine manufacturer in Houston is one of our clients. They have about 20 employees or so. Almost half of them were involved in designing and building these custom racing engines. And from 27 to 2021, we got them close to $660,000 of tax credits that are cash in your hand. These are refunds from the IRS or a reduction of your tax liability in the current year.Another robotics client that we had. We've done a couple of these very similar, about ten to 15 employees, about $600,000 of credits. One client I have in Indiana, another robotics. They build custom gantries and things of that nature that are used in manufacturing. They're developing the robotics going into the end user's facilities. And about 40 employees in that company, about 25, are very technical and engineering-focused. We got them $3,700,000,000 over five years. We've worked with them. These credits can be very lucrative and help move that needle to get companies to pay 0 tax if they're doing the right types of activities and they have the expenses to show court.Lisa Ryan:  What were they doing before? Do a lot of manufacturers not know that these tax credits exist, or are they just doing it poorly, or what was happening before they were suddenly saving all this $600,000 or $3,000,000?Casey Barka: You hit it right on the head. There are many we'd be able to out there that don't know this is on the books. It's that it's an incentive that is available to them. I've studied for some IRS certifications, things of that nature, and the 1200 pages of study materials for the full tax code. Section 41 was two paragraphs out of that. It's a very niche credit. Not a lot of people know about it. Even the CPAs that we partner with are helping their clients. We're often educating them for the first time. I remember hearing about this, but I don't have the bandwidth to do it. And that's what we hear, and that's why striking exists is that CPAs they're swamped. They're handling most of the general tax return, and they don't have the bandwidth to do these specialty calculations, which are pretty complex and require an outside expert who should be able to do it accurately and sustain the credits we calculate.Lisa Ryan: All I'm thinking about is not reading a 1200-page document on tax code. But good for you for finding that one paragraph that makes all the difference because that would just not be my strength.Casey Barka: Yeah. I'm not going to lie. A tax code reading all of that is not the most enjoyable. Still, after you have it in your brain for as many years as I have, it's kind of like the back of your hand that then it just applies to being able to disseminate that information to our clients and educate them on what they should have been claiming all along. We've just recently signed a client that's been around since 88, I believe, 89. A manufacturing client founded them. And literally, they could have been claiming this since they opened their doors. Every year, they're working on new product launches and things they want to add to their catalog or portfolio of products they're selling to the public, and we're going to be able to go back to the prior three years. We can go back and amend your three previous years' tax returns. As long as it's still open for amendment, you can go back and calculate these credits, claim them on an amended return, and get a refund check back from the IRS.Lisa Ryan:  Okay. So, yeah, that answered my question - for the last 30 years of that, they were screwed, but for the last three years, they could go back and get some of that.Casey Barka: Correct. That's right.Lisa Ryan:  You mentioned how much the tax code changes every year. What has? Can you provide us with an overview of what changed for 2022 and some of the challenges that manufacturers face if things like, I think it's section 174? If some of these changes are still being overturned.Casey Barka: Yeah. This has been a real eye-opener for many of our clients, and it's not necessarily in a good way. Unfortunately, in 2017, the Tax Cuts And Jobs Act was passed. This was a way that lowered the corporate tax rate down back down to 21%. It had some other incentives and things of that nature in there. But they had to figure out how to pay for those tax cuts. What they what the way it was written is they had five years before these changes took effect.For 2022, let me back up. It might be easier. What is the interplay between section 174 that you mentioned and section 41? If you want to think about an icon bull's eye with concentric circles in it. Your business incurs in a given year if you have all the expenses. That can be everything from your meals and entertainment to your depreciation expense, to all those different things that fall underneath costs, right, then your general ledger. Section 1 74 has to do with research and experimentation. Section 41 is a subset of that. Now section 41 is used to calculate your R&D tax credit for research-increasing research activities. What changed is that before 2022, nobody cared about 1 74. It was always there in order to have an R&D credit; the expense has to be subject to 174. That was the initial qualification. After that, CPAs didn't care. They just put it all in any general business expenses. For 2022, they took away the ability for a taxpayer to deduct ten percent of those expenses in the year.What has to happen now is that any research and experimentation expenses must be now capitalized and amortized over Five years. And there is a midpoint convention to that, without getting into the weeds; essentially, you had $1,000,000 of research expense to throw out a nice round number. k. For 2022, instead of deducting or writing off that $1,000,000, you can only deduct ten percent or $100,000. The other 900,000 gets added back to taxable income. That means that anybody that's doing R&D or RNE if you will. 2022 has become an eye-opener, painful, higher tax bills for many clients. And it is the tax code. It's the way it's written. There is a considerable push from various lobbying groups that we've partnered with from an education standpoint. So, like, the National Association of Manufacturers, nam.org. I think a lot of you are familiar with that. They have taken a spearhead to this and are actively trying to get people to reach out to their legislation, representatives, and senators.Two bills are in Congress now - one in the Senate and one in the House that is looking to change this law, mainly because it's detrimental to the people doing the innovation and driving growth in the US. This is a kick in the teeth if you will. And there are companies I've worked explicitly on where the owner had to take out a $1,500,000 personal loan this year to cover his tax bill just because of this rule change. And -- Wow. -- and, again, it's across the board. If you want to extrapolate that to Tesla and Lockheed Martin doing R&D, they're spending a million dollars, and only ten percent of that can be written off in a year. The big companies are feeling the hit as well. They've had to reissue some 10Ks for the publicly traded companies because their profitability outlook went through the floor.Lisa Ryan: Wow. Oh, and you'd think that with something like this, it would really stimulate, like you said, not only keeping manufacturing here in the United States but also stimulating innovation and growth within manufacturers because they're constantly looking for ways to improve their products. What do you see again regarding how they've used those credits to stimulate innovation and growth up until now?Casey Barka: If you want to consider it a blank check. It's money that you are owed; you're refunded. It's real cash in hand. Suppose you are a manufacturer and you qualify. In that case, you're doing these types of research projects, your new product releases, process improvements, you're getting, you're doing stuff, and you're getting patents. Patents are a great way to substantiate that you are doing R&D., But you can use this to hire more people, right? Say I threw out a $1,000,000 earlier in the back of the napkin calculation at the federal level; think about ten% returns. for every $1,000,000 that you spend, you'll probably get a $ten0,000, give or take, of actual R&D credit. that's a dollar-for-dollar deduction of your tax liability. It's not a deduction. It's a tax credit that is the bottom line. What is your overall tax liability? Credits are there to reduce that down to 0. Yes. You can hire more people. You can buy equipment. You can plan for that expansion that you want to do to your facility and add new capabilities and things of that nature. And in addition, you can use that as a tax planning tool because manufacturers we deal with frequently like to run close to even. They don't want to pay a lot of tax. They don't want to be at a loss, either. They try getting as close to netting out at 0 as possible. But now, if you know that you have this pool of tax credits, you can work with your CPAs to maybe change the way that you're doing your bonus depreciation, maybe the way that you're doing the way that you're writing off some of your assets, you can use them as a way to raise your taxable income. Still,...
undefined
Aug 21, 2023 • 28min

Felt Marketing for Manufacturers: Uncomplicating Success in the Manufacturing World with Allison DeFord

Connect with Allison DeFord:LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/allisondeford/Email: allison@feltmarketing.comLisa Ryan: Hey, it's Lisa Ryan. Welcome to the Manufacturer's Network podcast. I'm excited to introduce our guest today, Allison DeFord. Allison is the founder and trailblazer at felt marketing for manufacturers, and also an expert on the manufacturing MA Masters platform and the overly caffeinated host of the Manufacturing Masters podcast.She lives to rid the manufacturing world of the web. We syndrome and guide manufacturers to being seen, heard, and felt by their ideal customers. Allison, welcome to the show.Allison DeFord is Excited to be here. Thank you for having me.Lisa Ryan: Share a little about your background and what led you to do what you're doing with manufacturers.Allison DeFord, it's mostly the fact that they are makers, and that's always fascinated me. They make something from nothing. And for me, it's the people, the stories. Many companies we work with, granddad or grandma, bootstrapped had two nickels rubbed together, but they solved a problem.They created something that didn't exist to solve a problem. And I think the coolest thing about manufacturing is making something from nothing again. And I love its technology side and its evolution over the years. It used to be considered blue-collar, grungy, dark, whatever. It's the complete opposite today. And I just find that very exciting, watching the transformation, and yeah, I live to help people communicate better, and that's the reason that we are called Felt. The most beloved and successful manufacturers are not just seen and heard.But they're felt and connected to the heart of their customers, and that's not an easy task. And we're good at helping them do that, especially small to mid-size manufacturers. That's just my absolute favorite to work with.Lisa Ryan: Yeah. Awesome. And it reminds me of when I was in the welding industry, and it was literally at that time it was everything your mother ever warned you about the same thing, dark, dirty, dangerous.You'd walk in; everything was gross. Now I walk into these plants, and they're bright, shiny, and automated, and as you said, the technology is just amazing, and you start bringing in robots. It's also a recruiting tool because a candidate is walking in. They're like, that's the coolest thing ever. I want to work on that.Allison DeFord And good point, too, because there's all that talk of the robots taking our jobs. No. They're there to take over the repetitive stuff so that you can elevate the talented people that work with you.Yeah. Yeah. And when I've had people on the line on the show talking about automation, a good place to start I've found they have found is, what is the task your employees hate doing the most?And automate that because, again, you're showing them that you're listening to them and you're giving them other things to do that is a better use of their talent than whatever that manual labor task that a robot could do easier and cheaper and not call in sick. .if you could be marketing for any industry, why did you, why else did you choose manufacturing?Lisa Ryan: Why do you specialize in that?Allison DeFord We looked at this model years ago with our own business. We're the test dummy; I don't serve you something I haven't tried myself. And we figured out that distributors, for example, are looking to the manufacturer. For the marketing literature and the support and training, the dealers are looking to the manufacturer, and we thought, why would we want to work with anybody else?But the main, the maker everybody's looking to for the marketing support, that help, and that training. It just made sense to support them; the manufacturer is like that foundational person or foundational component, and it's the backbone of this country. I get excited about that.Lisa Ryan: Oh yeah. If you just look around, you. Somebody has made everything that we're looking at. Yep. Oh. I always joke with my friends that if I'm speaking at a weird, if there's a weird association, chances are I'm speaking to it because there are associations for everything. It is the coolest thing to be around makers passionate about things nobody else thinks about.Allison DeFord: Yes. Until they have to replace them or they break. Lisa Ryan: So I have to ask you, what is the We Syndrome, and how is it hurting manufacturers?Allison DeFord: If you look at most manufacturers' websites, let's say you do the five-second speed test. How many times do they use the word we?Look at their social media posts. How many times are they talking about themselves? And what I have had great success doing is helping manufacturers overcome this. And again, you and I have discussed here some things you can do to help yourself that don't cost any money or a lot of money.This is one of them. Flip the script and address. The viewer address, the prospective customer, or the customer who's coming back to your website or looking at your social media feed, you need to lead with them, not you. And I have this little story that I've shared a million times, and people are probably tired of hearing about it, but I found this image years ago a stock photo. It's this little boy, and he's staring at his navel, and he's like squeezing it together, like making it talk. And he's just fascinated with his navel. And to me, that's the Wewe syndrome. I grew up with cousins. I grew up in Indiana, and many boy cousins ran around with their shirts off, and I couldn't; I was a little jealous.Because it was humid as you know what, And they were just fascinated. They were just fascinated with their own navel and thought I was hilarious. And I, that's what I see companies doing. I've been guilty of it myself. Again, I'm not pointing fingers; three are always pointing back at you.It's to flip the script once and for all and show your prospective buyer or your current customer. This is what's in it for you. This is why you should buy this, and this is why you should buy it from us. This is how it will transform some part of your life or business. Flipping the script on the wee is, yeah, it's imperative, and it doesn't take a lot of effort.Lisa Ryan: No. Just switching those to use. And make a huge difference. It reminds me of my own marketing material that I, it's the same kind of thing, but I called it doing eye surgery, and that you go through and remove every time, I say I love that eye. Are you doing we surgery? Yes. But it's important.When it comes to marketing, it's not something that, You think a lot about when you are a manufacturer that you know, I make this stuff, people are going to come to me. How are you? What are the areas that you focus on when it comes to working with your clients in their marketing efforts?Allison DeFord: The brand foundation is number one. I always say marketing happens from the inside out, right? Or from the top. We talk about shit rolls downhill. Yeah. I find that most small to mid-size manufacturers I encounter don't have a compelling, unique value proposition.They're not leading with what's the promise? What's the thing that makes you different? Why should I care? What's in it for me? They're missing that the unique value proposition is key. How do you get to that? I take a look at who are your audience personas. Who, what do they look like?We don't have that. We have it here, but we don't have it in A P D F, or we've never put it on paper. It's imperative to understand who you're marketing for and on behalf of, not at. The major way we are different is that we're not trained to help you interrupt. We convince.It's connecting to the heart of your ideal customer. Because people don't make decisions rationally. 90% of the time, they make decisions based on emotion. Why not connect on an emotional level that's imperative? It's that brand foundation stuff that's usually missing.Also, they are usually missing a brand personality and a brand voice. I use Target as an example, even though they're a retailer. We can learn a lot from B2C. You see a commercial come on. Or maybe a radio spot or whatever; it's targeted before they even show you the bullseye logo at the end because there's a voice, there's a tone - same thing with brands like Yeti Gerber Knives. I could go on forever. But those are the ones that are memorable because they have, they're distinct, and they mean something to you. And then a strategy. Most manufacturers are missing a cohesive and not like some 80-page document that they're never going to follow, but create a holistic system as I think of the Hoberman sphere, and when you open it up, it's, and it's all connected.So how is your messaging connected? How is it connecting? Is it consistent? Is it relevant? And are you leading with what's in it for them? You have to help people self-serve because they're what, 80, excuse me, percent through the buying cycle before they ever pick up the phone to call you. And if they're millennials or younger, they don't want to pick up the phone, right?They don't want a salesperson to call them ever. They want to do it all digitally, and they want it to feel. Easy. Helping people overcome a lack of content, like we don't know what to talk about, is what we help you figure out. How often should we do it? Where should we do it? Do we have to be on every social media platform?No, you do not, but be where your people are. That's the whole ticket. It's breaking it down and dispelling the myths. Most manufacturers feel overwhelmed with marketing at this point, and I can see why. It's easy. It's easy to do, right? There's much more, and it's changing quickly.So it's like, where do I start? What do I don't know what to do? Guiding them. And what you're guiding, what appeared to me is that it is bringing back the passion for why you started your business. As far as what is that, you talked a couple of times about the promise in your unique value proposition, but why did you even start your company in your garage 20 years ago?What is it that you knew you could do better than anyone else? What is it that you are passionate about? How are you different? And I think if we just even go back to the very foundation. Of, the, of why we even started our business because it wasn't to make cheap stuff that well, we're a penny cheaper than anybody else, and that's why I started my business.There's no passion in that. And we can start to build our branding, or you can also help them build their branding by taking them back to the essence of what makes them unique from every other maker out there. Yes, and I find that most manufacturers make the mistake of talking about what they do, and what they make instead of why they do it, which is what you just said, right?And that's people don't buy from you because of what you make. They buy from you because of why you do it. And what's in it for them? How does it? How does it empower them? How does it make their life easier? Nobody wants to buy a drill, but they do want to make a three-quarter hole, make a hole.Yep. Most manufacturers have such a unique story. Nobody else has, but they've bought into this idea that we need to tell people how long we've been in business, how many square feet of manufacturing floor space we have, our history the more we tell you about ourselves and the, the products that we make, the more compelling it's going to be.And it's not. But when you start from a place of difference, for example, one of our clients is a custom circuit board manufacturer. And when you look at his competitors, everybody's saying the same thing, right? There's a lot of; there's a lot of me too. There's a lot of wee. And we looked at their operation, their business. They have 20 employees.They're not doing gazillions of dollars a year yet, but they've been around for a long time. And I said, you know what you guys do better than anybody else. You uncomplicate something complicated. You uncomplicate circuit board assembly, and your team is down to earth, and there's just this human element with this technological, Piece that I said, that's what makes you guys different.And as soon as we flipped that, and we led with that on their website, I, he's had people ring him up, and we rebranded, changed their logo, and made it a lot more relevant today. And he's gotten many compliments. People are like, oh my gosh, I love what you're saying. I love this.It's speaking to people. Sometimes it's something as simple as you uncomplicate something. Another manufacturer we work with, your natural gift is that you guys make this part of the construction process easy. Your competitors are all big corporate; they're doing many other things.They make it hard. You guys make it easy at every turn, and they said is that unique enough? And they said it is. No one else is talking about it. It doesn't have to be complicated. That's the thing, it's usually right under your nose, and you're just too close to it to see it yourself.Lisa Ryan: And it can be something that everybody else is doing. Several years ago, one of the beer companies came out with a label that turned blue. If the beer was super cold, I'm sorry. Everybody's beer will be the same amount of cold.But because they thought ahead, to make theirs blue. Everybody started thinking that theirs must be colder, but that was because they had something different that nobody else was talking about. You find that one thing you just summed up beautifully that you can own.Speaking of providing services and benefits to manufacturers, I have been an expert on manufacturing masters. I know that is your baby and your passion. Why don't you tell us a little bit about what the Manufacturing Masters platform is and why it's valuable for manufacturers and reps?Allison DeFord: Great question. It's the baby of Darren Mitchell; I give him all the credit. Yeah, he's awesome. He is an entrepreneur; I call him Midas. Everything he touches turns to gold, and he's very down-to-earth. And he created this Netflix for manufacturers because of what he likes to call it.But instead of entertainment, it's education and best practices. And me and my company had the great pleasure of helping him name it and develop a brand, and we came up with the tagline, everything they never taught you in school. That's what you're going to find on this platform. And the cool thing about it, Is you're not being educated by just willy-nilly random people, right?These are up to 130 vetted, battle-tested, and trusted experts. I'm on there talking about marketing. You're on there as well. It's every possible subject that you can think of. And one of my favorite stories, Is Darren was in a room with a bunch of manufacturers, and he was, they were talking about this platform, and the one guy just he'd been real quiet, and he raised his hand.Darren said, yeah, what's up? He said I've been doing my job for 26 years, and until I watched the best practices about, I can't remember what the exact topic was until I watched those on this on manufacturing masters. I had no idea what best practices even looked like for my job, and now I do. He's God; I wish I would've had this years ago.And it was just; it's that kind of transformation that happens. And the cool thing is I also have the gift of working with MEPs and associations to bring this to their entire audience. And Darren has priced it in such a way because he fully. NPS and associations and their value is that when they bring this into their program and offer it to their people, not just one person gets to subscribe.Every person in that manufacturing company gets to subscribe for the same. It's all covered. It's incredible. He keeps opening it up. And I keep saying, wow, when I think you're being too generous, you get more generous. And he said that's the point I wanted to bring this to people like me.He owned a business for 26 years, 25 maybe. And he said A lot of times you feel alone. Yeah. You don't know all the stuff that you need to know. And if you can have this support system at your fingertips, It's on demand; it's short. He purposely made, and you know this, every video is like anywhere from two minutes to, some of mine were 20 minutes because I was one of the ones at the beginning, and he's we have to shorten this up.We have to make it the right size and easy to consume on your time. You can grab this nugget and put it into action.Lisa Ryan: Yeah. Most of mine are in the five to seven-minute range. But the interesting thing about the platform that you alluded to is that regarding people being vetted, it's like any sponsors do not pay Darren to be who I want to be, and I have my own channel on manufacturing masters.Allison DeFord: I felt very blessed that he found me because of my work and invited me to participate. But if I would've just found him and started prospecting and trying to sell him on why I would be such a great expert, there's no way he would've had me unless he did the full background.So that's what I like about it, is that it's real people. Real plants. It's not you don't have. I'm a professional speaker, but I am the exception versus the rule. And you're just getting real people sharing their stories about what they do. And as you said, you've seen people learning in those little snippets of information many times.You must have access to something that I could sit down with, I could watch a five-minute or a 10-minute video, get some great ideas that I can put into practice, and you know what? And if it's not right for me, maybe it's not right this time, and I go on to another expert because I have 139 more people I can watch.And when you were on the Manufacturing Masters podcast, you brought up an excellent point, and I think it segues beautifully with this or ties in, I should say. You said it's not 2019 anymore. We can never return, so this platform is incredibly important and relevant today.Number one, everybody's zoomed out at this point, right? And we're working differently than before, consuming much information, news, and social media feeds. It's overwhelming to me, frankly. It's a.when you have many options. It has to be. Our attention spans are, have shortened tremendously.So that's why I think it was brilliant on his part to make these all very short to the point; he had zero fluff. Nobody's trying to sell you anything, right? It's, let's jump into this topic and
undefined
Aug 7, 2023 • 26min

Revitalizing Manufacturing Brands for Growth: Insights with Ed Delia

Connect with Ed Delia: edelia@delianet.comWebsite: Delianet.comLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/eddelia/Lisa Ryan: Hey, it's Lisa Ryan. Welcome to the Manufacturers Network podcast. I'm here today with Ed Delia. Ed is president of Delia Associates, a B2B brand growth firm based in White House, New Jersey. As a second generation of the firm founded by his father, Ed and his team of 12 serve a broad range of manufacturers in various market sectors, helping them use brand power to accentuate growth. Delia Associates has received over 50 industry awards for B2B brand marketing effectiveness in the last four years alone. Ed, welcome to the show.Ed Delia: Thanks much for having me, Lisa. Great to be here.Lisa Ryan: share a little about your background and what led you to do what you're doing with Delia.Ed Delia: Sure. Delia Associates was founded in 1964 by my father. Being part of a family and a family business, you grew up around it. I was always. And involved in the family business but never see it as a future occupation. Until shortly after college, I was all set to take a job outside of Philadelphia, and Dad and I had one of those heart-to-heart talks, and he said what do you think about coming into the business?Learning it from the ground up, and you buy me out and take it over? And it took a weekend to think about it. And said, wow, I'm about to pass up on business ownership. I don't think I should do that hastily. I said, yes, let's do this. And when you're in a good place, when time kind of flies, I looked up, and a year passed by, and I blinked.I'm like, wow, okay. Things are moving fast. I'm learning a lot. I'm doing a lot. This must be a good fit for me. That's where it all started. And. A few years later, we executed the buyout process, and then some years later, my dad retired, and the ship was mine. It started as a traditional business-to-business advertising and PR firm.And I always had a real keen interest and passion for brands. After taking over, I started to explore and immerse myself in the power of the brand. I realized at the time there was an unmet need where there were a lot of manufacturers who were our clients. Historically, They've been clients in manufacturing, engineering, processing technologies, and automation.There was no real clear sensibility of brand the power of a brand. It became my mission to bring that to them and to bring that to that audience and help them understand how powerful a brand could be when its marketing programs were enriched with a brand strategy and intent. So that became my life's work to date.Lisa Ryan: Okay. And you think of manufacturing, you think of brands with the large manufacturers out there, but when it comes to your small and medium, mid-sized manufacturers, how important is your brand to near and long-term success and growth of the organization, no matter your size?Ed Delia: It's critical even for the small manufacturers because they all compete. They're competing with companies of the same size, of smaller sizes. And often, they're trying to compete with much bigger entities. For them to have a voice in the mix, they can use brand power to accentuate their reason for being their mission, the value that they bring to we often say to our clients because some of them are small and mid-sized manufacturers, it's not about being the biggest, it's about being positioned as the best.Because when a buyer sees you as the best possible option, and they have that emotional connection through your brand, they're going to say, we're going to go with this firm. They're the best; they're the best fit for what we need right now. And then that's how we aim to position our clients.Lisa Ryan: if they, everybody has a brand, whether they've focused on it or not. And especially in the last couple of years when everything has changed. How would a manufacturer know when it's time to either rebrand or rethink its image and position in the marketplace?Ed Delia: It's a great question, and we often come up against that one. We often say it's time to rebrand, and we see this often when the organization's capabilities have outpaced the image. We'll often hear things from CEOs like we are; we're capable of much more. We're capable of bigger opportunities. We're not getting them. The larger clients or, the bigger engagements aren't seeing our value.And that's because their capabilities, from a capability standpoint, they're up to the task. They can handle the biggest, the strongest, the most complex requirements. But from a brand standpoint, they're just not being seen that way. Often say to Clarence, it's not; we all know about if we use a phishing metaphor; we all know about the big one that got away.But I'm more worried about all the fish that circled the bait and never took a bite because they said, no, this is not a good fit for us. They're not up to the task. They can't handle our needs based on how their brand is positioned. Ensuring that the brand is commensurate with the organization's capabilities is critical.And a lot of times we see that they. The organization has outpaced its identity, and that's when it's time for a refresh. And we see ten other common triggers to rethink or reposition the brand. But that would be a big one.Lisa Ryan: You think of branding or branding and marketing and all of this stuff, which just sounds expensive. What are some low-cost ideas that can get manufacturers to get started about thinking of their brand and then determining where they want to go if they want to make a larger investment, but take that fear and that, oh boy, I'm going to have to write a massive check to get anything done? What, how can they get started?Ed Delia: One of the things that we often do as a first step is to start a very focused conversation around growth before we even endeavor to get into discussions around the brand. Because sometimes, if a manufacturing leader doesn't fully understand or can't wrap their head around the brand initially, they most certainly understand growth.And often, we will work through a bit of a growth model where we help them prioritize the top three to five growth channels for their organization. That is ultimately going to move the lever and the needle. And then, from there, we start to assess whether that growth strategy could be realized with the current brand or if brand revitalization is required.It's not always necessary, and it's not always the first step. It's just an important step when the company is stalled, has hit a plateau, or is being held back by the brand. And then it's easier to make that value proposition because we're like it's not much what we're paying for, it's what we're losing in terms to competitors or the opportunities we're not getting If we had a stronger brand, we would be growing faster and further.It's been proven that well-branded companies will outpace their non-branded counterparts by two to one. There is an acceleration there once you do go down the path.Lisa Ryan: when you talk about growth, that probably means a lot of things to other people. And you said different components of growth. What do you mean by that?Ed Delia: When we look at a B2B or manufacturing enterprise, there are three primary growth methods. You either get more new customers or extend and expand current relationships with current customers. Or you increase buying frequency.Those are the three primary growth methods for a B2B organization or a manufacturer. From there, we've modeled that for each of those methods, there are ten growth channels a manufacturer could engage in to create that growth. Now, what you're left with then is 30 growth channels.That's a lot for anybody to swallow, even a large organization. I never suggest that. What we work with our clients to do is say, what are the top three to five that in the next 15 to 24 months will most readily and rapidly move the needle for this organization? And that's what we prioritize.And then that's what we encourage them, therefore, facing service and sales teams to prioritize. And then that's what's the prioritization in marketing. We're always working towards a growth strategy that, at the end of a period, we can say, how did we move the needle? Did we, ultimately, affect the change?And the strategies could range from either expanding a service line or expanding to a new market sector. Or, in adjacent markets, let's say the manufacturer sells into pharmaceuticals, and they see an opportunity to sell into it. Maybe the veterinary or medical device market is an adjacent or somewhat adjacent industry.Let's look at how to pivot and extend that way. Or it could also be establishing joint ventures or partnerships with other supply chain providers to extend their reach. It could also involve this one that big and large, big and small manufacturers miss asking for referrals and introductions.It sounds simple. But you would be surprised that even the most accomplished sales professionals don't do that or don't know how to do that well; sometimes it's as simple as that we helped the company almost double in two years just by saying, look at all the relationships you have. Imagine if you went out and smartly asked for introductions, and they did, and the growth was phenomenal.Lisa Ryan: I think the critical thing to learn from that lesson is a lot of times, we're going to hire a marketing company to come in and do a rebranding, and we want to do everything at once. And as you said, there are 30 different channels that they could choose from, and then just determining from the standpoint of what is the three that we should at least start with and get those going.Ed Delia: And maybe that baby step is we're going to teach you how to ask for referrals. It's not doing everything all at once. It's doing one thing, getting good at it, then doing the next.So it's almost like you're getting 1% better with everything you do. Over time, that will lead to big changes, but not getting. It sounds like you're helping them not to be overwhelmed with this whole process by reigning them in a little bit. That is very much, very well stated. We often say it's better to execute with excellence than do too much or too little.So I would rather see a company do three to five things incredibly well than try to take on 10 or 15 initiatives and fail at all of them. And that's part of the prioritization, which will get them down the path, the best way, the furthest, the fastest, and the best possible way.And that's where we prioritize. Yeah, it's only sometimes doing it all at once. We also have to consider bandwidth, resources, and what they can do, manage, and afford at a given period. That's commensurate with their organization. That's factored in as well.So I would never put on the table a massive program for a small niche manufacturer that they could never afford or even undertake doesn't make sense. Let's fix some doable strategies and paths that align with our focus and desire for growth, and let's work on those and execute them well.Lisa Ryan: aside from the increased visibility we've been discussing with the brand, what do you think are some other benefits people get when portraying a strong brand?Ed Delia: Interestingly, over the last two to three years, we've been getting more requests for rebranding from the manufacturing community driven by hr.Be driven, being driven by sales and marketing. And the reason is many manufacturers need help attracting and retaining great talent. Often, they have an employee population starting to age and look to retirement. Those people have a lot of tribal knowledge.They know a lot, and they can do a lot, but eventually, they're going to, they're going to say, okay, I'm done. It's time to retire. And there's just not that next generation coming up through the ranks that will take on those positions. And many of the emerging workforce generations, mainly the millennials and a little Gen Y, are just not seeing manufacturing as a sexy path.Although they can do great things in manufacturing, they can make. Some healthy incomes in manufacturing, right? We've been doing a lot of brand development and campaigning around attracting talent versus new customers for our manufacturing clients. That's become a big benefit. And a lot of the leadership and manufacturing are manufacturing realizes we better look the part for this emerging generation; we better showcase as a place that welcomes them is a good place for them too. To come, grow, and develop as our next great employee population.Lisa Ryan: Wow. Yeah. That's such a good point because I know a lot of times on this show, we talk about the workforce and how hard it is to find people who want to come into manufacturing, and then what do you do to keep them? It sounds like. When you have that strong brand, you are creating a workplace that people are proud to work for because it's known, a brand that's respected, and a brand that people are proud to work for and do business with. It would make attracting people to at least check out the organization easier.Ed Delia: Yeah. And the emerging workforce, they, they're. They're a little different than maybe a year in my day when we were entering the workforce and just happy to get a job. Exactly. Let's just get that first job. That's all we care about. They want to work for a place that has meaning, contributes to the greater good, has a purpose, and is on a journey where there's growth. They're looking for a lot more out of the experience of working, and The manufacturing leadership needs to be attended to that and can't stick to the old ways of just saying, oh, just be happy to be employed and have a job.Lots of places and ways for them to do that. And they don't need to be in the manufacturing community to do that. Manufacturers have to work harder, too. I would say the industry at large could be doing a better job at doing some missionary work to showcase that manufacturing is a great career path for the next generation workforce.Lisa Ryan: Oh. There was much gold in what you just said there, but even showcasing manufacturing, what dawned on me too is the manufacturing day, the first Friday in October, to use that as even a kickoff to your branding to show that this is what we're doing in the community, this is how we're interacting. This is our brand, and. Also, to realize that we are not returning to the good old days. Sometimes in my talk, when I'm talking about keeping your top talent from becoming someone else's, and these people come in, and they have that attitude that nobody wants to work anymore, and I can't pay these people enough, and they're not willing to pay their dues.Nobody's going to pay their dues anymore. They don't want to do the crap work nobody else wants to do because they can get tenure and build up their way. It's no, it's a different world where you're not coddling your employees, you're treating them with respect, you're listening to their ideas, and you're creating a workplace VI environment that is in this post-pandemic employee-centric marketplace that we are just not going back to. I'm sure you have dealt with prospects, and many of them understand that they have to change. And then other ones say, I don't need to do any of that. We've been doing it this way for 50 years. Those are probably not the ones you're working with.Ed Delia: No. They and those that may be tried to hold to that. They are quickly changing their tune and realizing that getting people to work for them used to be easier, but now it's not. And now they have to work a lot harder at it. And, some of them are like, do we have to do all that?And I'm like, if you want great talent, yeah. Yeah. You have to fight for it. And if you're willing to fight for it and you're willing to give them a great experience and a great environment, and they're going to stay and grow, You're going to grow, going to grow. Because great talent drives the bus a lot faster than throwing a body at an assignment that couldLisa Ryan: And the interesting thing, too, is we used to worry about losing our people to other competitive manufacturers down the street. Now, with all their options, we're not losing them to their manufacturers. We're losing them to Amazon; we're losing them to Uber. We're learning, losing them to DoorDash because people want to have their businesses and do their own thing instead of being disrespected, told what to do, and treated like another cog in the wheel.So that's the image we need to change with manufacturing, branding, and getting the word out there. We can do that. When you're working, how would you suggest manufacturers develop a realistic growth strategy for their company?Ed Delia: It starts with prioritization, looking at the three primary growth methods, and then assessing the growth channels and carefully assessing which ones are most relevant to that organization. And those are the ones we can then dig into, focus on, and build a real growth strategy, subsequent marketing planning, and then potentially brand planning around that to build a framework they can start to use and work toward.So that everybody, all. Everybody's flying in formation in the organization. Everybody understands what the growth priorities are, and everybody's working. Because when you get that momentum behind it, it will happen. It's going to happen. But with that, if there's clarity or people don't know, manufacturing organizations flounder because they need to know the priority, where they're going, or the focus. They need to know that. And that needs to be reinforced and reemphasized on an ongoing basis. It's not a one-and-done, and you're there. You have to keep working at and working at it, and then you get there, and you get that momentum going. And once that momentum going gets going, it's exciting. It's exciting for all.Lisa Ryan: what have you found to be some of the most effective marketing methods that manufacturing brands can use to reach new audiences?Ed Delia: there's some new and some old right now, and this is something of a post covid getting together and gathering.People love returning to trade shows and conferences because they couldn't for long, and it's human nature to want to gather. In the last year or two years, Our clients have all been very aggressive about returning to shows and meeting and greeting in person to re-establish that human...
undefined
Jul 10, 2023 • 27min

Overcoming Common Manufacturing Mistakes with ERP with Nick Foy

Lisa Ryan: Hey, it's Lisa Ryan. Welcome to the Manufacturer's Network podcast. Our guest today is Nick Foy. Nick is the founder, CEO, and Chief Evangelist of Silverdale Technology, which provides access to world-class processes, systems, and change management methods, regardless of the size or budget. Democratizing ERP, he has over 30 years of experience in business and technology consulting and leadership positions, focusing on logistics and supply chain. Nick, welcome to the show.Nick Foy: Thanks, Lisa. It's great to be here.Lisa Ryan: Share a little about your background and what led you to do what you're doing with Silverdale.Nick Foy: Yeah, like you said in the introduction, I usually say it's been 30 years, but I probably should increase that a little now. I've been saying that for a couple of years now. It's time I revised that number. But my background I started on the manufacturing line. That was my first job in the manufacturing line, producing video recorders.And I'm guessing some of your listeners aren't going to know what the hell I'm talking about. Whatever the hell is a video recorder, and why would you make one? That was my first job. I probably got sacked from there after three months for being a disruptive influence on the production line, and I'm pleased to say after 30-plus years in the industry, I'm still doing the same thing.Lisa Ryan: Is that disrupting things?Nick Foy: Absolutely. Asking questions, pointing things out, and making changes is what I do. As I said, I started on a video recorder production line. I then moved into what every good Scotsman does - I ended up working at a whiskey company and worked a lot in production and logistics in that in that business for six years, and then went down into third-party logistics and which was a great experience., and then, found myself in consulting. I worked for some great clients, such as Kellogg's, doing manufacturing and lean manufacturing with them all over Europe. I eventually ended up at Amazon and spent five years at Amazon doing some great projects there.Three and a half years ago, I founded my own company here at Silverdale, which is about bringing together the 30-plus years of experience that I have and helping companies that I've seen over the years, just like those, get into ERPs and systems and helping companies with process design and implementation.Lisa Ryan: Can you explain what ERP is and why it's crucial for businesses?Nick Foy: ERP is such a horrible phrase. Anyone who's not in the ERP industry doesn't call it that. It's a ridiculous phrase that we use internally. And when we say ERP, it stands for enterprise resource Planning.Now, that doesn't mean anything, either. We all know what those three words mean individually, just not in that order. What we're talking about is we're talking about a set of tools within a system that helps you to manage workflow to help give you a single view of the customer, a single view of your business, where all your data is connected, regardless of whether it's customer or product, bills, and material, whatever those things might be.Having it all in one place so you can make better, faster, smarter decisions. That's what an ERP is. And it's designed to replace a whole myriad of different systems out there that many companies are using if you get it right.Lisa Ryan: Regarding manufacturing, which is the show's focus? What should leaders in a manufacturing company look for to implement an ERP system?Nick Foy: If I were a manufacturer, some of our clients are very much into light manufacturing but also very heavy manufacturing. I recommend that you don't look at it in isolation from a manufacturing perspective, what's happening left and right, up and down in the manufacturing space.What we mean by that is how did the manufacturing order get created. What did that happen in the first place? Is it? A sales order. How did that sales order get created? Did it come from CRM? You've had to look left of that process. Then you have to look right at that process. Once it's manufactured, what do I do with it? Do I put it into inventory? Am I managing that through lots of serial numbers? How do I ship that to customers, get it off the shelf, et cetera? And then we've had to look up and down. What we mean by up and down is then looking at things like how do we control things like versioning. How do we control the bill's material?How do we control things like PLM - product lifecycle management? How is all that controlled? And then there's the detail of the manufacturing process itself: how are work orders controlled on the floor? How do I get instructions to operators? How do I make things clearly and easily understood on the shop floor? How do I control quality maintenance, all that great stuff that goes along? Again, because we're talking about all those things, it's about more than just that core manufacturing part of the system. There are lots of inputs, there are lots about bots, and there's a lot of stuff up and down at that as well.As far as manufacturing's concerned, there are a lot of great standalone manufacturing systems out there. We know that. But you've got to ask yourself, does it do everything to the left and right and up and down of this process as well? If it doesn't, then you'll have a hard time in manufacturing.Lisa Ryan: There are probably some challenges you've observed in the manufacturing and industries you've dealt with. What are some common challenges, and how can an ERP system address them?Nick Foy: One of the, one of the biggest challenges we see from our clients and especially over the last few years with covid and supply chain issues, is, do I have everything on the floor ready for me to start my production process?That's one of our most common issues when starting this production run. Do I have all the raw materials I need where I need them? And again, that comes down to your inventory control, how you receive products, how you store products, and how do you pick for production. For example, I can start the job by ensuring everything is in place. And getting that visibility here are the jobs I can start and those I can't. Your system needs to give you that kind of insight into material readiness or component availability.There's nothing worse than starting a production when realizing a quarter of the way through you're missing a vital component and then having to scramble. You either have tons of work in progress now taking off the line, or you have to substitute something else that may not be as ideal as it could be.There's nothing worse than that. Certainly, the availability of components and ensuring that inventory shows that the start of manufacturing is one of the biggest challenges our clients have faced. I believe it is, especially over the last few years.Lisa Ryan: What are the most common mistakes manufacturers make in implementation?Nick Foy: One of the most common mistakes we see is going too complicated, too quickly. We see clients with multi-level bills and materials: sub-components, sub-assemblies, et cetera. We had a client who we've helped get out with some of that over the last couple of months. We had an eight-level bill of material. And the reality is that it needs to be simpler for them to manage. All those sub-assemblies are part of a sub-assembly, part of another sub-assembly. And the poor operator on the shop floor is just; they're clicking buttons on the ERP. It's taking longer than it did to create the product. That's when you know you're in trouble. When the operators spend more time pressing buttons than they make the thing, you've gone to the too complex and too low level and your bills of material.Lisa Ryan: How would they fix that if it was such a complicated process that they already have? How would they backtrack and get out of that?Nick Foy: It comes down to which ERP system you use or the manufacturing system you use. Our system of choice is DU and with DU manufacturing. Rather than just a blunt bill of material or sub-assembly process, you also have a lot of other tools that are available to you, such as we can create different work centers to help manage that complexity. We can also create operational steps within manufacturing that can replace some of the sub-assembly processes.So sometimes, it's about something other than dumbing things down. When I say about getting complex too soon, it's not about dumbing it down to say, let's have a single level and deal with everything offline. What it comes down to is you've got to use a myriad of tools available to you in your ERP to make the complex a lot more straightforward.And rather than just seeing Bill's material as that, a blunt tool to fix that. There are a lot of other things in your ERP that are available to you to help fix those situations. This is where using a partner like what we do here at Silverdale becomes vital for these companies. Trying to do this on your own is problematic because guess what? You don't know what you don't know, or you don't see how other people solve This same issue, having a partner that you can call and say, Hey, Here's a problem I'm having. What do you think? And we can talk you through it.We've got another client in a similar industry, hardware, with a similar challenge. Let us talk you through how we solved it for them and then set up a demo and a walkthrough and help the team to understand that it is an important part of what we do as a company and how would a company know if they weren't using an ERP system, how would they even figure out that, Hey, maybe this is something that I should look at or do things a different way that I'm doing.Lisa Ryan: What would be some telltale signs?Nick Foy: One of the very big telltale signs is a lack of visibility. If you have a sales team selling the product, they don't know the customer order status, especially when you've got custom-made products. I'm sitting in the car now. I've just finished another client who does one hundred percent of what they do is custom. Every single job, every single project is completely custom. Their problem was that the customer would call in and say, Hey, I'm just checking on the status of my order.The problem is that they would have to call the customer then back. I don't know its status; I need to know the material availability. I don't know what's going on in manufacturing. I don't know the scheduled date. I don't know the ship date. And they'd have to call that customer back.Now what they can do, Is immediately see, okay, yeah, great, I've got your order here. They call in, and we know who it is because of their telephone number. We can bring up their project and bring up the manufacturing order. We can see the status of the material and the scheduled date they're ready to do. Certainly, you are experiencing some of those types of issues. If you can't see the visibility of when things are happening or be able to answer those questions in a single contact or a single phone call with a client, then it's probably time to start doing that. If you've got a lot of work in progress. If you've got a lot of inventory and capital tied up in your whip, it's time to pick up the phone. As I like to say to people, implementing an ERP is never too early, but it's always too late. The best time to do your re-ERP implementation apart from today was yesterday. And it's never too early to start that journey.Lisa Ryan: A lot of the show focuses on the workforce and creating that type of workplace culture, and we know that nobody likes change. When implementing a system, how do you approach change management for organizations now, especially if there may be some employee resistance?Nick Foy: I don't know what you're talking about. That's what never happens. You never run into that. Of course, everybody buys into it right away. Everyone sees the panacea; everyone sees the oasis that we're selling. It's never an issue. Yeah, I've, of course, it's always an issue. The biggest way that we do that is spending time on site with the, not just with the client and not just in the boardroom. We spend very little time of our time in boardrooms. We spend a lot of our time on the shop floor understanding how things work today, but also explaining and showing and demonstrating what it will look like tomorrow.And I know, I don't know what you're like, Lisa, but I know what I'm like If someone came into my workplace and started moving things around on my desk, put the mouse on the other side, put the webcam, underneath the monitor instead of on top. I'm going to be pretty pissed at that, and I want people to explain to me what the hell a benefit of that is.I want the opportunity to have input. There's a famous saying, I can't remember who said it now, but I use that a lot, which is if you're going to change me, involve me. Okay. We're very big on being on the shop floor, showing people what's happening, and getting them to be part of that process as early as possible. This change is not something you can do to someone. Otherwise, it's a very negative experience. I am spending a lot of time on site, helping our clients with their change management process, creating that awareness, creating the desire from people on the shop floors. They say, oh, that's way better than these pieces of paper, or It's way better than me going to this whiteboard every five minutes to update the quantities, or whatever it might be.It is creating that sense of awareness and desire. Give them good training outside the conference room, because guess what? Nothing's done in a conference room. But doing a training on the shop floor, creating a training environment inviting four shop floor operators to come and press buttons. Not being afraid of pressing the buttons. It's got to be a big hurdle for people when they see buttons that say, okay, cancel. Delete. Oh my God, am I going to delete the whole system? Getting people used to pressing buttons in a safe environment and helping them understand, you're part of a bigger picture here.A lot is going left and right in what you're doing. And being on the shop floor during the go-live and the training and the support is incredibly important to be part of that team. We're very good at what we do. We spend much time engaging with the operators on the shop floor.You'll regularly see us there in our blue shirts, on the shop floor, answering questions, helping operators, and getting to know them individually. In a lot of cases, everyone is in change management. Everyone does this at an individual pace. And you have to engage with individuals when you do this sort of thing. This is not something you can do in-mas. There are lots of tools and tricks that we have up our sleeve to make that happen. But, it's it is quite a journey, but again, it's a very individualized journeyLisa Ryan: Do you have an example of a client that you worked with, like a before and after where the employees were fighting it, or they were just a mess, and y because of that process that you just shared, what the benefits were what the turnaround turned out to be to benefit that customer.Nick Foy: Yeah. Yeah. I've got a goa couple. We have a client down in Georgia. They are manufacturing. They're a print company. They're manufacturing a lot of letters, postcards, and various other things on demand for some big nationwide entities. We spent a lot of time on their shop floor. Before the ERP, they had another system on the shop floor, but it wasn't available to the operators. They weren't using it for real-time updates on production. They had a wad of paper that would follow the order all the way through, through the shop floor, to make sure everything was accurate.Now what we did is again, we spent a lot of time on that shop floor with the operator understanding, what they do today, how they do it today, and then showing them, for example, on an iPad, we put technology on the floor. We put some iPads on the floor that are not what they're now using to run their manufacturing operations.What was interesting was showing them how easy it was to use. And I'll tell you, this is a big revelation for me. This first time on the shop floor with that client was about a year and a half ago when we first did that, and that was a. a big epiphany for me because it was fresh out of Covid.We hadn't been on-site with clients for quite some time. And it was interesting that when we were on the shop floor, we gave them an iPad with a keyboard attached, thinking, okay, they're going to use that and do this. The first thing they did was touch the screen, and that was a big revelation for me that things have moved. People have shifted now to they're expecting to touch screens. They're not expecting keyboards and mouses on the shop floor anymore. The old ERP systems manufacturing shop floor systems were complicated and looked cumbersome.You asked the question earlier about how you know when it's time to look at an ERP or look for a new system. If you've got keyboards and a mouse on your shop floor, you should replace them. There's no place for a keyboard and a mouse on the shop floor. And if you find yourself having to do that, you've got the wrong system. Things have moved on over the last five years. And if that's what your operators have to use, then it will not be intuitive, especially for this new generation of workers who are very used to touchscreens, et cetera.This is a significant learning for me; it is that, wow, this world has moved on. That client spent a lot of time on the shop floor, getting them used to the workspace, also giving them some choice around, okay, where should we put this touchscreen? Should it be on the left? Should it be on the right? Should it be underneath? Should it be on top of here? And giving them some choice around their workspace as to, oh, that's the most convenient. Put it up here. Oh, great, fantastic. Let's put it here. It gives them this sense of involvement and part of that process.We're not just going to stick it there, and it's that weird angle they can't reach or use easily. Certainly, doing small things like that makes a big difference when implementing this type.Lisa Ryan: Yeah, and with Covid, the last couple of years, we've just, we've had no choice but to adapt to technology. Technology itself has changed to become much more user-friendly.Nick Foy: Yeah. The shop owners think they have an older workforce, and these guys will never buy into this. They're not going to do it. It's no. They are. And, as you said, it's an expectation.Lisa Ryan: I do the same thing. I immediately want to touch the computer, and it's like when people tell me, oh, you have to use the mouse. I'm like, what?Nick Foy: Oh, absolutely. Yeah. We call it the official price screen. If it doesn't look like Fisher-Price. If it doesn't look like something you get on a kid's toy, then people aren't going to like it because they want big buttons. They don't want it to be difficult to right-click on something to make it go to the
undefined
Jun 5, 2023 • 29min

From Piles to Smiles: Improving Manufacturing Culture with Vince Sassano

Connect with Vince:Website: https://3dspc.com/LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/prodotrak/Lisa Ryan: Hey, it's Lisa Ryan. Welcome to the Manufacturer's Network podcast. I'm excited to introduce our guest today, Vince Sassano. Vince is the CEO of Strategic Performance Company, SPC. A leading provider of software and consulting services that enable manufacturers to increase throughput, grow profitability, and permanently improve workplace culture. One of my very favorite things to talk about. Vince, welcome to the show.Vince Sassano: Thank you for having me on.Lisa Ryan: Share with us about your background and what led you to do what you do with SPC.Vince Sassano: I am a degreed computer engineer and have been involved in manufacturing and consulting for over 30 years. Much of my experience with manufacturers came with installing and maintaining ERP systems. I owned a business with my partners on that. I subsequently sold that business and focused specifically on the plant floor because there was a tremendous need and an area where technology could help.This would've been back in the nineties when I did this. When I made that shift, I could utilize my technological talents in a lot better fashion, in conjunction with my consulting talents, and that's how it all started.Lisa Ryan: When it comes to workplace culture in manufacturing. Quality is a big thing, and we have to make sure that we're delivering on time supply chain, but workplace culture is the thing that makes it all happen. What do you think are some things manufacturers should do to improve their organizational culture?Vince Sassano: One of the first things they should do is review their organizational structure and see if they're just simply talking about the same issues over and over and not changing or are in a place where they can foster good communication from the frontline up to the front office.Lisa Ryan: How would they get started? If or how would they know that there's a problem?Vince Sassano: The simple answer there is data. You must have some information about what's happening; numbers are the best place to do it. I come from a culture long ago where the best way was what we used to call M B W A, which is management by walking around. The plant manager and the supervisors would walk out on the floor and look and see if they had a good or bad day based on stacks and piles and where they thought they ought to be. Then, at the end of the day, they would use just a gut feeling. Yeah, we had a good day. Yeah, we had a bad day. How do you know? How do you know unless you're performing some form of empirical measurement of what's happening?Lisa Ryan: Data, of course, is essential, but by walking around and seeing not only the piles but and looking at your employee's faces? Are they hiding from you when you're walking through the plant? Are they smiling and greeting you? So when it comes to workplace culture, that's still, even though we don't officially talk about it as much as we used to with the M B W A, it's still a critical component of assessing a company's workplace culture.Vince Sassano: I agree 100%. First and foremost, the people on the frontline want to matter, and they want to know that they matter. And if you have a culture that fosters that, then you have a better opportunity of not having that be a hindrance when it comes to performance. And you can see that when you are out on the floor, you can see it.I was told once by a management consultant when I read one of his books, and he said the best sign of a well-run plant is everybody walking around calmly. Because everybody's doing what they are supposed to be doing, and nobody's running around with their hair on fire. The best indication of a poorly run plant is everybody's running around like a chicken with their head cut off. They go from crisis to crisis. You can see your employee's faces. You can see if they're struggling. You can see if they're in crisis mode, and that will give you an indication of the fact that there's an issue there.But then you'll need to bring the data in to determine why this is happening and what we can do about it. Do we need more labor on the line? Do we need to change some machinery out? Is there a piece of machinery that's a real struggle? For example, from experience on the back end of the line, if there's a problem with the case taper or the case packer, which is usually the end of the line in many of the companies I work with, that's a struggle.That's just because that's the last thing they need working before they can palletize it and ship it off. And they are starting at the back end of the line and moving forward, looking at the employees and their actions. So that will be a significant indication of what's going on.Lisa Ryan: Also, make sure that you have current data. Because, as I like to say in my programs, we are staying in the good old days of 2019. After the pandemic, our priorities have changed, and that level of connection has changed. Everything has changed, and there's an expectation for things that in manufacturing we would've never thought about before - flexibility, shortened workdays, having shifts like the mom shift from 10 to two, and just making sure that you realize that data needs to be accurate and constantly talking to your employees to find out where they are and what resources they need. And I like that analogy of starting at the back of the line and working backward. Yeah.Vince Sassano: I can share with you that when it comes to cross-training, it was never more critical than during the Covid days. Having multifaceted people, you can move them around from line to line and from different parts of the line. And we have one of our customers who has a compensation program where one of the components is, "Are you useful and trained on multiple machines? Do you want to learn how to run this machine and run that machine?" That's the way the employees can then help control their destiny when it comes to that. If you think about it, manufacturing was the only industry with Covid that you can't mail in. How can you make your products remotely?Lisa Ryan: Exactly. You can't, no. And when it comes to cross-training, too, you think that you may have your employees in one part of the plant or an employee in one part of the plant, and when you cross-train that person in another plant, it lights them up. We discover that, hey, we have the right person on board, but maybe they're in the wrong seat on the bus, and it allows us to cater to that employee to find out what they're best at, what they like doing because we have a much better chance of keeping them that way.Vince Sassano: Yeah. And one of the big things we have as a corporate ethos and will never drop if I'm sitting in this chair is that people matter. People matter, and unless you have a fully automated line where stem to stern, it's a hundred percent robotics, your quality, and your efficiency, and everything is all computer generated. If you don't have that, then people will always matter. And quite frankly, that's the type of people we excel with and work best with because that's where the culture matters most. Because there is no culture with a machine, culture is people. And it's how people work together and interact.Lisa Ryan:  What are you seeing regarding some of the triggers from manufacturers when they need to consider a change or continuous improvement for their workplace culture?Vince Sassano: They're obviously feeling some pain, and they've had some event happen – a financial hiccup, loss of a key customer, some turnover, something has happened. That has given them a little bit of a kick in the pants. I can tell you a story about a prospect we were working with. They made all of the leather seats for John Deere. They had the exclusive, but it wasn't an exclusive contract. It was we've been working with these people for 35 years, and it turns out they had a problem with the machine and they had a problem with the operator. So through a series of events, they missed some shipments, which greatly affected John Deere.They said, listen, I hate to do this to you, but we cannot have you as our only supplier anymore. So we're going to have to take you out for bid. And boy, was that a wake-up call for them because they had been doing good for decades. And then, all of a sudden, they had a problem. They didn't have any backup provisions and ended up losing a significant portion of the business because, from John Deere's perspective, they could not afford that liability.Many people, especially in the manufacturing industry, don't necessarily think about what they will do if something goes wrong. But, especially when something has always gone right, that's not the case; contingencies are increasing, especially with the Covid situation. Contingencies are becoming increasingly important, so it's usually some event that happens.Lisa Ryan: We pay attention to things when it's either going well or something terrible has happened. But when things are just going along swimmingly and the day-to-day, we take that for granted instead of continuing to have those conversations and recognizing and acknowledging people for doing their job, doing it well, and keeping things running smoothly. When we get away from that, where it sounds like with that particular company, maybe they got a little lax or a little complacent because they'd had the business for so long that they assumed. They would have it forever, which only happens if you pay attention.Vince Sassano: They would've had it forever without a problem. Nothing would've changed. One of our customers does something that I like when it comes to this. This concept of weaving culture and technology and data and people, they always set on an annual and a quarterly basis, two things. One, they set a goal. For their productivity, they set a stretch goal, okay? And they say, okay, here's what we want you to hit. But if you hit that, here's what we want you to hit. And it helps combat complacency. And that's what you're talking about. You get stuck in the same old, same hole, and everything's running fine, and there's no incentive for what if we tweak the machine up a little bit?What if we get it going faster? What if we kick it up one bag a minute? Is everything going to blow up, or will we see any problems that come up? And having that stretch goal has encouraged me—the culture to continue to expand on an incremental basis. You're not trying to double your productivity in one day, but you are trying to say, okay, we've hit our goal for the quarter, the first four weeks in a row. What do we do now? Let's look at the stretch call. And I must commend the VP of management and the president of that company for coming up with that concept of being able to do that. Because then it gets you to know what your organization's limits are.Lisa Ryan: And then, how are they getting the buy-in from the people on the line? Because obviously, you want to meet your goals, and then there are the stretch goals, but there's got to be some reward for the employees or getting their input or doing something so that they still feel valued. So they are willing to put in that extra effort that we hear so much about the quiet quitters that don't. So what is this management team doing to get their employees excited about these stretch goals and meeting the regular goals?Vince Sassano: There are three different components to it. It's not every department. Most departments have a stretch goal, but for some, the first thing you do is educate. They educate the people on the front line about what management is trying to accomplish and how they're trying to accomplish it concerning meeting a particular goal. And then the second thing that they do is they give them access to information and data about how well they're doing. And what could they do to improve; what are the primary issues that are presenting or hindering them from being more productive?There's a communication that goes on there, so the employees feel part of the process because they're part of it. Then the third thing is they've implemented a pay-for-performance model in some areas of their company where the employee can see a direct benefit to wanting to reach the stretch goal. So, for example, reaching 85% efficiency on their line puts them at a level two employee with this particular pay scale. If they get to 90%, that might bump them up to level three. Okay? Now, productivity is not the only component. There's quality, safety, and cross-training; there are so many other components that they've added to that paper for the performance model.But still, the employee understands. What the important the importance of efficiency is and productivity to themselves? They get it. After all, they've bought into the system because they understand that education is the first step.Lisa Ryan: When they reach the goals, is a celebration a part of it? And how do they do that?Vince Sassano: Yes, the celebration happens on a shift by shift in a day by day and week-by-week basis. Because what they do is they take their information and they post it on the board. There you go. It's right there where all the employees walk into the locker room, and they can see all the productivity, efficiencies, downtimes, issues, and charts going up and down and sideways and all that kind of stuff.They make it very visible to the employees. In the meetings that they have, the daily production meetings, the weekly production meetings, and the monthly trend meetings, they talk about. The stuff that they post and what's going on. And it's in those meetings where the employees, and the dissemination of that information, feel part of the team; even if they're not in the meeting, they know their boss is in it. And then the boss says, hey, I just met with the shift supervisor or the plant manager, and he's happy about what we've been able to do on these lines with these products and let's keep it up. Good job. And by the way, here are some of the struggles that we've had, but here's what we're going to do about it. So it's a lot of open communication. But this communication can only happen because they're speaking a common language. And they must speak a common language.Lisa Ryan: That level of transparency you shared is so important because some companies think I want to keep my employees manageable. Or if things aren't going well, I don't want to scare them or whatever it is. But if they know that you are laying everything out and being transparent, good times, bad times, everything in between. Because if you go through a good time, things start getting bad. Your employees are much more likely to say what if we try this? What if we try this? Because it's like they know their jobs better than their managers know their jobs. When managers are transparent, it trickles down that employees are much more willing to share.Vince Sassano: Absolutely. When you've got people on the frontline daily, they know what's happening better than anybody else because they're there for their entire shift doing whatever task. And it's imperative that they feel that they matter and that information trickles down in that transparency. I agree a hundred percent is significant. I don't think information dissemination is not done because they're worried about overwhelming the employees. They can take on a lot more than people think they can. And you shouldn't limit somebody's capability based on the position that they're in. You should limit their capability based on what they're capable of.It's that stick factor that's more of an issue because the managers are afraid to share the information because they think the employees are going to feel they're going to get beat up with that information. So they don't share it. Or the employees are afraid that if they say what's going on, it will be a stick and that they will get beat up by it. That is a hurdle, but it can be overcome. Overcome, and you overcome that hurdle through education, but not just educating on the what? Educating on the why. Why are we doing this? What is it that we're trying to accomplish here? It's that type of transparency. That is a tremendous booster culture.Lisa Ryan: That's one way to ensure you are keeping your more tenured employees relevant. Because they understand the history, they understand the why, and it's up to them to share that passion with the newer people coming in that don't have that same level of history and background so that they can more fully understand the why. They have that same level of passion and passion that your more tenured employees have.Vince Sassano: I agree. And when the tenured employees are at their position, walking around, or in the lunchroom, they carry themselves differently because they know that they have achieved and earned a certain amount of status. They garner respect from management because they're instrumental, and they garner respect from their peers and the people that work on the line with them because these people know that this guy's been around in a while and he knows what he's doing. Exactly. That's where cross-training and information dissemination are essential.I'll tell you a short story. One of our customers had a problem with a can labeler, and they noticed through their information that it consistently ran better on the first shift than on the second. The first shift was 85, 90%. The second shift was down in the seventies. And I pointed that out on some of the reports, and I was like, why is that? I went to the guy on the line. And he was like, oh yeah, I developed this little technique that the machine sticks, and if I have a little bit of a ruler and when it sticks, I just poke it keeps things running smooth. The second shift guy needed to learn of that. I went to the manager, and I told him that, and the manager said that's an easy fix.I'll have the first shift guy stay late and the second shift guy comes early, and he can show him what he's doing. And that happened the next day. And when he showed what he was doing, the second chief guy said, " Oh my gosh, thank you so much. I have this problem all the time. I didn't know what to do. So it's those little nuggets of information that unless you have that culture that encourages that type of cross-communication or you have a reporting system that can point that stuff out where you can ask why that's when things can pay dividends.Lisa Ryan: Absolutely. I know you have a background in technology, so what are you seeing as far as using technology with change management to improve the organization's culture?Vince Sassano: What I'm seeing is that the more you can interweave technology with people, Not the opposite, which would be people with technology, the more
undefined
May 29, 2023 • 32min

Breaking the Stigma: Why Autistic Workers Make Great Employees in Manufacturing with Peter Mann

Connect with Peter MannLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/peter-mann/Lisa Ryan: Hey, it's Lisa Ryan. Welcome to the Manufacturer's Network podcast. I'm excited to introduce our guest today, Peter Mann. Peter Mann is the CEO & Founder of Virginia-based Oransi, a leading air purification company known for its efficient, intuitive, and reliable products for consumers, schools, organizations, and businesses. He is the Chair of the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers' Air Cleaner Council. Peter is late diagnosed autistic and now advocates for autism awareness in the workplace. Peter, welcome to the show.Peter Mann: Yeah, thanks, Lisa. I am excited to be here.Lisa Ryan: share a little about your background and what led you to do what you're doing with Oransi.Peter Mann: Sure. Yeah. I grew up in Syracuse, New York, and attended college in Rochester nearby. I didn't know what I wanted to do. So I took a Navy ROTC scholarship which effectively paid for my college. Then I was in the Navy for four years, which was interesting and unexpected since the first Gulf War started. We got sent over to the Middle East and didn't anticipate that.After four years, I got out; I got a job at a company called Tech Data in Clearwater, Florida. They're a large computer distributor. I was there for seven years. It was exciting because this was in the nineties, was the computer industry started to take off. We went from Fortune 500 to Fortune 100, and I moved up from an individual contributor to director of Marketing Operations.In 2000, Dell recruited me. I moved to Austin, Texas, and did some development work for dell.com, and then I moved to a marketing role where I was a marketing leader with the Dell printer launch, managed pricing strategy, and a few other things. That's when the.com bubble burst.I was at Dell for about three years, which pushed me to start something on my own. So I co-founded an e-commerce business with another guy in Austin. I sold my part in 2009 and used those proceeds to create Oransi, focusing on indoor air quality and, specifically, air purifiers. My interest in that was because my son suffered from asthma as a child. It was rough, especially in my younger years in elementary and middle school. So I've always been interested in trying to help him and others like him who suffered from respiratory issues.Lisa Ryan: It seems you do one thing, and suddenly, you join the military, and you're in the Gulf War. You go into the dot com industry, and the bubble bursts. You're on all these trends; air purification hits and a pandemic.Peter Mann: Yeah. Who knew? The pandemic was incredible because there was more demand in supply. What's been interesting is that many brands entered the market. It was more of a niche market before Covid; now, the market's gone back to more or less pre covid levels. But now there are two or three times as many brands as before. So it's going to be interesting. I would add that, during Covid, we merged with an electric motor company in Virginia that has a proprietary motor technology, which will allow us to restore manufacturing; that's where our focus is now.What's exciting about that is we can latch onto the next trend, electrification and moving away from fossil fuels now that we have this electric motor base. We're starting with air purifiers since that's what we know, but we could make anything with an electric motor in our facility. For me, that's pretty exciting since the air purifier market, as much as it is, it's painful to say, it's become more of a commodity since there are too many brands in the space for the market size currently.Lisa Ryan: You mentioned before the show that you were actively bringing this reshoring back from China to the United States because you can do that almost as cheaply as it was before with China. Talk a little about why that is happening and what restoring a business is like.Peter Mann: Yeah, I have to keep relearning this lesson because it always takes longer and costs more than you, you would think. From a cost standpoint, though, on the product, what we've realized is if you're buying components or raw materials, the cost is similar here versus in China; the difference is in labor. So we've been focused on how to take labor out of the manufacturing assembly of the products. Because if you can take the labor out and make it much more efficient, you can close the gap from a cost standpoint and may make it lower cost than you can from China.The other thing that's happening is these tariffs have been coming on, coming off. They're 25%, which is more significant than ocean freight. We got crazy expensive during Covid. So it's back to where it was pre covid. But that's another variable risk regarding sourcing from China in the longer term. We've talked to several companies, and there's interest in wanting to restore and not rely on manufacturing anything in China.Lisa Ryan: It sounds too that you're focusing on going from fossil fu fuels to more electricity and with that clean energy mission. Talk a little bit about that. Why is that important to you?Peter Mann: It's the right thing to do. It's the moment in time. I remember the nineties, and the computer industry was like that's all the momentum was. If you look at the government and where they're putting the funds in terms of chips, batteries, investments, several other efforts, and import tariffs. The focus is on how we make stuff here and how we make it here competitively. And you can fight it. But that's where all the momentum and the market's future are. Clean energy will be similar to what the computer industry was like in the nineties and early two-thousands.Lisa Ryan: I'd like to spend some time talking about your journey with autism. First, finding out, you said that you were late-stage diagnosed; what were some of the signs, first of all? Then I'd like to lead the conversation regarding potentially hiring workers with autism. We look at the fact that in the labor market, we need more people, particularly in manufacturing. We have a lot of people that can do a great job, but maybe due to fear or myths, or not knowing or not being educated as far as this group of people who may make great employees if you can share from diagnosis to what you've discovered and what you're sharing now.Peter Mann: This was something that figured out during Covid. My wife was watching a C B S morning show, and they did a profile on a woman that maybe worked for NASA, and she was describing her traits. It was a profile of her as an autistic person being successful in the workplace. When she told me her traits, it was exactly how I was. My wife watched it. She's, oh my gosh, you need to watch this. If I had gone back a couple of weeks before that, we would have had a conversation where she was upset about something that poured out her heart to me. I wasn't feeling great, and I had no response.It went from her being upset to What was wrong with you? You don't have human emotions. I have no words, as I had, my brain was empty, and you know, when she saw the C B S Morning show, you're like, oh, that explains a lot, okay. Yeah. I watched it, and I'm like, holy cow. That's right, I went online and took an online screening tool. What's pretty interesting is that one of the leading authorities in doing these kinds of assessments or research into autism is the disguise, Simon Baron Cohen. He's a cousin to Sasha Baron Cohen. He's a Cambridge professor anyways; he has these 50 questions, and in the assessment, you get a score from zero to 50. Most people score a 16, in the 18 kinds of range; autistic folks tend to score above 30. I took it, and I scored 43 out of 50. Then I took several others, and they were all consistent. I'm like, holy cow, I want to. Get an official diagnosis. I didn't want to be like, feel like a poser, like I was then. I didn't know I was autistic, and I didn't even know a lot about autism.I started calling the local autistic clinics or centers in this area. They're all geared towards children; then there's one. I live right by Virginia Tech, and there's one that is part of the campus, and they could do it, but they wouldn't be able to see me for a year and a half. I eventually found someone that did it via telehealth, and she's in Oregon. She did it because her husband was autistic, and she wanted to provide the service to other autistic folks, particularly underdiagnosed women. I worked with her for some months and officially got the diagnosis. Since then, I've been reading a lot and educating myself on what autism is. Even if it's not what most people think, it's a different way of thinking, perceiving, and communicating.Some co-occurring conditions may or may not be present, such as speech, cognition, A D H D, and a whole slew of other things. So there's essential autism, and then there are co-occurring conditions, which most people think of a lot of co-occurring conditions when they think of autism. That's not the core of what autism is. But you may have those conditions as well.Lisa Ryan: For somebody unfamiliar with it, what would be a good definition or examples or something they may need to know a little bit more about, be comfortable with what it is. Because we all have our ideas of what we think it is, but according to you, it's probably a lot different than what we believe.Peter Mann: A lot of it is having awareness for what's going on with the autistic person. It's that our brains are wired differently. I don't view it as it's been stigmatized as a defective person. It's more like a left-handed versus right-handed person. Your brain works differently. It's not that it's a bad thing. It's different than the way 98% of the people are wired. You're in the; you're in the 2% group. That routine is essential. But you have a routine because it helps you manage anxiety. People need to stick to routines to be simple. It's a way of being your best self.Another one that is widely prevalent with not understood is sensory sensitivity. We can discover disabling if you think of the senses, which most people find annoying. It's a level of intensity. If I go into a loud restaurant, I can hear all and none of the conversations. They're all like, if you think of Charlie Brown's teacher went to the wah wah wah. It's like they turned the volume up what allowed restaurants like me, and it becomes exhausting over a while of trying to hear conversations.It's like when you plug all the appliances in and blow the circuit breaker, and nothing's working, then why isn't Peter joining in the conversation? And you have no idea how hard this is in this situation. The environment drives a lot of it. When I talk to other people, they're like, nobody likes that. We speak louder it's because I don't have that natural ability. There are certain filters that people have that you could filter out, like other tables that are talking and listening to the person at your table.I don't have all those filters. I'm hearing our table's conversation two tables over, and they're all; it's like having people talking over each other is what it's like. It's exhausting. Do you tend not to put yourself in those situations to cope? That's another difference.The other thing I have, which is helpful in the workplace, is hyper-focus; they call it a state of flow. I can, get focused on something, block out everything around me, and have all these positive chemicals going. That's served me well in the workplace because I can sit for hours on something. I know sitting for that long is not healthy, but I can get completely lost in something and shift to a higher gear that I intuitively know most people don't have.Lisa Ryan: When you're in a loud restaurant, all the words are there, and you hear everything. But when you're in flow, you hear nothing because you're focused. Is that something that you can turn on and turn off? How do you get to flow at work and not in a restaurant?Peter Mann: Because at work, it's something, it's a singular thing that I'm interested in. I can focus on it and then, naturally, block everything out. The problem is if somebody comes and knocks on my door and says something, it's jarring. To come out of that state is a sleep state, but it's like you're being startled.When that happens and you can't, like in a restaurant, I can't get in a state of flow. Because I walk in, and it's woah. I can see the volume going up, and it's overwhelming. I've talked to people, and they're like, can't you get used to it? Or can't you and I'm like, to me, it's like touching a hot stove. It doesn't matter how often you feel it; it will burn. It's like there's no way around that. There's nothing anyone can do to help me in that situation other than not get into that situation. Don't touch the hot stove. My hand's not ever going to get used to it.Lisa Ryan: From a manufacturing standpoint, because on one side, some manufacturing plants are loud, and things are going on, you could get in that routine. Where are good jobs? If you're thinking of a manufacturer, in your experience in manufacturing, where would be some good places for manufacturers to consider hiring people with your skillset?Peter Mann: I guess what I would add is, I'm one person, and I described my experience, but it's like when they say autism, there's a massive spectrum of abilities. Some people have ADHD that I find are super creative in design—coming up with new things. Others have hyperfocus, but they can get distracted a little bit. Like me, I don't have a d c at all. I'm like all in on focus. So for me, it's like a process. If you look at Silicon Valley, they have a high percentage of autistic folks because computer programming is, you dialed in on the computer coding, and you get lost in that.You can have someone on the assembly line that's doing specific tasks. You can get focused. I can do things other people find boring if I'm interested. That's the key. It is an engineering, but if you look at the arts, creative people like David Byrne from Talking Heads are pretty open about being autistic.And it's different from the engineering computer traditional guy like I'm a math person. I'm like an autistic person. But other folks have different talents. It spans almost any job accounting. There isn't a limit to what folks can do. The challenge is most autistic people can't get through the interview process because if you come in, you don't make eye contact. It's like, this person's not trustworthy, or you get asked a question you have yet to think of. So we tend to be more bottom-up thinkers versus most people being top-down thinkers.When you ask a question, if it's something we haven't thought of before, we're going through all these options and details, then it's there can be like, I do this myself with some people, like an awkward pause because I'm thinking through like, how do I best answer that? And the other people, are you there?I get inward and have a lot going on internally, but my face shows nothing, and in an interview, it does. It could translate better. You're like, this guy's or girl is weird. I can't see them being part of our team, and it's unfortunate because these are some of the most like, hardworking, loyal people desperate to work. It's like the Ph.D. that's working at minimum wage. The unemployment numbers are crazy high, up to 80%. I don't know what the actual number is, but most autistic folks are average to above-average intelligence. The other thing is, I'm Gen X and grew up in the seventies and eighties.When I was in elementary school, one in 2,500 was diagnosed as being autistic. Now it's more than 2% more than as high as one in 36. It's not like autistic people didn't exist before; we weren't diagnosed. Unless you have very high support needs, anyone that is a later millennial will be late diagnosed autistic. Almost none of us were diagnosed. You think of how many hundreds of millions have gone through the public school system, trying to get jobs or being diagnosed with other things and not understanding that you're autistic. I don't think there's anything wrong with anyone that's autistic or different. It's, it's when you have most people one way, and it's this is the right way to be, and then you have a small group of people who are a different way. It's, oh no, you're. Yeah, you guys are wrong.Lisa Ryan: When it comes to workplace culture because again, there are many interesting points because we want people to get along, and we have this, this friendship, this relationship building, which is difficult for people who are on the spectrum because of what you said about not knowing how to get to those emotions or asking the question, having to spend more time processing questions that you've ever that you haven't heard before.One of my side hustles is teaching HR law on virtual programs about the ADA; in the interview process, it's not like you can have that conversation; do you have a disability? Because, of course, that would go against ADA. How could a manufacturer craft an interview? Is it sending out the questions before time? Is it give some ideas because, as you said, if I have somebody come in and I'm interviewing, and I don't know about autism, and you're not making eye contact, and you're staring off into space when I'm asking questions, I'm going to do that.Hey, this guy's going to be a bad fit. But if I have an awareness of that. He may, he or me, she may be an excellent employee and can do exactly what I want them to do. So we have to not only have an awareness from my standpoint but to share this with the rest of the people so that we can make those I don't even want to use the word accommodations, but that level of understanding that because this person is different doesn't mean that he's any less than anybody else on there.Peter Mann: Yeah, I would say, you know this, I don't know who said this, but I agree with it, is that autistic folks are more like the canary and the coal mine, and changes that you make to the benefit of the autistic person helps everyone if you're doing an interview what I've seen, which when I've talked with autistic people, they're blown away by, this is It's about setting expectations and having an understanding for what to expect.If there's an interview, give someone a document saying this is where you go. This is what time, this is who you're meeting, this is who they are, this is what you wear. These are the questions we're going to ask you. This is how your day will go for two hours. So someone can mentally prepare for that and see the questions relevant to the job they can think through, like, how do I best answer this? Because the person doing the interview wants to do the best job, but it's, The interview process is primarily set up for social extroverts, which is traditional, right?There's this invisible hierarchy. Autistic folks tend to be at the bottom of the social order. This levels the playing field. If you go to a meeting or something and you're like, this is the agenda or a meeting, and this is what to expect.For me, elementary school was a nightmare. Then when I got to sixth grade, I had a schedule. I knew where...
undefined
May 22, 2023 • 29min

Sustainability and Manufacturing: How New Technologies Can Help Save the Planet with Renan Devillieres

Connect with Renan DevillieresWebsite: https://www.oss.ventures/LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/renan-devillieres/Lisa Ryan: Hey, it's Lisa Ryan. Welcome to the Manufacturer's Network Podcast. Our guest today is Renan Devillieres. Renan is the visionary Founder and CEO of OSS Ventures, who is dedicated to shaping the future of the manufacturing sector through startups and innovative solutions. With substantial operations, SaaS, and venture capital background, Renan is an inspiring leader committed to driving sustainability and fostering adaptability in the ever-evolving industrial landscape. Renan, welcome to the show.Renan Devillieres: Thank you for having me.Lisa Ryan: Please share your background and what led you to do what you're doing with OSS Ventures.Renan Devillieres: Sure. I'm 36, and I started my career as an operations guy. I was working in factories. I was a factory director and supply chain director. Then, I became the assistant director of Richmond Co., a luxury company. And I got to see the incredible world that produces physical things, and I loved it. And then, as I was always a geek, I started coding something in my bedroom and ended up creating a good tech company, leaving my job and ending up in San Francisco, setting my startup to Google, and having a lot of traction there.I discovered the world of tech. And when I sold my company and my shares in the company, I told myself the World of Tech is just incredible. I love operations. Let's bring those two worlds together. And as I had a bit of money, I chose the investor slash venture builder path.What we do at O US Ventures has been three years and a half. We either create or invest in startups technological startups that are exclusively helping the physical world, operations, retail, and those kinds of things. So we've been doing that for three years and a half. We are based in Paris, but we are all around the world. We created 15 companies. We live in a little over 1000 factories worldwide, and 350 people are working for all those awesome tech solutions for the manufacturing world.Lisa Ryan: You started by saying that you were 36 years old, and I know that in manufacturing, changing the conversation to attract younger people to it. What originally made you consider manufacturing an option and something you became passionate about?Renan Devillieres: It's a funny story. I come from a background where people need to learn what even a company is. And I was good at math. So I did the math, then opened Google, and I put a company most well-known for being good at doing business, and the number one result was McKinsey Company. So I applied to McKinsey Company, not knowing what it was, and I was recruited there. I'm very grateful because they taught me a lot about business. On my first day, they told us to choose orientations, and I ended up selecting operations because it sounded cool, and I wanted to do things with the physical world.I did not know what a factory was. I was just a fresh graduate knowing nothing, and I learned my job there. So the first time I went to a factory, I saw that incredibly complex web of people working and incredible speed-changing matter, and I said, okay, this is the dream. This is where I want to work for a lot of time because when you're a geek like me, and you like systems, and you're interested in those kinds of things, It's paradise to me.The two most interesting things you can think of, and work on are either a tech company or a factory because those two systems are incredibly complex, beautiful, and interesting.Lisa Ryan: It's nice to see with such an emphasis on tech, and I know we're going to be talking about AI and all of the new things that are coming into manufacturing, but just to be able to marry those two worlds. Because, again, it's changing that conversation to find people passionate about the physical world and the intricacies that go on with that. In your life, how do you see the future of manufacturing evolving? Particularly when looking at integrating new technologies and increasing automation in factories.Renan Devillieres: It's very interesting to see. I think manufacturing is just the result of two basic passes. First, what do people want, and what does society want? And the second is which technologies are available. And to those two questions, I answer very simply. People want a different social model. People do not want their products to be made by slaves in Bangladesh or China anymore. That has changed, and people would like to leave. Unbelievable planet. People want local things that are more respectful of the environment. Energy prices are high, everything. That's the forces.What is new in technology is that the steam engine and the electrical power automated everything manually and moving beats around. Now, we will automate everything repetitive and intellectual with computers and AI. And what I think is going to happen is that our production model, our factories will be different. They're going to be more local, more green, and more respect for the workers and more automation. So that's a big part of what operations are going to be. And there will be all new infrastructures, giga factories such as massive infrastructure models with billions and billions of capital.It's going to be taking all over manufacturing. And let me take two examples. When I was in California, I went to visit Tesla Freeman. In Tesla Freeman, you have nerds younger than me running around wearing t-shirts and programming machines with their Macintosh laptops. That is the future.Another glimpse of the future of manufacturing operations is a company that stopped sourcing in China. What they do is, as a customer, you pay every month, and you get clothes for your baby. And when your baby has grown, you give back the clothes, and they give you clothes of the right size. What they do is they repair all kinds of clothes, and it is very automated. It is very different. And they don't use materials anymore. They just repaired it. And it's very different as a system, but it's very green and profitable.Lisa Ryan: Wow, I never even heard of that. And we're going to talk a lot about startups and helping them scale, but if you have a legacy manufacturing plant doing things and all of this, you're speaking a foreign language to them; what do you mean? Mail ordering clothes, repairing them, and walking around in t-shirts and programming machines. So is there hope for legacy manufacturers, or is it best to start with a clean slate and have a startup?Renan Devillieres: Yes, there is hope, and I like to take an example, a very simple one: 30, 40 years ago, a little Japanese car company named Toyota invented a new way of organizing factories. They invented Lin, which was ridiculously different from everything everyone did then. Radically different, but it was 20 to 30 points better. And everybody started doing Lin. When you look at a high-level picture of what happens, it took 20 years. 25% of all the factories died because they were not competitive and could not transform themselves. But 75% made it on the other end. And with varying degrees of success, you can only go to a factory with a continuous improvement arm.And they do things, and they do daily meetings. It's going to be the same with tech. Tesla F is the new Toyota. That's the new blueprint, but there are 20 years in the future, and there is to, there is going to be a catch-up movement. It's going to take time. Some companies will die, but some will make it, and it will take time, not because of the tech but because of the people in the future.Lisa Ryan: Such a good point of just realizing that everything is changing and looking at asking questions that you may have never had to ask yourself before. Because business is changing, and as you said, there's going to be a certain percentage of those businesses that, if they don't change, will die.If they want to keep up that, then to explore when you're talking about your approach to identifying and supporting innovative manufacturing startups, you have the small company. So how do you help them scale?Renan Devillieres: We have a very particular method of doing that. First, you need to address a widely available pain point to scale. So I have a 20% team each week. My team visits three and four factories all over Europe, and they ask people like, what are your pain points? What needs to be sold? How much money do you have to solve it? Is it in your top three? And we only work on what we call a burning platform.Like burning hair issues, nice-to-haves are not candidates. That's the first part of the answer. The second part of the answer is that we don't invest in startups or create startups where implementation time is more than two weeks per factory. This rules out 90% of the startups that we are seeing.Of course, you can create a company with six-month or 12 months implementation cycles. Yes, can you scale That? It seems too hard for me. And we only invest in startups that are doing that. So the third thing that we do to help them scale is very simple. We created a platform, and that platform shares technical components to be able to connect to the top 15 ERPs in factories instantly.And that platform shares the contacts of all the innovation-friendly European factories and us. And when you enter the USS community as a startup, you get access to roughly 250 companies—accounting for 1000 factories already deployed on the SS network. And by combining those three factors, our startups achieve consistent 300-person growth year, the average in Repository.Lisa Ryan: I think the lesson that anybody listening to this show can take from you is going around and asking employees about their pain points and acting. On the most critical, those burning issues because there are many times that we think we know what the employees are doing, where they know their job better than we know their job.And when employees see that you're listening to them, there's a much better chance that they will be engaged and committed and help in the process. So true. You mentioned this several times regarding the importance of caring for the planet. What are some of the key strategies that companies can implement to become more environmentally responsible?Renan Devillieres:  I can tell you what I've seen starting to get a lot of traction. It's an ongoing issue. Everybody's speaking about it. We'll see. It's a continuous development, but we've seen first improving processes and improving your footprints on the planet. A consistent thing we have seen is that leaders in being positive for the planet are leaders in performance. There is no anti-correlation. That's the first. The second thing that we have seen is that focusing on the value that you can bring to your customer and then trying to perform that value in a very lean way in terms of the effort and the materials, and the footprint that you have on the planet can lead to incredible results.Let me take an example. One of our customers is Michelin, the tire maker; I love it. I love them. I love all my clients, Michelin. They have a factory producing 40% fewer tires and making 40% more money. And they do that by putting a chip in the tire and selling kilometers or miles for you, us people, to their clients.And they say, I, this is a price per mile. You only pay for the miles that you do. By doing that, they can start improving the lifetime of the tire. They're incentivized. To do less and fewer tires, and they'll get more and more money by producing fewer and fewer tires. And their engineers started working not on improving processes to do more tires per hour, but more kilometers per euro, which is different because you're not optimizing for the same thing.It can help you optimize for the right thing, which is the value, not the object. And what we see a lot of shifts from optimizing for the objects you're producing, which is sub-efficient. You stop doing that, and you optimize the value you create for your clients. And you can reduce the items, increase the value, and take more money.Lisa Ryan: Yeah, that gets into that quality versus quantity conversation. And it's also; you're making fewer tires, you're going to have less waste because you're getting more kilometers/miles for each product sold. So what an interesting way of looking at the things we know are the right thing to do, but when you put dollars behind it, it makes a little bit easier conversation.Renan Devillieres: Of course. Let me take another example. We are working with some of the suppliers of Apple. Apple created the machine. The machine's name is Julia, and what is the machine doing? You can take any iPhone and put it in the machine, and the machine can take any iPhone apart, change components, and put them in little boxes. You can reuse those components for the next generation of iPhones. Their goal for the next generation of iPhones is to have at least 50% of all the value reused in the following phones. When you do that, you reuse the stress on the planets per iPhone and increase the dollars per iPhone.Lisa Ryan: Wow. And people feel better about buying iPhones because they know they are getting products made of 50% recycled material and have less of a negative impact on the planet.Renan Devillieres: Precisely. And for the listeners, if you want to put on YouTube, you put on YouTube Apple Machine, iPhones, and you'll get a video of the machine. It's incredible.Lisa Ryan: We spoke about a little bit, but what do you think about artificial intelligence and machine learning regarding the future of manufacturing? And if you still need to get there, how can companies prepare for these advancements in both?Renan Devillieres: artificial intelligence is both over-hyped and under-hyped. We are overhyping what it will do in the short term and under hyping what it'll do five to 10 years from now. Five to 10 years from now, I'm a former artificial intelligence researcher, and 30 to 40% of all intellectual jobs we're doing will be automated.By AI, if it's intellectual and it's repetitive, it can be automated that will happen. And for example, in manufacturing, and designing new parts, there is already a lot of generative AI and putting a new program in a robot. It's very repetitive. And there is already there is a Stanford startup that is coming from you. Just type a sentence, take the red thing, do a quarter rotation, and put it in the box, and the robot does it.This is going to happen for sure. And it'll take time. And you ask the question, as a manufacturer, what can I do for it? In the artificial intelligence age, your edge is your data and ability to implement fast. With the new technologies on those two fronts, manufacturers are historically bad. 70% of all the data in ERPs and systems are not usable for artificial intelligence because of the data structure, bad data, and because they need more data. As a manufacturer, having good data hygiene and having some nodes and data scientists is an excellent first step. And then the second, when you look, Tesla or SpaceX, or B Y D be your dream is the number one car, an electric car manufacturer in the world. It's a Chinese company. They have data scientists who change the production process every three or six months. Having agility helps you as a manufacturer use the new technologies because if you change your process every six years, then at best, you'll be three years outdated. When technology paces of change go from five to 10 years to one to two years, your frequency of changing your processes has to go down. You have to be more agile, and this is something that manufacturers have historically been bad ads. Let me take basics as an example.SpaceX is launching a new rocket every three to four months. And each rocket is a new version. Building upon the learnings of the last rocket today, no space company could have the path. The best space company's path was one to two years between each launch; they're bringing that down to freaking four months. The versioning of the cars is once every six months. And increasing the pace of change to embed those learnings and those new technologies is essential to surviving that next normal.Lisa Ryan: That is undoubtedly one of the significant challenges that are facing manufacturing today. What would you say would be other significant challenges that manufacturers are dealing with, and how do you think startups can help address these issues?Renan Devillieres: Number one, talent for sure, like number one. If you look at another vertical, another market, retail. Retail. When Amazon came, they were bad at the internet. They were bad at marketplaces. They were terrible at all—that new stuff. And there was a first wave where they said, ah, it's not going to happen. Denial manufacturers a lot of manufacturers are in denial right now. Still, in retail, after that, Amazon became dominant, and when Amazon became dominant, they morphed, and they had to hire talents from startups from the tech world.From those new companies to increase the pace of change, change the culture, and modify the systems. And in manufacturing today, for example, decathlon, an excellent sportswear brand, they are new. C e o comes from Google. Wow, it's a freaking manufacturing textile company. Steel is from that new layer of talent, bringing a new set of crypto technology processes; the pace will change the manufacturing world. But the challenge is getting them on board, retaining them, and giving them the keys to change the crypto. But that's going to happen out of all of this.Lisa Ryan: As we end our time together, what would be your best tip to a manufacturer listening today? And let's say that they are not necessarily a startup but want to make some of these changes. What would you advise?Renan Devillieres: A very simple thing. Get your hands dirty in one big issue that you have at your factory, and be open and say, okay, what if I could solve this with tech and start small, have big ambitions and scale fast for that problem, and then do one another, and then do another, and then do another and exponential change comes from rapid scaling of good local solutions, gone global.Lisa Ryan: And how do you work with your clients? How would somebody listening today know they should schedule a conversation with you? How can you help?Renan Devillieres: Two things that we do. The first thing is if any manufacturer in the world has an issue or something they want to talk about, they can book a call with someone from my team, and they will say either, look, we have our database, 100 manufacturers like you. They all had the same issue, and here is how they dealt with it.That's the first type, the second type of answer; we have more than thousands of...
undefined
May 15, 2023 • 28min

The Human Connection in Manufacturing: Bridging the Gap between Operations and Supply Chain Management with Tom Pierce

Connect with Tom Pierce:Email: Tom@i2s.usWebsite: https://i2s.us/LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/tom-pierce-6799b356/Lisa Ryan: Hey, it's Lisa Ryan. Welcome to the Manufacturer's Network podcast. I'm excited to introduce today's guest, Tom Pierce. Tom is the President of Integrated Information Systems with decades of experience; Tom brings a unique perspective to solving complex problems in integrated business planning, cost and schedule analysis, and cross-functional collaboration.His ability to combine human intelligence with innovative software solutions makes him an invaluable resource for those in the manufacturing sector seeking to improve efficiency, streamline operations, and drive sustainable growth. So Tom, welcome to the show.Tom Pierce: Thank you so much, Lisa. It's a pleasure to be with you.Lisa Ryan: Share a little about your background and what led you to do what you're doing now with integrated information systems.Tom Pierce: Certainly. I'll cover the mountain peaks. I took my one and only one computer course in seventh grade. That would've been about 1972. After that, I never took another course. I was self-taught and was fascinated with how computers and technology can help solve problems. It was a side interest for a very long time. Then, I went to college on an Army ROTC scholarship. On my first day of reporting for duty, they plucked me out, seeing my math major, knowing that I loved computers.I was on an analysis team and did simulation modeling for the Army missile maintenance, ammunition, and logistics. After I left the Army, I started working for a defense contractor, developing logistics models for the Army. From there, they put me in with a defense manufacturing facility in Louisville, where I help install an MRP system.That was over 30 years ago, and I'm still helping maintain that MRP system through all its variations and improvements. Seven years in, I quit working for the defense contractor and went out on my own Because I didn't like how my employer treated my people or clients. So I hung my shingle, and we've been in business and will have our 30th anniversary this summer. We have loved supporting everything about the manufacturing and finance piece within the defense industry and a significant client, a major defense contractor. I've been blessed to fall in with many subject matter experts that have guided my career. I was a programmer/analyst. I live on the slash. I am naturally an analyst who knows how to program, so I got bilingual that way. It is a huge opportunity to be embedded with the people who use the software I've written and some of the software I analyze and critique.Lisa Ryan: Right off the bat, you brought up an interesting point. You left one employer because of how they treated you and your people. You don't have to go into immense detail, but what were some of the biggest mistakes they made that caused you to leave? And then how are you turning that around for your employees to create a workplace culture that keeps them?Tom Pierce: Thank you for asking that. That's one of the most important things about what it means to be in business for me. Anecdotally, during one of the most critical demonstrations we had been developing for two years, we fried a computer getting ready to do a demonstration for a room full of 300 Army generals.One of my newest employees came to work for me from Toys-R-US. He was brilliant but could have made a better impression. He volunteered his brand new 486. Another one of my employees drove it down for five hours so we could use it, and we could use it, but we fried his monitor.The employer refused to reimburse him for the monitor we fried. Later on, I was denied a request to give my employees raises. I was denied permission to throw them a Christmas party; a stellar recommendation would produce a 2% raise that the bonuses were in the range of, maybe enough to buy a new suit. The words and deeds didn't match. The final straw was when it was time to renew the contract with our Navy customer. They raised their rates tremendously because they knew the Navy had become dependent on us in that area, creating a tremendous amount of stress, budget, personnel, all that kind of stress that I didn't need to deal with.So I undercut them by 40% and won that contract away from them. As a result, I retained many critical people, and employee retention, family, and team building have been a massive part of our success.Lisa Ryan: It sounds like they were, picking up pennies and leaping over dollars because a little bit bigger raises the price of replacing that monitor or the monitor. It's not like they even had to give 20% raises. But how much money did they lose to make employees feel valued because they didn't do these little things well? And in a market where it's so important to find people and then treat them well enough so that they stay. People need to realize that it's not all about the money. Money plays a part in it, and sometimes you've got to spend a little money to save a lot.Tom Pierce: One of the most authentic expressions of appreciation; put your money where your mouth is. But there are undoubtedly many ways; they need to be consistent. The money, words, and behavior must match your value to the people doing the work.Lisa Ryan: You and I were talking a before the show. Not only do you have military experience, but you talked about, but you have a pastoral ministry, then you have the application software. How have these experiences shaped your approach to solving complex problems that the manufacturing industry is dealing with?Tom Pierce: I used to think I suffered from a dissociative identity disorder or something like that. I have a hat rack with many different hats, but in recent years, they've emerged more. I've started to see how even the seminary education, I'm only half joking when I tell people that what I learned in seminary is more applicable to business than it ever was to church ministry. The problems are not dissimilar. The difficulties of trying to get people to work together well, whether they're volunteer or paid, whether they're clients or employees - the human dynamics. I understand you have a bit of background or emotional intelligence yourself.There's a full range of human experience, whether you are talking about a military commander leading men into battle, men and women into battle, or a manufacturing facility, trying to go cross-functional skill sets and make sure everybody's collaborating or building a small business and keeping the team together, the human dynamics of understanding the value that each person brings to the table and how to pair them up. There's even a little bit of musical background. I was also a choir director, so getting the tenors, the basses, the sopranos, the altos, the drummers, and the guitars to all come in at the right time, and it's not unison, right?It's the harmony that you're seeking. That's been a huge part of my experience. And lo and behold, it turns out computers have the same problem. Getting computers to communicate well with each other and to feed helpful information, manufacturing is an incredibly complex endeavor. Even the most straightforward small firms get all the functions, even speaking the same language. Here's a small anecdote. While I was pastoring at one time, I was pastoring three different churches simultaneously, three different denominations. The old saying of trying to get everybody singing out of the same hymnal was a real logistical challenge for me. It's not the dark red one; it's the right one, red today.The human and computers, that true integration of shared information, shared intelligence and shared understanding applies to humans and computers equally well.Lisa Ryan: It gives you the background because I often don't want to make a broad statement in IT and to work with computers, but it's not a position that screams human connection. Bring that combination of realizing that using your pastoral background to connect with people. See them as human beings and acknowledge their excellent work, making them want to work harder for you.Tom Pierce: Absolutely. There's a surprising amount of overlap between counseling and consulting. You're advising people, seeking truth, and sharing wisdom in every way possible. It's a very similar field.Lisa Ryan: Absolutely. In your experience, what are some of the most common challenges faced by operations and supply chain managers in the manufacturing sector?Tom Pierce: I hate to oversimplify it, but to start with, I'll use the simple word gap. There are enormous gaps that are naturally forming, like an entropy thing. People are incentivized to make their bosses happy. If you're in a stove pipe organization, your supply chain people will be focused on what the vice president of the supply chain wants. Your operations people are going to be, and if there are good relationships or good collaboration at the highest levels, you end up with an entirely cohesive organizational structure. Sometimes they lean too heavily on software to solve other problems. We can get everybody to use the same software system. That'll solve all our problems. It doesn't be because they don't understand each other's language.They don't develop trust, and the digital insertion in communication between humans makes trust more difficult to establish. It's harder to develop a trusting relationship with somebody you know only through email, Twitter, Facebook, or whatever than it is to sit in a room, talk, and collaborate. Some of the most valuable conversations in a business happen in the parking lots and in the hallways when people are reading body language, expressing full life implications of decisions, and collaborating holistically with each other. So you've got massive gaps between finance and production.There's even a war between what you used in the introduction, the integrated business planning. Wait a minute, is that the same thing as sales and operations planning, or one led by finance? One led by production. Oh, do we need both? And supply and operations often fight with each other. Why don't we have the parts we need? Because you needed to order them sooner. You didn't give the specs. Quality lives on its island many times, so trying to get functional people incentivized to collaborate. People don't typically get bonuses. The results show good relationships with the other functions at the team level.Lisa Ryan: If a person listening to this realizes that their communication strategies aren't that good and they need to integrate more collaboration between departments or people, what would be an excellent way to get the conversation started?Tom Pierce: One of the simplest things that my son, who's worked for me for 15 years, Alex, added an innovation that I undervalued first and came to appreciate later. He started putting collaboration notes in every report. So if somebody from the supply chain gets a report, they can comment on it and save it. And that same note gets replicated to anybody looking for information about that appeal in line.And he has expanded the use of collaboration notes, which has, in turn, sparked more phone calls and more text messages. We'll be in conference room settings and workshops, not reporting the status of an issue. But seeing what somebody has written in the notes, picking up the phone, writing an email, or setting up a side meeting immediately solves the problem before it has to be reported on getting that rhythm.Most organizations are not set up to solve problems; they're set up to report them. And if you can get the momentum moving in the other direction where the purpose of the meeting is to solve problems, then you don't have to worry about the plan of action and milestones and whether the due date was met; solve it so that genuine working relationship.Lisa Ryan: Are these collaboration notes a part of the software? Like when you were talking, I was thinking like people using Google Docs where everybody can go in and do the same, see the same notes when people are editing it.Tom Pierce: That's the same basic idea, but Alex incorporated that, and pretty much every report and Excel is very commonly used, even for the people that hate Excel. He figured out the technology and the techniques to embed the collaboration notes in the Excel report. So you may be reading a report, but you can go in and type in save the note. The following person who opens the report sees the note saved in a shared database, but all the reports are integrated. You know the name of the company. We integrate the information systems so that the information is shared, and it's not meant to replace human face-to-face voice sharing. It's intended to facilitate it. I see here that you made this note. Can you tell me more?Lisa Ryan: What are some other best practices for successfully implementing ERP systems in manufacturing businesses to help them to streamline their operations and improve efficiency?Tom Pierce: Similar answer but a completely different angle on it. I've been a part of multiple ERP implementations, one at the beginning of my career and several SAP implementations. The classic approach is, by nature, fragmented. Let's get all the supply chain people over here. Let's get all the production control people over here, all the finance people over here. And to try to speed up the process, they think what they're doing is dividing and conquering. But in any organization, some essential lynchpin kinds of people function as translators between those functional areas, and those people can't be in both meetings. So you need to add your schedules to allow the people focused on a particular functional area to talk to each other. Have somebody from procurement in there. When talking to quality people, have somebody from protection in there. When you're talking to the finance people because they, the fragmentation of large organizations is one of the biggest rings. It is a sink of efficiency, motivation, and morale. It's a communication breakdown from the GetGo to the implementation process itself. They tend to fragment people. So try to get everybody involved at the same time. It might slow your schedule, but it pays off in the long term.There are no surprises when everybody brings out their little separate hymnals. They're talking to each other, and they're pro potentially building relationships, which leads to friendships, which leads to them not leaving the organization willingly. One of the astounding, I can't quote the exact number, but there's an astounding number of people that leave the company; I remember I was like 30%. In a typical ERP implementation, 30% of the people will leave. Wow. Because the implementation process itself is so exhausting and straining on relationships, time and budget pressure, and everything else. And the people who leave first are the people that find the next job easiest, which tend to be your best people.Lisa Ryan: Especially in the last three years, we've seen that people are making different choices with the pandemic. If they are miserable at their job, they're like, you know what it is? Life is way too short to stay somewhere I'm miserable. So that's how we start losing, keep losing our people.Tom Pierce: Exactly. And the work-from-home phenomenon opened that door. I can sit here at my desk, and I've got a client in Mississippi that I'll be supporting for the next three weeks. I don't have to go; I used to drive to Mississippi once every month for ten years. I don't have to drive anymore. I can do everything from here that I could do Then, which opens the door for employees. It's more of an employee's market now.Lisa Ryan. That leads us to the role of technology evolving in the manufacturing industry. How do you see that working in automation, data analysis, and integration with legacy systems?Tom Pierce: Absolutely. I love the way you asked that because when I first started my business and chose the name, the problem was this new thing that appeared called a pc. Everybody wanted to use their PC, Windows, and Word Perfect document to create work instructions, but their PC couldn't talk to the MRP system's mainframe. One of the first innovations we built was the communication between the PC and the mainframe. The legacy system, integrating with the new technology, was the reason I called my company what I did 30 years ago. I thought it was temporary until Windows took over; I was wrong. Getting the computers to talk to each other has an equal emphasis on the people working together.They go hand in hand. I've been fascinated with this latest surge of interest in AI, the chat GBT and everything. I see instructions advising people how to talk to your AI here. Here's a set of prompts you can use, and it reminds me of what it's like I've got six grandchildren, and so they're all four and under. You learn how to talk to your grandchild, and your grandchild learns how to communicate with you in two different ways. Dynamic, and it's funny. My four-year-old Christopher did not speak at a very young age, but he managed to express himself and communicate with body language and to point, and the first word he used commonly when we were out for a walk was way, yeah, I want to go that way, and he would point.We teach each other how to communicate. We've got the same problem with people when Google was new. People had to learn how to talk to Google. How do I ask my questions to get the answers I want? That will continue to happen, but it will explode if you don't know how to talk to, communicate with, and convey what you want to this automated device. I joke with people that I'll believe AI is here for good when Alexa knows I'm mad at her. And she doesn't; she annoys me sometimes and doesn't pick up on the signal that I'm annoyed. But what I'm worried about is what happens when Alexa gets mad at me. That's a different problem, but emotional intelligence will find its way into our relationship with technology. You probably need to be older to remember, but it wasn't long after the PC boom that people threw their computers out the window in sheer frustration. It was the blue screens of death from the old days. They keep changing what happens when the computer freezes. But all of us get frustrated in working with technology. Technology is great when it works. We're going to have to interact with it more and more.We're going to have to develop the soft skills of interacting. And if you are okay with me elaborating, one more stretch on that. I used to think of it as a humorous point; I'm not treating it more seriously. I'm a huge fan of automation. I hate asking people to do tedious work that the computer can do. So you'd come up with this whole flow chart of how this process feeds that process while you're asleep, and then people started saying, wait a...

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode