Daniel Davis Deep Dive

Dr. Gilbert Doctorow, a historian and international affairs analyst based in Brussels, joins Lt. Col. Daniel Davis to delve into Russia's shifting red lines amid the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. They examine Western claims about Russian boundaries and whether Tomahawk missiles represent a real threat. Doctorow also discusses the implications of Germany's Taurus missiles and how Trump's stance complicates U.S.-Russia relations. Additionally, they explore the evolving dynamics of warfare, the slow Russian advance, and the strategic significance of Odessa.

Larry C. Johnson, a former CIA analyst and author, brings his insights on the escalating Russia-Ukraine conflict. He discusses the collapse of peace momentum since the Trump-Putin Anchorage meeting, highlighting Russia's strict demands for a settlement. The conversation explores the dangers of U.S. military support, including the implications of Tomahawk missile transfers, and critiques NATO's cohesion. Johnson also forecasts a potential timeline for resolution, warning of significant long-term consequences for Ukraine and its people.

Glenn Diesen, a political science professor and Russia scholar, dives deep into the geopolitical tensions surrounding NATO and Russia. He discusses how Western discourse neglects rivals' security concerns, exacerbating diplomatic failures. Diesen highlights Putin's 2007 Munich speech as a warning against unipolarity and connects NATO's expansion to increased conflicts. He cautions that regime change in Russia may lead to more hardline leadership and warns that escalating Western support risks direct conflict, suggesting a delicate balance in Russia's military strategy.

Col Doug Macgregor, a retired U.S. Army colonel and defense analyst, provides a candid analysis of current Middle Eastern tensions and the role of U.S. foreign policy. He critiques Trump's claims of peace, arguing that genuine stability remains elusive. Macgregor emphasizes Israel's ambitious regional agenda powered by U.S. support, while contending that Iran is often unfairly vilified. He discusses potential military responses from Iran and warns against reckless rhetoric that could worsen conflict, all while calling for a focus on domestic security over foreign interventions.

Matthew Ho, a former State Department official and combat veteran, shares insights on the deep-rooted history of violence against Palestinians prior to October 7, 2023. He discusses the 1948 Nakba and its consequences, the rise of the Israeli occupation post-1967, and the failures of the Oslo Accords. Ho emphasizes that historical context is crucial for understanding recent events, critiques the media's portrayal of the conflict, and raises concerns about Palestinian resistance and ongoing oppression. He ultimately warns of a bleak future if international pressure fails.

In this engaging discussion, the viability of Trump's peace plan for ending the Gaza war is scrutinized. Key questions arise about whether Hamas's capitulation is essential for peace. The potential for a non-terrorist governance model in Gaza is analyzed, along with the challenges of demilitarization. Historical context is provided for recent violence, and concerns over who will finance Gaza's reconstruction are raised. The implications of Netanyahu's stance and the necessity of mutual recognition for long-term peace are also highlighted.

Andrei Martyanov, a seasoned Russian military analyst, delves into the recent escalation of energy attacks in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. He discusses the exaggerated impacts of drone strikes on Russian infrastructure and clarifies Russia's fuel export policies. The conversation explores Ukraine's limited long-range attack capabilities and Zelensky's messaging approach. Martyanov critiques Western military advice for Ukraine, emphasizes Russia's strategic aims, and evaluates the risks of nuclear escalation and logistical challenges faced by the West.

Independent journalist Patrick Henningsen, known for his insights into international affairs, joins to discuss the implications of escalating U.S. military actions, especially regarding Venezuela. He critiques the legality of strikes and the concentration of power in the executive branch. The duo dives into NATO's perceived weakness, sanctions on Russia, and the risks of militarization in politics. Henningsen warns about the provocative nature of U.S. actions and the potential for global escalation, emphasizing the need for cautious engagement.

In this engaging conversation, Jennifer Kavanagh, a Senior Fellow in military analysis, shares her insights on the complexities of Tomahawk missile scarcity amidst ongoing global tensions. She explains Ukraine's challenges with missile access and launch capabilities. The discussion highlights U.S. motivations regarding military involvement and NATO's defense responsibilities. Kavanagh also critiques European defense dynamics and argues for a strategy that empowers Europe while evaluating the implications of U.S. withdrawal. The conversation culminates with thoughts on potential conflicts, illustrating the intricate ties between military readiness and diplomacy.

In this insightful discussion, journalist Alexander Mercouris, known for his expertise in international politics and Russian-European relations, shares his thoughts on the ongoing Ukraine-Russia conflict. He warns about the risks of U.S. support enabling deeper strikes into Russia and critiques European leaders for ignoring historical contexts. Mercouris also analyzes the dynamics of Poland and Hungary's positions, the legal implications of seizing Russian ships, and the rising domestic tensions in Britain, urging caution as the situation escalates.