We Are Not Saved

After getting significant pushback I revisit my evaluation of Bryan Caplan's argument for open borders. I continue to maintain that if the average GDP of the US drops by half that some low-skilled workers will be caught in that. Even if many people end up benefiting. I bring in Garett Jones' argument against Caplan along with Caplan's response.

In the book War! What is it Good For? by Ian Morris, he speculates that the world has been built on the back of productive war. But what happens when empire building is out of fashion and nukes make war impossible even if it wasn't. Is it possible that after using war to achieve unity over the course of thousands of years, that it will stop working just at the moment it seemed possible we might unify the whole world?

The Technology Trap: Capital, Labor, and Power in the Age of Automation By: Carl Benedikt Frey Gandhi & Churchill: The Epic Rivalry that Destroyed an Empire and Forged Our Age By: Arthur Herman All Creatures Great and Small By: James Herriot To America: Personal Reflections of an Historian By: Stephen E. Ambrose War! What Is It Good For?: Conflict and the Progress of Civilization from Primates to Robots By: Ian Morris The End Is Always Near: Apocalyptic Moments, from the Bronze Age Collapse to Nuclear Near Misses By: Dan Carlin Primal Screams: How the Sexual Revolution Created Identity Politics By: Mary Eberstadt Open Borders: The Science and Ethics of Immigration By: Bryan Caplan

A collection of ways in which atheists misunderstand the strength of their position (or rather the lack their of).  The difference between gathering evidence on the existence of something like Bigfoot as opposed to gathering evidence on the existence of God. Their ability to imagine things which in all respects meet the definition for the existence of God. They just don't like the God proposed by religions. Pascal's Mugging and the oversimplification of religious belief.

Nietzsche said that God is Dead, and that people had not reckoned with with the consequences of that. Additionally he and other's predicted that people could not be good in the absence of religion. This has proved to be incorrect, there are plenty of atheists who are good people. But how has civilization fared. Is it possible that Nietzsche and the rest were just premature in their pessimism? That the current culture war is so fierce because we don't have a common set of values to negotiate around?

Moderation is an underrated value. To achieve it we need to not merely push for moderation, we need to push back against whichever side which has become too extreme. This is the pendulum, and it swings back and forth. If we value moderation we seek to keep it as close to the center as possible, while also avoiding violent swings from side to side. Doing so requires arguing for both sides of an issue depending on which is ascendant. 

It's my monthly review of the books I read. In this episode I cover: Savage Worlds: Adventure Edition By: Shane Lacy Hensley Adrift: Seventy-Six Days Lost at Sea By: Steven Callahan Novacene: The Coming Age of Hyperintelligence By: James Lovelock Bronze Age Mindset By: Bronze Age Pervert Why Are The Prices So Damn High? By: Eric Helland, Alex Tabarrok An Introduction to the Book of Abraham (Religious) by: John Gee The Lies of Locke Lamora (Gentleman Bastard #1) By: Scott Lynch No More Mr Nice Guy: A Proven Plan for Getting What You Want in Love, Sex, and Life By: Robert A. Glover Deep Survival: Who Lives, Who Dies, and Why By: Laurence Gonzales

I have heard some people, even in the comments of my this podcast, claim that we shouldn't worry about the current level of political unrest because there's nowhere for the violence to start. That we don't see the sort of large scale violence we once saw in the past. I think they're wrong I think there will be bloodshed, and the question this episode looks to answer is where does it start?

I recently read American Carnage, the story of the development of the Republican Civil War and the events which led to the current political crisis. While reading it I was struck by a question, not why is this happening now, but rather why isn't it always this way? I think I have the answer to that question and it involves nationalism, wars, immigration and most of all the sayings of the Pashtun. 

From the perspective of our system of government there are a lot of deviations currently going on. Many of them are being normalized. In the based we could correct deviations by means of amending the Constitution, but that no longer seems possible. Meaning we have largely decided to normalize them and hope that they're improvements, or at least not the kind of thing that is going to make the entire structure crash. As you might imagine I have my doubts that this is even possible.