MARSCAST

Concluding our series on the New Perspective on Paul, Rev. Andrew Compton, Dr. Marcus Mininger, and Dr. Cornelis Venema survey the perspective's use of extra-biblical texts to make their claim and offer their thoughts on further implications that holding to this new perspective can have.  To learn more, consider Dr. Venema's book, The Gospel of Free Acceptance in Christ 

With the New Perspective on Paul framed and described for us by Rev. Compton and Dr. Mininger in our last episode, they, along with Dr. Cornelis Venema, continue in today’s episode to examine the New Perspective a little more closely, giving an analysis and critique of this assessment of Paul.

Last week, we wrapped up a series of episodes on Federal Vision. Embedded in that conversation you may have heard our professors mention another theological controversy, namely, the New Perspective on Paul, a debate that’s been around for some time now. What is it, and how should we assess it? Because it deals with the New Testament, Second Temple Judaism, and doctrinal matters, joining the podcast for this series is Dr. Marcus Mininger, Professor of New Testament Studies, Rev. Andrew Compton, Associate Professor of Old Testament Studies, and President of Mid-America and Professor of Doctrinal Studies, Dr. Cornelis Venema, who will be joining in future episodes. 

Continuing in their review and critique of Federal Vision theology, Dr. J. Mark Beach, along with Drs. Alan Strange and Cornelis Venema, open up the Doctrinal Testimony Regarding Recent Errors, a document written and published by the Faculty of Mid-America back in 2007, where they identify carefully, explain clearly, and evaluate pastorally the errors of this teaching.  You can read the "Doctrinal Testimony Regarding Recent Errors" here: https://bit.ly/regarding-recent-errors

Today marks the first of a couple of episodes where our professors deliberate on a rather controversial topic found in some pockets of the Reformed world: that of Federal Vision theology. What is Federal Vision? Here to help us out are Dr. Alan Strange, Dr. J. Mark Beach, and Dr. Cornelis Venema. 

In this concluding episode of Dr. Alan Strange’s series on church discipline, he discusses the practice and basis of church discipline, using Scripture as our guide.

Continuing in his series church discipline, Dr. Strange moves forward in describing it in the lives of church members, that is, how discipline is both sought for, but also imposed. What does that all mean, exactly? Here’s Dr. Strange to explain.  

On the podcast for the next few weeks is Professor of Church History and Apologetics, Dr. Alan Strange, leading us in a series on Church Discipline. Today he’ll address the importance of it as one of the crucial marks of the church. 

Here’s a subject that should certainly be interesting: The conditionality of the covenant of grace. Is it appropriate to speak of "conditions" present in this covenant? Continue listening as Dr. Beach and Dr. Venema flesh this out a little more for us.

Is there any sense in which God in his providence “prepares” his people for conversion? Dr. Venema and Dr. Beach elaborate a little bit more on this subject of preparatory grace, or preparationism, a topic you’ll typically hear in the context of soteriology, or the doctrine of salvation.