Stay Tuned with Preet

Leah Litman, a constitutional law professor at the University of Michigan and co-host of Strict Scrutiny, dives into the Supreme Court’s conservative leanings and its embrace of fringe legal theories. She critiques how these ideologies shape landmark decisions and discusses the implications of unenumerated rights and the unitary executive theory. The conversation also touches on upcoming Supreme Court cases that could reshape the Voting Rights Act and influence education, all while infusing humor into the serious topic of judicial defiance.

Join Trevor Morrison, Dean Emeritus of NYU Law School and expert in constitutional law, as he discusses the limits of executive power. Trevor and Preet delve into the Trump administration's resistance to court orders regarding wrongful deportations. They explore a judge's decision against an executive order targeting a law firm, and a ruling deeming the use of the Alien Enemies Act for deportations as unlawful. This conversation emphasizes the ongoing battle between judicial authority and presidential overreach.

Michael Roth, President of Wesleyan University since 2007 and a leading voice in higher education debates, dives deep into the challenges universities face amid political attacks. He discusses the ideological biases in academia and the pressing need for diverse perspectives. Roth also explores how university leaders can maintain neutrality while engaging with controversial issues. Plus, he reflects on elitism in admissions and the importance of fostering democratic values in education. It's a thought-provoking conversation on the future of academia.

A Wisconsin judge is in hot water for allegedly helping someone avoid ICE agents in her courthouse. Legal experts discuss the implications of this controversial case on immigration enforcement. The podcast also tackles the ongoing tensions between federal agents and state court defendants. With a former judge facing similar charges in New Mexico, the conversation deepens around the judicial system’s integrity. Lastly, tensions escalate as courtroom disruptions threaten the balance between judicial authority and federal law enforcement.

Dahlia Lithwick, a Senior Editor at Slate and host of the Amicus podcast, shares her deep insights on the American legal system. She discusses the alarming fragility of legal norms, especially under executive power, and the implications of non-compliance with court orders. The conversation navigates the erosion of democratic processes and the critical role of voter engagement. Additionally, Lithwick explores the legal and ethical dilemmas posed by the Trump administration, raising pressing questions about accountability and the media's evolving responsibilities.

Who gets due process? Did the Trump administration deny Kilmar Abrego Garcia due process by deporting him to El Salvador despite an immigration judge’s prior order blocking his removal? Listen to an excerpt from the Insider podcast with Preet Bharara and Joyce Vance. In the full episode, Preet and Joyce further discuss the Abrego Garcia case, including a recent circuit court opinion, authored by a conservative judge, strongly rebuking the Trump administration’s resistance to court orders compelling officials to facilitate Abrego Garcia’s return to the United States.Also on the Insider docket:– The Supreme Court’s emergency order blocking the Trump administration from using the Alien Enemies Act to deport alleged Venezuelan gang members;– A federal judge’s indication that he will launch contempt proceedings against the Trump administration for seemingly violating his order blocking some deportations; and– The latest developments in the “Signal-gate” controversy, after reporting revealed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth shared sensitive information in a group chat with his wife, brother, and lawyer.CAFE Insiders click HERE to listen to the full analysis. Not an Insider? Now more than ever, it’s critical to stay tuned. To hear from reasoned voices in unreasonable times, become an Insider today. You’ll get access to full episodes of the podcast and other exclusive content. Head to cafe.com/insider.Subscribe to our YouTube channel.This podcast is brought to you by CAFE and Vox Media Podcast Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Ian Bremmer, a renowned political scientist and founder of the Eurasia Group, discusses the chaotic impacts of Trump's presidency on both America and global relations. He unpacks the economic fallout from Trump's tariffs, linking them to rising wealth disparity and political dysfunction. The conversation explores the rethinking of American capitalism, challenges to transatlantic ties, and the need for campaign finance reform. Additionally, they delve into concerns about insider trading and the implications of social media on market volatility.

The discussion centers on the controversial deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia and the uncertainties surrounding his potential return to the U.S. after a Supreme Court ruling. It dives into the political motivations behind his asylum journey, driven by threats from gangs. The hosts also analyze due process issues within the immigration system and the implications for citizenship rights. Additionally, there’s a sharp critique of Trump’s retaliatory actions against former officials who spoke out, highlighting the precarious balance of power in government.

In this insightful discussion, renowned economist Justin Wolfers, a professor at the University of Michigan, analyzes the tumultuous world of Trump's tariffs. He explores the chaotic stock market reactions and the erosion of global trust, emphasizing the steep tariffs on China and their implications for consumers. Wolfers contrasts the short-term optimism with long-term repercussions, questioning whether any economic recovery can outweigh the damage. He also delves into the need for reform in presidential tariff powers to protect citizens from financial strain.

Stephen Breyer, former Supreme Court Justice and advocate for pragmatic constitutional interpretation, shares his insights on judicial integrity and political pressures. He discusses the challenges judges face, including impeachment threats. Breyer humorously explores the balance between empathy and neutrality in judicial decision-making and critiques strict textualism. The conversation also touches on legal ethics in Trump-era law practices and the obstacles faced by interim U.S. Attorneys, providing a profound look at the complexities within the judiciary.