
RCEM Learning
A twice monthly #foamed podcast from the Royal College of Emergency Medicine. Literature reviews, guideline updates and interviews with the smartest minds in Emergency Medicine.
Latest episodes

Jan 2, 2020 • 50min
January 2020
Happy New Year. This month we have New in EM currency in EM intubation | ASC 2019: Govind Oliver - Clinical Gestalt vs TMAC scoring | New in EM early antibiotic in sepsis | ASC 2019: Gordon Fuller AHEAD-2

Dec 24, 2019 • 57min
EMJ December 2019

Dec 2, 2019 • 49min
December 2019
This month we have New in EM TXA for epistaxis, EMEC Liz Herrieven, Mark Lyttle ASC, IPED Study

Nov 26, 2019 • 31min
EMJ Podcast November 2019
This month we have: - Should we resusitate elderly patients with blunt traumatic cardiac arrest? - The public perception to bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Nov 1, 2019 • 59min
November 2019
This month we have New in EM XueBiJing for pneumonia, Renal Colic Live guidlines, DFTB19 Paul Reavley, DFTB19 Anna Dobbie, New in EM Intralipid in OD

Oct 4, 2019 • 49min
October 2019
This month we have a special podcast coming from the RCEM ASC in Gateshead. We have an interview with Dr Katherine Henderson the new RCEM President. Prof Simon Carley on his top 10 papers for EM, and an interview with Rod Little prize winner Dr Gordon Fuller The ACUTE (Ambulance CPAP: Use, Treatment effect and Economics) feasibility study: A pilot randomised controlled trial of prehospital CPAP for acute respiratory failure

Sep 2, 2019 • 1h 6min
September 2019

Aug 12, 2019 • 31min
EMJ podcast August 2019
This month we discuss Cannabis hyperemesis syndrome and interpreting and verifying the index test

Aug 1, 2019 • 1h 14min
August 2019
This month we have Belfast 2019 CPD - Leadership | Belfast CPD 2019 End of life care | New in EM: Rethinking IV Size & Location for CTPA | EMEC Jon Carter | Belfast CPD 2019 Top Paeds Papers | Guideline NICE CVA and TIA (part one TIA)

Jul 16, 2019 • 43min
EMJ podcast July 2019
This month we have Dental Anaesthesia in the Emergency Department, and sources of bias in studies of diagnostic test performance