Parallax Views w/ J.G. Michael

In this explosive episode of Parallax Views, investigative journalist Jack Poulson joins host J.G. Michael to uncover the shadowy post-retirement career of Michael Anne Casey-Tyler, a former CIA official alleged to be one of the real-life inspirations behind Jessica Chastain’s character “Maya” in Zero Dark Thirty. She's also for her controversial role in the CIA’s Bin Laden Issue Station, namely being accused of blocking critical 9/11 intelligence from reaching the FBI. Now Casey-Tyler has resurfaced in the private sector and her latest affiliations are raising eyebrows. Poulson breaks down his bombshell reporting on how Casey-Tyler consulted with McNally Capital, a private equity firm that now has an “economic interest” in Safe Reach Solutions, the security partner behind the so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a militarized aid operation accused of facilitating the deaths of over 600 Palestinians and providing cover for Israeli displacement efforts. We dive deep into: Connections between former intelligence officials and militarized humanitarian aid The role of private military contractors like Safe Reach Solutions and UG Solutions How McNally Capital and Orbis Operations are profiting from crisis zones The controversies around the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which is being called a “fig leaf for further violence” by UN officials Is humanitarian aid being weaponized? Is the post-CIA private sector creating a new form of covert empire? And what do these shadowy networks say about the future of war, intelligence, and privatized power?

On this edition of Parallax Views, journalist Eric Margolis returns to discuss his articles "The Honey Trap on East 71st" and, more recently, "The Epstein Scandal". Margolis recounts his experience at a luncheon hosted by Epstein at his palatial residence on East 71st Street in New York City. Margolis was offered a 'massage' soon after arriving at Epstein's house, and was puzzled by it. As someone who'd spent time in Russia and dealt with KGB, he immediately believed that this was a honey trap. That is to say, an operation to get kompromat on prominent, influential, and powerful individuals through sexual liasons. Margolis believes that at the heart of the Epstein scandal is espionage, specifically an intelligence operation, and blackmail. He also speculates that Israeli intelligence fingerprints are all over the case. We discussed all of this as well as the Jonathan Pollard spying case, the Bill Clinton-Monica Lewinsky scandal (which has received renewed attention due to an article entitled "Did Benjamin Netanyahu Blackmail Bill Clinton Over the Monica Lewinsky Sex Tapes?" by Ryan Grim at Drop Site News), and more.

👉 Pitch in on Patreon and fuel the future of free-thinking conversations. In the wake of Hulk Hogan’s death, this episode of Parallax Views looks past the familiar WWE narrative to uncover the real history of professional wrestling’s popularity—before, during, and after Hulkamania. Wrestling historian Matt Farmer joins us to explore the career of Hulk Hogan—from his early days in Verne Gagne's American Wrestling Association and Japan as well as his first WWE run to the meteoric rise of "Hulkmania" as a phenomenon that took America by storm— and assess his legacy as it pertain to the wrestling. Additionally, you'll hear Farmer discuss the days of pro wrestling prior to Vince McMahon's national expansion of the WWE. Farmer gives an insight into the landscape of wrestling before Hogan, how it marked by regional territories run by various promoters, and its overlooked popularity in the pre-Hulkmania era. We examine the massive crowds and box office success of stars like Jim Londos, Rikidōzan, and Bruno Sammartino, who sold out arenas and stadiums long before the WWF’s national expansion in the 1980s. At the same time, Farmer doesn’t deny Hogan’s genuine drawing power. He talks about how Hogan became a cultural icon, one of pro wrestling's biggest box office attraction of all time and played a key role in fundamentally transforming wrestling during the cable TV boom. We'll also discuss the factors that led to Vince McMahon and WWE's national expansion, the target audience of the WWE during the Hulkamania era, how McMahon having access to the New York market gave him a structural advantage in his pursuits, and much, much more. But what did the industry gain—and what did it lose? We look at the audience that faded away after Hogan’s massive rise to superstardom, and why history often forgets them. We also tackle the problem of revisionist history: how simplified corporate narratives rewrites wrestling’s past, erasing earlier eras and larger contexts in favor of a historically inaccurate and imprecise narratives about the profession's storied history. And not all the blame can be placed on WWE. That's part of it, but there's also the issue of how institutions didn't exist after the territories fell to McMahon's national expansion to preserve collective memory. Additionally, Farmer explains how regional wrestling promoters played a role in the profession's history not always being preserved. All that and much more in this edition of Parallax Views that should also be of interest to those interested in case studies of how history is remembered and forgotten as well as the reasons why oversimplified revisionism takes hold. In that sense, it's not just an episode about pro wrestling and Hulk Hogan, but historiography, hagiography, and the ways in which the two often butt heads like a grueling bout in the squared circle.

👉 Pitch in on Patreon and fuel the future of free-thinking conversations. On this edition of Parallax Views, Matthew Ellis, a senior instructor in Portland State University's film and media studies program, joins the show to discuss, and more specifically demystify, the much celebrated "New Hollywood" period of American cinema. Don't be mistaken, this episode isn't an attack on the great films that came out of that period: Arthur Penn's Bonnie & Clyde, William Friedkin's Sorcerer, Haskell Wexler's Medium Cool, Francis Ford Coppola's The Godfather, Stanley Kubrick's A Clockwork Orange, Sam Peckinpah's The Wild Bunch, and Martin Scorsese's Raging Bull. It is, however, an attempt to look at the material and economic factors that led to this incredible period in American cinema. In other words, a material analysis. Coming from a Marxist perspective, Ellis is more than equipped to look at the ways in which economic forces influenced the trajectory that gave us New Hollywood. In that sense, this conversation is a look at the myths and realities of New Hollywood. We discuss the birth of the modern blockbuster in the 1970s through Steven Spielberg's Jaws and George Lucas's Star Wars, the uses and abuses of Laura Mulvey's male gaze theory in film studies, the narrative about Michael Cimino's Heaven's Gate and the end of New Hollywood, Roger Corman and how B-movies paved the way for A-list 70s movies like Jaws, the auteur theory of cinema and criticisms of it, the Paramount drama series The Offer (which is about the development of Coppola's adaptation of Mario Puzo's The Godfather), the companies behind production and distribution in Hollywood vs. the hired hands (directors), how French director's viewed American filmmakers like John Ford and Alfred Hitchcock, neoliberalism and cinema, capitalism and the production of movies, the 1948 ruling that broke up the Hollywood studio system's monopoly on film production, Old Hollywood's producer unit system of production and the shift to the package unit system in the 1960s, and much, much more

👉 Pitch in on Patreon and fuel the future of free-thinking conversations. On this edition of Parallax Views, we dive deep into the 17th BRICS summit, held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil on July 6–7, 2025. BRICS—originally made up of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—is an bloc of emerging economies seeking to build an alternative to the U.S. global economic order outside traditional Western-dominated institutions. In recent years, BRICS has expanded to include countries like Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and the UAE, representing an even larger share of the Global South. Journalist Michael Fox joins us to report on what he saw at the summit: Brazilian President Lula da Silva's words at the summit and what it says about BRICS vision, the question of global reform to address pressing international issues balanced with national sovereignty, de-dollarization, and more. We also discuss the newly created BRICS Popular Council, a civil society forum designed to amplify grassroots voices from across the Global South and break down what the official BRICS Leaders’ Declaration tells us about the bloc’s evolving vision.

On this episode of Parallax Views, J.G. Michael is joined by writer and self-described film analyst Albert Lanier to discuss his work on the blog The Final Cut and his Retro Reviews website. We kick things off by exploring why Albert prefers the term “film analyst” over “movie reviewer,” delving into what it means to engage deeply with cinema rather than simply judge it. From there, we dive into his thoughtful takes on: Psycho II, the surprising and often overlooked sequel to Hitchcock’s classic, and how it rethinks Norman Bates for a new era. Tobe Hooper’s Lifeforce, a wild blend of sci-fi, horror, and eroticism that could only have come out of the 80s. The heyday of raunchy 80s comedies, what they reflected about the culture at the time, and why they endure (or don’t). Split Image, a lesser-known thriller about cults that holds up as both a tense drama and a cultural artifact of its period. It’s a conversation that ranges from cult cinema (and movies about cults) to the philosophy of film criticism, nostalgia, and why some forgotten gems deserve a second look.

On this edition of Parallax Views, George Beebe — Director of Grand Strategy at the Quincy Institute, former director of the CIA's Russia analysis, and a former  staff advisor on Russia matters to Vice President Dick Cheney — about the shifting architecture of global power and its impact on U.S. foreign policy. We begin by unpacking the rise of multipolarity: what it really means for America, why it could encourage balance and restraint, and why it also carries serious risks of miscalculation and instability. From there, we turn to the surprising recent signs of frustration between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, and what that might portend for the grinding, entrenched nature of the Russia-Ukraine war. We explore potential pathways to negotiation, asking what concessions would be unacceptable for either side — and what a settlement might look like from a realist perspective. Throughout, Beebe draws on his background in the realist school to argue for understanding geopolitical interests without morally excusing aggression. It’s a conversation that moves beyond daily headlines to consider how shifting power dynamics, great-power rivalry, and hard strategic choices could shape the next phase of the war — and the world order that follows.

👉 Pitch in on Patreon and fuel the future of free-thinking conversations.   On this episode of Parallax Views, J.G. spoke with Lev Parnas—former Trump insider turned whistleblower—for an unfiltered conversation about Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, and the transactional world of MAGA politics. For many, Parnas is a controversial figure. Some hail him as a whistleblower, others question his credibility due to his conviction related to campaign finance crimes. His story involves working with Rudy Guiliani for the Trump campaign and going to Ukraine to dig up dirt on the Biden family. Parnas will be in D.C. soon to receive the Pillar Award at the Whistleblower Summit & Film Festival on July 30th, and he plans to speak with beltway congressmen and power players while in town. Lev reveals how he broke away from what he calls the "MAGA cult" and offers an insider’s view of Trump not as a foreign agent, but as a useful idiot—a figure driven by self-interest and easily manipulated by others. We discuss Trump's shadowy dealings with the UAE, Gulf States, and other foreign nations, and how figures like RFK Jr. and JD Vance are carving out their own opportunistic lanes ahead of the next election. But the real bombshell? Lev goes in-depth on his latest explosive article about Trump's alleged cover-up efforts around the Epstein scandal. He explains why he believes U.S. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche—once Paul Manafort's lawyer and his own legal adversary—is now being sent in as, in Lev's words, "Trump's fixer" to meet with Ghislaine Maxwell. Lev argues this isn’t about justice, but about controlling the narrative, burying the truth, and shielding powerful elites linked to Epstein’s trafficking network. We also talk about Trump’s move to disavow outraged MAGA supporters after Epstein files remained sealed, the rumored rift between Trump and Dan Bongino, and why Lev sees this as part of a much larger strategy to protect Trump and powerful figures associated with him.

👉 Pitch in on Patreon and fuel the future of free-thinking conversations. On this edition of Parallax Views, Chris Lehmann, D.C. Bureau Chief at The Nation, joins the program to unpack the unraveling of Trump’s deep‑state narratives — and how it could spark fractures within his own movement. At the heart of our conversation: Trump’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Faced with mounting pressure from the QAnon‑influenced wing of MAGA — who’ve long treated “the Epstein client list” as proof of a hidden global cabal — Trump recently pivoted to claiming the list exists but was fabricated by Obama and the Democrats. Lehmann explains how Trump's moves in relation to Epstein threatens to alienate the very conspiratorial base that, for years, functioned almost like a religious movement around Trump, providing meaning and a sense of cosmic struggle. We explore how this moment reveals deeper tensions: what once unified the MAGA coalition is now splintering into paranoia and internal suspicion — setting the stage for a potential “MAGA civil war.” From there, we dive into Lehmann’s other recent piece on Trump’s omnibus “Big Beautiful Bill,” which quietly funnels billions into ICE and federal law enforcement — constructing the scaffolding of an unprecedented police state, largely unnoticed amid the media circus. Finally, we turn to the Democratic Party’s failures: why their reluctance to engage on issues like immigration and their procedural, visionless opposition have helped clear the path for authoritarian expansion. Together, we trace how conspiracy, disillusionment, and institutional power are converging — and what that might mean for America’s political future. Further reading: Trump’s Deep-State Conspiracy Theories Are Getting Beyond His Control | The Nation Trump’s Big Bill Is Building a Big Police State | The Nation

👉 Pitch in on Patreon and fuel the future of free-thinking conversations. On this edition of Parallax Views, journalist Klaus Marre—senior editor for Politics and director of the Mentor Apprentice Program at WhoWhatWhy—joins the show to explore rising tensions inside the MAGA movement over the Jeffrey Epstein scandal and whether it could spark a kind of “MAGA Civil War.” Recently, Donald Trump has publicly dismissed supporters still demanding answers about the Epstein case. Meanwhile, the FBI and DOJ insist there’s nothing more to investigate and no secret “client list.” Some MAGA influencers have rushed to defend Trump or shifted blame to figures like Pam Bondi—but at the grassroots level, frustration and disillusionment with Trump appear to be growing. Klaus breaks down what his reporting reveals about this internal MAGA divide, analyzes how the right‑wing media and propaganda ecosystem shape the narrative, and offers a critical look at how Democrats have mishandled both the Epstein issue and America’s deepening economic inequality. Further reading: Flailing Trump Disavows His Core Supporters Over ‘Epstein Hoax’ - WhoWhatWhy GOP, Fox, MAGA Influencers Comply With Trump’s Directive to Move on From Epstein - WhoWhatWhy A Golden Opportunity for Democrats Arises After Trump Bungles Epstein Response - WhoWhatWhy Trump Tries New Tactic to Distract MAGA Base From Epstein - WhoWhatWhy Epstein Question Rattles Trump - WhoWhatWhy FBI’s ‘Nothing to See Here’ Epstein Memo Will Surely Placate MAGA Faithful - WhoWhatWhy