Financial Climate

Catherine Bracy, founder and CEO of TechEquity and author of World Eaters, dives deep into the pitfalls of venture capital, especially its impact on climate tech. She sheds light on how VC incentives often lead to systemic harm, urging founders to rethink their funding strategies. Bracy critiques the blitzscaling playbook and emphasizes the need for a shift in entrepreneurial mindsets. She also illustrates the dangers of excessive focus on AI, warning about its resource consumption and societal effects. A thought-provoking discussion on balancing profit with social responsibility!

In the U.S., between 2020 and 2024, the total cost of major weather related disasters averaged about $150 billion per year. That’s more than five times the annual average during the 1980s, even after adjusting for inflation. At the same time as they’ve gotten more costly, major disasters have become more frequent. Inevitably, increasing losses have begun to strain property insurers. In some areas, like parts of California, premiums have gone up drastically. In some markets, insurance is now only offered through last-resort government-sponsored programs. My guest today is Dr. Carolyn Kousky, an expert on disaster insurance and climate risk management. She has advised numerous communities on these subjects. Her many publications include the 2022 book Understanding Disaster Insurance: New Tools for a More Resilient Future. She’s taught courses on related subjects at the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania. More recently she founded a nonprofit organization called Insurance for Good, and she currently serves as Associate Vice President for Economics and Policy at the Environmental Defense Fund. I sat down with Carolyn to better understand the current and future points of failure in markets for insurance against weather disasters. I was interested to know what the broader consequences may be of a breakdown in those markets. I wanted to hear about what kinds of innovations or policy changes might help in this critical area of climate finance, which has the potential for such profound effects on households and businesses everywhere.Additional resources:Institute for Business & Home Safety (IBHS)First StreetUnited PolicyholdersInsurance for GoodUnderstanding Disaster Insurance: New Tools for a More Resilient Future, by Carolyn KouskyEnvironmental Defense Fund (EDF)

Few people are more closely associated with the climate movement than Bill McKibben. In 1989 he published The End of Nature. It was the first popular book for a broad audience on the climate crisis. Over more than 35 years since then, he’s written about 20 books, and many, many articles in prominent publications. In 2008, he founded a climate advocacy nonprofit called 350.org, which now has about $20 million in annual revenues and is active on six continents. More broadly, he played a critical role in establishing a grassroots activist movement for climate action. He’s been instrumental in a number of climate campaigns, encouraging fossil fuel asset divestment and pushing to block construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, among many other efforts. With all the things he’s been involved with, you or I may quibble with McKibben about this or that particular strategy or tactic or approach. But it’s undeniable that he has worked more tirelessly and authentically over a longer time period than almost anyone toward progress on the climate crisis. I sat down with Bill to talk about his latest book, which is called Here Comes the Sun: A Last Chance for the Climate and a Fresh Chance for Civilization. I wanted to learn more about how he sees the current role of the climate movement. And I wanted to hear how and why he thinks solar power may provide a uniquely important path forward for climate progress at this dangerous and critical moment. Additional resources mentioned in this episode:Here Comes the Sun by Bill McKibbenThe Crucial YearsThird ActSun Day350.orgShort Circuiting Policy, by Leah Cardamore StokesHow Big Things Get Done, by Bent Flyvbjerg and Dan Gardner

Anyone paying even a bit of attention to climate solutions knows that we’ve seen in recent years tremendous development of wind and solar power generation. Most people also understand that that development needs to continue, along with deployment of other carbon-free power sources. But in order for the clean energy transition to succeed, we also need to make ambitious improvements to America’s transmission grid. The transmission system is a vast, intricate, nationwide machine that most of us take for granted. Most people don’t fully understand all the things it does, why it’s so important, or how is needs to evolve.My guest today, is Rob Gramlich. He’s the founder and President of a Washington-DC-based consultancy called Grid Strategies. You’d be hard pressed to find someone more knowledgeable than he is about the challenges and opportunities of grid improvement. He frequently testifies before Congress, the Federal energy regulatory commission, and state agencies, and he’s widely respected by key decisionmakers across the political spectrum. Rob has founded a number of important organizations, including Americans for a Clean Energy Grid. Before founding Grid Strategies, he also held important roles at the American Wind Energy Association, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and elsewhere. I sat down with Rob to better understand why improvements to the transmission system are essential for the success of the renewable energy transition. I was curious what needs to be improved to make the grid function as it needs to. I wanted to hear what obstacles are impeding these improvements, and where there may be opportunities—even in the current political environment—for meaningful progress on this complex and crucial aspect of the climate problem.Other resources:Grid Strategies, LLCFederal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)Abundance, by Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson 

In the last episode of this show, I had the privilege of talking with Elizabeth Burch and Adam Orford, two law professors from University of Georgia. They helped me to better understand many of the types of climate lawsuits that have proliferated in recent years.But there are so many varieties of climate litigation that there’s a whole other category we barely touched on, which has special relevance to the nexus of climate and finance. I’m talking about shareholder lawsuits brought under corporate or securities law. As before, I wanted to talk with an expert insider, but someone who has more objectivity and a broader perspective than a lawyer immersed in pending cases. My guest today is Emily Strauss. She’s a law professor at UC Law San Francisco. That’s the University of California law school that was formerly known as UC Hastings. She’s an expert in corporate law and securities and financial regulation, and some of her recent scholarly research spcifically explores patterns in climate-related shareholder litigation. I sat down with Emily to learn more about how these lawsuits relate to other types of climate-related shareholder advocacy and other types of climate lawsuits. I wanted to know what opportunities shareholder litigation might create to push corporations toward action on climate, and what limitations they may have as a tool for advancing environmental or social goals. Additional resources:Climate Change and Shareholder Lawsuits (academic paper by Emily Strauss)Is Everything Securities Fraud? (academic paper by Emily Strauss)Climate Change Litigation Databases (Columbia Law School, Sabin Center for Climate Change Law)

In recent years, as climate change has gained attention, there's been a proliferation of climate related lawsuits. They're based on a wide variety of legal theories. Some are brought under federal statutes like the Clean Air Act, others are brought under state statutes. Still others rely on common law, which is so old that it predates the widespread use of fossil fuels. Some of these lawsuits seem mainly symbolic. Others have been brought by state and local governments—inspired by the multibillion dollar tobacco litigation of the 1990s—seeking to hold fossil fuel companies liable for astronomical financial damages. The Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia University maintains a public database that tracks climate related litigation. The center reports 97 climate related cases filed just in the first 10 months of 2023, with well over 100 filed each year since 2017. And that's for the U.S. alone. To better understand all this, I thought about talking with some of the attorneys bringing or defending these lawsuits. But it seemed like a better idea to talk to experts with a more objective viewpoint than an attorney involved directly in a case. I also wanted to understand better where these climate change cases fit into the bigger picture of environmental law. I wanted to learn how they relate more broadly to the use of litigation to bring about change on major societal issues like opioids, or toxic waste or the spread of disinformation. Today I'm joined by two law professors from the University of Georgia School of Law. Elizabeth Chamblee Burch is an expert in complex civil lawsuits. Among her many publications on related subjects, she wrote a book in 2019, called Mass Tort Deals: Backroom Bargaining in Multidistrict Litigation. Adam Orford’s expertise is in environmental and climate change law and the energy transition. He's litigated complex environmental and energy cases in private practice. And besides his law degree, he has a Ph.D. in energy and resources. Other resources:Climate Change Litigation Databases (Columbia Law School, Sabin Center for Climate Change Law)Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Climate Change, by Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway

The Paris climate agreement was designed to keep Earth habitable through a framework of national emission reduction commitments. But actual binding laws enforcing those commitments are still lagging behind. In response, many corporations have promised to reach net zero emissions voluntarily. Many have released plans of how they intend to do that. And consumers and investors have sought to hold them accountable.Despite some admirable progress, a lot of corporate commitments are based an incomplete patchwork of emission disclosures. And too often, companies’ climate plans are full of caveats, inconsistencies, and outright greenwashing. Federal governmental action to require rigorous climate disclosures is—at best—slow in coming. But California has found a brilliant workaround. If California were a country, it’s economy would be the fifth largest in the world. By passing a state law that affects companies doing business in California, the state can set a standard that companies are held to around the country and the world. On October 7, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed a bill called the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act, championed by State Senator Scott Wiener. The law will soon require rigorous and standardized disclosures for a huge number of companies that do business in California. This episode’s guest, Catherine Atkin is an attorney, a climate entrepreneur, and the co-founder of a nonprofit organization called Carbon Accountable. She’s also a CodeX fellow at the Stanford Center for Legal Informatics. State Senator Wiener’s office has described Catherine as the legal mastermind behind the new law. SB 353 TextCarbon AccountableCatherine Atkin Stanford CodeX Fellow bio

InnSure is a nonprofit organization that fosters insurance-related innovations to address climate problems. Usually, we think of insurance as a tool for climate change adaptation—and it is. But InnSure also looks at insurance as an indispensable tool to help implement and scale emission-reducing technologies. I wanted to understand better why and how that is. I also wanted to learn about the enormous climate-related business opportunities emerging in the insurance industry, and how these relate to the set of transformative insurance initiatives commonly known as insurtech.This episode's guest, Christopher Lowell, is a Managing Director at InnSure. He has deep expertise and hands-on experience in the insurance industry. He worked as the Managing Director of Corporate Strategy and Research at Liberty Mutual. Among other insurance roles, he also set up and led an experimental insurance innovation lab inside The Hartford.https://innsure.org/https://www.linkedin.com/in/christopher-lowell

More than ever before, advocates are pressuring private-sector companies to take action related to climate impacts. One thing that’s increased the potential effectiveness of these tactics is the tremendous concentration of corporate voting power in the hands of a small number of enormous asset managers. And at the same time, huge, secretive, private equity firms are amassing control of privately held companies, or are taking publicly-traded corporations private.  Harvard Law and Economics professor John C. Coates has just released an insightful and thought-provoking book about the dangers and challenges of these investing trends. During his distinguished career, he was a partner at the leading Wall Street law firm of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, and he served at the U.S. the Securities and Exchange Commission in several roles, including as General Counsel. His new book is called The Problem of 12: When a Few Financial Institutions Control Everything. I sat down with John Coates to learn about the many problems stemming from this extraordinary concentration of corporate power. I was especially interested to understand what his arguments mean for the efforts of the activists and consumers pushing corporations to meet climate goals and uphold other standards of environmental and social responsibility. 

Robin Millington is the CEO of the London-based nonprofit financial think tank Planet Tracker. She talks about how her organization uses sophisticated financial tools to make markets more environmentally sustainable.https://planet-tracker.org/