Moral Maze

“Dawn... and as the sun breaks through the piercing chill of night on the plain outside Korem, it lights up a biblical famine, now, in the 20th century...” Those words, spoken by Michael Buerk 40 years ago, pricked the world’s conscience, triggered an unprecedented humanitarian effort, led to Live Aid and spawned institutions like Comic Relief. Since then, more than a billion people around the world have climbed out of extreme poverty, although around 700 million people still live on less than $2.15 a day, according to the World Bank.Times have changed. Not only is the media landscape vastly different, making competing demands on our attention, but also our attitudes to helping the poor around the world are different. The question is not simply whether we have a moral duty to help people in other countries, but HOW we should help them.In a post-pandemic world, there are those who advance ever stronger arguments for ending poverty through debt cancellation, robust institutions and international co-operation. Critics of development aid, however, see it as wasteful, ineffective and enabling corruption: ‘poor people in rich countries subsidising rich people in poor countries’. Others view the sector as a legacy of European colonialism, citing Band Aid’s portrayal of Africa as emblematic of the ‘White saviourism’ ingrained in the system. Others, meanwhile, believe the best way to help people is to bypass institutions altogether, and give cash directly to individuals to make their own decisions about how to spend it. 40 years on from Michael Buerk’s landmark report from Ethiopia, how should we help the global poor?Chair: Michael Buerk Producer: Dan Tierney Assistant producer: Ruth PurserPanellists: Ash Sarkar Anne McElvoy Inaya Folarin Iman Carmody Grey

In popular tourist destinations, locals are protesting the impact of mass tourism on their communities. The conversation delves into the moral dilemmas of travel, weighing economic benefits against cultural degradation. With certain strategies suggested to address over-tourism, the ethical dimensions of travel emerge, raising questions about sustainability and local engagement. Perspectives on holiday choices and the complex relationship dynamics between tourists and residents highlight the importance of responsible tourism that respects local identities.

Recent riots in the UK spark a fiery debate about immigration and social cohesion. Tensions rise as communities grapple with feelings of neglect and discontent. The clash between diversity as strength and the fear that tolerance breeds intolerance highlights deep societal divides. Amidst chaos, stories of solidarity emerge, showcasing community support against racism. The call for clearer communication on integration and national identity resonates throughout discussions, emphasizing the need for understanding and bridging divides in a multifaceted society.

One moment in the Olympics opening ceremony in Paris clearly touched a nerve: the tableau of mostly drag queens believed to be parodying Da Vinci’s ‘Last Supper’. Organisers have since denied this was the intention and apologised for the offense caused. Many commentators, including non-believers, declared it “blasphemous”, and “a denigration of Western culture”. While others, Christians among them, considered that response to be an over-reaction. Stepping back from the immediate and perhaps predicable outrage drawn along culture war lines, is the deeper question of what we consider to be ‘sacred’ and ‘profane’ in a largely secular Western society. What, if anything, is sacred? Does the idea only make sense in relation to the concept of God? Does it have a moral function or is it more about personal spirituality? Maybe nothing is sacred, since categorising something as such puts it beyond scrutiny? Or can the concept be widened, even secularised, to take in, for example, the idea of ‘profaning’ the natural world or hollowing out the things we hold to be of value by turning them into commercial transactions? Are the concepts of ‘sacred’ and ‘profane’ still important? And if so, what role do they have in the 21st century? Producer: Dan Tierney Assistant producer: Ruth PurserPanel: Anne McElvoy Giles Fraser Ash Sarkar Tim StanleyWitnesses: Melanie McDonagh Andrew Copson Fergus Butler-Gallie Francis Young

The Modern Olympics were founded in 1896 by a Parisian with serious moral principles . Pierre De Coubertin even made up a word for it: Olympism: ‘a way of life based on the joy of effort ..and respect for universal fundamental ethical principles. He thought that sports at an international level could foster respect and peace between nations. This week as the Games get underway in De Coubertin’s city, athletes have been meeting to do just that, talk about the role that sport plays in building bridges. But how much does the modern games live up to these highminded ideals? For detractors, it’s a bloated megagames, always billions over overbudget that displaces communities and marginalises the excluded. What about nationalism and the place of the politics in the competition? The way De Coubertin conceived the idea with nations competing for international glory, means it’s impossible to put nationalism and politics aside. He insisted it was individuals, not countries in competition but the medal tables tell a different story. And the Olympics has often been the battleground to show the triumph of one ideology over another, particularly during the Cold War. Does the Olympics really promote peace as it’s goals suggest or is just ‘war minus the shooting’ as George Orwell wrote. Do the Olympics cause more harm than good? WITNESSES: Dr Shakiba Moghadam, Dora Pallis, Prof David Case Large, Prof David Papineau PANELLISTS:Giles Fraser, Anne McElvoy,Ash Sarkar, Mona Siddiqui Presenter: Michael Buerk Producer: Catherine Murray Assistant Producer: Ruth Purser Editor Tim Pemberton

The podcast dives into the dark realities of political violence and its roots in today's toxic discourse. It questions the implications of tribal politics and the alarming rise in threats against politicians. With insights from experts, the discussion highlights the psychological toll on public figures and how social media exacerbates hostility. Can we promote civility while keeping political passion alive? The conversation explores innovative solutions, such as citizen assemblies, to foster constructive dialogue in an increasingly polarized environment.

Debates on when older individuals should step down in politics and work, considering societal biases and capabilities. Discussions on ageism, wisdom, and power dynamics between generations in leadership roles. Exploration of the impact of age on social media and societal values. Emphasis on accountability, performance evaluations, and redefining age-related issues in a rapidly changing world.

Exploring the complex relationship between history and modern values, the podcast discusses the role of historical figures like Virginia Woolf, the purpose of studying history, and the use of history as a tool in today's societal battles. With a diverse panel of experts and insightful debates, the podcast sheds light on the multifaceted nature of history and its impact on shaping our world.

Discussing the debate between price and value in arts and culture, questioning the ethics of selling experiences, the role of government funding in ensuring access for all, and the societal significance of cultural events. Panelists explore the impact of state subsidies, career choices, and the bias in measuring arts success, raising questions about the necessity of public funding for the arts.

Exploring the changing trends in funerals, the podcast discusses the rise of direct cremations and DIY celebrations. It questions the impact on human dignity and religious traditions, as well as the influence of technology on grieving. The debate delves into the significance of farewell rituals, fear of technology, and the evolving perspectives on death in society.