MGTOW Sandman Quotes

Sponsor Link:The Men's Guide to High-Conflict Divorce & The Police Are Not Your Friendshttps://amzn.to/36YftNlMystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyqzM...Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comHi Everyone Sandman Here, This video isn't brought to you by any donations because I didn't get any for today. I thought I'd share a short article from May 14, 1923 in the New York Times that shows you that female nature trying to shut down male spaces and shut us up stretches way back in time. The woman in it even calls men that are single and refuse to remarry simps. That was one of the earliest documented uses. Here's what it says and I quote: "Woman Calls Bachelors "Simps" "Afraid to Take a Chance," Says Woman Referring to Club. In Atlantic City New Jersey on May 13 a letter signed by "Miss Lillian Henderson," which bitterly assailed Atlantic City's bachelors," was received here today by Acting Captain of Detectives Frank Feretti from Newark. The letter referred particularly to the now defunct Bachelors' Club here and the Atlantic City Widowers Association. "Those bachelor simps." wrote Miss Henderson." are afraid to take a chance and are too tight to share their earnings with a wife." The Bachelor Club assailed by Miss Henderson disbanded recently when some of its members deserted and married. The Widowers' Association headed by City Detective Edward Sowney, is formed mainly of those who have traveled a stormy marital path and have sworn "never again." unquote. At first I couldn't figure out why Miss Lillian Henderson petitioned the police to shut down a bachelor's club. Then it dawned on me she was probably trying to cancel Detective Edward Sowney back in 1923 for being head of the Widower's Association. That's probably the real reason she contacted his place of employment and sent his higher up the letter. This is 100 years ago and the cancel culture ideas remain the same the names have just change. Back then Widowers and bachelor's associations were used by men to meet and share ideas about female nature and probably just network. But proto feminists and suffragettes back then wanted to shut down all male spaces. They had shut down the bars when they banned alcohol only three years before thanks to the prohibition act. But that wasn't enough. Lilian was using the typical shaming language that single men were selfish and stupid simps. Shaming men back then for being cowards unwilling to take a chance. All stuff I recently spoke about in a video I shared that has a chapter from my upcoming book called: "Shaming Single Men." Lilian contacted active Captain of Detectives Frank Feretti. She was trying to shame detective Sowney to his boss and put pressure on him by also shaming him and all the detective to try and get Sowney canned. Lilian is trying to scare men from talking to one another in their own clubs and associations without the company of a woman. She's trying to say that they will be cancelled and it's pure scare tactics the way we see today. I'll discuss more in just a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor T Fitz:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link:- Red Pill Ring- https://www.redpillring.com/Man's Married NOT to His Lover But a Corpse Bridehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXQ8i...Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMAru...Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comHi Everyone Sandman Here, This video is brought to you by a donation from Lord Jaguar and here's what he has to say: "Soyciety will stop at nothing to shame me into a relationship I honestly thought I wanted for 30ish years or so. If I don't want one then their will be hell to pay. One time my father says to me, "Dude don't clean the garage because it gives your mother something to complain about." I was a bit taken back and thought that was dumb. Now I understand it was bored women in the 1950's, bored from technology making life easier for them, that snapped from a Utopian level of happiness to cause chaos. The house was built to be cleaned and keep crazies the clown, aka modern women, at bay. Women were better off when they had to do dishes by hand because they didn't have an existential crisis due to time creep. Every time we invent a time saving device we have to fill the void, and now a days that means drugs or cheap meaningless sex. I heard from a contact that the homeless community doesn't just like to get spun out on heroin, but to shove a plunger up their poop chute to top it off. My contact says he misses the day when they just used to get spun out on heroin. But that's not the only thing I want you to talk about. I want you to comment on a movie review that I found recently that in Taoism some women that die unmarried get married after death to prevent a banshee/ghost from coming back from the dead and haunting the whole village. When I heard that I thought about dating again and I quit. In such a situation the man the family will select for the undead husk is the first schmuck to touch a red envelope left out in the open. Thanks for not getting our consent, and women complain about an expensive ring we buy for them, but they can give us a red economic rape envelope. So in essence, If women reject you, level up. If you reject women, they'll threaten a bachelor tax, force marriage, force reproduction, slander you, shame you, and now come back form the after life and haunt you and your loved/unloved ones! That's INSANE!!! Women hate rejection and accountability, and so do men, but if we come back from the dead to haunt the village because we didn't burdened with wedlock, the whole village would drop what they were doing and laugh you back into the nether realm. It would be the ghost equivalent of going postal in high school because you didn't get a date to the prom. Another tactic used by Western women is to threaten suicide when you catch them cheating on you." Well Lord Jaguar thanks for the donation and topic. I'll get to it in just a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Red Pill Ring:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link: Chris Whalen CPAhttp://www.chriswhalencpa.comhttps://www.amazon.com/dp/0979352266Lauren Southern: https://youtu.be/VcM-zv9QDlo?t=5690John Stamos' ex-wife Rebecca Romijn admits to current husband she misses 'a lot of things' about her exhttps://www.yahoo.com/news/john-stamo...Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuWzQ...Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a more than generous donation from Mr. Anonymous from the Swiss Alps. This is the first of five videos I'm making for him. Recently I came across an article called: "John Stamos' ex-wife Rebecca Romijn admits to current husband she misses 'a lot of things' about her ex" which I've linked to in the description. It's short so I'll read it and then share my thoughts. So here goes and I quote: "Rebecca Romijn got candid about her past relationships with current husband Jerry O'Connell. Romijn admitted there's a "lot of things" she misses about ex-husband John Stamos during a recent appearance on "The Talk." "Going through a divorce is terrible, it’s awful," Romijn explained to O’Connell on the show. "I was with him for 10 years. Divorce feels like a failure and there were a lot of things that I had to let go of that were very sad." O'Connell noted that Romijn's relationship with Stamos seemed "fun" to him. "I have a lot of really fun memories," she responded. "I have a lot of fond memories of him. A lot of things about him that I miss. But yeah, it’s tricky. It’s a very hard decision to come to when you decide to end a marriage. It was heartbreaking." Stamos and Romijn got engaged in 1997 and tied the knot the following year. The two were married until Stamos filed for divorce in 2004. Romijn also recalled seeing Stamos for the first time since the two split while at a strip mall with her kids "just a few weeks ago." After the "Full House" actor walked in front of her car, she pointed him out to her kids and explained that she used to date him. The kids asked her how she knew it was Stamos. "I said, ‘Girls, it’s because I was with him for 10 years. I would recognize that gait from a block away,'" Romijn recalled saying. "I recognize the way his body moves. I know that walk. I’m familiar with his body." The "Femme Fatale" actress began dating O'Connell shortly after the split and the two married in 2007. Romijn and O'Connell share two kids together. O'Connell and Romijn began dating after the actress and Stamos had legally split. The two met while Romijn was on a date with another guy." unquote. Boy of boy this is going to be fun. Rebecca is certainly giving off the that Alpha Widow regret. She says it is a hard decision when you decide to end a marriage. But that's just it she wasn't the one that ended it. She got dumped by Stamos as he was the one filing for divorce. Luckily Yahoo news filled us in that. He was the one that dumped her close to the top of her beauty and fame when she was in her early to mid thirties. Back when she was playing super sexy mystique. Now she plays number 1 in Star Trek Discovery and I guess she plays number 2 for Stamos. Also way to go destroying Jerry O'connell's self confidence on national television by sharing the story about how she misses the life she had with Stamos. Does she want Jerry the father of your children to know that he got uncle Jesse's sloppy seconds. Have mercy Rebecca! Have mercy! Something tells me that Jerry wasn't her first pick. I also can't get over the way they men while Romijn was on a date with another guy. Talk about monkey branching In the middle of your meal. So she gets dumped by a Greek Adonis with great hair to marry the fat kid from Stand By Me. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Chris Whalen:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link:Surviving 4th Wave Feminismhttps://amzn.to/3hu3Ai6Women ultimately may pay the price for finally earning as much as menhttps://nypost.com/2022/04/16/women-m...Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkA8_...Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comHi Everyone Sandman Here,Another day without a topic donation. If you want to request a topic you can through a small payment through paypal or subscribestar. So with that out of the way I want to talk about an article called: "Women ultimately may pay the price for finally earning as much as men" from the New York Post. Now let me read a few key points from that article and I quote: "Across the nation, young women now earn 93 cents on the dollar overall when compared to men, according to Pew – with economists attributing that stubborn 7-cent difference to the lower number of hours worked by young women compared to men. When accounting for factors such as job title, education, experience, industry, job level, and hours worked, that number rises to a hair-splitting 99 cents on the dollar, according to Payscale’s recently-released 2022 State of the Gender Pay Gap Report. As the “wage gap” closes, a “partner gap” is taking its place – leaving women struggling to find a desirable match for marriage and motherhood. Evolutionary psychologists say that women tend to be more attracted to men who are more highly educated and/or out-earn them because sex can bring great costs for women – namely pregnancy and childbirth. Women, the theory goes, seek a partner who can ensure she is fed, sheltered and protected while pregnant — as well as secure her offspring’s well-being after delivery. Finding men of higher or even equal earning and academic status is increasingly difficult because of the “college gap” which widens year after year. unquote. Well folks forget about men going their own way reducing relationship and marriage formation. Women are pricing themselves out of the market because of high standards that very few men can live up to these days. So now we know conclusively that the gender wage gap no longer exists. If a woman complains about it point to this article and tell her she's lying. So now that the gender wage gap is gone feminists and women are inventing the next form of oppression, the Gender Partner gap. They need to get more funding from governments for being oppressed even though they are financially and educationally empowered. Are evolutionary psychologists taking into consideration that some women fear earning more money than men because it's the men that might start taking them to the divorce court cleaners the way they take men? They probably believe there is an underclass of disgruntled males out there just waiting to use them for beta female provisioning. Women always have to complain about the next thing that's hurting them. But I believe that we have hit the point of diminishing returns for nagging and complaining. Articles like this one tell me that women always see themselves as victims even when the win. They are the ones that created the partner gap and now they probably expect that men or the government will fix it. They will probably shame men to work harder and compete with women so that women have someone to marry. Meanwhile with female hiring quotas and the advantage in education rates women will never give up the gains they've made in college. So this puts the whole species into a stressful situation. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Surviving 4th Wave Feminism:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link: Profit Specialist Groupvideo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FV-m...https://www.cashisking.cc/Skirt Clubhttps://skirtclub.co.uk/homeMen and Women Respond Identically to Erotic Imageshttps://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkZ0q...Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comHi Everyone Sandman, This video is brought to you by a donation from Truth Seeker and here's what he has to say: "Hi, Sandman! I'm a guy from Norway pushing 50, that relies more on observation and research regarding women, than actual experience. What I have noticed is that women's lack of interest in men, is often explained away, with them wanting high status men, men with resources and sometimes men with the best bodies/DNA for their reproductive urges. But female homosexuality is becoming more and more common. Like Skirt-Club that has venues for bi-curious women in more than 20 cities all over the world: Then there is research showing no difference in how male and female brains react to erotic visual stimuli, and the complete failure of the magazine 'Playgirl' to attract female readers. Leading to the obvious conclusion that women are more aroused by women's bodies than men's. And the constant blaming of men for only 30% of women being able to reach orgasm, when women have no problem reaching it when being with other women. This might also correlate to the revelation made by one of the spicey websites that ends with the second word hub, that most of their female viewers watch spicy content with two women gettin it on. So these facts have led me to the conclusion that when it comes to sexuality, and not need for male validation, relationship or primal reproductive urges, women are more homosexual than heterosexual. Would love to hear your thoghts on these issues. Best Regards, 'Truth-Seeker'" Well Truth-Seeker thanks for the donation and topic. I like to rely on as much data as possible and the first thing I want to share is this poll that I've shared before in another video showing that 16 percent of zoomers are LGBT. In 2 generations if the trend of doubling continues from one generation to the next fifty to sixty percent of males and females will be LGBT. The question is is this just the way women have always been or is there something more to it? My Sandman Spidey sense is telling me that since our soyciety has been over sexualized it's taking a lot more to turn both men and women on. Since the female body is more visually appealing I don't blame women for being turned on by it. Then again women being more interested in women might just be a natural part of our species. Take a look at this Tweet that Mr. Obvious shared about how the disintigration of the family and rise in homosexuality led to the fall of Rome. He thinks we are going through something similar in the west right now. I agree. Chastity is all about harnessing human productive energy to build civilization. Uncontrolled sexual energy leads to the destruction of civilization because when you're into pleasure you have nothing to show for it except a temporary good feeling followed by chasing the next sexual high. But when you aren't sexually satisfied you have to keep working on other things in life and transmute your sexual energy into your family or your work. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Profit Specialist Group:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link: - MGTOW's Guide to Retiring on $200K in SE Asia- http://www.mgtowbooks.com- Promo code SANDMAN for 10% offMystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuUWq...Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a donation from Jared on Patreon. He didn't give me a topic so what I want to do is discuss why women hate sigma males. I haven't looked up the definition of a sigma male before and only did so because I read an article from Australia's Sydney Herald where women were complaining that YouTube was recommending videos about Sigma Males to young men. If it's pissing off feminists then you know it must be a good thing. First, it's important to define what a sigma male is. He's a successful, independent & introverted man that's difficult to control or rule. If you know anything about women then you know they want you to be Independent but they don't want you to think independently. I've been a sigma male my entire life without even knowing it. I've a lifelong entrepreneur, I'm introverted and when women try taking control of my life I leave instead of bending the knee. I think women are attracted to Sigma males because they want to break their spirit. They want to take a man they desire to and turn him into a man that's undesirable and then blame the man for changing. A sigma also has similar traits to an alpha male except he chooses to live outside the dominance hierarchy of society. The idea was that sigma males were rare but the rise of the internet allowing men to work anywhere and anytime has led to a rapid rise in men that refuse to bow down to corporations and women. Women are authoritarians that are not compatible with the sigma male that wants to do what he wants to do. Women want complete control over social norms and values and it drives them bananas that some men are figuring out ways to escape their pearl clutching hands. Besides complaining that YouTube was showing young men videos about Sigma Males that Australian article says that YouTube needs to do more to recommend videos to men to create the feminist future they want. That YouTube shouldn't show men the videos they want to see. But instead show them the videos women want them to see. I think they are worried that sigma males are made instead of born. From everything I've read so far it sounds like Sigmas are introverts that are high in personality trait openness because they are creative, willing to go on new adventures and want to do things their way. Most women tend to be attracted to sigma males due to their independent minds, self-sufficiency, and ability to control their lives without relying on anything or anyone. I think that's the case because they lack those qualities in themselves and opposites attract. Women always say they are looking for a man with a sense of humor the reason for that is because they don't have one themselves. I think that women have a love hate relationship with sigmas I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor The MGTOW Book Collection Part 2:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Hi Everyone Sandman Here,Jim talk but he cancelled so I'll give him a topic. I found an article from the Toronto Red Star newspaper called "The Whole World Has An Angry Young Man Problem." Well at least they didn't say angry white male problem and are acknowledging that the problem is coming from all sides. Usually you hear about how unsafe the United States is but if you took Chicago, Detroit, Philadelphia, Washington DC and St. Louis out of the violent crime statistics. I think there was one more city involved there but I can't be sure. Then you'd see that out of 195 or so countries if you exclude those cities then America was a 189th safest compared to the rest of the world. That's almost at the top. Again those aren't the exact numbers because I can't remember which article I read that in but those are ballpark numbers. The media doesn't really cover the black on black crime in those cities creating outrage when young black males go after each other in Chicago? Their coverage is almost non existent. I've mentioned before that it white on white violence gets media headlines because the majority of people that watch the mainstream media are from the Caucasian persuasion and are more likely to spend money on the products advertised during commercials. It's just the news outlets trying to draw more attention from aged viewers that have money. But besides money I think the angry young male problem is being highlighted to white as wonder bread America to take boom sticks away from the population. Even Elon Musk says that assault rifles need to be taken away from people and he's recently converted over to voting for the right. I'm beginning to see things from a different perspective. That it's not just racism and a battle between the sexes that's taking place here. But that it's also a battle between personality types. Alpha males tend to be authoritarians and they want everyone to bow down to their authority and if you don't then they go after you with force. They can't exactly do that if you're well armed and can defend yourself. Alpha males trying to take away the right to bear arms are doing so they can impose totalitarianism and crown themselves kings over all the cucks out there. It's in their nature to dominate and rule over others and so they are fighting sigma males that want to defend themselves from the tyranny of the alphas. This creates a problem because the omegas, betas and the other males use boom sticks not to defend themselves from the Alphas but to lash out because their place in the hierarchy is low and there's no way for them to go. The angry young men are not gaining access to women and yes some of them like the Payton Gendron the guy in Buffalo that went nuts at the local Tops friendly market was a racist. Probably pissed off at multiculturalism and odds are was radicalize by white nationalists. The article says that the cause of the angry young man problem might be racism or incel misogyny. And if that's the case it's going to get a lot worse. I'll discuss more in just a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Chris Whalen:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link:How & Where to Buy HEXhttps://coinclarity.com/coin/hex/Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQMf7...Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a donation from Thomas. He didn't give me a topic so I want to discuss my recent 1 week forced time out from YouTube which ended my attempt to make a video and release it everyday for ten years straight. Well I made it just shy of eight years and four months. I was prepared for a strike and had videos uploaded but this time unlike the others YouTube wouldn't let me make my previously uploaded videos public. I guess they figured out that people would prepare content for release incase they got a strike. The video I got punished for had medical misinformation in it and was for was from January of this year. I took 20 minutes from a 3 hour discussion I was in and uploaded it. The original video if you do a search for Yeetus, Y E E T U S & Sandman is still up on Undead chronics channel. I tried arguing with YouTube that it was fair use and the content didn't have any issues elsewhere. But I think they are clearly trying to make an example of me. At the same time they killed Hammerhands channel. That other video was on Undead Chronic's account. The idea was not to get him in trouble to but to argue fair use. The hits keep on coming and the writing is on the wall for the acronym mgtow and we are more toxic than a used up douche bag. I looked to see if anyone was missing my content and other than a handful of people all I got was crickets. Down the YouTube memory hole I go. The neuce is tightening on MGTOW content creators. I have to be super careful going forward. No talk about the coof. Also one of my sponsors, the red pill ring sells MGTOW rings and recently he sent me this message after I told him I'd have to move his ads up one week ahead because of the strike and I quote: "Thanks for the notice Sandman. My first web host and a credit card processing company closed my account because my products "promoted hate, violence, and terrorism.". Neither company would explain. They said I had no right to review. We are all on a tight rope because freeing slaves has always been illegal. Also as I've told you, you are one of the guys who saved me from suicide so you have my support. The payment processor issue happened about a year ago. I am still going but had to remove any reference to MGTOW. I originally had text to promote MGTOW but now A guy has to be full MGTOW to understand what I am saying or what the rings mean." unquote. So they are going after the sponsors as well now. Now that MGTOW content is almost gone and I've made the decision to stop making it under the same acronym at the ten year mark and change formats which I'll get into a little bit the next target is the incel community. I'm seeing a media campaign claiming that any misogynistic behavior in real life is coming from the incel community. Stardusk the Thinking Ape rebranded himself so that he could remain monetized under the label black pill. I wonder how long before the incel black pill community is demonetized on YouTube? Wheat Waffles, Face&LMS don't use the term incel very often so it's hard to take away their money if they are talking about guys issues. I recently found the Sigma Male community and realise it describes me for the most part so I'm going to try and create a MGTOW Sigma hybrid channel. I'll discuss more in just a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor HEX:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link:- Red Pill Ring- https://www.redpillring.com/Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ABnU...Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a donation from Rusty and here's what he has to say: "Hey Sandman, You often speak about the Strauss-Howe generational theory and how America and the West may be entering a 4th turning crisis period right now. What if we actually are in the middle of the 4th turning, things will get worse before they get better, but once they do we will be back into a 1st turning period. What if the High Times period come around again very soon? While this may sound optimistic, I worry this may be sobering news for independent thinkers like us. According to the theory, the 1st turning is characterized by a time of strong institutions and conformity. People who try to stand out do not do well during this period. As the Russia-Ukraine crisis breaks out, I think we are getting a glimpse of what the 1st turning of the next cycle might be like. American institutions and individuals are reacting by punishing Russian icitizens not being able to differentiate between the Russian people and the oligarchs ruling them. The international financial sanctions has crippled Russia's economy, which does more damage to the regular, middle class Russian much omore than it hurts their elites. People in Russia are unable to go about their daily lives because of the banking sanctions and that many Western companies voluntarily stopped selling products in Russia. AMD and Intel will no longer sell hcips in Russia. Boeing will no longer service airplanes. Nike will not sell shoes. I believe this move will spectacularly backfire on the West because they just cut off all their means of projecting soft power through our greatest ally n this crisis - the Russian population. I believe all this will do is separate the world into a West led by the United States and a Russia/China alliance in the East. A new cold war era begins.I worry that censorship will accelerate in hthissnew period because dissenting opinions will be treated as a matter of national security. It will be McCarthyism 2.0 on a scale that couldn't have been imagined in the 1950s. On Reddit, the r/Russia subreddit was quarantined this week. It is now socially dangerous to express the opinion that the Ukraine invasion may have been triggered by NATO's aggressive overexpansion toward the East over the last 15 years. I worry that we are entering a time where expressing sympathy for Russians and their points of view will be taboo. Russians are being dehumanized for an act of the dictatorship ruling them. The West is steps away from redoing its mistakes of the past, such as the internment camps they put innocent Japanese nationals in during World War 2, only this time it will be Russians.The 4th turning will be a rough time, but I worry the 1st turning will be even worse for free thinkers. What if the 1st turning will be a woke dystopia? In our last cycle, societal norms were driven by the conversative values of organized religion. This upcoming cycle will be driven by messages promoted by the media elites under the guise of wartime necessity. The current court of public opinion reminds me all too much of the "weapons of mass destruction" bandwangon, freedom fries, and racism towards Middle Eastern people in the early 2000s. I don't think the average person is able to wake up because people keep getting fooled by the same propaganda, just presented under a different emergency. If we have to take ideas like MGTOW underground, what will that life be like for people like us? How will we spread our messages and connect with like minded individuals in that kind of environment? " well Rusty thanks for the donation and topic. I'll get to it in just a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor The Red Pill Ring:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link: Chris Whalen CPAhttp://www.chriswhalencpa.comhttps://www.amazon.com/dp/0979352266Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMWLX...Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comHi Everyone Sandamn Here,This video isn't brought to you by any donations. I thought I'd discuss Demi Lovato and her mom bod without being a mom. I don't know when the photo in the thumbnail was taken. When I posted it on Twitter people shared other newer pictures of her that looked very sexy. But those photos were taken from the front you couldn't see her profile. Some people even said the after picture in the thumbnail isn't even her. But if you look at the tattoos, the short hair and visit her Podcast on YouTube from about a year ago you'll realise it is her. Plus she's wearing baggy clothes that make her look even frumpier than she is. So what happened? She still has a pretty face and nice voice. Why did she put on all that weight, become non-binary and dress the way she has? This is what happens when you go woke at the same time you hit the wall. She's thirty now and the music industry is brutal for women even if they keep writing great songs. The audience moves onto more attractive women that are prettier and more fertile even though the female artist matures. Mind you I liked some of Lovato's earlier songs and commented on them on YouTube and even predicted that one of her songs would be a hit early on and it received over a billion views. But she's falling into the trap of catering to a less attractive Lesbian audience like the artists Tove Lo and Dragonette. While they don't come out as being lesbians what they do is they project ambiguous sexuality in their music videos and appearance to appeal to young women in their early to mid twenties that are attracted to older more masculine looking women in their thirties. The 20 and 30 year old guys no longer find them as attractive as they once did so they embrace their inner butch and to get those bucks. But there's a fine line there and Lovato has stepped way over it. The other artists I mention they kept their sexuality ambiguous to some extent and didn't radically alter their appearance and say they are now non-binary. Lovato has alienated her older audience while trying to attract the new woke lesbian one. I see women that beef up their bodies to appear progressive as being lazy with a good excuse for it. I don't know about you but when I've dated women the vast majority were slobs. They would hang underpants inside their ovens to warm them up before they wore them. On their televisions and other strang places. Their cosmetics would cover entire counters with no room to spare gathering dust. I'll discuss more in just a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Chris Whalen:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy