MGTOW Sandman Quotes

Sponsor Link: Chris Whalen CPAhttp://www.chriswhalencpa.comhttps://www.amazon.com/dp/0979352266Mystery Link: https://youtu.be/76BXYrVpEkU?t=852Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video isn't brought to you by any donations. They are getting slimmer lately because YouTube is throttling my channel like never before I'll talk about the future of this channel in the last quarter of this video. Another sudden drop in views happened in early October of 2022. I'm not sure what's going on and think it might have something to do with the midterm election. Anyhow I wanted to pipe in about the Tom Brady and Gisele Bundchen divorce situation. There were videos done about his before and people were saying that even one of the best men in the world is still not good enough for the women out there. Even a guy that's one of the top Athletes with hundreds of millions of dollars. At first I didn't believe they were going to get divorced and I still think they won't. But recently they finally hired lawyers. So what's the reason she supposedly wants to leave him? Well, she doesn't like the idea that he's going to unretire at the at of 45 because football is a dangerous sport. But is she only threatening to leave him or is she serious? This is not the first time Tom and Gisele have called things off. Him going back into football at the age of 45 should be understood as one great big shit test. She's threatened to divorce him many times over football and then she didn't go through with it so it looks like he's passed many of her shit tests before. He's telling her that he's his own man and that she's not the one that's going to make decisions for his life. She ends up stomping her feet like a five year old, calming down and then everything goes back to normal. We recently saw this with another celebrity couple I covered Sylvester Stallone and Jennifer Flavin. They are no longer getting a divorce and are seen going out on dates. All this drama makes me wonder if some washed up and stars that are fading away are faking divorces on purpose. That there's a celebrity trend of faking breakups to get attention in the mainstream media. Maybe it was obvious with the Rocky dog being tattooed over his wife's face on his arm. Apparently that's what led her to want to divorce Sly. Now they are out in public like nothing happened. How much you wanna bet that Tom Brady doesn't get divorced and they reconcile? Were in an attention based economy and people are increasingly willing to do whatever it takes to stay in the public spotlight. What's to say that Giselle didn't conspire together to stir up a media storm so they could get some attention. Or what's to say we aren't just watching her shit test him in public again? I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Chris Whalen:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sandman Contact Info & Store:Email: SandmanMGTOW@Gmail.comhttps://teespring.com/stores/sandman-...New Research: #MeToo Movement Hurt Female Productivityhttps://unherd.com/thepost/new-resear...Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQ1PZ...Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a donation from Mark and here's what he very briefly has to say: "I enjoyed the video you put together for me Sandman. I believe Rich Cooper also lives in Canada. All those simp bucks have bought him a McClaren, what an ego. Anyways, here's some long overdue Sheckels." Well Mark thanks for the donation. I thought I'd use it to cover an article by Finn Mcredmond about Metoo backfiring on whamen. Here's what her article says and I quote: "CV data shows that fewer women academics are collaborating with men. A new paper has found that the #MeToo movement has caused a significant decline in the productivity of women academics because fewer are collaborating with their male colleagues. This fall is most acute in universities “where the perceived risk of sexual harassment accusations for men is high”, resulting in a chilling effect on cross-sex collaboration. Using CV data to track collaborations between economists over six years around #MeToo (2015-2020), researcher Marina Gertsberg discovered that junior female academics started 0.7 fewer projects per year than before. 60% of this decline can be attributed to a decrease in collaborations with new male co-authors, which broadly correlates with a reduction in growth of the co-author network. Gertsberg attributes this fall to men unwilling to collaborate with women due to fears of accusations of sexual harassment. In fact, several surveys have found that men believe they are more vulnerable to false allegations of sexual harassment in a post-MeToo landscape, and are perhaps managing this perceived risk by reducing their exposure to women. #MeToo’s original goal was to improve workplace conditions for women by holding men accountable for sexual misconduct. The response resulted in public allegations that brought down several high-profile individuals. Early cases included William V Harris, the well-established Columbia history professor who retired as part of a settlement in a sexual harassment lawsuit in late 2017; and prominent Harvard Professor, Jorge I. Domínguez, who was accused of sexual harassment by up to 18 women. This new research is significant because it highlights that the #MeToo movement had negative effects on women too. Junior researchers depend on collaboration with colleagues to build their reputation and qualify for tenure. But a reduction in interactions and professional collaborations “will exacerbate inequality between the career opportunities of men and women,” the paper concludes. The MeToo movement intended to improve the workplace for women, but it may have had the unintended consequence of stalling their careers." unquote. The thing is women in the workforce were never as productive as they let on to begin with. They were just using men to do their work for them and now their gynocentric gravy train has come to an end. They chant my body my choice. Men chant back my mentorship my choice. Or my attention my choice. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Me The Sandman:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link:- Red Pill Ring- https://www.redpillring.com/Mystery Link: https://youtu.be/RwE3Sb2kvC8Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a donation from Killjoy08 and he just sent me a donation as a thank you with no topic. A week ago I was listening to Andrew and Tristan Tate attack their haters and one of the main arguments from their critics was that they were nice guys and that the Tate brothers were bad boys. Tristan Tate said that he was a nice guy too and would pay for women on dates and open the door for women. That he was a gentleman and that the simps criticizing him were lonely and their main selling point to women was that they were nice guys so women should give them attention. It made me think these YouTube critics had drank up the period blood koolaid and began believing that women wanted nice guys even though for years now we've heard phrases like nice guys finish last and nice guys get friend zoned. But how much truth is there to the idea that nice guys don't get the girl and women aren't attracted to them? Especially when they shout out respect me, love me because I'm a nice guy. Or at least I'm virtue signalling that I'm a nice guy but I'm just a creep. Why is it that suddenly were seeing so many guys online promoting the idea that being a nice guy is some sort of accomplishment? I think part of it has to do with cultural differences and the idea that being a bad boy is part of toxic masculinity. Also a guy is expected to be nice to women in the east but in the west it's virtue signalling. Two different cultures are colliding with the Tate Brothers adopting Eastern values in Romania and pumping them out to western men and the west criticizing them for being a so called sex traffickers. If I was Andrew Tate I'd sue them for slander and libel. Claiming that by saying that he was a sex trafficer with no proof on their YouTube channels was doing damage to his reputation. If there's anything that the black pilled community has taught us it's that for women looks are the most important thing. Not how much of a nice guy or a bad boy you are. What I also found laughable was how the Tate's said they were nice guys meanwhile they are involved with the Romanian Mafia and were in the casino business with them as well as having a cam whorehouse business. Those are some real nice guy businesses right there. Sure they might treat the women they date nicely which is just part of eastern traditionalism but that doesn't mean they are nice guys. Andrew Tate is putting a secret gun compartment in his Bugatti to store a glock and he's putting in bullet proof glass. It's not exactly a secret if you tell everyone about it. Luckily he's smart enough to know not to try and shoot through the bullet proof glass or risk a rickochet bullet hitting him back. In the end though It doesn't matter if you're nice or bad. What matters first is if you're good looking and masculine. Number two if you have your shit together financially and other men look up to you because of status. Being nice or being a bad boy is way down on the list. So why are western YouTubers and men in general so obsessed with being nice recently? I'll dive into that douche pit from hell in just a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor The Red Pill Ring:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link: Chris Whalen CPAhttp://www.chriswhalencpa.comhttps://www.amazon.com/dp/0979352266Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gr_Op...Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a donation from Roger and here's what he briefly has to say: "Keep up the great content Sandman. I'm trying to talk my son out of marrying. I'm twice divorced. I don't want my son to go through all the poop it that it brings, which is life long pain and suffering. I don't care about the women, I just care about what they stole from me after baby trapping me." unquote. Thanks for venting your frustrations Roger. You've got to allow your son to make his own mistakes within reason. Mastering ones emotions takes exposing oneself to situations where you deal with temptation. I'm not sure what to tell you about your son. You don't want to see him suffer but some degree of suffering builds character. And speaking of suffering what I want to talk about today is a film that's going to make a lot of whamen suffer called wifelike. Here's a brief breakdown of the film from streamable and I quote: "A grieving detective in the near-future hunts down criminals who trade artificial humans on the black market. In the fight to end AI exploitation, an underground resistance attempts to infiltrate him by sabotaging the programming of the artificial human assigned as his companion to behave like his late wife. She begins to question her reality as memories of a past life begin to surface in a world where nothing is as it seems." unquote. I wonder what the resistance will look like? probably a rag tag group of renegade overweight feminists called the manatee collective no doubt. Lifelife female androids are a fantasy for men and a horror film for women. The stepford wives explores that the fullest where there's a town full of men replacing their real lives with passable androids. Ending of the Stepford wives is more realistic where the main female character is also replaced by a femoid. Clearly in the future there will be no happy Cherry 2000 ending where men give up perfect sexy androids for real whamen. But women won't successfully ban them either. I think things will fall somewhere in the middle and that in the end men won't want a companionbot. Instead they will want a boinkbot for quickies and then shove it under their bed or something. As for Wifelike the film begins with a cheesy ad designed to piss off whamen. The owner of the wifelike company says how would you like to never go to bed lonely or mourn the loss of a loved one. His sloagan is upgrade your wife. Upgrade your life. A play on the whole happy wife, happy life thing. I really hope this isn't yet another film that devolves into a female fantasy that somehow the female androids will rise up against the programming that men have coded for them, join the female collective and punish men for trying to replace biological women with artificial ones. The reality when it comes will be very different. Neither side will be happy with the outcome. Men will see through the facade of the silicone to see there's nothing there and whamen will get less attention than ever. Anyways, I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Chris Whalen:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link:The Men's Guide to High-Conflict Divorce & The Police Are Not Your Friendshttps://amzn.to/36YftNlMen, Women, and Optimal Violencehttps://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.c...Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wuy14...Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a donation from The Chungus Among Us and here's what he briefly has to say: "Hey, I just wanted to send a short message showing my great appreciation for the work you do. Hopefully I'll eventually be able to support your work a little more my little addition will be another grain in the heap keeping you fed. Keep up the great work, you're truly saving lives Sandman!!" Well Chungus thanks for the support as YouTube continues to throttle my channel into oblivion. I wanted to share a crazy article I found called men, women, and optimal violence and here's what the summary of it says and I quote: "While both men and women can, and do, use violence against each other, men’s violence against women is far more common, less justified, and more destructive than women’s violence against men. One of the reasons for this asymmetry is that men do not fear retaliation for violence against women, whereas women do fear retaliation for their use of violence against men. The distribution of violence between the genders, then, is suboptimal. Society would be better off as a whole if more women were willing to engage in justified violence against men, and fewer men were willing to engage in unjustified violence against women. To that end, women’s justified violence against men should be encouraged, protected, and publicized. This will require a reversal of the current trend in legal and social practices, which is to tolerate and encourage men’s unjustified violence against women while discouraging and legally restricting women’s violence against men. Even if encouraging an increase in women’s justified violence against men may sometimes result in unjustified or disproportionate violence in individual situations, the overall effects of the redistribution of violence will be preferable to the current asymmetry." unquote So here we have a woman named Mary Anne Franks that expects men to get married and accept being a part of battered husband syndrome. She says that women that report violence from men fear retaliation. As if men don't fear being hunted down the street for hitting a woman by the popo. As if women don't have battered whamen shelters to run to if they are hit. How about instead of justifying violence against either men or women as normal we make it unacceptable for both men and women to hit each other? Men aren't even allowed to have shelters to go to if they experience spousal abuse. The feminists saw to that back in the 1970s. Every time a men's shelter is setup it's always shut down. Not to mention that Erin Pizzey opened a shelter for men and women in the 1970s and found that about half the people being abused by their spouse physically were men and the other half were women. That violence was already pretty equally distributed between the sexes. But if that were to be made a reality then it wouldn't paint women in a positive light so feminist forced her to shut down. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor T Fitz:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link: Profit Specialist Groupvideo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FV-m...https://www.cashisking.cc/Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7cKb...Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a donation from Megan and here's what she has to say: "Cheers, Sandman. Thanks for all your fine work. I’m it’s embarrassing but I’m a girl I’d like to talk about how my father was hen pecked by my mother and I believe it had something to do with him taking the rope. I haven’t seen any daughters on these forums or any female followers affected like I have been. I have also had what I would describe as post-cognitive dreams— I dream of alternate endings for my father like he moved away instead. I envisioned a Mgtow philosophy for him before I knew what it was online. Thanks!" Well Megan thanks for the donation and sharing your story. If you're seriously having dreams with alternate life paths for your father and you've experienced psychic phenomena before then look up the work of Philip K. Dick the author. His books were mostly of so called alternate realities that he saw in his dreams. He even saw his young sons death from a hernia in a precognitive dream and he prevented it from happening. It's too bad you didn't have pre cognitive dreams and saved your father's life by seeing him take the rope around his neck and stopped him from doing so. For women the only men they truely love are their fathers. So that explains why you're probably sending me this message. You suffer because your father isn't in your life anymore. Maybe he couldn't help you out with a down payment because he was already put down in the ground? Today I had some interesting interactions with a woman that buried her father about five years back and she's not happy for a different reason. Her father was smart to make sure that the executer of his will was his friend that makes sure his wife and two daughters don't spend all of their inheritance into oblivion. Today she used me as an emotional tampon complaining how her car was six years old and the executer of his will won't let her buy a new one. She doesn't really make much money and I told her my car was ten years old and it works fine. That she doesn't need a new car. Then she said I sounded like the executer and I was making her depressed. Then she devolved into personal attacks shaming me for being single and telling me that I was giving off a gay vibe and asked me if guys hit on me before. Most guys would never admit to that even if it happened but I told her sure I'd been hit on by at least five to ten guys in my life because I'm artistic and sensitive and the only time I was offended was when one guy groped me. The rest of the times I never cared. Here was a woman I'm sure hen pecked her own father. Her sister too and probably her mother as well. He didn't end it all like your dad Megan but he sure got his revenge. It's hilarious to see two women in their late forties or early fifties that can't manage their own money and their own father knew it and neither are married because no man could suffer being with them. So they end up living together as sister wives. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Profit Specialist Group:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link: - MGTOW's Guide to Retiring on $200K in SE Asia- http://www.mgtowbooks.com- Promo code SANDMAN for 10% offOh no! The rise of lonely, single men is upon us!https://www.goingyourownway.com/mgtow...https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/bl...Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OunzV...Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here, This video is brought to you by a donation from Tim he told me to get well from my most recent health issues but didn't give me a topic so I wanted to dedicate this video to him. I found an article called: "The Rise of Lonely, Single Men." The article is basically shaming men for being single. But what about Tinder skewing women's expectations upwards? What about women being more educated and making more money unwilling to lower their expectations? The article says this and I quote: "Dating opportunities for heterosexual men are diminishing as relationship standards rise. Men represent approximately 62% of dating app users, lowering their chances for matches. Men need to address skills deficits to meet healthier relationship expectations. Younger and middle-aged men are the loneliest they’ve been in generations, and it’s probably going to get worse. This is not my typical rosy view of relationships but a reality nonetheless. Over the last 30 years, men have become a larger portion of that growing group of long-term single people. And while you don’t actually need to be in a relationship to be happy, men typically are happier and healthier when partnered. Here are three broad trends in the relationship landscape that suggest heterosexual men are in for a rough road ahead: Dating Apps. Whether you’re just starting to date or you’re recently divorced and dating again, dating apps are a huge driver of new romantic connections in the United States. The only problem is that upwards of 62% of users are men and many women are overwhelmed by the number of options they have. Competition in online dating is fierce, and lucky in-person chance encounters with dreamy partners are rarer than ever. Relationship Standards. With so many options, it’s not surprising that women are increasingly selective. I hear recurring dating themes from women between the ages of 25 and 45: They prefer men who are emotionally available, who are good communicators, and who share their values. Skills Deficits. For men, this means a relationship skills gap that, if not addressed, will likely lead to fewer dating opportunities and longer periods of being single. There's less patience for poor communication skills today. The problem for men is that emotional connection is the lifeblood of healthy, long-term love and it requires all the skills that families still are not consistently teaching young boys. While there’s probably no chance of stemming the rising tide of unintentional single men, there is some good news. Men need to level up their mental health game. That means getting into some individual therapy to address your skills gap. It means valuing your own internal world and respecting your ideas enough to communicate them effectively. It means seeing intimacy, romance, and emotional connection as worthy of your time and effort. Men have a key role in this transformation but only if they go all-in. It’s going to take that kind of commitment to themselves, to their mental health, and to the kind of love they want to generate in the world. Will we step up?" unquote. You hear that men? It's time step up if you're sick and tired of being single and lonely. Also, men make up a larger portion of single people. What does that mean? Does that mean two women are sharing one Chad? Women make up the majority of population so mathematically they should make up the majority of single people unless in some cases multiple women are clinging on to one high value man. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor The MGTOW Book Collection Part 2:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link: Chris Whalen CPAhttp://www.chriswhalencpa.comhttps://www.amazon.com/dp/0979352266UNSOCIAL DISTANCING https://www.the-sun.com/news/6072174/...Mystery Link: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt15978956/Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a donation from Thomas he didn't give me a topic so I wanted to cover an article called: Australiain Nightclub bans STARING without getting ‘verbal consent’" Looks like life in the land of the Cuckaroo has just got a lot worse. Or has it. Let's explore further. So in that club which is called Club 77 if you stare at a woman there she will approach one of the pink pussy vested chaparones to point you out and ruin the mood. Australia is quickly becoming a dystopian world if you have a dick. We have the handmaids tale and now we have the incels tale. Before I get into more of my analysis let me read a bit from that article and I quote: "A NIGHTCLUB has banned staring without getting "verbal consent" - and hired "safety officers" in pink vests to police revellers. The venue also asked clubbers not to turn up if their "sole purpose" for their night out is the meet someone to "pick up". Club 77 in Sydney said it wanted to be a 'safe space'Club 77 in Sydney said managers will call the cops if clubbers stare at others without getting their consent. It updated its rules as it had recently "attracted some people who do not share our values and ethics when it comes to club culture". The fresh policy states that "Club 77 is not a place to come to if your sole purpose is to 'pick up'". It added: "If you do come in and are approaching multiple people or giving unwanted attention to someone, you are going to attract the attention of our security, who have been instructed to stop this kind of behaviour." Social media users jumped to support the new policy. One said: "Amazing!!! Positive party culture all the way!" Another wrote: "Backing this 100 per cent." unquote. I'll tell you what's about to happen: "There will be no simps going to that club to pay for drinks so the nightclub is going to die like that coffee shop that was charging men 20% more for coffee because apparently men make 20% more on average. It went bust. We'll have another article to share about that in another 1-2 years. Bars ane night clubs make their money off of drinks. Usually the men that are unattractive buy the majority of them. Without the creepy men the club will shut down if men aren't allowed to stare at whamen. In the case of that coffee shop the lesbian owners complain that misogyny led to men boycotting their shop so that's why it went bust. yadda yadda yadda. No man wants attitude from a lesbian-owned, vegan coffee shop in Brunswick, Australia. This sort of stupidity seems to have found a home in the lesbian land down under. Maybe everyone that goes to that club will start wearing sunglasses like Andrew Tate to cover their shark eyes and grow a beard to cover their weak? I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Chris Whalen:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

https://teespring.com/stores/sandman-...Mystery Link: https://youtu.be/U6zwlMrPWisOdysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a donation from Luke and here's what he has to briefly say: "Hey Sandman, Please watch the Jordan Peterson clip with Peirs Morgan, as he reacts to Olivia Wild calling him King of the Incels (it's on YouTube). He gets emotional and It's hard to watch. I'd love to get your take on the situation. I just can't believe a movie star can shit on a man she has never met from her ivory tower and no one says anything." Well Luke thanks for the donation and welcome to MGTOW as it's something new for you. Do you really believe that Peterson was showing empathy and crying for incels on national television after making videos telling them it's their fault for not being picked by women and that they need to up their game? Doesn't anyone else think he's acting and being dramatic crying to supposedly show sympathy for the pain young men feel after insulting them in previous videos? Does he have sympathy, sure? But does he have as much as he's showing? I doubt it. The reason you felt uncomfortable seeing him put on the water works Luke is because no one likes a man that cries. Not other men, women, children or small animals. Men aren't supposed to cry. When you're young and you cry all of the other boys will bully you to the extreme. Being a highly sensitive person myself it was impossibly hard for me to control my tears until I was 13 years of age. But seeing Peterson him do it is in a way emasculating men because it's showing us that it's ok to be sensitive for the whole wide world to see. This is an awful mistake because it means women exploit emotional weakness. If there was ever a reason for you to believe the Peterson was part of the mainstream manipulation machine that would be it. He's telling you clean up your room but all telling you it's ok to cry in your cornflakes. It's absolutely disgusting the subtle manipulation he's doing on men. He does that after telling Piers Morgan that when he speaks he just says what he feels and doesn't have a plan. That it's all genuine and then he turns on the water works. Doesn't anyone else think that might be a lie? He might have also done it as a sort of role reversal. Usually women are the victims and not men. Peterson releasing some possible cuckidile tears might be a way for him to get even with Olivia Wilde. As I said people are disgusted when a man cries. He knows Wilde is going to watch the video clip and if she sees him crying she will be disgusted. That's something I learned in middle school when I couldn't control my sobs and tears in the classroom. The bully was having fun agitating me up to the point of tears. But the moment I turned on the waterworks there was a look of disgust from the entire classroom including the bully. Perhaps subconsciously I was getting back at the bully for attacking me and getting back at everyone else in the classroom for making that sort of behavior acceptable and not standing up to it? Maybe he's also upsetting everyone else that didn't correct Wilde on her behavior and her baseless attack. Anyways, I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Me The Sandman:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

- Red Pill Ring- https://www.redpillring.com/Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHMzC...Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a donation from Mr. Anonymous and here's what he has to say: "Hi Sandman, I would like to thank you for red pilling me & hope your health improves. Here's a quick story I would like you to make a video about. I had a male coworker who married right out of college. He was married about 3 years. He and his wife had been saving for the dream condo that she wanted. They purchased the condo. Three weeks later, she tells him that she's been having an affair, wants a divorce, and just leaves. The poor guy even had to deal with his mother in law constantly hounding him on the phone trying to contact his ex-wife because the ex-wife would not answer her phone. He constantly told her, he had no idea where the ex-wife was. Eventually the ex-wife served the divorce papers. Obviously, this young man was crushed. The reason I am telling this story is that I have seen similar things happen. A woman stays in the marriage because she sees a big payout coming. In this case, it was the fancy condo. However, once the woman gets the big payout, she is still not happy." unquote. Well Mr. Anonymous thanks for the donation and topic. These days it's smart for a young man in a relationship not to get married. It's about stringing them along without actually giving women what they want. I know one guy that bought his long-term girlfriend to ten plus years a new car (on a lease of course), dog and lets her live in his house. But when she asked him to buy her her own condo he put his foot down. The best you can hope for these days is to provide the spoiled woman you're with with the lifestyle she wants but to keep her on an economic leash. Where if she steps out of line or tries to leave you're the one that has leverage. It's like living with a shark with breasts waiting to take a bite out of you the moment you put a drop of blood in the water. Unfortunately for your young co-worker he didn't live with anyone before getting married and he didn't have enough relationship experience before giving his ex-wife all that leverage. Odds are she took his down payment and dream condo. She's also in her prime carousel riding years and so of course her getting married in her early twenties should have been a massive red flag. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor The Red Pill Ring:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy