
SCOTUS Clarifies 'True Threats'
Cato Daily Podcast
00:00
What’s evidence of a threating motive? VA v Black (2003): Is Cross-Burning a Prima Facie Threat?
The Supreme Court has recognized a true threat exception to constitutionally protected speech. In the Virginia v. Black case, the court declared that burning a cross with the intent to intimidate someone can be prohibited because it constitutes a true threat. However, the court held the statute unconstitutional because it presumed that anyone burning a cross intended to intimidate, without considering other possible motivations. This case raised the question of whether proving a speaker's intent to threaten someone is necessary to prohibit something as a true threat, or if showing that the speech was objectively threatening is enough. The Countermen case aims to address this question.
Transcript
Play full episode
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.