Paul Matzko, an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute, and Walter Olson, a senior fellow at the same institute, delve into the intricate powers of the FCC over speech regulation. They discuss the potential risks posed by a politically motivated FCC suppressing dissenting voices and the bipartisan concerns regarding its impact on free speech. The conversation highlights how changes to Section 230 could reshape online discourse, examining case studies where regulations have stifled political messages and drawing disturbing parallels to oppressive regimes.