Tess Bridgeman

Tess Bridgeman, co-editor in chief at Just Security and a legal scholar, joins the conversation to dive into the murky legal waters surrounding U.S. vessel strikes. She explains the War Powers Resolution and the complex relationship between the President and Congress regarding military actions. The discussion touches on the legal definition of 'hostilities' and the implications of extrajudicial killings. Bridgeman emphasizes the need for accountability and explores congressional tools to ensure oversight in military engagements.

Tess Bridgeman, co-editor-in-chief of Just Security and former White House legal adviser, dives into the legality of recent U.S. strikes in the Caribbean, which have seen a controversial number of fatalities. She discusses the administration's claims linking the strikes to drug trafficking, highlighting the lack of solid evidence. Tess also explores the implications for U.S.-Venezuela relations, including covert CIA operations and the dangers of escalating military action. The conversation sheds light on potential congressional checks on presidential military power.

In this discussion, Julian Barnes, an intelligence and national security reporter for The New York Times, and Tess Bridgeman, co-editor-in-chief at Just Security and former legal adviser to the National Security Council, delve into the controversial U.S. boat strike that resulted in fatalities. They analyze accusations of war crimes, implications for the law of war, and the Pentagon's shift from law enforcement to military action. The duo also highlights concerns about political accountability and the potential erosion of safeguards in U.S. military operations.

Joined by Tess Bridgeman, co-editor of Just Security and former national security lawyer, the discussion dives deep into the fallout surrounding Pete Hegseth's defense of a controversial military action. Bridgeman critiques the legality of the bombing campaign and reveals the troubling evidence that suggests the victims were waving for help. She highlights the wavering support from lawmakers and addresses the implications for accountability concerning President Trump's involvement. Their conversation underscores the urgent need for oversight and a legal reevaluation of military actions.

In this discussion, Tess Bridgeman, co-editor-in-chief of Just Security and former national security lawyer under Obama, dissects the fallout from Pete Hegseth's defense of a controversial airstrike. She argues that videos showing survivors raising their hands undermine his position, highlighting the legal violations behind the strikes. Bridgeman explores the implications of the boat’s true destination and the growing Republican pushback, suggesting a path to accountability through congressional oversight and legal avenues.