Stefania Palma

In this discussion, Stefania Palma, U.S. legal correspondent for the Financial Times, shares insights on the Supreme Court's skepticism towards Trump's use of emergency tariffs. She highlights controversy surrounding the constitutional implications and potential economic fallout. Sujit Indap, Wall Street editor, delves into the dramatic First Brands bankruptcy, revealing shocking allegations of fraud and over $2 billion missing. He explains the competitive strategies creditors will employ as they navigate the unfolding financial turmoil.

James Politi, the Financial Times' Washington Bureau Chief, and Stefania Palma, its U.S. legal correspondent, dive into Donald Trump's return to the White House. They discuss his aggressive tactics aimed at reshaping the federal government and targeting critics. The conversation highlights the erosion of democratic norms and the potential chaos stemming from Trump’s unconventional management style. With a focus on loyalty over dissent, they explore how these actions may impact governance and the implications for America's political landscape.

Peter Andringa, a data-driven reporter from the Financial Times, and Stefania Palma, a U.S. legal correspondent, delve into the troubling world of government surveillance on immigrants. They reveal how the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) collaborates with private companies to create a vast tracking network. From discussing the role of data brokers to the implications of automated license-plate readers, they highlight the legal and privacy challenges tied to these practices. The conversation also touches on the shifting focus of immigration enforcement and the potential dangers of expanding surveillance.

Stefania Palma, U.S. legal and enforcement correspondent for the Financial Times, sheds light on a crucial Supreme Court case involving presidential immunity. The discussion navigates the constitutional question of whether a sitting president can face criminal charges, especially in the context of Donald Trump's trials. They explore how judicial decisions could redefine presidential powers and accountability, impacting future presidencies. Additionally, the conversation examines how Trump's legal challenges may affect his campaign strategy and political narrative.

Stefania Palma, The Financial Times' U.S. legal and enforcement correspondent, joins to discuss the Supreme Court's upcoming term and its potential impact on Trump’s presidency. They analyze critical legal challenges surrounding presidential power, especially in areas like immigration and tariffs. The conversation highlights the court's controversial emergency rulings and the polarized perceptions of its motivations. Additionally, they reflect on the implications of rising political violence and the shifting dynamics among justices during this pivotal moment.