undefined

Simon Sandoval-Moschenberg

Attorney for Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was mistakenly deported from Maryland. Works to defend and advocate for his client's rights.

Top 3 podcasts with Simon Sandoval-Moschenberg

Ranked by the Snipd community
undefined
23 snips
Apr 8, 2025 • 42min

Fierce backlash against Trump's agenda seen in sweeping, nation-wide protests

Simon Sandoval-Moschenberg, an attorney advocating for immigrant rights, discusses the widespread protests against Donald Trump's controversial immigration policies. He highlights community unity in response to wrongful deportations, sharing stories of individuals impacted. The conversation delves into the implications of recent Supreme Court rulings on deportation rights and the urgent public health crisis linked to these policies. Sandoval-Moschenberg emphasizes the critical need for legal protections and health vigilance as dissent grows across the nation.
undefined
16 snips
Apr 5, 2025 • 55min

He Was Deported by Administrative Error. We Talked to His Lawyer.

In this discussion, lawyer Simon Sandoval-Moschenberg sheds light on the harrowing experience of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, a family man wrongfully deported to El Salvador due to a bureaucratic error. As they unravel the complexities of immigration law, Sandoval-Moschenberg reveals the emotional toll on families grappling with such injustices. Additionally, Slate's Mark Joseph Stern dives into the controversial tariffs introduced during the Trump administration, questioning their legality and underscoring the broader implications for American consumers.
undefined
Apr 5, 2025 • 55min

Amicus | He Was Deported by Administrative Error. We Talked to His Lawyer.

Simon Sandoval-Moschenberg, an immigration law expert, reveals the shocking story of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, wrongfully deported to El Salvador due to a government error, exposing severe flaws in the U.S. deportation system. Mark Joseph Stern joins to discuss the legality of Trump’s controversial tariffs, questioning whether they will withstand judicial scrutiny under the major questions doctrine. The conversation highlights systemic failures, human rights implications, and the necessity for judicial accountability in immigration and tariff policies.