Join Sarah Isgur, a former Justice Department spokeswoman, Matthew Continetti, a leading conservative voice and author, and Josh Hammer, a Newsweek senior editor, as they delve into the GOP’s reimagining under Trump. They discuss his surprising appeal to working-class voters, the shift toward a multiracial party, and the ramifications of his cabinet choices. Key themes include the party's future conservatism, the evolving immigration sentiment, and how Trump's endurance shapes political landscapes ahead.

Michael Douglas, the illustrious two-time Academy Award-winning actor, shares his insights on societal shifts post-pandemic. John Heilemann, a chief political economist, analyzes the complexities from recent elections, while Sarah Isgur, a seasoned legal expert, discusses the challenges of voter engagement. The trio dives into political polarization and environmental crises, highlighting pressing issues like ocean pollution and the disconnect facing the middle class. With humor and heartfelt reflections, they inspire a call for greater awareness and genuine political dialogue.

Last week, the Supreme Court handed down, as they usually do as the term comes to an end, a flurry of highly anticipated major decisions. Two of them made a lot of news: one effectively ended affirmative action in American higher education, and another ruled that a Colorado web designer could refuse to create a wedding website for a same-sex couple. The mainstream media’s prevailing sentiment over the last week has been that these are the sorry consequences of a conservative majority court. This court overturned Roe v. Wade last year in a major setback to women’s rights; now they’ve undone decades of precedent that helped historically disadvantaged students have a chance at the American dream, and they’ve weakened gay rights. When President Joe Biden was asked at a press conference last week whether or not this is a “rogue court,” Biden basically said yes. He muttered, “This isn’t a normal court.”  Is that true? Is this court “not normal”? Or do these decisions actually reflect a legitimate reading of the Constitution? To help separate signal from noise and fact from hyperbole, today we have three legal experts from different sides of the political aisle to hash it out. Harry Litman is an attorney who has clerked for two Supreme Court justices, Thurgood Marshall and Anthony Kennedy. He is also a host of the podcast Talking Feds. Jeannie Suk Gersen is a professor at Harvard Law School and writer for The New Yorker. She clerked for David Souter. And Sarah Isgur is a columnist for The Dispatch and an ABC News contributor. She clerked for the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and served as the Justice Department spokeswoman during the Trump administration. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The podcast discusses Trump's financial troubles, Elon Musk's controversial actions, free speech during the pandemic, challenges of border control in Texas, political polarization and Israeli politics, evolving race and identity, and the changing American political landscape.

Legal analysts Sarah Isgur and Marcia Coyle join to review the Supreme Court's key decisions of 2023-24 term, covering topics like Chevron deference, domestic violence law, obstruction laws in January 6 cases. Insights include shifts in judicial dynamics, overturning precedents, originalism evolution, and implications on executive power. Supreme Court cases like Fisher and Garland versus Cargill are also discussed.

In a thought-provoking conversation, legal expert Sarah Isgur, a contributor to ABC News and editor at The Dispatch, navigates the complexities of presidential power and the Supreme Court's role in American governance. She discusses the implications of recess appointments in a changing political landscape and how populist leaders could reshape judicial authority. The dialogue also delves into the bureaucratic challenges the federal workforce may face and the ongoing tensions between political parties as public perceptions shift.

Adam Liptak and Sarah Isgur join Jeffrey Rosen to preview the Supreme Court's October 2023 term, discussing major cases on the right to bear arms, the future of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the First Amendment and social media, and more.

Authors Richard Hasen and Lawrence Lessig, along with editor Sarah Isgur, discuss vulnerabilities in the American election system and propose constitutional amendments to enhance election integrity. They delve into topics such as universal voter registration, election security, challenges surrounding the 2024 election, and the Senate's role in judging elections. The conversation highlights the importance of safeguarding voting rights and addressing potential risks in democratic processes.

Bill Maher's guests Keegan Michael Key, Elle Key, Sarah Isgur, and Matt Welch discuss topics such as Trump's immigration policies, the role of humor in marriage, the intensifying border crisis and the idea of bombing Mexico, the importance of the Speaker of the House, controversy over zoos, and the issue of fabricating racism.

Join David French, a prominent commentator on conservative politics, Jonah Goldberg, a well-known conservative writer, and Sarah Isgur, a political analyst and former DOJ spokesperson, as they dive into the crossroads of conservatism today. They dissect Liz Cheney's shift towards Democrats and its implications for the Republican identity. Discussions include the complexities of presidential power, the fallout from Israel's military actions against Hezbollah, and the nuances of the upcoming 2024 election landscape. Amid these weighty topics, they touch on the importance of kindness in a polarized society.