Ruth Marcus

This week, Ruth Marcus, a legal columnist and constitutional law expert, joins the conversation. She dives into the tensions between the Trump administration and the judiciary over mass deportations, raising concerns about due process. The discussion also sheds light on shifting voter dynamics and Trump’s growing appeal among minority groups. Additionally, they explore the implications of TikTok in political engagement and reflect on Trump's unique relationship with Putin amid the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict.

Ruth Marcus, a former Washington Post columnist known for her sharp political insights, joins to discuss an astonishing blunder in the Trump administration involving leaked war plans. She delves into the challenges of journalistic ethics, particularly when handling sensitive information. Marcus reflects on her recent resignation and the chaotic dynamics within the DOJ. The conversation also tackles the ongoing attacks on the judiciary and emphasizes the importance of due process and integrity amidst today's turbulent political landscape.

David Enrich, a Business investigations editor for The New York Times, discusses rising legal threats against the press. Ruth Marcus, a former associate editor at The Washington Post, explores the impact of misinformation on public trust. Ben Mullin, a media reporter for The New York Times, highlights how Trump's legal tactics seek to undermine freedom of expression. Together, they emphasize the deteriorating state of press freedom, the chilling effects of lawsuits, and the vital role of independent journalism in today's democracy.

Ruth Marcus joins the hosts to discuss Biden's decision, Kamala Harris as presumptive nominee, and Secret Service fallout. Topics include party loyalty, Kamala's evolution, AI in finance, and Secret Service responsibilities.

Ruth Marcus, a legal columnist for The New Yorker and former writer for The Washington Post, joins the conversation to tackle pressing issues. They discuss the constitutional crisis linked to mass deportation and the tension between judicial authority and executive power. The dialogue shifts to the evolving political landscape, highlighting emerging voter demographics and Trump's strategies, including his TikTok engagement. Geopolitical tensions, particularly concerning Ukraine, and the historical context of leadership decisions are also explored, making for a compelling and insightful discussion.

Karen Tumulty, a sharp political columnist, Dana Milbank, known for his contemporary insights, and Ruth Marcus, an expert in political analysis, delve into J.D. Vance's recent vice-presidential debate performance. They highlight how Vance's attempt to soften his stance on abortion reflects Republican anxieties ahead of the election. The trio also discusses the lingering impact of the Jan. 6 events, the dynamics of live fact-checking during debates, and the challenges candidates face in navigating polarized politics while aiming to connect with voters.

Ruth Marcus, a sharp Washington Post columnist, dives into the intriguing world of political legacies and constitutional themes. She analyzes RFK Jr.'s surprising endorsement of Trump and its familial fallout. The discussion also critiques Senate Majority Leader Schumer's proposed legislation responding to Trump's immunity opinion. With a nod to political dynasties, they explore the tension between familial legacies versus merit in elections, emphasizing the need for principles over opportunism in political endorsements.

Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus joins hosts to discuss Biden's withdrawal, Harris's nomination challenges, and Secret Service investigation mysteries. They explore leadership dynamics, Harris's candidacy enthusiasm, and potential challenges ahead.

The podcast discusses the Supreme Court case on access to mifepristone, the aftermath of overturning Roe v. Wade, the complexities of abortion politics, and the dehumanization in abortion discourse.

Ruth Marcus, associate editor and columnist for The Washington Post, has been covering national politics, Washington, and the Supreme Court since she began her career in journalism in the ‘80s. Preet and Ruth discuss the quality of writing at the Supreme Court, the theory of originalism, and the fate of Kevin McCarthy. Plus, how can DOJ protect itself from meddling by the new GOP Congress? And what is the likelihood that those prosecuted for January 6th will be pardoned by the next Republican president? Don’t miss the Insider bonus, where Preet and Ruth discuss Chief Justice John Roberts’s tenure and the interpersonal relationships between the Supreme Court justices. To listen, try the membership for just $1 for one month: cafe.com/insider.For show notes and a transcript of the episode head to: https://cafe.com/stay-tuned/judging-the-judges-with-ruth-marcusTweet your questions to @PreetBharara with the hashtag #AskPreet, email us your questions and comments at staytuned@cafe.com, or call 669-247-7338 to leave a voicemail.Stay Tuned with Preet is brought to you by CAFE and the Vox Media Podcast Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices