undefined

Ronald Meester

Professor in probability theory with expertise in percolation theory, ergodic theory, philosophy of science, and forensic probability.

Best podcasts with Ronald Meester

Ranked by the Snipd community
undefined
7 snips
Aug 9, 2022 • 1h 3min

Ronald Meester and Klaas Slooten, "Probability and Forensic Evidence: Theory, Philosophy, and Applications" (Cambridge UP, 2021)

In Probability and Forensic Evidence: Theory, Philosophy, and Applications (Cambridge UP, 2021), Ronald Meester and Klaas Slooten address the role of statistics and probability in the evaluation of forensic evidence, including both theoretical issues and applications in legal contexts. It discusses what evidence is and how it can be quantified, how it should be understood, and how it is applied (and, sometimes misapplied).Ronald Meester is Professor in probability theory at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. He is co-author of the books Continuum Percolation (1996), A Natural Introduction to Probability Theory (2003), Random Networks for Communication (2008), and has written around 120 research papers on topics including percolation theory, ergodic theory, philosophy of science, and forensic probability.Klaas Slooten works as Statistician at the Netherlands Forensic Institute and at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam where he is Professor by special appointment. He as published around 30 articles on forensic probability and statistics. He is interested in the mathematical, legal, and philosophical evaluation of evidence.Marc Goulet is Professor in mathematics and Associate Dean in the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoicesSupport our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/mathematics
undefined
Aug 30, 2024 • 57min

Onderzoek naar oversterfte: is er sprake van datavervuiling? | #1689 Ronald Meester en Bram Bakker

Ronald Meester, expert op het gebied van oversterfte gerelateerd aan Covid-19 vaccinaties, en Bram Bakker, professional in gezondheidsimpact, delen hun inzichten over de controversiële bevindingen van hun onderzoek. Ze bespreken de mogelijk vertekende gegevens en de impact van vaccinatie op sterftecijfers, vooral onder jongeren. De nadelen van het huidige peer review-systeem en de samenwerking met crowdfunding worden ook aangekaart. Daarnaast benadrukken ze de noodzaak van transparantie en samenwerking met officiële instanties voor betere gezondheidsdata.