
Peter Harrell
Contributing editor at Lawfare and visiting scholar at Georgetown Law with expertise in international economic law and trade policy; provided focused analysis of the statutory and practical implications of the tariffs.
Top 3 podcasts with Peter Harrell
Ranked by the Snipd community

10 snips
Nov 7, 2025 • 1h 2min
Lawfare Daily: Supreme Court Oral Arguments on President Trump’s Tariffs
In this discussion, Peter Harrell, a trade policy expert, analyzes the implications of President Trump's tariffs while Georgetown Law professors Marty Lederman and Kathleen Claussen provide insights on the Supreme Court's oral arguments. They explore the skepticism from conservative justices about the IEPA's authority, debate the regulatory versus revenue nature of tariffs, and unpack potential limits on executive power. The conversation also touches on the major questions doctrine and the practicalities following a court loss, all while pondering the likelihood of a narrow ruling.

Sep 3, 2025 • 1h 20min
Rational Security: The “Master of the House” Edition
Anna Bower, a Senior editor and trial correspondent, Tyler McBrien, Managing editor, and Peter Harrell, an economics expert, dive into pressing national security issues. They discuss the U.S. government’s controversial investment in Intel amid global AI competition. The guests analyze Indian Prime Minister Modi’s diplomatic gestures towards Russia and China, signaling challenges for U.S. relations. Legal battles over the deportation of unaccompanied minors also take center stage, revealing the intricate intersections of immigration law and government policy.

Aug 11, 2025 • 1h 35min
Lawfare Daily: The Trials of the Trump Administration, Aug. 8
Peter Harrell, a Lawfare contributor and expert on tariffs at the Carnegie Endowment, joins the discussion alongside Lawfare’s senior editors. They delve into the D.C. Circuit's recent legal rulings affecting Trump’s IEEPA tariffs and the intriguing legal crises in Texas over redistricting. The trio examines the complexities of mandamus and contempt, along with the implications of Justice Kavanaugh's views on national security. They also humorously dissect the legal intrigue surrounding Texas legislators fleeing their duties, showcasing the confluence of law and politics.


