Join Peter A. Bruland, an advocate for Danny Rivers, and Aaron L. Nielson, representing Eric Guerrero, as they dive into the complexities of the Rivers v. Guerrero case. They explore the implications of newly discovered evidence in habeas corpus appeals, discussing how the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act complicates the legal landscape. The conversation highlights the distinction between amending petitions and submitting successive ones, revealing the procedural hurdles petitioners face. Tune in for an insightful look into legal intricacies and barriers in seeking justice.