New York Times restaurant critic Pete Wells discusses the challenges of being an anonymous reviewer and how he decides which places deserve bad reviews. The evolving role of restaurant critics and the impact of anti-immigrant sentiment on the culinary world are also explored. The power of negative reviews and the debate surrounding the critique of Guy Fieri's restaurant are discussed. The hosts delve into personal food preferences and the role of professional critics in understanding and appreciating dishes.

During his time as a restaurant critic for The Times, Pete Wells has become both feared and revered in the world of dining — crowning those at the top and dethroning those whose time has passed.But when the pandemic arrived, handing out stars to fancy restaurants made no sense anymore. A fundamental change was needed.Guest: Pete Wells, a restaurant critic for The New York Times. Background reading: For the return of The Times’s star ratings this year, Pete Wells visited La Piraña Lechonera, a weekend party in a Bronx trailer where one man serves up the rich flavors of Puerto Rico.For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.  Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

Pete Wells, a New York Times reporter and former restaurant critic, dives into the evolving world of food criticism. He discusses the clash between traditional critics and social media influencers, sharing how TikTok and celebrity chefs have changed culinary power dynamics. Wells debates the authenticity of diversifying food reviews amidst cultural conversations and humorously reveals he’s never tasted dog or cat. The conversation uncovers the importance of maintaining credibility in journalism while adapting to rapidly changing trends in food and media.