Nicholas Grossman

Political analyst Nicholas Grossman discusses the misuse of terms like fascism, Nazism, and communism in public discourse. The podcast explores whether Trump's movement is fascist, democratic backsliding in the US, and the potential impact of Project 2025 on American democracy.

International relations professor Nicholas Grossman joins to discuss Trump's alarming ambitions regarding Canada, suggesting a push to make it a "51st state." He highlights how Trump's threats, particularly tariffs, please Putin by creating rifts in NATO. The conversation underscores the implications of Trump's foreign policy choices, revealing how they not only strain U.S.-Canada relations but also position authoritarian regimes for strategic advantage. Grossman connects these moves to a broader reshaping of international order, raising concerns over global alliances.

Panel discusses Trump's money troubles, Schumer's speech on Netanyahu, interest-free loans to Ukraine, TikTok ban debates, special visas for Afghans, legality of Texas deportation law, and U.S. happiness ranking. Chapters cover critique of Trump's rally, Manafort's Russian ties, Israeli politics, aid to Ukraine, and personal stories.

Nicholas Grossman, an international relations professor and expert on U.S. foreign policy, dives into Trump's heated rhetoric towards Canada, suggesting a real shift in U.S. diplomacy that pleases Putin. He discusses how Trump's threats of tariffs might weaken Western alliances and embolden authoritarian regimes. The conversation also highlights the dangerous implications of viewing Canada as a potential '51st state,' warning against the serious risks to established democratic values and global norms.

In this discussion, Jared Yates Sexton, an author and political analyst, and Nicholas Grossman, an international relations expert, dissect Kamala Harris's election loss, arguing it reflects deeper societal frustrations. They explore how Trump's influence may linger beyond his presidency, especially in shaping public perception and voter sentiment. The duo also critiques the disinformation affecting political debates and sheds light on the urgent need for marginalized communities to mobilize against systemic challenges, highlighting the emotional exhaustion felt within social justice spaces.