In this enlightening discussion, Michelle Dimino, the Education Program Director at Third Way, and Neal McCluskey, Director of Cato’s Center for Educational Freedom, debate the controversial relevance of the Department of Education. They explore the balance between federal and state control in education, analyzing policies like No Child Left Behind. The conversation also tackles the implications of Title IX enforcement and whether civil rights oversight could shift to other agencies, raising questions about equity and student outcomes.

Neal McCluskey, a leading expert on education policy, explores the changing landscape of religious education and school choice. He discusses recent court rulings that favor taxpayer funding for religious schools, arguing for parental rights in choosing educational paths. McCluskey highlights ongoing debates over integrating religious elements in public schools and examines historical Blaine amendments that have impacted religious education. This conversation sheds light on the evolving legal dynamics and advocates for greater educational freedom for families.

Neal McCluskey, an expert on educational policies from Cato, dives into the complex issues surrounding Arizona's universal Education Savings Account program. He discusses how parental choice in education challenges traditional institutional power. The conversation reveals how funding follows students, debunking myths about class sizes and outcomes. McCluskey also addresses equity concerns, showing increased enrollment among lower-income families and emphasizing the vital role of informing all families about educational options.

Neal McCluskey, an advocate for education reform and commentator, discusses the implications of Project 2025 and its proposed educational reforms. He praises the plan's call for reduced federal control and advocates for school choice. McCluskey dives into the GOP's stance against critical race theory and the controversial 1776 Commission. He also critiques former President Trump's contradictory education rhetoric and emphasizes the need for state autonomy over educational policies. The conversation highlights important shifts in the education landscape.

Education policy expert Neal McCluskey and Nico Perrino from FIRE discuss the limited role Congress should play in regulating speech on college campuses, highlighting the complexity of free speech obligations at public and private universities. They delve into the potential violations of First Amendment rights caused by government interventions and the challenges universities face in balancing free speech with safety concerns.