Mr. Chang (Counsel for Petitioner)
Appellate counsel representing the petitioner in Hencely v. Fluor Corp.; argued that state tort claims by U.S. service members against military contractors are not preempted and defended limiting Boyle-based preemption.
Best podcasts with Mr. Chang (Counsel for Petitioner)
Ranked by the Snipd community
Nov 3, 2025 • 1h 30min
[24-924] Hencely v. Fluor Corporation
Mr. Chang, counsel for the petitioner, argues that state tort claims should apply to military contractors, challenging the limits of federal preemption. Mr. Mosier from Fluor Corporation counters that uniquely federal interests in wartime activities necessitate preemption of such claims. Mr. Gannon represents the U.S. position, advocating for a test to determine when contractor claims may be preempted based on combat activities. The discussion delves into military supervision, constitutional arguments, and the implications of contractor liability in combat zones.
