Matthew Diller

Matthew Diller, a Fordham Law Professor, discusses a judge's ruling that declared President Trump's executive order against Perkins Coie unconstitutional, highlighting threats to judicial independence. Timothy Zick from William & Mary Law analyzes the Third Circuit's decision that teaching Islam does not breach the Establishment Clause, sparking a broader conversation about religious education. Meanwhile, George Yin, Emeritus Professor at UVA, tackles the Trump administration's threats to revoke Harvard’s tax-exempt status, raising concerns over political influence on legal frameworks.

Join legal minds Matthew Diller, an ethics expert, Richard Briffault, a redistricting authority, and Terence Ross, a copyright litigator. They dissect the ethical implications of executive orders affecting law firms during Trump's presidency. The conversation shifts to Louisiana's contentious congressional map and the Supreme Court's pivotal voting rights deliberations. Lastly, they tackle the complexities of AI and copyright, revealing why machines can't own copyright and the challenges of human versus AI authorship in the evolving creative economy.

In this captivating discussion, Matthew Diller, a Fordham Law professor, and Erik Larson, a Bloomberg legal reporter, delve into Donald Trump's contentious relationship with the judiciary. They analyze how Trump has targeted judges and lawyers while trying to reshape legal institutions, focusing on the alarming trend of appointing loyalists over qualified candidates. The conversation also touches on the implications of a recent court ruling that blocked the use of wartime law for deportations, highlighting the importance of due process and the chilling effects of political pressure on legal advocacy.