Matthew A. Seligman

Legal commentator Matthew Seligman from Stanford Law School discusses the alarming trends of President Trump's increasing hostility towards the Supreme Court. The conversation dives into Trump's intimidation tactics and how he leverages perceived public support to challenge the judiciary. They explore critical issues like birthright citizenship and the implications of defying legal rulings. Seligman warns of the dangers of Trump's manipulation within the legal system, highlighting the potential threats to democracy and constitutional rights.

Matthew Seligman, a legal commentator and fellow at Stanford Law School, joins to discuss President Trump’s increasing confrontations with the Supreme Court. They delve into Trump’s threats regarding birthright citizenship and the implications for judicial authority. Seligman explains how these threats could lead to significant legal confrontations and why Trump’s advisers may be encouraging this behavior. The conversation highlights concerns over the erosion of democratic norms and the potential consequences for American citizens' rights.

Join Derek Muller, a leading election law scholar from Notre Dame, Ned Foley, an expert on constitutional election law, and Matthew A. Seligman, a fellow at Stanford, as they dissect the complex landscape of U.S. presidential elections. They analyze the implications of close elections on public trust and discuss the intricacies of the election certification process. The trio also examines possible reforms, the impact of recent legal changes, and the challenges posed by election disputes, emphasizing the need for clarity and stability in democratic processes.