Matt Sleat

In this engaging conversation, Matt Sleat, a Reader in political theory at the University of Sheffield, delves into the emerging ideas of post-liberalism. He contrasts post-liberal thinkers like Adrian Vermeule and Patrick Deneen, exploring their views on individualism versus the common good. Sleat discusses the historical caricature of liberalism and critiques the coercive elements within post-liberal thought. He also examines the challenges of governing diverse societies under post-liberalism and predicts its impact on the political right.

In this discussion, Matt Sleat, Reader in Political Theory at the University of Sheffield, delves into the emerging landscape of post-liberalism. He contrasts post-liberal thinkers like Adrian Vermeule and Patrick Deneen, highlighting their differing visions of community and governance. The conversation explores the challenges of post-liberalism in pluralistic societies and critiques how it caricatures liberalism to gain traction. Sleat suggests that a more robust liberal response could counterbalance post-liberal sentiments effectively.

Guest Matt Sleat, a Reader in Political Theory at the University of Sheffield, dives into the concept of post-liberalism. He discusses its rejection of traditional liberal values, favoring the common good over individual rights. Notable figures like Patrick Deneen and Adrian Vermeule are examined, showcasing their contrasting ideas. Sleat raises concerns about the viability of post-liberal governance and the challenges it poses in a pluralistic society. He predicts that while post-liberalism may not dominate elections, it will influence the political landscape toward state activism.